1,029
Views
81
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Section Article

The digital divide and t-government in the United States: using the technology acceptance model to understand usage

, &
Pages 308-328 | Received 01 Sep 2008, Accepted 01 Nov 2010, Published online: 19 Dec 2017

References

  • Al-adawiZYousafzaiSPallisterJConceptual model of citizen adoption of e-governmentProceedings of the Second International Conference on Innovations in Information Technology (IIT'05)2005
  • Althoff S (2004, March 7) Point, click, elect: should voting be that easy? Boston Globe, p 26, 7 March.
  • AjzenIFrom intentions to actions: a theory of planned behaviorAction Control: From Cognition to Behavior1985101128
  • AjzenIThe theory of planned behaviorOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes199150217921110.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  • AjzenIFishbeinMUnderstanding Attitudes and Predicting social Behavior1980
  • Anonymous (2009, May) Medical informatics; studies from university of Wollongong add new findings in the area of medical informatics. Information Technology Business, 143.
  • BanduraASocial Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory1986
  • BenbasatIBarkiHQuo vadis TAMJournal of the Association for Information Systems200784211218
  • BlackstoneEBogannoMHakimSInnovations in E-government: The Thoughts of Governors and Mayors2005
  • Bonham G, Seifert J and Thorson S (2001) The transformational potential of e-government: the role of political leadership. Presented at the 4th Pan European International Relations Conference, University of Kent, UK, 6–9 September.
  • Brief of Amicus Curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, National Black Chamber of Commerce, Inc., and Pennsylvania Chamber of Business and Industry in Support of Petitioners (1998) Seif (No. 97-1620) available in Chester Residents Concerned For Quality Living v. Seif, 132 F.3d 925 C.A.3 (Pa.), WL457676.
  • BrookesRSlipping through the net? A study of the effectiveness of current U.K. policy regarding public access to information communications technologyProceedings of the 4th European Conference on E-government20049198
  • Cabinet Office, United Kingdom Government (28 March 2006) Transformational local government discussion paper. [WWW document] http://www.cio.gov.uk/documents/pdf/transgov/trans_local_gov060328.pdf (accessed 31 August 2008).
  • CarterLE-government diffusion: a comparison of adoption constructsTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy20082314716110.1108/17506160810902167
  • CarterLBélangerFThe utilization of e-government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factorsInformation Systems Journal200515152510.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00183.x
  • CarterLWeerakkodyVE-government adoption: a cultural comparisonInformation Systems Frontiers200810447348210.1007/s10796-008-9103-6
  • ChangICLiYCHungWFHwangHGAn empirical study on the impact of quality antecedents on tax payers’ acceptance of internet tax-filing systemsGovernment Information Quarterly200522338941010.1016/j.giq.2005.05.002
  • ConnollyRBannisterFTrust and the taxman: a study of the Irish revenue's website service qualityElectronic Journal of e-Government200762127134
  • Council of the City of Chester (1994) Chester city vision 2000. Comprehensive Plan & Economic Development Strategy.
  • DadayanLFerroEWhen technology meets the mind: a comparative study of technology acceptance modeleGov05 Proceedings2005
  • DavisFDBagozziRPWarshawPRUser acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical modelsManagement Science1989358982100310.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  • DiMaio A, Baum C and Keller B (2002, February 1) Five truths and five myths to cross the digital divide. Gartner Research Note (TG-14-3578).
  • DimitrovaDVChenYProfiling the adopters of e-government information and services: the influence of psychological characteristics, civic mindedness, and information channelsSocial Science Computer Review200624217218810.1177/0894439305281517
  • Donnelly V and Merrick R (2003, November 10–11) Community portals through communitization. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Universal Usability (ZAJICEK M and EDWARDS A, Eds), pp 9–14, ACM Publications, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • DooleyDSocial Research Methods2001
  • DugdaleADalyAPapandreaFMaleyMAccessing e-government: challenges for citizens and organizationsInternational Review of Administrative Sciences20057110911810.1177/0020852305051687
  • eGovernment National Awards (2007) Prime Minister Gordon Brown praises winners in the e-government National Awards. [WWW document] http://www.publictechnology.net/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=13764 (accessed 1 October 2009).
  • FishbeinMAjzenIBelief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research1975
  • FuJFarnCChaoWAcceptance of electronic tax filing: a study of taxpayer intentionsInformation & Management20064310912610.1016/j.im.2005.04.001
  • GallivanMJExamining IT professionals’ adaptation to technological change: the influence of gender and personal attributesThe Data Base for Advances in Information Systems2004353284910.1145/1017114.1017119
  • GefenDCustomer loyalty in e-commerceJournal of the Association for Information Systems200232751
  • GefenDStraubDWBoudreauMCStructural equation modeling and regression: guidelines for research practiceCommunications of the AIS200047177
  • GrimsleyMMeehanAE-government information systems: evaluation-led design for public value and client trustEuropean Journal of Information Systems200716213414810.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000674
  • Hart-Teeter (April 2003) The new e-government equation: ease, engagement, privacy and protection. [WWW document] http://www.cio.gov/Library/documents_details.cfm?id=The%20New%20E-Government%20Equation:%20Ease,%20Engagement,%20Privacy%20and%20Protection&structure=OMB%20Documents%20and%20Guidance&category=OMB%20E-Government (accessed 1 October 2009).
  • Hasson J (2002) E-gov act signed into law. Federal Computer Week. [WWW document] http://fcw.com/articles/2002/12/16/egov-act-signed-into-law.aspx?sc_lang=en (accessed 1 October 2009).
  • HeeksRStanforthCUnderstanding e-government project trajectories from an actor-network perspectiveEuropean Journal of Information Systems200716216517710.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000676
  • HerbigPDunphySCulture and innovationCross Cultural Management199854132210.1108/13527609810796844
  • HM Government (2007) Transformational Government: Enabled by Change. HMSO, London, [WWW document] http://www.cio.gov.uk/documents/annual_report2006/trans_gov2006.pdf (accessed 31 August 2008).
  • HM Council (2005) Transformational Government: Enabled by Change. HMSO, London, [WWW document] http://www.cio.gov.uk/documents/pdf/transgov/transgov-strategy.pdf (accessed 31 August 2008).
  • Holmes TE (2002, April) Crossing the digital divide. Black Enterprise, p 51.
  • HossainLDe SilvaAExploring user acceptance of technology using social networksJournal of High Technology Management Research2009201110.1016/j.hitech.2009.02.005
  • HowardPAndersonKBuschLNafusDSizing up information societies: toward a better metric for the cultures of ICT adoptionInformation Society200925320821910.1080/01972240902848948
  • HsiehJJPRaiAKeilMUnderstanding digital inequality: comparing continued use behavioral models of the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantagedMIS Quarterly200832197126
  • HsuMChiuCPredicting electronic service continuance with a decomposed theory of planned behaviorBehaviour & Information Technology200423535937310.1080/01449290410001669969
  • HuPJBrownSThongJYLChanFKYTamKYDeterminants of service quality and continuance intention of online services: the case of eTaxJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology200960229230610.1002/asi.20956
  • HuangWD’AmbraJBhallaVAn empirical investigation of the adoption of e-government in Australian citizens: some unexpected research findingsThe Journal of Computer Information Systems200243115
  • Humphreys JM (2004) The multicultural economy (America's minority buying power). Georgia Business and Economic Conditions 64 (3) [WWW document] http://www.selig.uga.edu/forecast/GBEC/GBEC043Q.pdf (accessed 31 August 2008).
  • HungSYChangCMYuTJDeterminants of user acceptance of the e-government services: the case of online tax filing and payment systemGovernment Information Quarterly20062319712210.1016/j.giq.2005.11.005
  • ICT Results (11 August 2008) Citizen-inspired e-government for ‘thin-skinned’ cities. [WWW document] http://cordis.europa.eu/ictresults/index.cfm?section=news&tpl=article&BrowsingType=Features&ID=89957 (accessed 1 October 2009).
  • IraniZAl-SebieMEllimanTTransaction stage of e-government systems: identification of its location & importanceProceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences2006
  • IraniZEllimanTJacksonPElectronic transformation of government in the U.K.: a research agendaEuropean Journal of Information Systems20071632733510.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000698
  • IraniZLovePEDEllimanTJonesSThemistocleousMEvaluating e-government: learning from the experiences of two U.K. local authoritiesInformation Systems Journal200515618210.1111/j.1365-2575.2005.00186.x
  • IraniZLovePEDMontazemiAE-government: past, present and futureEuropean Journal of Information Systems20071610310510.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000678
  • JanssenMShuWSTransformational government: basics and key issuesProceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 3512008117122
  • JohnsonECSecurity awareness: switch to a better programmeNetwork Security200621510.1016/S1353-4858(06)70337-3
  • JungJYQiuJLKimY-CInternet connectedness and inequality: beyond the ‘divide’Communication Research200128450752510.1177/009365001028004006
  • KatzEBlumlerJGGurevitchMUtilization of mass communication by the individualThe Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratifications Research1974
  • KeWWeiKKSuccessful e-government in SingaporeCommunications of the ACM2004476959910.1145/990680.990687
  • Keller B (2001, 10 April) Best practices for overcoming the digital divide. Gartner Research Note (COM-13-3435).
  • KingDBrownSEmerging trends, 2.0, and librariesThe Serials Librarian2009561–43210.1080/03615260802672452
  • KingSCotterillSTransformational government? The role of information technology in delivering citizen-centric local public servicesLocal Government Studies200733333335410.1080/03003930701289430
  • KingWRHEJA meta-analysis of the technology acceptance modelInformation & Management20064374075510.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
  • KretzmannJMcKnightJPBuilding Communities from the Inside Out1993
  • KumarNMohanKHolowczakRLocking the door but leaving the computer vulnerable: factors inhibiting home users’ adoption of software firewallsDecision Support Systems200846125410.1016/j.dss.2008.06.010
  • Lamb J (2004) Epublic: access: a personal map of cyberspace. The Guardian, p 9, 24 March.
  • LaroseREastinMA social cognitive theory of internet uses and gratifications: toward a new model of media attendanceJournal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media200448335837710.1207/s15506878jobem4803_2
  • LaroseRMastroDAEastinMSUnderstanding internet usage: a social cognitive approach to uses and gratificationsSocial Science Computer Review20011939541310.1177/089443930101900401
  • Lau E (2003) Challenges for e-government development. In The Proceedings of the 5th Global Forum on Reinventing Government (CHEEMA S and AHMED N, Eds), Mexico City, Mexico, 5 November.
  • LeeMPredicting and explaining the adoption of online trading: an empirical study in TaiwanDecision Support Systems200947213310.1016/j.dss.2009.02.003
  • LeeCBPLeiULEAdoption of e-government services in MacaoProceedings of the 1st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 2322007217220
  • LeeJRaoHRComplexity of compliance tasks and user acceptance of G2C online compliance servicesProceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Digital Government Research2008363364
  • LegrisPInghamJCollerettePWhy do people use information technology?Information & Management200340319120410.1016/S0378-7206(01)00143-4
  • Lenhart A (2002) Barriers to internet access: from the non-user and new user perspective. Proceedings of the Association of Internet Researchers Conference 3.0, (MURERO M and JENSEN KB, Eds) Maastricht, Netherlands, 14 October, pp 1–27 [WWW document] http://www.aoir.org/?q=taxonomy/term/10&from=50 (accessed 4 December 2010).
  • MarchioniniGSametHBrandtLDigital governmentCommunications of the ACM2003461242710.1145/602421.602440
  • MathiesonKPredicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behaviorInformation Systems Research19912317119110.1287/isre.2.3.173
  • Moon J (2004) From e-government to m-government? Emerging practices in the use of m-technology by state governments. IBM Center for the Business of Government, 1–42 [WWW document] http://www.uquebec.ca/observgo/fichiers/28540_mgovernment.pdf (accessed 9 December 2010).
  • Novak T and Hoffman D (2000) Bridging the digital divide: the internet of race on computer access and internet use. [WWW document] http://elab.vanderbilt.edu/research/papers/html/manuscripts/race/science.html (accessed 31 August 2008).
  • NTIA (1995) Falling through the Net: A Survey of the ‘Have Nots’ in Rural and Urban America. National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington DC, USA [WWW document] http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fallingthru.html (accessed 27 September 2010).
  • NTIA (1998) Falling through the Net II: New Data on the Digital Divide. National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington DC, USA [WWW document] http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/net2/falling.html (accessed 27 September 2010).
  • NTIA (1999) Falling through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide. National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington DC, USA [WWW document] http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn99/contents.html (accessed 27 September 2010).
  • NTIA (2000) Falling through the net: Toward digital inclusion. A Report on Americans’ Access to Technology Tools. National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, [WWW document] http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/fttn00/falling.htm (accessed 27 September 2010).
  • NTIA (2002) A Nation Online: How Americans Are Expanding Their Use of the Internet. National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington DC, USA [WWW document] http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/dn/anationonline2.pdf (accessed 27 September 2010).
  • NTIA (2010) Digital Nation: 21st Century America's Progress toward Universal Broadband Internet Access. National Telecommunications and Information Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, [WWW document] http://www.ntia.doc.gov/reports/2010/NTIA_internet_use_report_Feb2010.pdf (accessed 27 September 2010).
  • NunnallyJCBernsteinIHPsychometric Theory1994
  • OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2001) Understanding the digital divide. [WWW document] http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/38/57/1888451.pdf (accessed 1 October 2009).
  • OhSAngJKimBAdoption of broadband internet in Korea: the role of experience in building attitudesJournal of Information Technology200318426728010.1080/0268396032000150807
  • OjhaASahuGPGuptaMPAntecedents of paperless income tax filing by young professionals in India: an exploratory studyTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy200931659010.1108/17506160910940740
  • Ostberg O (2003) A Swedish view on mobile government. In Proceedings of International Symposium on E- & M-Government, pp 1–12, 18 December, Seoul, Korea, http://www.ipd.bth.se/e-gov.arena/PDFdokument/Ostberg%20mGov%20Korea%20031218.pdf.
  • PaganiMPasinettiCAccessibility, usability, and functionality in t-government servicesEncyclopedia of Multimedia Technology and Networking2009
  • PalmgreenPRayburnJDAn expectancy-value approach to media gratificationsMedia Gratifications Research19856172
  • PhangCWSutantoJKankanhalliALiYTanBCYTeoHSenior citizens’ acceptance of information systems: a study in the context of e-government servicesIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management200653455556910.1109/TEM.2006.883710
  • Pilling D and Boeltzig H (2007, May 20-23) Moving toward e-government – effective strategies for increasing access and use of the internet among non-internet users in the U.S. and U.K. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Bridging Disciplines & Domains Philadelphia, (CUSHING JB and PARDO TA, Eds) ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 228 Digital Government Research Center 2007, pp 35–46, ACM Publications.
  • PorterCEDonthuNUsing the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine internet usage: the role of perceived access barriers and demographicsJournal of Business Research200659999100710.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.003
  • PR Newswire (2000) Congress seeks to bridge gap between tech haves and have nots; Legislation aimed at inner cities, rural America, 13 new co-Sponsors join bills bridging digital divide possible. 12 September, New York, (accessed 4 December 2010) from ABI/INFORM Global ProQuest Newsstand (Document ID: 59952418).
  • PrattipatiSNAdoption of e-governance: differences between countries in the use of online government servicesJournal of American Academy of Business200331/2386
  • RocheleauBWhither e-government?Public Administration Review200767May–June58458810.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00741_1.x
  • RogersEMDiffusion of Innovations1995
  • Rossel P and Finger M (2007, December 10–13) Conceptualizing e-governance. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ACM International Conference Proceeding Series 232, (JANOWSKI T and PARDO TA, Eds), pp 399–407, ACM Publications, Macau, China.
  • RosengrenKEUses and gratifications: a paradigm outlinedThe Uses of Mass Communications1974
  • RyderGDebunking the optimists an evaluation of conventional wisdom about the digital divide and e-government in the British IslesTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy20071211213010.1108/17506160710751959
  • SahuGPGuptaMPUsers’ acceptance of e-government: a study of Indian central exciseInternational Journal of Electronic Government Research20073312110.4018/jegr.2007070101
  • SchauppLCCarterLE-voting: from apathy to adoptionJournal of Enterprise Information Management2005185/658610.1108/17410390510624025
  • ShelleyMCIIThraneLEShulmanSWLost in cyberspace: barriers to bridging the digital divide in e-politicsInternational Journal of Internet and Enterprise Management20064322824310.1504/IJIEM.2006.010916
  • SilverstoneRFrom audiences to consumers: the household and the consumption of communication and information technologiesEuropean Journal of Communication19916213515410.1177/0267323191006002002
  • SilverstoneRHaddonLDesign and domesticationCommunication by Design1996
  • SipiorJCWardBTBridging the digital divide for e-government inclusion: a United States case studyElectronic Journal of e-Government200533137146
  • SipiorJCWardBTVoloninoLMarzecJZA community initiative that diminished the digital divideCommunications of the AIS2004132956
  • StanleyLDBeyond access: psychosocial barriers to computer literacyInformation Society200319540741610.1080/715720560
  • Symonds M (2000, June 24) Government and the internet: digital democracy. The Economist.
  • TanCBenbasatICenfetelliRTBuilding citizen trust towards e-government services: do high quality websites matter?Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on System Sciences2008217
  • ThomasJCStreibGThe new face of government: citizen-initiated contacts in the era of e-governmentJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory20031318310210.1093/jpart/mug010
  • ThompsonRLHigginsCAHowellJMPersonal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilizationMIS Quarterly199115112414310.2307/249443
  • TriandisHCInterpersonal Behavior1977
  • TrimiSShengHEmerging trends in M-governmentCommunications of the ACM2008515535810.1145/1342327.1342338
  • Van DijkJAGMPetersOEbbersWExplaining the acceptance and use of government internet services: a multivariate analysis of 2006 survey data in the NetherlandsGovernment Information Quarterly200825337939910.1016/j.giq.2007.09.006
  • VathanophasVKrittayaphongphunNKlomsiriCTechnology acceptance toward e-government initiative in Royal Thai NavyTransforming Government: People, Process and Policy20092425628210.1108/17506160810917954
  • VenkateshVDeterminants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivations, and emotion into the technology acceptance modelInformation Systems Research200011434236510.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872
  • VenkateshVBrownSAA longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: adoption determinants and emerging challengesMIS Quarterly20012517110210.2307/3250959
  • VenkateshVMorrisMGWhy don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behaviorMIS Quarterly200024111513910.2307/3250981
  • VenkateshVMorrisMDavisGDavisFDUser acceptance of information technology: toward a unified viewMIS Quarterly2003273425478
  • WangYSThe adoption of electronic tax filing systems: an empirical studyGovernment Information Quarterly200320433335210.1016/j.giq.2003.08.005
  • WangpipatwongSChutimaskulWPapasratornBUnderstanding citizen's continuance intention to use e-government website: a composite view of technology acceptance model and computer self-efficacyThe Electronic Journal of e-Government2008615564
  • WeerakkodyVDhillonGMoving from e-government to t-government: a study of process reengineering challenges in a U.K. local authority contextHandbook of Research on Strategies for Local E-government Adoption and Implementation: Comparative Studies2009
  • Wilhelm AG and Thierer AD (2000) Should Americans be concerned about the digital divide. Insight on the News 16 (33), 4 September.
  • WorshamJBLDisparate impact lawsuits under title VI, section 602: can a legal tool build environmental justice?Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review2000274631

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.