Why would we care about privacy?

References

• Acquisti A (2004) Privacy in electronic commerce and the economics of immediate gratification. In Proc. ACM Electronic Commerce Conference, pp 21–29, ACM, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Acquisti A and Grossklags J (2005) Privacy and rationality in individual decision making. IEEE Security and Privacy 3(1), 26–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acquisti A, John L and Loewenstein G (2012) The impact of relative standards on the propensity to disclose. Journal of Marketing Research 49(2), 160–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskerville R (2012) Reviving the IT in the IS. European Journal Information Systems 21(6), 587–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélanger F and Crossler RE (2011) Privacy in the digital age: a review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Quarterly 35(4), 1017–1041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cate FH (1997) Privacy in the Information Age. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Cranston M (1973) What Are Human Rights? Taplinger Pub Co., New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Culnan MJ and Armstrong PK (1999) Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness and impersonal trust: an empirical investigation. Organization Science 10(1), 104–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Corbière F and Rowe F (2013) From ideal data synchronization to hybrid forms of interconnections: architectures, processes, and data. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 14(10), 550–584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhillon G, Backhouse J and Ray A (2007) Editorial: JSIS security and privacy special issue. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 16(2), 127–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinev T, Bellotto M, Hart P, Russo V, Serra I and Colautti C (2006) Privacy calculus model in e-commerce — a study of Italy and the United States. European Journal of Information Systems 15(4), 389–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinev T, Hart P and Mullen M (2008) Internet privacy concerns and beliefs about government surveillance — an empirical investigation. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17(3), 214–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinev T, Smith HJ and McConnel A (2013) Privacy macromodels: are we really rational? Work in progress.
   Google Scholar
• Goes P (2013) Information systems research and behavioral economics. Editor's comments. MIS Quarterly 37(3), iii–viii.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossklags J and Acquisti A (2007) When 25 cents is too much: an experiment on willingness-to-sell and willingness-to-protect personal information. Proceedings of the 6th Workshop Economics of Information Security, WEIS, Pittsburgh, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Hickson RF (1987) Privacy in a Public Society: Human Rights in Conflict. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Jaeger WW (1986) Paideia: The Ideals of Creek Culture. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Knetsch KL and Thaler RH (1991) Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. Journal of Economics Perspectives 5(1), 193–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman D, Slovic P and Tversky A (1982) Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Keith M, Thompson SC, Hale J, Lowry PJ and Greer C (2013) Information disclosure on mobile devices: re-examining privacy calculus with actual user behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 71(12), 1163–1173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling R (1996) Information technologies and the shifting balance between privacy and social control. Computerization and Controversy: Value Conflicts and Social Control. (Kling R, Ed), 2nd edn, pp 614–633, Academic Press Inc, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Li T and Unger T (2012) Willing to pay for quality personalization? Tradeoff between quality and privacy. European Journal of Information Systems 21(6), 621–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y (2011) Empirical studies on online information privacy concerns: literature review and an integrative framework. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 28(1), Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol28/iss1/28/.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Sarathy R and Xu H (2011) The role of affect and cognition on online consumers' decision to disclose personal information to unfamiliar online vendors. Decision Support Systems 51(3), 434–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G (1996) Out of control: visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 65(3), 272–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry PJ, Moody GD, Vance A, Jensen M, Jenkins JL and Wells T (2012) Using an elaboration likelihood approach to better understand the persuasiveness of website privacy assurance cues for online consumers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63(4), 755–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon D (2001) Surveillance Society: Monitoring Everyday Life. Open University Press, Buckingham, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Mason RO (1986) Four ethical issues of the information age. MIS Quarterly 10(1), 4–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLean D (1995) Privacy and Its Invasion. Praeger, Westport, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Miltgen CL and Peyrat-Guillard D (2014) Cultural and generational influences on privacy concerns: a qualitative study in seven European countries. European Journal of Information Systems 23(2), 97–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oetzel MC and Spiekermann S (2014) A systematic methodology for privacy impact assessments: a design science approach. European Journal of Information Systems 23(2), 97–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlou Pa (2011) State of the information privacy literature: where are we now and where should we go? MIS Quarterly 35(4), 977–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty RE and Cacioppo JT (1986) Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Petty RE and Wegener DT (1998) Attitude change: multiple roles for persuasion variables. In Handbook of Social Psychology (Gilbert DT, Fiske ST and Lindzey G, Eds) Vol. 1, 4th edn, pp 323–390, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe F (2011) Towards a greater diversity in writing styles, argumentative strategies and genre of manuscripts. European Journal of Information Systems 20(5), 491–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe F (2012) Toward a richer diversity of genres in information systems research: new categorization and guidelines. European Journal of Information Systems 21(5), 469–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith HJ, Dinev T and Xu H (2011) Information privacy research: an interdisciplinary review. MIS Quarterly 35(4), 989–1015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te'eni D (2012) What's communication got to do with IT? European Journal of Information Systems 21(4), 341–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai JY, Egelman S, Cranor L and Acquisti A (2011) The effect of online privacy information on purchasing behavior: an experimental study. Information Systems Research 22(2), 254–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velecky L (1978) The concept of privacy. In Privacy (Young J, Ed), pp 13–34, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Westin AF (1967) Privacy and Freedom. Atheneum, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Westin AF (2003) Social and political dimensions of privacy. Journal of Social Issues 59(2), 431–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang P (2013) The affective response model: a theoretical framework of affective concepts and their relationships in the ICT context. MIS Quarterly 37(1), 247–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar