3,375
Views
66
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editorial

Insufficient theoretical contribution: a conclusive rationale for rejection?

Pages 593-599 | Published online: 19 Dec 2017

References

  • ÅgerfalkPJEmbracing diversity through mixed methods researchEuropean Journal of Information Systems201322325125610.1057/ejis.2013.6
  • Avison D and Malaurent J (2014) Is theory king? Questioning the theory fetish in information systems. Journal of Information Technology, advance online publication, 6 May, doi:10.1057/jit.2014.8.
  • BakerTPollockTGMaking the marriage work: the benefits of strategy’s takeover of entrepreneurship for strategic organizationStrategic Organization20075329731210.1177/1476127007079957
  • BanvilleCLandryMCan the field of MIS be disciplined?Communications of the ACM1989321486010.1145/63238.63241
  • BaskervilleRLPries-HejeJExplanatory design theoryBusiness & Information Systems Engineering20102527128210.1007/s12599-010-0118-4
  • CorleyKGGioiaDEBuilding theory about theory building: what constitutes a theoretical contribution?Academy of Management Review2011361123210.5465/amr.2009.0486
  • EggerMSmithGDMeta-analysis: potentials and promiseBMJ19973151371137410.1136/bmj.315.7119.1371
  • GeletkanyczMTepperBJFrom the editors: publishing in AMJ – Part 6: discussing the implicationsAcademy of Management Journal201255225626010.5465/amj.2012.4002
  • GoesPBEditor’s comments: design science research in top information systems journalsMIS Quarterly2014381iiiviii
  • GregorSThe nature of theory in information systemsMIS Quarterly2006303611642
  • GregorSHevnerARPositioning and presenting design science research for maximum impactMIS Quarterly2013372337355
  • GregorSJonesDThe anatomy of a design theoryJournal of the Association of Information Systems200785312335
  • HambrickDCThe field of management’s devotion to theory: too much of a good thing?Academy of Management Journal20075061346135210.5465/AMJ.2007.28166119
  • HevnerARMarchSTParkJRamSDesign science in information systems researchMIS Quarterly200428175105
  • Iivari J (2014) Distinguishing and contrasting two strategies for design science research. European Journal of Information Systems, advance online publication, 7 January, doi: 10.1057/ejis.2013.35.
  • KimMZimmermannTNagappanNAn empirical study of refactoring challenges and benefits at MicrosoftIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering201440763364910.1109/TSE.2014.2318734
  • KuechlerWVaishnaviVThe emergence of design research in information systems in North AmericaJournal of Design Research20087111610.1504/JDR.2008.019897
  • LarssonAOMoeHStudying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaignNew Media & Society201214572974710.1177/1461444811422894
  • MillerDParadigm prison, or in praise of atheoretic researchStrategic Organization20075217718410.1177/1476127007077558
  • MiltgenCLPeyrat-GuillardDCultural and generational influences on privacy concerns: a qualitative study in seven European countriesEuropean Journal of Information Systems201423210312510.1057/ejis.2013.17
  • MyersMDInvestigating information systems with ethnographic researchCommunications of the AIS1999223120
  • Pries-Heje J and Baskerville R (2013) Discovering the significance of scientific design practice: new science wrapped in old science? In Electronic Proceedings of the SIG Prag Workshop on IT Artefact Design & Workpractice Improvement, 5 June, Tilburg, the Netherlands. [WWW document] http://www.vits.org/?pageId=407 (accessed 24 August 2014).
  • RoweFTowards a greater diversity in writing styles, argumentative strategies and genre of manuscriptsEuropean Journal of Information Systems201120549149510.1057/ejis.2011.29
  • RoweFToward a richer diversity of genres in information systems research: new categorization and guidelinesEuropean Journal of Information Systems201221546947810.1057/ejis.2012.38
  • SandelowskiMWhatever happened to qualitative description?Research in Nursing & Health20002333434010.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
  • StraubDWEditor’s comments: why top journals accept your paperMIS Quarterly2009333iiiix
  • SuttonRIStawBMASQ forum: what theory is notAdministrative Science Quarterly199540337138410.2307/2393788
  • ThomasGJamesDReinventing grounded theory: some questions about theory, ground and discoveryBritish Educational Research Journal200632676779510.1080/01411920600989412
  • WalshamGInterpretive case studies in IS research: nature and methodEuropean Journal of Information Systems199542748110.1057/ejis.1995.9
  • WeickKEWhat theory is not, theorizing isAdministrative Science Quarterly199540337138410.2307/2393789
  • VenkateshVWhere to go from here? Thoughts on future directions for research on individual-level technology adoption with a focus on decision makingDecision Sciences200637449751810.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00136.x
  • YinRKCase study Research: Design and Methods2014

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.