108
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
General Paper

Technology selection: application of the PROMETHEE in determining preferences—a real case of nanotechnology in Iran

, &
Pages 884-897 | Received 01 Sep 2010, Accepted 01 Nov 2011, Published online: 21 Dec 2017

References

  • ArastiMRBagheri MoghaddamNUse of technology mapping in identification of fuel cell sub-technologiesInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy201035179516952510.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.05.071
  • AzzoneGManziniRQuick and dirty technology assessment: The case of an Italian Research CentreTechnological Forecasting & Social Change20087581324133810.1016/j.techfore.2007.10.004
  • BaiCProgress of nanoscience and nanotechnology in ChinaJournal of Nanoparticle Research20013425125610.1023/A:1017988725647
  • BehzadianMKazemzadehRBAlbadviAAghdasiMPROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applicationsEuropean Journal of Operational Research2010200119821510.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.021
  • BransJMareschalBThe PROMETHEE VI procedure. How to differentiate hard from soft multicriteria problemsJournal of Decision Systems19954321322310.1080/12460125.1995.10511652
  • BransJPL’ingénièrie de la décision; Elaboration d’instruments d’aide à la décision. La méthode PROMETHEEL’aide à la décision: Nature, Instruments et Perspectives d’Avenir1982183213
  • ChanFTSChanMHTangNKHEvaluation methodologies for technology selectionJournal of Materials Processing Technology20001071–333033710.1016/S0924-0136(00)00679-8
  • ChangCWWuCRLinCTChenHCAn application of AHP and sensitivity analysis for selecting the best slicing machineComputers & Industrial Engineering200752229630710.1016/j.cie.2006.11.006
  • ChangCWWuCRChenHCUsing expert technology to select unstable slicing machine to control wafer slicing quality via fuzzy AHPExpert Systems with Applications20083432210222010.1016/j.eswa.2007.02.042
  • ChoudhuryAKShankarRTiwariMKConsensus-based intelligent group decision-making model for the selection of advanced technologyDecision Support Systems20064231776179910.1016/j.dss.2005.05.001
  • ChuangMYangYLinCProduction technology selection: Deploying market requirements, competitive and operational strategies, and manufacturing attributesInternational Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing200922434535510.1080/09511920802209066
  • CunninghamSWvan der LeiTEDecision-making for new technology: A multi-actor, multi-objective methodTechnological Forecasting & Social Change2009761263810.1016/j.techfore.2008.08.012
  • DaimTYatesDPengYJimenezBTechnology assessment for clean energy technologies: The case of the Pacific NorthwestTechnology in Society200931323224310.1016/j.techsoc.2009.03.009
  • DiazMMachucaJAlvarez-GilMA view of developing patterns of investment in AMT through empirical taxonomies: New evidenceJournal of Operations Management200321557760610.1016/j.jom.2003.03.002
  • DussaugePHartSRamanantsoaBStrategic Technology Management1992
  • FigueiraJRGrecoSEhrgottMMultiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys2005
  • FleischerTDeckerMFiedelerUAssessing emerging technologies—Methodological challenges and the case of nanotechnologiesTechnological Forecasting & Social Change20057291112112110.1016/j.techfore.2004.10.005
  • GhazinoorySFarazkishMA model of technology strategy development for Iranian nano-composite companiesBaltic Journal on Sustainability20101612542
  • GhazinoorySDivsalarASoofiASA new definition and framework for the development of a national technology strategy: The case of nanotechnology for IranTechnological Forecasting and Social Change200976683584810.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.004
  • GhazinoorySMirzaeiSGhazinooriSA model for national planning under new roles for government: Case study of the National Iranian Nanotechnology InitiativeScience and Public Policy200936324124910.3152/030234209X427095
  • GolecATaskinHNovel methodologies and a comparative study for manufacturing systems performance evaluationsInformation Sciences2007177235253527410.1016/j.ins.2007.06.024
  • HajkowiczSCollinsKA review of multiple criteria analysis for water resource planning and managementWater Resources Management20072191553156610.1007/s11269-006-9112-5
  • HsuY-LLeeC-HKrengVBThe application of Fuzzy Delphi method and Fuzzy AHP in lubricant regenerative technology selectionExpert Systems with Applications: An International Journal201037141942510.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.068
  • KahramanCFuzzy Multi-criteria Decision Making: Theory and Applications with Recent Developments2008
  • KakatiMStrategic evaluation of advanced manufacturing technologyInternational Journal of Production Economics199753214115610.1016/S0925-5273(97)00115-1
  • de KeyserWPeetersPA note on the use of PROMETHEE multicriteria methodsEuropean Journal of Operational Research199689345746110.1016/0377-2217(94)00307-6
  • KhalilTMManagement of Technology: The Key to Competitiveness and Wealth Creation2000
  • KhelifiOGiovannaFDVranesSLodoloAMiertusSDecision support tool for used oil regeneration technologies assessment and selectionJournal of Hazardous Materials B2006137143744210.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.02.035
  • LeeCSelecting technologies for constantly changing applications marketsResearch-Technology Management20105314454
  • MacharisCSpringaelJBruckerKDVerbekeAPROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis. Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHPEuropean Journal of Operational Research2004153230731710.1016/S0377-2217(03)00153-X
  • MadleneraRKowalskibKStaglSNew ways for the integrated appraisal of national energy scenarios: The case of renewable energy use in AustriaEnergy Policy200735126060607410.1016/j.enpol.2007.08.015
  • MalczewskiJGIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: A survey of the literatureInternational Journal of Geographical Information200620770372610.1080/13658810600661508
  • MareschalBBransJPGeometrical representations for MCDAEuropean Journal of Operational Research1988341697710.1016/0377-2217(88)90456-0
  • Mareschal B, De Smet Y and Nemery P (2008). Rank Reversal in the PROMETHEE II Method: Some New Results. Proceeding of the conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management. Singapore, pp 959–963.
  • MergiasIMoustakasKPapadopoulosALoizidouMMulti-criteria decision aid approach for the selection of the best compromise management scheme for ELVs: The case of CyprusJournal of Hazardous Materials2007147370671710.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.071
  • NaikBChakravartyAKStrategy acquisition of new manufacturing technology: A review and research frameworkInternational Journal of Production Research19923071575160110.1080/00207549208948108
  • ParreirasROVasconcelosJAA multiplicative version of PROMETHEE II applied to multiobjective optimization problemsEuropean Journal of Operational Research2007183272974010.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.002
  • PohekarSDRamachandranMApplication of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning: A reviewRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews20048436538110.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007
  • RomeroCRehmanTNatural resource management and the use of multiple criteria decision making techniques: A reviewEuropean Review of Agricultural Economics1987141618910.1093/erae/14.1.61
  • ShehabuddeenNProbertDPhaalRFrom theory to practice: challenges in operationalising a technology selection frameworkTechnovation200626332433510.1016/j.technovation.2004.10.017
  • StaceyGSAshtonWBA structured approach to corporate technology strategyInternational Journal of Technology Management199054389407
  • ThakurLJainVAdvanced manufacturing techniques and information technology adoption in India: A current perspective and some comparisonsInternational Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology2008365–661863110.1007/s00170-006-0852-4
  • TranTADaimTA taxonomic review of methods and tools applied in technology assessmentTechnological Forecasting & Social Change20087591396140510.1016/j.techfore.2008.04.004
  • WangYMLuoYOn rank reversal in decision analysisMathematical and Computer Modeling2009495–61221122910.1016/j.mcm.2008.06.019
  • YurdakulMSelection of computer-integrated manufacturing technologies using a combined analytic hierarchy process and goal programming modelRobotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing200420432934010.1016/j.rcim.2003.11.002
  • ZopounidisCDoumposMMulticriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature reviewEuropean Journal of Operational Research2002138222924610.1016/S0377-2217(01)00243-0

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.