129
Views
110
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
General Paper

Axiomatic properties of inconsistency indices for pairwise comparisons

&
Pages 1-15 | Received 20 May 2013, Accepted 03 Sep 2013, Published online: 21 Dec 2017

References

  • AczelJLectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications1966
  • AguarónJMoreno-JiménezJMThe Geometric Consistency Index: Approximated thresholdEuropean Journal of Operational Research2003147113714510.1016/S0377-2217(02)00255-2
  • AupetitBGenestCOn some useful properties of the Perron eigenvalue of a positive reciprocal matrix in the context of the analytic hierarchy processEuropean Journal of Operational Research199370226326810.1016/0377-2217(93)90044-N
  • BarzilaiJConsistency measures for pairwise comparison matricesJournal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis19987312313210.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199805)7:3<123::AID-MCDA181>3.0.CO;2-8
  • BozókiSRapcsákTOn Saaty’s and Koczkodaj’s inconsistencies of pairwise comparison matricesJournal of Global Optimization200842215717510.1007/s10898-007-9236-z
  • BozókiSFülöpJRónyaiLOn optimal completion of incomplete pairwise comparison matricesMathematical and Computer Modelling2010521–231833310.1016/j.mcm.2010.02.047
  • BrunelliMA note on the article ‘Inconsistency of pair-wise comparison matrix with fuzzy elements based on geometric mean’Fuzzy Sets and Systems20111761767810.1016/j.fss.2011.03.013
  • Brunelli M, Canal L and Fedrizzi M (2013a). Inconsistency indices for pairwise comparison matrices: A numerical study. Annals of Operations Research, published online 27 February, doi: 10.1007/s10479-013-1329-0.
  • BrunelliMCritchAFedrizziMA note on the proportionality between some consistency indices in the AHPApplied Mathematics and Computation2013219147901790610.1016/j.amc.2013.01.036
  • BrysonNA goal programming method for generating priority vectorsJournal of the Operational Research Society199546564164810.1057/jors.1995.88
  • CavalloBD'ApuzzoLA general unified framework for pairwise comparison matrices in multicriterial methodsInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems200924437739810.1002/int.20329
  • ChooEUWedleyWCA common framework for deriving preference values from pairwise comparison matricesComputers & Operations Research200431689390810.1016/S0305-0548(03)00042-X
  • CookWDKressMDeriving weights from pairwise comparison ratio matrices: An axiomatic approachEuropean Journal of Operational Research198837335536210.1016/0377-2217(88)90198-1
  • CrawfordGWilliamsCA note on the analysis of subjective judgement matricesJournal of Mathematical Psychology1985294254010.1016/0022-2496(85)90002-1
  • DongYCHongWCXuYFMeasuring consistency of linguistic preference relations: A 2-tuple linguistic approachSoft Computing201317112117213010.1007/s00500-013-1031-9
  • DuszakZKoczkodajWWGeneralization of a new definition of consistency for pairwise comparisonsInformation Processing Letters199452527327610.1016/0020-0190(94)00155-3
  • FedrizziMBrunelliMFair consistency evaluation for reciprocal relations and in group decision makingNew Mathematics and Natural Computation20095240742010.1142/S1793005709001398
  • GenestCLapointeFDrurySWOn a proposal of Jensen for the analysis of ordinal pairwise preferences using Saaty’s eigenvector scaling methodJournal of Mathematical Psychology199337457561010.1006/jmps.1993.1035
  • GoldenBLWangQAn alternate measure of consistencyThe Analytic Hierarchy Process, Applications and Studies19896881
  • HarkerPTIncomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy processMathematical Modelling198791183784810.1016/0270-0255(87)90503-3
  • Herrera-ViedmaEHerreraFChiclanaFLuqueMSome issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relationsEuropean Journal of Operational Research200415419810910.1016/S0377-2217(02)00725-7
  • HornRAJohnsonCRMatrix Analysis1985
  • IrwinFWAn analysis of the concepts of discrimination and preferenceThe American Journal of Psychology195871115216310.2307/1419203
  • IshizakaALabibAReview of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy processExpert Systems with Applications201138111433614345
  • IshizakaABalkenborgDKaplanTDoes AHP help us make a choice? An experimental evaluationJournal of the Operational Research Society201162101801181210.1057/jors.2010.158
  • KemenyJGSnellJLMathematical Models in the Social Sciences1962
  • KingmanJFCA convexity property of positive matricesThe Quarterly Journal of Mathematics.Oxford Second Series196112128328410.1093/qmath/12.1.283
  • KoczkodajWWA new definition of consistency of pairwise comparisonsMathematical and Computer Modelling1993187798410.1016/0895-7177(93)90059-8
  • LamataMTPeláezJIA method for improving the consistency of judgmentsInternational Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems200210667768610.1142/S0218488502001727
  • Osei-BrysonNAn action learning approach for assessing the consistency of pairwise comparison dataEuropean Journal of Operational Research2006174123424410.1016/j.ejor.2005.01.061
  • PeláezJILamataMTA new measure of consistency for positive reciprocal matricesComputer and Mathematics with Applications200346121839184510.1016/S0898-1221(03)90240-9
  • RamíkJKorvinyPInconsistency of pair-wise comparison matrix with fuzzy elements based on geometric meanFuzzy Sets and Systems2010161111604161310.1016/j.fss.2009.10.011
  • SaatyTLA scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structuresJournal of Mathematical Psychology197715323428110.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
  • SaatyTLWhat is relative measurement? The ratio scale phantomMathematical and Computer Modelling1993174–511210.1016/0895-7177(93)90170-4
  • SaatyTLHighlights and critical points in the theory and application of the analytic hierarchy processEuropean Journal of Operational Research199474342644710.1016/0377-2217(94)90222-4
  • SaloAAInconsistency analysis by approximately specified prioritiesMathematical and Computer Modelling1993174–512313310.1016/0895-7177(93)90181-W
  • ShiraishiSObataTDaigoMProperties of a positive reciprocal matrix and their application to AHPJournal of the Operations Research Society of Japan1998413404414
  • Shiraishi S, Obata T, Daigo M and Nakajima N (1999). Assessment for an incomplete matrix and improvement of the inconsistent comparison: Computational experiments. Proceedings of ISAHP 1999, Kobe, Japan.
  • SteinWEMizziPJThe harmonic consistency index for the analytic hierarchy processEuropean Journal of Operational Research2007177148849710.1016/j.ejor.2005.10.057
  • XuZCuipingWA consistency improving method in the analytic hierarchy processEuropean Journal of Operational Research1999116244344910.1016/S0377-2217(98)00109-X
  • Xu Z and Xia M (2013). Iterative algorithms for improving consistency of intuitionistic preference relations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, advance online publication, 10 April, doi: 10.1057/jors.2012.178.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.