References
- AdlerNHarzingA-WWhen knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankingsAcademy of Management Learning and Education200981729510.5465/AMLE.2009.37012181
- AhlgrenPJarnevingBRousseauRRequirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson’s correlation coefficientJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology200354655056010.1002/asi.10242
- Association of Business Schools (2010). Academic journal quality guide. Association of Business Schools.
- BlondelVGuillaumeJ-LLambiotteRLefebvreLFast unfolding of communities in large networksJournal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2008200810P1000810.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008
- Boyack K and Klavans R (2011). Multiple dimensions of journal specifity: Why journals can’t be assigned to disciplines. In: E Noyons, P Ngulube and J Leta (eds). The 13th Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (Vol. I, ISSI, Leiden University and the University of Zululand, Durban, S. Africa, pp 123–133.
- EggheLLeydesdorffLThe relation between Pearson’s correlation coefficient r and Salton’s cosine measureJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology20096051027103610.1002/asi.21009
- HairJAndersonRTathamRBlackWMultivariate Data Analysis1998
- HoepnerAUnermanJExplicit and implicit subject bias in the ABS Journal Quality GuideAccounting Education200921131510.1080/09639284.2011.651291
- HussainSFood for thought on the ABS Academic Journal Quality GuideAccounting Education201120654555910.1080/09639284.2011.596659
- Leydesdorff L (2004). Top-down decomposition of the Journal Citation Report of the Social Science Citation Index: Graph- and factor-analytical approaches. Scientometrics 60 (2): 159–180.
- Leydesdorff L (2006). Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the Journal Citation Reports? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (5): 601–613.
- LeydesdorffLCaveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluationsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology200859227828710.1002/asi.20743
- LeydesdorffLOpthofTScopus’s source normalized impact per paper (SNIP) versus a journal impact factor based on fractional counting of citationsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology201061112365236910.1002/asi.21371
- LeydesdorffLOpthofTScopus’ SNIP indicator: Reply to MoedJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology201062121421510.1002/asi.21405
- MacdonaldSKamJRing a ring o’ roses: Quality journals and gamesmanship in management studiesJournal of Management Studies200744464065510.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00704.x
- MingersJProblems with SNIPJournal of Informatics201484890894
- MingersJBurrellQModelling citation behavior in management science journalsInformation Processing and Management20064261451146410.1016/j.ipm.2006.03.012
- MingersJLipitakisECounting the citations: A comparison of Web of Science and Google Scholar in the field of managementScientometrics201085261362510.1007/s11192-010-0270-0
- MingersJLipitakisEEvaluating a department’s research: Testing the Leiden methodology in business and managementInformation Processing & Management201349358759510.1016/j.ipm.2012.11.002
- MingersJWillmottHTaylorizing business school research: On the ‘one best way’ performative effects of journal ranking listsHuman Relations20136681051107310.1177/0018726712467048
- MingersJWatsonKScaparraMPEstimating business and management journal quality from the 2008 Research Assessment Exercise in the UKInformation Processing and Management20124861078109310.1016/j.ipm.2012.01.008
- MoedHCWTS crown indicator measures citation impact of a research group’s publication oeuvreJournal of Informetrics20104343643810.1016/j.joi.2010.03.009
- MoedHMeasuring contextual citation impact of scientific journalsJournal of Informetrics20104326527710.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002
- Moed H (2010c). The source-normalized impact per paper (SNIP) is a valid and sophisticated indicator of journal citation impact. in arXiv preprint, arxiv.org.
- MoedHFBurgerWFrankfortJVan RaanAThe use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performanceResearch Policy198514313114910.1016/0048-7333(85)90012-5
- MorrisMHarveyCKellyAJournal rankings and the ABS Journal Quality GuideManagement Decision20094791441145110.1108/00251740910995648
- MorrisHHarveyCKellyARowlinsonMFood for thought? A rejoinder on peer-review and RAE2008 evidenceAccounting Education201120656157310.1080/09639284.2011.634215
- PaulRChallenges to information systems: Time to changeEuropean Journal of Information Systems200716319319510.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000681
- PaulRMeasuring research quality: The United Kingdom government’s Research Assessment ExerciseEuropean Journal of Information Systems200817432432910.1057/ejis.2008.31
- PudovkinAGarfieldEAlgorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journalsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology200253131113111910.1002/asi.10153
- RAE (2004). RAE2008: Initial decisions by the UK funding bodies. Report, HEFCE, http://www.rae.ac.uk/pubs/2004/01/.
- RAE (2005). Guidance on submissions. Report, HEFCE, http://www.rae.ac.uk/pubs/2005/03/.
- RAE (2006). RAE2008 Panel criteria and working methods. Report No. 01/2006, HEFCE, http://www.rae.ac.uk/pubs/2006/01/.
- RAE (2009). RAE2008 subject overview reports: I 36 business and management studies. Report, HEFCE, http://www.rae.ac.uk/pubs/2009/ov/.
- RafolsILeydesdorffLContent-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effectsJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology20096091823183510.1002/asi.21086
- RafolsILeydesdorffLO’HareANightingalePStirlingAHow journal rankings can suppress interdisciplinary research: A comparison between innovation studies and business & managementResearch Policy20124171262128210.1016/j.respol.2012.03.015
- RiniaEJvan LeeuwenTNvan VurenHGvan RaanAFJComparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria: Evaluation of condensed matter physics in the NetherlandsResearch Policy19982719510710.1016/S0048-7333(98)00026-2
- Rowlinson M, Harvey C, Kelly A, Morris H and Todeva E (2013). Accounting for research quality: Research audits and the journal rankings debate. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, available online 25 June, doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2013.05.012.
- SaltonGMcGillMIntroduction to Modern Information Retrieval1987
- SteinleyDProperties of the Hubert-Arabie adjusted Rand indexPsychological Methods2004938639610.1037/1082-989X.9.3.386
- Van RaanAThe use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developmentsTechnology Assessment—Theory and Practice20031122029
- Van RaanAvan LeeuwenTVisserMvan EckNWaltmanLRivals for the crown: Reply to Opthof and LeydesdorffJournal of Informetrics20114343143510.1016/j.joi.2010.03.008
- WaltmanLvan EckNvan LeeuwenTVisserMSome modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicatorJournal of Informetrics20137227228510.1016/j.joi.2012.11.011
- WillmottHJournal list fetishism and the perversion of scholarship: Reactivity and the ABS listOrganization201118442944210.1177/1350508411403532
- Zhao H and Lin X (2010). A comparison of mapping algorithms for author co-citation data analysis. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 47(1), pp 1–3.