References
- BasovSMonopolistic screening with boundedly rational consumersThe Economic Record200985S1S29S3310.1111/j.1475-4932.2009.00586.x
- Basov S and Danilkina S (2006). Quality and product variety in a monopolistic screening model with nearly rational consumers, Proceedings of the 35th Australian Conference of Economists Perth, Western Australia: Economics Society of Australia, pp. 1–21.
- Becker-PethMKatokEThonemannUWDesigning buyback contracts for irrational but predictable newsvendorsManagement Science20135981800181610.1287/mnsc.1120.1662
- BoltonGEA comparative model of bargaining: Theory and evidenceAmerican Economic Review199181510961136
- BoltonGEOckenfelsAERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competitionThe American Economic Review200090116619310.1257/aer.90.1.166
- BoltonGEBrandtsJOckenfelsAFair procedures: Evidence from games involving lotteriesThe Economic Journal20051155061054107610.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01032.x
- CachonGSupply chain coordination with contractsHandbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Supply Chain Management2003229257
- CorbettCJde GrooteXA supplier’s optimal quantity discount policy under asymmetric informationManagement Science200046344445010.1287/mnsc.46.3.444.12065
- CoxJCHow to identify trust and reciprocityGames and Economic Behavior200446226028110.1016/S0899-8256(03)00119-2
- CuiTHRajuJSZhangZJFairness and channel coordinationManagement Science20075381303131410.1287/mnsc.1060.0697
- DufwenbergMKirchsteigerGA theory of sequential reciprocityGames & Economic Behavior200447226829810.1016/j.geb.2003.06.003
- FehrESchmidtKMA theory of fairness, competition and cooperationThe Quarterly Journal of Economics1999114381786810.1162/003355399556151
- FehrEKirchsteigerGRiedlAGift exchange and reciprocity in competitive experimental marketsEuropean Economic Review199842113410.1016/S0014-2921(96)00051-7
- ForsytheRHorowitzJLSavinNESeftonMFairness in simple bargaining experimentsGames and Economic Behavior19946334736910.1006/game.1994.1021
- GüthWSchmittbergerRSchwarzeBAn experimental analysis of ultimatum bargainingJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization19823436738810.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7
- HaAYSupplier-buyer contracting: Asymmetric cost information and cutoff level policy for buyer participationNaval Research Logistics2001481416410.1002/1520-6750(200102)48:1<41::AID-NAV3>3.0.CO;2-M
- Ho T-H, Su X and Wu Y (2014). Distributional and peer-induced fairness in supply chain contract design. Production and Operations Management 23 (2): 161–175.
- HsiehC-CWuC-HHuangY-JOrdering and pricing decisions in a two-echelon supply chain with asymmetric demand informationEuropean Journal of Operational Research2008190250952510.1016/j.ejor.2007.06.019
- InderfurthKSadriehAVoigtGThe impact of information sharing on supply chain performance under asymmetric informationProduction & Operations Management201222241042510.1111/j.1937-5956.2012.01372.x
- KalkanciBChenK-YErhun.FContract complexity and performance under asymmetric demand information: An experimental evaluationManagement Science201157468970410.1287/mnsc.1110.1318
- KatokEPavlovVFairness in supply chain contracts: A laboratory studyJournal of Operations Management201331312913710.1016/j.jom.2013.01.001
- Katok E, Olsen T and Pavlov V (2014). Wholesale pricing under mild and privately known concerns for fairness. Production and Operations Management 23 (2): 285–302.
- KerschbamerRMadernerNAre two a good representative for many?Journal of Economic Theory19988319010410.1006/jeth.1997.2456
- LaffontJ-JMartimortDThe Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model2002
- LauAHLLauH-SWangJ-CHow a dominant retailer might design a purchase contract for a newsvendor-type product with price-sensitive demandEuropean Journal of Operational Research2008190244345810.1016/j.ejor.2007.06.042
- LiYXuXZhaoXYeungJHYYeFSupply chain coordination with controllable lead time and asymmetric informationEuropean Journal of Operational Research2012217110811910.1016/j.ejor.2011.09.003
- Loch CH and Wu Y (2007). On the usefulness of mathematical models in behavioral operations management research, http://experimental-instruments.com/BDOM/2010/MathModels.pdf, accessed 12 March 2014.
- LochCHWuYSocial preferences and supply chain performance: An experimental studyManagement Science200854111835184910.1287/mnsc.1080.0910
- LuceDIndividual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis1959
- Mirrlees JA and Basov S (2009). Nonlinear pricing under bounded rationality. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1399924 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1399924, accessed 12 March 2014.
- NöldekeGSamuelsonLOptimal bunching without optimal controlJournal of Economic Theory2007134140542010.1016/j.jet.2006.01.001
- RabinMIncorporating fairness into game theory and economicsAmerican Economic Review199383512811302
- RochetJ-CChonéPIroning, sweeping, and multidimensional screeningEconometrica199866478382610.2307/2999574
- SappingtonDLimited liability contracts between principal and agentJournal of Economic Theory198329112110.1016/0022-0531(83)90120-5
- SuckyEA bargaining model with asymmetric information for a single supplier-single buyer problemEuropean Journal of Operational Research2006171251653510.1016/j.ejor.2004.08.039
- WangJCLauHSLauAHLWhen should a manufacturer share truthful manufacturing cost information with a dominant retailer?European Journal of Operational Research2009197126628610.1016/j.ejor.2008.06.001
- VoigtGSupply Chain Coordination in Case of Asymmetric Information: Information Sharing and Contracting in a Just-in-Time environment2011
- VoigtGInderfurthKSupply chain coordination and setup cost reduction in case of asymmetric informationOR Spectrum20113319912210.1007/s00291-009-0173-8
- VoigtGInderfurthKSupply chain coordination with information sharing in the presence of trust and trustworthinessIIE Transactions201244863765410.1080/0740817X.2011.635179
- XuHShiNMaSLaiKKContracting with an urgent supplier under cost information asymmetryEuropean Journal of Operational Research2010206237443810.1016/j.ejor.2010.03.012