Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of the Operational Research Society Volume 67, 2016 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
216
Views
52
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
General Paper

Distributed preference relations for multiple attribute decision analysis

Chao FuHefei University of TechnologyAnhuiP.R. China;Key Laboratory of Process Optimization and Intelligent Decision-making, Ministry of EducationAnhuiP.R. ChinaCorrespondence[email protected]
,
Dong-Ling XuThe University of ManchesterManchesterUK
&
Shan-Lin YangHefei University of TechnologyAnhuiP.R. China;Key Laboratory of Process Optimization and Intelligent Decision-making, Ministry of EducationAnhuiP.R. China
Pages 457-473 | Received 16 Jun 2014, Accepted 11 Aug 2015, Published online: 21 Dec 2017

References

  • AtanassovKIntuitionistic fuzzy setsFuzzy Sets and Systems1986201879610.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
  • BottomleyPADoyleJRA comparison of three weight elicitation methods: Good, better, and bestOmega200129655356010.1016/S0305-0483(01)00044-5
  • ChenCBKleinCMAn efficient approach to solving fuzzy MADM problemsFuzzy Sets and Systems1997881516710.1016/S0165-0114(96)00048-6
  • ChenTYTsaoCYThe interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysisFuzzy Sets and Systems2008159111410142810.1016/j.fss.2007.11.004
  • ChiclanaFHerreraFHerrera-ViedmaEIntegrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relationFuzzy Sets and Systems1998971334810.1016/S0165-0114(96)00339-9
  • DeschrijverGKerreEEOn the composition of intuitionistic fuzzy relationsFuzzy Sets and Systems2003136333336110.1016/S0165-0114(02)00269-5
  • FanZPMaJZhangQAn approach to multiple attribute decision making based on fuzzy preference information on alternativesFuzzy Sets and Systems2002131110110610.1016/S0165-0114(01)00258-5
  • FarquharPHUtility assessment methodsManagement Science198430111283130010.1287/mnsc.30.11.1283
  • FuCHuhnsMYangSLA consensus framework for multiple attribute group decision analysis in an evidential reasoning contextInformation Fusion201417223510.1016/j.inffus.2011.12.002
  • FuCYangSLThe group consensus based evidential reasoning approach for multiple attributive group decision analysisEuropean Journal of Operational Research2010206360160810.1016/j.ejor.2010.03.011
  • FuCYangSLAn attribute weight based feedback model for multiple attributive group decision analysis problems with group consensus requirements in evidential reasoning contextEuropean Journal of Operational Research2011212117918910.1016/j.ejor.2011.01.040
  • FuCYangSLAn evidential reasoning based consensus model for multiple attribute group decision analysis problems with interval-valued group consensus requirementsEuropean Journal of Operational Research2012223116717610.1016/j.ejor.2012.05.048
  • GoodwinPWrightGDecision Analysis for Management Judgment2004
  • GongZWLiLSZhouFXYaoTXGoal programming approaches to obtain the priority vectors from the intuitionistic fuzzy preference relationsComputers & Industrial Engineering20095741181119310.1016/j.cie.2009.05.007
  • HerreraFHerrera-ViedmaEChiclanaFMultiperson decision-making based on multiplicative preference relationsEuropean Journal of Operational Research2001129237238510.1016/S0377-2217(99)00197-6
  • Herrera-ViedmaEHerreraFChiclanaFLuqueMSome issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relationsEuropean Journal of Operational Research200415419810910.1016/S0377-2217(02)00725-7
  • HorowitzIZappeCThe linear programming alternative to policy capturing for eliciting criteria weights in the performance appraisal processOmega199523666767610.1016/0305-0483(95)00039-9
  • HorskyDRaoMREstimation of attribute weights from preference comparisonsManagement Science198430780182210.1287/mnsc.30.7.801
  • IshizakaABalkenborgDKaplanTInfluence of aggregation and measurement scale on ranking a compromise alternative in AHPJournal of the Operational Research Society201162470071010.1057/jors.2010.23
  • LipoverskySTishlerAInterval estimation of priorities in the AHPEuropean Journal of Operational Research1999114115316410.1016/S0377-2217(98)00012-5
  • LiuJLiuSFLiuPZhouXZZhaoBA new decision support model in multi-criteria decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on risk preferences and criteria reductionJournal of the Operational Research Society20136481205122010.1057/jors.2012.180
  • MaJFanZPHuangLHA subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weightsEuropean Journal of Operational Research1999112239740410.1016/S0377-2217(98)00141-6
  • MaJFanZPJiangYPMaoJYMaLA method for repairing the inconsistency of fuzzy preference relationsFuzzy Sets and Systems20061571203310.1016/j.fss.2005.05.046
  • OlsonDLWuDSSimulation of fuzzy multiattribute models for grey relationshipsEuropean Journal of Operational Research2006175111112010.1016/j.ejor.2005.05.002
  • PedryczWSongMLAnalytic hierarchy process (AHP) in group decision making and its optimization with an allocation of information granularityIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems201119352753910.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2116029
  • RodríguezRMMartínezLHerreraFHesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision makingIEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems201220110911910.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2170076
  • SaatyTLThe Analytic Hierarchy Process1980
  • SaatyTLVargasLGUncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy processEuropean Journal of Operational Research198732110711710.1016/0377-2217(87)90275-X
  • SenPYangJBDesign decision making based upon multiple attribute evaluation and minimal preference informationMathematical and Computer Modelling199420310712410.1016/0895-7177(94)90034-5
  • ShirlandLEJesseRRThompsonRLIacovouCLDetermining attribute weights using mathematical programmingOmega200331642343710.1016/S0305-0483(03)00081-1
  • SirajSMikhailovLKeaneJAEnumerating all spanning trees for pairwise comparisonsComputers & Operations Research201239219119910.1016/j.cor.2011.03.010
  • SzmidtEKacprzykJA consensus-reaching process under intuitionistic fuzzy preference relationsInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems200318783785210.1002/int.10119
  • TakedaECoggerKOYuPLEstimating criterion weights using eigenvectors: A comparative studyEuropean Journal of Operational Research198729336036910.1016/0377-2217(87)90249-9
  • TaninoTFuzzy preference orderings in group decision makingFuzzy Sets and Systems198412211713110.1016/0165-0114(84)90032-0
  • WalleniusJDyerJSFishburnPCSteuerREZiontsSDebKMultiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: Recent accomplishments and what lies aheadManagement Science20085471336134910.1287/mnsc.1070.0838
  • WangTCChangTHApplication of consistent fuzzy preference relations in predicting the success of knowledge management implementationEuropean Journal of Operational Research200718231313132910.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.039
  • WangZJLiKWGoal programming approaches to deriving interval weights based on interval fuzzy preference relationsInformation Sciences20121931518019810.1016/j.ins.2012.01.019
  • WangYMYangJBXuDLEnvironmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approachEuropean Journal of Operational Research200617431885191310.1016/j.ejor.2004.09.059
  • WinstonWOperations Research: Decision Making2004
  • XuZSChenJSome models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relationsEuropean Journal of Operational Reserach2008184126628010.1016/j.ejor.2006.11.011
  • XuYJPatnayakuniRWangHMThe ordinal consistency of a fuzzy preference relationInformation Sciences2013224115216410.1016/j.ins.2012.10.035
  • XuYJPatnayakuniRWangHMLogarithmic least squares method to priority for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relationsApplied Mathematical Modelling20133742139215210.1016/j.apm.2012.05.010
  • XuZSIntuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision makingInformation Sciences2007177112363237910.1016/j.ins.2006.12.019
  • XuZSAn error-analysis-based method for the priority of an intuitionistic fuzzy preference relation in decision makingKnowledge-Based Systems20123317317910.1016/j.knosys.2012.03.009
  • XuZSCaiXSzmidtEAlgorithms for estimating missing elements of incomplete intuitionistic preference relationsInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems201126978781310.1002/int.20494
  • XuZSDaQLThe uncertain OWA operatorInternational Journal of Intelligent Systems200217656957510.1002/int.10038
  • XuZSXiaMMIterative algorithms for improving consistency of intuitionistic preference relationsJournal of the Operational Research Society201465570872210.1057/jors.2012.178
  • XuZSYagerRRIntuitionistic and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations and their measures of similarity for the evaluation of agreement within a groupFuzzy Optimization and Decision Making20098212313910.1007/s10700-009-9056-3
  • YangJBXuDLOn the evidential reasoning algorithm for multiattribute decision analysis under uncertaintyIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A: Systems and Humans200232328930410.1109/TSMCA.2002.802746
  • YangJBXuDLEvidential reasoning rule for evidence combinationArtificial Intelligence201320512910.1016/j.artint.2013.09.003
  • YehCHDengHChangYHFuzzy multicriteria analysis for performance evaluation of bus companiesEuropean Journal of Operational Research2000126345947310.1016/S0377-2217(99)00315-X

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.