Developing a WPF-CCR model for selecting suppliers in the presence of stochastic data

References

• Akarte, M.M., Surendra, N.V., Ravi, B. and Rangaraj, N. (2001) Web based casting supplier evaluation using analytical hierarchy process. Journal of Operational Research Society 52(5): 511–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amid, A., Ghodsypour, S.H. and O'Brien, C. (forthcoming) A weighted max—min model for fuzzy multi-objective supplier selection in a supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, in press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, R.C. and Talluri, S. (1997) A closer look at the use of DEA for technology selection.
   Google Scholar
• Computers and Industrial Engineering 32(1): 101–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R.D.A., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30(9): 1078–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayazit, O. (2006) Use of analytic network process in vendor selection decisions. Benchmarking: An International Journal 13(5): 566–579.
   Google Scholar
• Biorn, E. (1981) Estimating economic relations from in complete cross-section/time series data. Journal of Economics 16(2): 461–483.
   Google Scholar
• Biorn, E. and Jansen, E.S. (1983) Individual effects in a system of demand functions. Scandinavian Journal of Econometrics 85(4): 221–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braglia, M. and Petroni, A. (2000) Vendor selection using principal component analysis. Journal of Supply Chain Management 36(2): 63–69.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, F.T.S. (2003) Interactive selection model for supplier selection process: An analytical hierarchy process approach. International Journal Production Research 41(15): 3549–3579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Clark, C.T., Cooper, W.W. and Golany, B. (1985) A developmental study of data envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of maintenance units in the U.S. air force. Annals of Operations Research 2(1): 112–295.
   Google Scholar
• Charnes, A. and Cooper, W.W. (1959) Chance constrained programming. Management Science 6(1): 73–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and Rhodes, A. (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2(6): 429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L. and Stutz, J. (1982) A multiplicative model for efficiency analysis. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 16(5): 223–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C.T., Lin, C.T. and Huang, S.F. (2006) A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Economics 102(2): 289–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choy, K.L. and Lee, W.B. (2002) A generic tool for the selection and management of supplier relationships in an outsourced manufacturing environment: The application of case based reasoning. Logistics Information Management 15(4): 235–253.
   Google Scholar
• Choy, K.L., Fan, K.K.H. and Lo, V. (2003) Development of an intelligent customer-supplier relationship management system: The application of case-based reasoning. Industrial Management and Data Systems 103(4): 263–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choy, K.L., Lee, W.B. and Lo, V. (2002) Development of a case based intelligent customer — Supplier relationship management system. Expert Systems with Applications 23(3): 281–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choy, K.L., Lee, W.B. and Lo, V. (2004) An enterprise collaborative management system — A case study of supplier relationship management. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 17(3): 191–207.
   Google Scholar
• Choy, K.L., Lee, W.B. and Lo, V. (2005) A knowledge-based supplier intelligence retrieval system for outsource manufacturing. Knowledge-Based Systems 18(1): 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, W.W., Deng, H., Huang, Z.M. and Li, S.X. (2002) Chance constrained programming approaches to technical efficiencies and inefficiencies in stochastic data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 53(12): 1347–1356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, W.W., Deng, H., Huang, Z.M., Li, S.X., Lelas, V. and Sullivan, D. (1998) Chance constrained programming formulations for stochastic characterizations of efficiency and dominance in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis 9(1): 53–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, W.W., Huang, Z. and Li, S. (1996) Satisficing DEA models under chance constraints. Annals of Operations Research 66(4): 279–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, H., Benyoucef, L. and Xie, X. (2003) A simulation-optimization approach using genetic search for supplier selection. Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference 2: 1260–1267.
   Google Scholar
• Farzipoor Saen, R. (2008) Using super-efficiency analysis for ranking suppliers in the presence of volume discount offers. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 38(8): 637–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farzipoor Saen, R. (2009) A decision model for ranking suppliers in the presence of cardinal and ordinal data, weight restrictions and nondiscretionary factors. Annals of Operations Research 172(1): 177–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farzipoor Saen, R. and Zohrehbandian, M. (2008) A data envelopment analysis approach to supplier selection in volume discount environments. International Journal of Procurement Management 1(4): 472–488.
   Google Scholar
• Florez-Lopez, R. (2007) Strategic supplier selection in the added-value perspective: A CI approach. Information Sciences 177(5): 1169–1179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forker, L.B. and Mendez, D. (2001) An analytical method for benchmarking best peer suppliers. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 21(1–2): 195–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gencer, C. and Gürpinar, D. (2007) Analytic network process in supplier selection: A case study in an electronic firm. Applied Mathematical Modelling 31(11): 2475–2486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghodsypour, S.H. and O'Brien, C. (2001) The total cost of logistics in supplier selection, under conditions of multiple sourcing, multiple criteria and capacity constraint. International Journal of Production Economics 73(1): 15–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendershott, P., Macgregor, B. and White, M. (2002) Explaining real commercials rents using an error correction model with panel data. Journal of Real Estate 24(1–2): 59–87.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, G.H., Park, S.C., Jang, D.S. and Rho, H.M. (2005) An effective supplier selection method for constructing a competitive supply-relationship. Expert Systems with Applications 28(4): 629–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, J. and Su, D. (2007) EJB—MVC oriented supplier selection system for mass customization. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 18(1): 54–71.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, Z. and Li, S.X. (2001) Stochastic DEA models with different types of input-output disturbances. Journal of Productivity Analysis 15(2): 95–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, Z.M. and Li, S.X. (1996) Dominance stochastic in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 95(2): 370–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivaldi, M., Monier-Dilhan, S. and Simioni, M. (1995) Stochastic production frontiers and panel data: A latent variable framework. European Journal of Operational Research 80(3): 524–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpak, B., Kumcu, E. and Kasuganti, R.R. (2001) Purchasing materials in the supply chain: Managing a multi-objective task. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 7(3): 209–216.
   Google Scholar
• Kumbhakar, S.C. and Heshmati, A. (1991) Efficiency Measurement Using Rotating Panel Data: An Application to Swedish Dairy Farms 1976–1988. Memorandum. No. 154, Department of Economics, Gothenberg University, p. 31.
   Google Scholar
• Kwong, C.K., Ip, W.H. and Chan, J.W.K. (2002) Combining scoring method and fuzzy expert systems approach to supplier assessment: A case study. Integrated Manufacturing Systems 13(7): 512–519.
   Google Scholar
• Land, K.C., Lovell, C.A.K. and Thore, S. (1993) Chance-constrained data envelopment analysis. Managerial and Decision Economics 14(6): 541–554.
   Google Scholar
• Li, S.X. (1998) Stochastic and models and variables returns to scales in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 104(3): 532–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F.H.F. and Chen, C.L. (2009) The worst-practice DEA model with slack-based measurement. Computers & Industrial Engineering 57(2): 496–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, F.H.F. and Hai, H.L. (2005) The voting analytic hierarchy process method for selecting supplier. International Journal of Production Economic 97(3): 308–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Ding, F.Y. and Lall, V. (2000) Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 5(3): 143–150.
   Google Scholar
• Morita, H. and Seiford, L.M. (1999) Characteristics on stochastic DEA efficiency - reliability and probability being efficient. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan 42(4): 389–404.
   Google Scholar
• Muralidharan, C., Anantharaman, N. and Deshmukh, S.G. (2002) A multi-criteria group decision-making model for supplier rating. Journal of Supply Chain Management 38(4): 22–33.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, W.L. (2008) An efficient and simple model for multiple criteria supplier selection problem. European Journal of Operational Research 186(3): 1059–1067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noguchi, H., Ogawa, M. and Ishii, H. (2002) The appropriate total ranking method using DEA for multiple categorized purposes. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 146(1): 155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen, O.B. and Petersen, N.C. (1995) Chance constrained efficiency evaluation. Management Science 41(3): 442–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, D.L. and Swenseth, S.R. (1987) A linear approximation for chance constrained programming. Journal of Operational Research Society 38(3): 261–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanayei, A., Mousavi, S.F. and Yazdankhah, A. (2010) Group decision making process for supplier selection with VIKOR under fuzzy environment. Expert Systems with Applications 37(1): 24–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar, A. and Mohapatra, P.K.J. (2006) Evaluation of supplier capability and performance: A method for supply base reduction. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 12(3): 148–163.
   Google Scholar
• Sarkis, J. and Talluri, S. (2002) A model for strategic supplier selection. Journal of Supply Chain Management 38(1): 18–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta, J.K. (1982) Efficiency measurement in stochastic input-output systems. International Journal of Systems Science 13(3): 273–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta, J.K. (1987) Data envelopment analysis for efficiency measurement in the stochastic case. Computers & Operations Research 14(1): 117–129.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta, J.K. (1990) Transformations in stochastic DEA models. Journal of Econometrics 46(1–2): 109–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta, J.K. (1997) Stochastic efficiency measurement: A new approach. Applied Economics Letters 4(2): 125–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta, J.K. (1998) Efficiency distribution and the cost frontier. Applied Economics Letters 14(1): 67–76.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta, J.K. (2000) Efficiency analysis by stochastic data envelopment analysis. Applied Economics Letters 7(6): 379–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A. (1957) Models of Man. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sueyoshi, T. (2000) Stochastic DEA for restructure strategy: An application to a Japanese petroleum company. Omega 28(4): 385–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talluri, S. (2002) A buyer—seller game model for selection and negotiation of purchasing bids. European Journal of Operational Research 143(1): 171–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talluri, S. and Narasimhan, R. (2003) Vendor evaluation with performance variability: A max-min approach. European Journal of Operational Research 146(3): 543–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talluri, S. and Narasimhan, R. (2005) A note on ‘a methodology for supply base optimization. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 52(1): 130–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talluri, S., Narasimhan, R. and Nair, A. (2006) Vendor performance with supply risk: A chance-constrained DEA approach. International Journal of Production Economics 100(2): 212–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vokurka, R.J., Choobineh, J. and Vadi, L. (1996) A prototype expert system for the evaluation and selection of potential suppliers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 16(12): 106–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadhwa, V. and Ravindran, A.R. (2007) Vendor selection in outsourcing. Computers & Operations Research 34(12): 3725–3737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar