1,935
Views
139
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Factors and measures of business process modelling: model building through a multiple case study

, &
Pages 347-360 | Received 03 Feb 2005, Accepted 30 Aug 2005, Published online: 19 Dec 2017

References

  • Amoroso DL (1998) Developing a model to understand Reengineering project success. IEEE reference number 1060-3425/98.
  • BaileyJEPearsonSWDevelopment of a tool for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfactionManagement Science19832953054510.1287/mnsc.29.5.530
  • BancroftNHImplementing SAP R/3: How to Introduce Large Systems into Large Organizations1998
  • BarkiHHartwickJRethinking the concept of user involvementMIS Quarterly198913526310.2307/248700
  • BartholomewDProcess is backIndustry week1999
  • BatiniCFurlaniLNardelliEWhat is a good diagram? A pragmatic approachProceedings of the Fourth International Conference on the Entity-Relationship Approach: The Use of ER Concept in Knowledge Representation1985312319
  • BeckerJKugelerMRosemannMProcess Management2005
  • BeckerJRosemannMSchütteRBusiness to business process integration: functions and methodsProceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS'97)1997816827
  • BeckerJRosemannMVon UthmannCGuidelines of business process modellingBusiness Process Management: Models Techniques and Empirical Studies20003049
  • BenbasatIGoldsteinDKMeadMThe case research strategy in studies of Information SystemsManagement Information Systems Quarterly19871136938610.2307/248684
  • Bingi P, Sharma MK and Godla JK (1999) Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation. Journal of Information Systems Management 7–14.
  • BrashDThe contributions of participants to Enterprise ModelingProceedings of the Tenth Australasian Conference of Information Systems (ACIS '99)1999
  • Burkhard DL (1990) Examination of factors contributing to the success of the implementation of Computer-Aided-Software-Engineering Technology. IEEE reference number 0073-1129/90/0000/0418.
  • CarrDKJohannsonHJBest Practices in Re-engineering – What Works and What Doesn't in the Re-engineering Process1995
  • Chuang M and Shaw WH (2000) Distinguishing the critical success factors between E- commerce, Enterprise Resource Planning, and Supply Chain Management. IEEE, Reference number 0-7803-6442-2/00.
  • ClemonsEKThatcherMERowMCIdentifying sources of reengineering failures: a study of behavioural factors contributing to reengineering risksJournal of Management Information Systems199512910.1080/07421222.1995.11518079
  • CurtisBKellerMIOverJProcess modellingCommunications of ACM199235759010.1145/130994.130998
  • DavenportTProcess Innovation: Reengineering Work through Information Technology1993
  • Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly.
  • De LoneWHMcleanERInformation systems success: the quest for the dependent variableJournal of Information Systems Research19923609510.1287/isre.3.1.60
  • Evans R (1994) The human side of Business Process Re-engineering. Management Development Review l7(6).
  • Fettke P and Loos P (2003) Classification of reference models – a methodology and its application. In Information Systems and e-Business Management (ISSN 1617–9846), Vol. 1, No. 1, pp 35–53.
  • Fisher J (2000) User satisfaction and system success: considering the development team. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Australasian Conference of Information Systems (ACIS '00). (GABLE G and VITALE M, Eds), 6–8 December, Brisbane.
  • Forsberg T, Rönne G and Vikström J (2000) Process Modelling in ERP projects – a discussion of potential benefits, available at: http://www.processworld.com/content/22.doc, last accessed date 25th, March 2001.
  • GableGGA multidimensional model of client success when engaging external consultantsManagement Science1996421175119810.1287/mnsc.42.8.1175
  • GarrityEJSandersGLDimensions of IS Success in Information Systems Success Measurement. Series in Information Technology Management19981345
  • GatianAWIs user satisfaction a valid measure of system effectivenessInformation and Management19942611913110.1016/0378-7206(94)90036-1
  • Gill PJ (1999) Application development: business snapshot – business modelling tools help companies align their business and technology goals. Information week, April 1999.
  • GinzbergMJEarly diagnosis of misimplementation failure: promising results and unanswered questionsManagement Science19812745947810.1287/mnsc.27.4.459
  • GoodhueDLUser evaluations of MIS success: what are we really measuring?Proceedings of the 25th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences1992303314
  • Green P and Rosemann M (2000) Ontological analysis of integrated process modeling: some initial insights. In Proceedings of the Eleventh Australasian Conference on Information Systems (GABLE G and VITALE M, Eds.), 6–8 December, Brisbane.
  • GroverVJeongSRKettingerWJTengJTCThe implementation of Business process reengineeringJournal of Management Information Systems19951210913910.1080/07421222.1995.11518072
  • GullaAJBrasethvikTOn the challenges of business modelling in large-scale reengineering projectsProceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Requirements Engineering20001726
  • HammerMChampyJMReengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution1993
  • HawkSRAldagRJMeasurement biases in user involvement researchOmega19901860561310.1016/0305-0483(90)90052-B
  • Holland CP, Light B and Gibson N (1999) Critical success factors model for Enterprise Resource Planning implementations. In Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference of Information Systems (ECIS '99), Vol. 1, pp 273–297.
  • Inchusta SP, Pina A and Buldain G (1998) Economic feasibility and success factors in Information Technology Implementations: a case study. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Technology management, (IEMC '98), Pioneering New Technologies: Management Issues and Challenges in the Third Millennium, pp 88–93.
  • IvesBMOlsonMHUser involvement and missuccess: a review of researchManagement Science19843058660310.1287/mnsc.30.5.586
  • KanellisPLycettMPaulRJEvaluating business information systems fit: from concept to practical applicationEuropean Journal of Information Systems19998657710.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000316
  • KesariMChangSSeddonPBA content analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of process modellingProceedings of the Australasian Conference of Information System2003111
  • Kettinger WJ, Teng JTT and Guha S (1997) Business process change: a study of methodologies, techniques and tools. MIS Quarterly.
  • Krogstie J, Lindland OI and Sindre G (1995a) Defining quality aspects for conceptual models. Proceeding of the International Conference on Information systems Concepts: Towards a Consolidated View, 28–30 March, Marburg.
  • Krogstie J, Lindland OI and Sindre G (1995b) Towards a deeper understanding of quality in requirements engineering. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Advance Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE '95), pp 82–95.
  • Larsen MA and Myers MD (1998) BPR success or failure? A business process reengineering project in the financial services industry. Communications of ACM 367–381.
  • LeeASA scientific methodology for MIS case studiesManagement Information Systems Quarterly198913325010.2307/248698
  • LindlandIOSindreGSolvbergAUnderstanding quality in conceptual modelingIEEE software199411424910.1109/52.268955
  • LucasCHImplementation of the Key to Successful Information Systems1981
  • Lucas CH, Walton JE and Ginzberg JM (1998) Implementing package software. MIS quarterly, 537–549.
  • McClure CL (1979) Software development: failure and success. IEEE reference number CH1515–6/79/0000–0001.
  • McnurlinCBSpragueHRInformation Systems Management in Practice1989
  • MilesMBHubermanAMQualitative Data Analysis: A Source Book of New Methods1984
  • Moody D (1996) Seven habits of highly effective data modelers. Database Programming and Design 57–64.
  • MoodyDShanksGWhat makes a good data model? Evaluating the quality of entity relationship modelsProceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on the Entity Relationship approach (ER '94), Business Modeling and Reengineering199494111
  • MurphyFStaplesSReengineering in Australia: factors affecting successProceedings from the Ninth Australasian Conference of Information systems1998
  • MyersBLKappelmanLAPrybutokVRA comprehensive model for assessing the quality and productivity of the information systems function: toward a theory for information systems assessmentInformation Systems Success Measurement, Series in Information Technology Management199894121
  • NandhakumarJDesign for success?: critical success factors in executive information systemsEuropean Journal of Information Systems19965627310.1057/ejis.1996.12
  • ParrANShanksGDarkePIdentification of necessary factors for successful implementation of ERP systemsnew information technologies and theoretical organizational processes: field studies and theoretical reflections on the future of work1999
  • PeristerasVTarabanisKTowards an enterprise architecture for public administration using a top-down approachEuropean Journal of Information Systems2000925226010.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000378
  • Rainer RK and Watson HJ (1995) The key to executive information system success. Journal of Management Information Systems 12(2).
  • Raymond EM, Coleman Jr HJ and Creed WED (1995) Key to success in cooperate redesign. California Management Review.
  • Rosemann M (1998) Managing the complexity of multi-perspective information models using the guidelines of modeling. In Proceedings of the Third Conference on Requirements Engineering- ACRE, 26–27 October.
  • RosemannMUsing reference models within the enterprise resource planning life cycleAustralian Accounting Review20003193110.1111/j.1835-2561.2000.tb00067.x
  • Rosemann M and Chan R (2000) Structuring and modelling knowledge in the context of ERP. Proceedings of the Fourth Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2000) (CD-ROM) (THONG JP, CHAU KY and TAM HK Eds), 1–3 June 2000.
  • RosemannMZur MühlenMEvaluation of workflow management systems – a meta model approachAustralian Journal of Information Systems19976103116
  • ScheerA-WARIS Business Process Modelling1998
  • ScheerA-WARIS – Business Process Frameworks2000
  • ScheerA-WAbolhassanFJostWKirchmerMBusiness Process Excellence: ARIS in Practice2002
  • ScheerA-WAbolhassanFJostWKirchmerMBusiness Process Change Management: ARIS in Practice2003
  • Seddon P (1997) A re-specification and extension of the De Lone and Mclean model of IS success. Information Systems Research 8(3).
  • SederaWRosemannMGableGGProcess modelling for Enterprise Systems: factors critical to successThe Proceedings of the 12th Australasian Conference on Information Systems2001585595
  • SederaWRosemannMGableGGMeasuring process modelling successProceedings of the Tenth European Conference of Information Systems2002331341
  • SmithHFingarPBusiness Process Management. The Third Wave2003
  • Smyth RW (1999) Understanding CASE success: a basis for ongoing case adoption. In Proceedings of the Seventh European conference of Information Systems (ECIS '99), Vol. 2.
  • Srivihok A (1999) Understanding executive information systems implementations: an empirical study of EIS success factors. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaiian International Conference on System Sciences.
  • Stefanou CJ (1999) Supply Chain Management (SCM) and organizational key factors for successful implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Systems. In Proceedings from the Americas Conference of Information Systems.
  • SumnerMCritical success factors in enterprise wide information management systems projectsProceedings from the 5th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS '98)1998
  • Warne L and Hart D (1996) The impact of organizational politics on Information Systems Project failure – A case study. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Hawaiian International Conference on System Sciences.
  • Wreden N (1998) Model business processes. Information week, September, pp 1A–8A.
  • YinRKCase Study Research Methods1994

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.