References
- CharnesACooperWWRhodesEMeasuring efficiency of decision making unitsEur J Opl Res1978242944410.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
- AllenRAthanassopoulosADysonRGThanassoulisEWeights restrictions and value judgements in data envelopment analysis: evolution, development and future directionsAnn Opn Res199773133410.1023/A:1018968909638
- Pedraja-ChaparroFSalinas-JimenezJSmithPOn the role of weight restrictions in Data Envelopment AnalysisJ Prod Anal1997821523010.1023/A:1007715912664
- RollYGolanyBAlternate methods of treating factor weights in DEAOmega1993219910910.1016/0305-0483(93)90042-J
- SeifordLMData envelopment analysis: the evolution of the state of the art (1978–1995)J Prod Anal199679913710.1007/BF00157037
- KaoCYangYCMeasuring the efficiency of forest managementFor Sci19913712391252
- KaoCYangYCReorganization of forest districts via efficiency measurementEur J Opl Res19925835636210.1016/0377-2217(92)90066-I
- KaoCMeasuring the efficiency of forest districts with multiple working circlesJ Opl Res Soc19984958359010.1057/palgrave.jors.2600570
- KaoCMeasuring the performance improvement of Taiwan forests after reorganizationFor Sci200046577584
- KaoCChangPHwangSNData envelopment analysis in measuring the efficiency of forest managementJ Environ Mngt199338738310.1006/jema.1993.1030
- ViitalaEJHänninenHMeasuring the efficiency of public forestry organizationsFor Sci199844298307
- BogetoftPThorsenBJStrangeNEfficiency and merger gains in the Danish forestry extension serviceFor Sci200349585595
- DysonRGThanassoulisEReducing weight flexibility in data envelopment analysisJ Opl Res Soc19883956357610.1057/jors.1988.96
- RollYCookWDGolanyBControlling factor weights in data envelopment analysisIIE Trans1991232910.1080/07408179108963835
- GolanyBA note on including ordinal relations among multipliers in data envelopment analysisMngt Sci1988341029103310.1287/mnsc.34.8.1029
- AliAICookWDSeifordLMStrict vs. weak ordinal relations for multipliers in data envelopment analysisMngt Sci19913773373810.1287/mnsc.37.6.733
- ThompsonRGSingletonFRJrThrallRMSmithBAComparative site evaluation for locating a high-energy physics lab in TexasInterfaces198616354910.1287/inte.16.6.35
- ThompsonRGLangemeierLMLeeCTLeeEThrallRMThe role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farmingJ Econom1990469310810.1016/0304-4076(90)90049-Y
- HalmeMKorhonenPRestricting weights in value efficiency analysisEur J Opl Res200012617518810.1016/S0377-2217(99)00290-8
- BankerRDCharnesACooperWWSome models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysisMngt Sci1984301078109210.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
- WongYHBBeasleyJERestricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysisJ Opl Res Soc19904182983510.1057/jors.1990.120
- CharnesACooperWWHuangZMSunDBPolyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banksJ Econom199046739110.1016/0304-4076(90)90048-X
- HalmeMJoroTKorhonenPSaloSWalleniusJA value efficiency approach to incorporating preference information in data envelopment analysisMngt Sci19994510311510.1287/mnsc.45.1.103
- GolanyBRollYAIncorporating standards via DEAData Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications1994313328
- AllenRThanassoulisEIncreasing envelopment in data envelopment analysisEur J Opl Res200415436337910.1016/S0377-2217(03)00175-9