References
- CharnesACooperWWRhodesEMeasuring efficiency of decision making unitsEur J Opl Res1978242944410.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
- CharnesACooperWWLewinAYSeifordLMData Envelopment Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Applications1994
- StewartTJData envelopment analysis and multiple criteria decision making: a responseOmega19942220520610.1016/0305-0483(94)90079-5
- GreenRDoyleJImproving discernment in DEA using profiling: a commentOmega19952436536610.1016/0305-0483(96)86991-X
- AdlerNFriedmanLSinuany-SternZReview of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis contextEur J Opl Res200214024926510.1016/S0377-2217(02)00068-1
- AndersenPPetersenNCA procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysisMngt Sci1993391261126410.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
- TorgersenAMForsundFRKittelsenSACSlack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient unitsJ Prod Anal1996737939810.1007/BF00162048
- BardhanIBowlinWFCooperWWSueyoshiTModels for efficiency dominance in data envelopment analysis. Part 1: additive models and MED measuresJ Opns Res Soc Japan199639322332
- CharnesACooperWWHuangZMSunDBPolyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banksEur J Opl Res199046739110.1016/0377-2217(90)90299-Q
- ThompsonRGThe role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas firmsJ Econ1990469310810.1016/0304-4076(90)90049-Y
- ThanassoulisEBoussofianneADysonRGExploring output quality targets in the provision of perinatal care in England using DEAEur J Opl Res19956058860810.1016/0377-2217(94)00139-4
- WongYHBBeasleyJERestricting weight flexibility in data envelopment analysisJ Opl Res Soc19904182983510.1057/jors.1990.120
- DysonRGPitfalls and protocols in DEAEur J Opel Res200113224525910.1016/S0377-2217(00)00149-1
- DysonRGThanassoulisEReducing weight flexibility in data envelopment analysisJ Opl Res Soc19883956357610.1057/jors.1988.96
- RollTCookWDGolanyBControlling factor weights in data envelopment analysisIIE Trans1991232910.1080/07408179108963835
- RollYGolanyBAlternate methods of treating factor weights in DEAOmega1993219910910.1016/0305-0483(93)90042-J
- HalmeMA value efficiency approach to incorporating preference information in data envelopment analysisMngt Sci19994510311510.1287/mnsc.45.1.103
- HalmeMKorhonenPRestricting weights in value efficiency analysisEur J Opl Res200012617518810.1016/S0377-2217(99)00290-8
- Sinuany-SternZMehrezAHadadYAn AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making unitsInt Trans in Opl Res2000710912410.1111/j.1475-3995.2000.tb00189.x
- LahdelmaRHokkanenJSalminenPSMAA-Stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysisEur J Opl Res199810613714310.1016/S0377-2217(97)00163-X
- LahdelmaRSalminenPHokkanenJCombining stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis and DEAIntegrating Technology and Human Decisions: Global Bridges into the 21st Century1999
- LiXReevesGRA multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysisEur J Opl Res199911550751710.1016/S0377-2217(98)00130-1
- DoyleJGreenREfficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and usesJ Opl Res Soc19944556757810.1057/jors.1994.84
- DoyleJMultiattribute choice for the lazy decision maker: let the alternatives decideOrganizational Behav Hum Decision Process1995628710010.1006/obhd.1995.1034
- FriedmanLSinuany-SternZScaling units via the canonical correlation analysis in the DEA contextEur J Opl Res199710062963710.1016/S0377-2217(97)84108-2
- Retzlaff-RobertsDLRelating discriminant analysis and DEA to one anotherComput Opns Res19962331132210.1016/0305-0548(95)00041-0
- Sinuany-SternZMehrezABarboyAAcademic departments efficiency in DEAComput Opns Res19942154355610.1016/0305-0548(94)90103-1
- Sinuany-SternZFriedmanLDEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking unitsEur J Opnl Res199811147047810.1016/S0377-2217(97)00313-5
- SueyoshiTDEA-discriminant analysis in the view of goal programmingEur J Opl Res199911556458210.1016/S0377-2217(98)00014-9
- SueyoshiTExtended DEA-discriminant analysisEur J Opl Res200113132435110.1016/S0377-2217(00)00054-0
- CharnesACooperWWThe non-Archimedean CCR ratio for efficiency analysis: a rejoinder to Boyd and FäreEur J Opl Res19841533333410.1016/0377-2217(84)90102-4
- YuPLA class of solutions for group decision problemsMngt Sci19731993694610.1287/mnsc.19.8.936
- AignerDJChuSFOn estimating the industry production functionAm Econ Rev1968LVIII826839
- ZelenyMMultiple Criteria Decision Making1982
- WierzbickiAThe use of reference objectives in multiobjective optimizationMultiple Objective Decision Making, Theory and Application1980
- WierzbickiAOn the completeness and constructiveness of parametric characterizations to vector optimization problemsOR Spektrum19868738710.1007/BF01719738
- KaoCYangYCReorganization of forest districts via efficiency measurementEur J Opl Res19925835636210.1016/0377-2217(92)90066-I
- GolanyBYuGA goal programming-discriminant function approach to the estimation of an empirical production function based on DEA resultsJ Prod Anal1995617118610.1007/BF01073410
- KaoCPerformance of several nonlinear programming software packages on microcomputersComput Opns Res19982580781610.1016/S0305-0548(98)00013-6