References
- AkarteMMSurendraNVRaviBRangarajNWeb based casting supplier evaluation using analytical hierarchy processJ Opl Res Soc20015251152210.1057/palgrave.jors.2601124
- AlhoJMKangasJAnalyzing uncertainties in experts' opinions of forest plan performanceFor Sci199743521528
- AlhoJMKolehmainenOLeskinenPRegression methods for pairwise comparisons dataThe Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making2001235251
- Alho JM, Korhonen P and Leskinen P (2002). Measurement of preferences in multiple criteria evaluation. In: Pukkala T (ed). Multi-objective Forest Planning. Managing Forest Ecosystems, Vol. 6. Kluwer Academic Publishers: London, pp 21–36.
- BeltonVGearTDiscussion: On the meaning of relative importanceJ Multi-Crit Decis Anal1997633533810.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199711)6:6<335::AID-MCDA168>3.0.CO;2-J
- ChooEUSchonerBWedleyWCInterpretation of criteria weights in multicriteria decision makingComp Indust Engin19993752754110.1016/S0360-8352(00)00019-X
- CrawfordGWilliamsCA note on the analysis of subjective judgment matricesJ Math Psy19852938740510.1016/0022-2496(85)90002-1
- De JongPA statistical approach to Saaty's scaling method for prioritiesJ Math Psy19842846747810.1016/0022-2496(84)90013-0
- HämäläinenRPSaloAARejoinder: The issue is understanding the weightsJ Multi-Crit Decis Anal1997634034310.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199711)6:6<340::AID-MCDA170>3.0.CO;2-7
- HammondJSKeeneyRLRaiffaHSmart Choices. A Practical Guide to Making Better Decisions1999
- HuizinghEKREVrolijkHCJA comparison of verbal and numerical judgments in the analytic hierarchy processOrganiz Behav Human Decis Processes19977023724710.1006/obhd.1997.2708
- KangasJMultiple-use planning of forest resources by using the Analytic Hierarchy ProcessScand J For Res1992725926810.1080/02827589209382718
- Kangas J, Matero J and Pukkala T (1992). Analyyttisen hierarkiaprosessin käyttö metsien monikäytön suunnittelussa—tapaustutkimus (Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process in planning of multiple-use forestry—A case study. In Finnish.). Research Notes 412, Finnish Forest Research Institute.
- KangasJStoreRLeskinenPMehtätaloLImproving the quality of landscape ecological forest planning by utilising advanced decision-support toolsFor Ecol Manag200013215717110.1016/S0378-1127(99)00221-2
- KeeneyRLRaiffaHDecisions with Multiple Objectives. Preferences and Value Tradeoffs1993
- Krantz DH, Luce RD, Suppes P and Tversky A (1971). Foundations of measurement. Additive and Polynomial Representations, Vol. 1. Academic Press: New York, USA.
- LeskinenPMeasurement scales and scale independence in the Analytic Hierarchy ProcessJ Multi-Crit Decis Anal2000916317410.1002/1099-1360(200007)9:4<163::AID-MCDA274>3.0.CO;2-L
- Leskinen P (2001). Statistical Methods for Measuring Preferences. Publications in Social Sciences, Vol. 48. University of Joensuu: Finland.
- LeskinenPKangasJAnalysing uncertainties of interval judgment data in multiple-criteria evaluation of forest plansSilva Fenn19983236337210.14214/sf.677
- LeskinenPKangasJRank reversals in multi-criteria decision analysis with statistical modelling of ratio-scale pairwise comparisonsJ Opl Res Soc20055685586110.1057/palgrave.jors.2601925
- LeskinenPKangasASKangasJRank-based modelling of preferences in multi-criteria decision makingEur J Opl Res200415872173310.1016/S0377-2217(03)00384-9
- LeskinenPKangasJPasanenA-MAssessing ecological values with dependent explanatory variables in multi-criteria forest ecosystem managementEcol Mod200317011210.1016/S0304-3800(03)00283-7
- LootsmaFAScale sensitivity in the multiplicative AHP and SMARTJ Multi-Crit Decis Anal199328711010.1002/mcda.4020020205
- Ma D and Zheng X (1991). 9/9–9/1 scale method of AHP. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on the AHP, Vol. I. University of Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh, PA, pp 197–202.
- MilletIThe effectiveness of alternative preference elicitation methods in the Analytic Hierarchy ProcessJ Multi-Crit Decis Anal19976415110.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199701)6:1<41::AID-MCDA122>3.0.CO;2-D
- MoshkovichHMMechitovAIOlsonDLOrdinal judgments in multiattribute decision analysisEur J Opl Res200213762564110.1016/S0377-2217(01)00106-0
- PöyhönenMHämäläinenRPOn the convergence of multiattribute weighting methodsEur J Opl Res200112956958510.1016/S0377-2217(99)00467-1
- PöyhönenMAHämäläinenRPSaloAAAn experiment on the numerical modelling of verbal ratio statementsJ Multi-Crit Decis Anal1997611010.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199701)6:1<1::AID-MCDA111>3.0.CO;2-W
- SaatyTLA scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structuresJ Math Psy19771523428110.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
- SaatyTLThe Analytic Hierarchy Process. Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation1980
- SaloAAHämäläinenRPOn the measurement of preferences in the Analytic Hierarchy ProcessJ Multi-Crit Decis Anal1997630931910.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199711)6:6<309::AID-MCDA163>3.0.CO;2-2
- SchenkermanSUse and abuse of weights in multiple objective decision support modelsDecis Sci19912236937810.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb00352.x
- SchonerBWedleyWCAmbiguous criteria weights in AHP: Consequences and solutionsDecis Sci19892046247510.1111/j.1540-5915.1989.tb01561.x
- ShaDYCheZHSupply chain network design: Partner selection and production/distribution planning using a systematic modelJ Opl Res Soc200657526210.1057/palgrave.jors.2601949
- TavanaMA priority assessment multi-criteria decision model for human spaceflight mission planning at NASAJ Opl Res Soc2006571197121510.1057/palgrave.jors.2602107
- Von WinterfeldtDEdwardsWDecision Analysis and Behavioral Research1986
- WeberMDiscussion: Remarks on the paper ‘On the measurement of preferences in the Analytic Hierarchy Process' by AA Salo and RP HämäläinenJ Multi-Crit Decis Anal1997632032110.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199711)6:6<320::AID-MCDA164>3.0.CO;2-2
- YueJChenBWangM-CGenerating ranking groups in the analytical hierarchy processJ Opl Res Soc20065719020110.1057/palgrave.jors.2601975