References
- Ackermann F, Belton V, Shafti S and Wisniewski M (2005). Building a balanced scorecard the OR way. Paper presented at IFORS 2005, Hawaii, USA.
- AkkermansHAvan OorschotKERelevance assumed: A case study of balanced scorecard development using system dynamicsJ Opl Res Soc20055693194110.1057/palgrave.jors.2601923
- AndersenDFRohrbaughJSome conceptual and technical problems in integrating models of judgement with simulation modelsIEEE T Syst Man Cyb1992221213410.1109/21.141308
- BeltonVStewartTJMultiple Criteria Decision Analysis: An Integrated Approach2002
- BititciUSSuwignjoPCarrieASStrategy management through quantitative modelling of performance measurement systemsInt J Prod Econ200169152210.1016/S0925-5273(99)00113-9
- BititciUSTurnerTBegemannCDynamics of performance measurement systemsInt J Opns Prod Mngt20002069270410.1108/01443570010321676
- BohanecMZupanBRajkovicVApplications of qualitative multi-attribute decision models in health careInt J Med Inform20005819120510.1016/S1386-5056(00)00087-3
- BolandTFowlerAA systems perspective of performance management in public sector organisationsInt J Prod Syst Mngt200013417446
- BotsPWGHulshofSDesigning multi-criteria decision analysis processes for priority setting in health policyJ Multi-Crit Decis Anal200091-3567510.1002/1099-1360(200001/05)9:1/3<56::AID-MCDA267>3.0.CO;2-E
- Brailsford SC and Harper P (eds) (2006). OR in health. Special Issue of Eur J Opl Res, forthcoming.
- BrailsfordSCLattimerVATarnarasPTurnbullJCEmergency and on-demand health care: Modelling a large complex systemJ Opl Res Soc2004551344210.1057/palgrave.jors.2601667
- BransJPMacharisCKunschPLChevalierASchwaningerMCombining multicriteria decision aid and system dynamics for the control of socio-economic processes. An iterative real-time procedureEur J Opl Res199810942844110.1016/S0377-2217(98)00068-X
- ChevalierAKunschPLBransJPA contribution to the development of strategic control and planning instruments: An acquisition case studyInt Trans Opl Res200411215516810.1111/j.1475-3995.2004.00448.x
- ClintonBDWebberSAHassellJMImplementing the balanced scorecard using the AHPMngt Acc Quart200233111
- Commission for Health Improvement (2001). National Service Framework Assessments No. 1—NHS Cancer Care in England and Wales. Commission for Health Improvement: London.
- CoyleRGSystem Dynamics Modelling: A Practical Approach1996
- Da SilveiraGSlackNExploring the trade-off conceptInt J Opns Prod Mngt200121794996410.1108/01443570110393432
- Dangerfield BC and Roberts CA (eds) (1999). Health and health care dynamics. Special issue of the Sys Dynam Rev 15(3).
- Davies R and Bensley D (eds) (2005). Meeting health challenges with OR. Special issue of J Opl Res Soc 56(2).
- DavisAO'DonnellJModelling complex problems: System dynamics and performance measurementMngt Acc19977551820
- DennisRLStewartTRMiddletonPDowntonMElyDKeelingMCIntegration of technical and value issues in air quality policy formation: A case studySocio Econ Plann Sci19831739510810.1016/0038-0121(83)90027-7
- Department of Health (1999). A Survey of Radiotherapy Services in England. Department of Health: London.
- Department of Health (2000). The NHS Cancer Plan—A Plan for Investment, A Plan for Reform. Department of Health: London.
- Department of Health (2001). A Survey of Radiotherapy Services in England and Wales (2001). Department of Health: London.
- Department of Health (2002). A Survey of Radiotherapy Services in England and Wales (2002). Department of Health: London.
- DolanJGPatient priorities in colorectal cancer screening decisionsHealth Expect2005833434410.1111/j.1369-7625.2005.00348.x
- DysonRGStrategy, performance and operational researchJ Opl Res Soc200051151110.1057/palgrave.jors.2600916
- FitzgeraldLJohnstonRBrignallSSilvestroRVossCPerformance Measurement in Service Businesses1991
- ForresterJWIndustrial Dynamics1961
- Gardiner PC and Ford A (1980). Which policy run is best, and who says so? In: Legasto AA, Forrester JW and Lyneis JM (eds). System Dynamics: TIMS Studies in the Management Sciences, vol. 14. North-Holland: Amsterdam. pp 241–257.
- GruverWAFordAGardinerPCPublic policy analysis using three systems science techniquesIEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet1984SMC-1435536110.1109/TSMC.1984.6313225
- HammondKRKlitzJKCookRLHow systems analysts can provide more effective assistance to the policy makerJ Appl Syst Anal197852111136
- HammondKRMumpowerJLSmithTHLinking environmental models with models of human judgment: A symmetrical decision aidIEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet1977SMC-735836710.1109/TSMC.1977.4309724
- KaplanRSNortonDPThe balanced scorecard—Measures that drive performanceHarvard Bus Rev19927017179
- KeeneyRLRaiffaHDecisions with Multiple Objectives1976
- KunschPLChevalierABransJPComparing the adaptive control methodology (ACM) to the financial planning practice of a large international groupEur J Opl Res200113247948910.1016/S0377-2217(00)00199-5
- KunschPLSpringaelJBransJPAn adaptive multicriteria control methodology in sustainable development case study: A CO2 ecotaxBelgian J Opns Res Statist Comput Sci199939109143
- LaneDCMonefeldtCRosenheadJVLooking in the wrong place for healthcare improvements: A system dynamics study of an accident and emergency departmentJ Opl Res Soc20005151853110.1057/palgrave.jors.2600892
- LynchRLCrossKFMeasure Up! The Essential Guide to Measuring Business Performance1991
- MapesJNewCSzwejczewskiMPerformance trade-offs in manufacturing plantsInt J Opns Prod Mngt199717101020103310.1108/01443579710177031
- MinHMitraAOswaldSCompetitive benchmarking of health care quality using the analytic hierarchy process: An example from Korean cancer clinicsSocio Econ Plann Sci199731214715910.1016/S0038-0121(96)00021-3
- MosmansAPraetJCDumontCA decision support system for the budgeting of the Belgian health care systemEur J Opl Res200213944946010.1016/S0377-2217(01)00369-1
- MumpowerJVeirsVHammondKRScientific information, social values, and policy formation: The application of simulation models and judgment analysis to the Denver regional air pollution problemIEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet1979SMC-946447610.1109/TSMC.1979.4310272
- NeelyAAdamsCCrowePThe performance prism in practiceMeasur Bus Excell20015261310.1108/13683040110385142
- NeelyAAdamsCKennerleyMThe Performance Prism: The Scorecard for Measuring and Managing Business Success2002
- NHS Executive (1999). The NHS Performance Assessment Framework. NHS Executive: London.
- OlsonDLDimitrova-DavidovaPStoykovISystem dynamics model of a transition firmManage Fin20053136780
- RabeloLEskandariHShalanTHelalMProceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference. Orlando: Florida2005
- RangoneAAn analytical hierarchy process framework for comparing the overall performance of manufacturing departmentsInt J Opns Prod Mngt199616810411910.1108/01443579610125804
- Reagan-CirincionePSchumanSRichardsonGPDorfSADecision modeling: Tools for strategic thinkingInterfaces1991216526510.1287/inte.21.6.52
- RichardsonGPProblems with causal-loop diagramsSyst Dynam Rev19862215817010.1002/sdr.4260020207
- RichardsonGPProblems in causal-loop diagrams revisitedSyst Dynam Rev199713324725210.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199723)13:3<247::AID-SDR128>3.0.CO;2-9
- Rosas-FlungerRProceedings of the 18th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Bergen, Norway2000176177
- SantosSPBeltonVHowickSAdding value to performance measurement by using system dynamics and multicriteria analysisInt J Opns Prod Mngt2002221246127210.1108/01443570210450284
- SchmidtMJGaryMSCombining system dynamics and conjoint analysis for strategic decision making with an automotive high-tech SMESyst Dynam Rev20021835937910.1002/sdr.257
- ShutlerMStorbeckJPerformance management (Part Special Issue Editorial)J Opl Res Soc20025324524610.1057/palgrave.jors.2601345
- SmithPCGoddardMPerformance management and operational research: A marriage made in heaven?J Opl Res Soc20025324725510.1057/palgrave.jors.2601279
- SpringaelJKunschPLBransJPA multicriteria based system dynamics modelling of traffic congestion caused by urban commutersCentral European J Opns Res20021018197
- StermanJDBusiness Dynamics Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World2000
- Tatikonda LU, Tatikonda RJ (1998). We need dynamic performance measures. Mngt Acc. September: 49–53.
- von WinterfeldtDEdwardsWDecision Analysis and Behavioural Research1986
- WisnerJDFawcettSELinking firm strategy to operating decisions through performance measurementProd Invent Mngt1991323511
- WolstenholmeEFA patient flow perspective of UK health services: Exploring the case for new ‘intermediate care’ initiativesSyst Dynam Rev19991525327110.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199923)15:3<253::AID-SDR172>3.0.CO;2-P