References
- ArkseyHO’MalleyLScoping studies: towards a methodological frameworkInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology200581193210.1080/1364557032000119616
- AveyardHDoing a literature review in health and social care: a practical guide2014UKMcGraw-Hill Education
- AytugZGRothsteinHRZhouWKernMCRevealed or concealed?Transparency of procedures, decisions, and judgment calls in meta-analyses, Organizational Research Methods2012151103133
- BakerMJWriting a literature review. MarketingReview200012219247
- Bandara W, Furtmuller E, Gorbacheva E, Miskon S and Beekhuyzen J (2015) Achieving rigour in literature reviews: insights from qualitative data analysis and tool-support. Communications of the Association for Information Systems37, 8.
- BarkiHHartwickJRethinking the concept of user involvementMIS Quarterly1989131536310.2307/248700
- Baumeister RF (2013) Writing a literature review. In The Portable Mentor, pp 119–132. Springer, New York.
- BenbasatIWeberRResearch commentary: Rethinking “diversity” in information systems researchInformation Systems Research19967438939910.1287/isre.7.4.389
- BoellSKCecez-KecmanovicDOn being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews in ISJournal of Information Technology201530216117310.1057/jit.2014.26
- BoellSCecez-KecmanovicDDebating systematic literature reviews (SLR) and their ramifications for IS: a rejoinder to Mike Chiasson, and Richard WatsonJournal of Information Technology201530218819310.1057/jit.2015.15
- Booth A, Papaioannou D and Sutton A (2012) Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Sage, London.
- Borko H, Liston D and Whitcomb JA (2007) Genres of empirical research in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education58(1), 3.
- CampbellDTSchilppPAEvolutionary EpistemologyThe Philosophy of Karl Popper1974LaSalle, ILOpen Court413463
- CampbellRPoundPMorganMDaker-WhiteGBrittenNPillRYardleyLPopeCDonovanJEvaluating meta-ethnography: systematic analysis and synthesis of qualitative researchHealth Technology Assessment20111543116410.3310/hta15430
- CheungCThadaniDThe impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: a literature analysis and integrative modelDecision Support Systems201254146147010.1016/j.dss.2012.06.008
- ChiassonMAvoiding methodological overdose: a declaration for independent endsJournal of Information Technology201530217417610.1057/jit.2015.11
- ChuaWFRadical developments in accounting thoughtThe Accounting Review1986614601632
- ConnVSIsaramalaiSARathSJantarakuptPWadhawanRDashYBeyond MEDLINE for literature searchesJournal of Nursing Scholarship200335217718210.1111/j.1547-5069.2003.00177.x
- CooperHMOrganizing knowledge syntheses: a taxonomy of literature reviewsKnowledge, Technology & Policy19881110412610.1007/BF03177550
- Cooper HM (2010) Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis: A Step-by-Step Approach, 4th edn. Sage, London.
- Cooper HM and Hedges L (2009) Research synthesis as a scientific process. In The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-analysis (Cooper H, Hedges L and Valentine L, Eds), pp 3–16. Russell Sage Foundation, London.
- CurranPJThe seemingly quixotic pursuit of a cumulative psychological sciencePsychological Methods200914778010.1037/a0015972
- D’ArcyJHerathTA review and analysis of deterrence theory in the IS security literature: making sense of the disparate findingsEuropean Journal of Information Systems20112064365810.1057/ejis.2011.23
- DaudtHMMosselCScottSJEnhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s frameworkBMC Medical Research Methodology2013134810.1186/1471-2288-13-48
- DeeksJJDinnesJD’amicoRSowdenAJSakarovitchCSongFPetticrewMAltmanDJEvaluating non-randomised intervention studiesHealth Technology Assessment2003727117910.3310/hta7270
- Dixon-WoodsMBonasSBoothAJonesDRMillerTSuttonAJShawRLSmithJAYoungBHow can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research?A critical perspective. Qualitative Research2006612744
- DubéLParéGRigor in information systems positivist case research: current practices, trends, and recommendationsMIS Quarterly2003274597636
- EdwardsAElwynGHoodKRollnickSJudging the ‘weighting of evidence’ in systematic reviews: introducing the rigour into the qualitative overview stage by assessing signal and noiseJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice2000617718410.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00212.x
- FishbeinMAjzenIBelief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research1975Reading, MAAddison-Wesley
- GarvinDAWhat does “product quality” really mean?Sloan Management Review19842612543
- GarvinDACompeting on the eight dimensions of qualityHarvard Business Review1987656101109
- GoughDThomasJOliverSClarifying differences between review designs and methodsSystematic Reviews201211283610.1186/2046-4053-1-28
- GreenhalghTPeacockREffectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sourcesBritish Medical Journal200533175241064106510.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68
- GreenhalghTRobertGMacfarlaneFBatePKyriakidouOPeacockRStorylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic reviewSocial Science & Medicine200561241743010.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.001
- GuyattGOxmanADAklEAKunzRVistGBrozekJet alGRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tablesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology201164438339410.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026
- HartCDoing a literature search: A comprehensive guide for the social sciences2001London, SageThousand Oaks
- HigginsJPTAltmanDGAssessing risk of bias. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series. Higgins JPT, Green S, (editors). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & SonsLtd20082008187241
- HigginsJGreenSCochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions2008ChichesterWiley-Blackwell
- Hirschheim RA and Klein HK (2006) Crisis in the IS field? A critical reflection on the state of the discipline. In Information Systems: The State of the Field (King JL and Lyytinen K, Eds), Chapter 5, pp 71–146.: Wiley, Chichester, UK.
- HoonCMeta-synthesis of qualitative case studies: an approach to theory buildingOrganizational Research Methods201316452255610.1177/1094428113484969
- Houy C, Fettke P and Loos P (2015) Stylized facts as an instrument for literature review and cumulative information systems research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems37, 10.
- JarvenpaaSLDicksonGWDeSanctisGMethodological issues in experimental IS research: experiences and recommendationsMIS Quarterly19859214115610.2307/249115
- KeutelMMichalikBRichterJTowards mindful case study research in IS: a critical analysis of the past ten yearsEuropean Journal of Information Systems20142325627210.1057/ejis.2013.26
- KingWRHeJUnderstanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in IS researchCommunications of the Association for Information Systems2005161665686
- KitchenhamBBreretonOPBudgenDTurnerMBaileyJLinkmanSSystematic literature reviews in software engineering – a systematic literature reviewInformation and Software Technology200951171510.1016/j.infsof.2008.09.009
- Kitchenham B and Charters S (2007) Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. EBSE Technical Report. http://www.dur.ac.uk/ebse/resources/guidelines/Systematic-reviews-5-8.pdf
- KitsiouSParéGJaanaMSystematic reviews and meta-analyses of home telemonitoring interventions for patients with chronic diseases: a critical assessment of their methodological qualityJournal of Medical Internet Research2013157e15010.2196/jmir.2770
- Klein HK (2003) Crisis in the IS field? A critical reflection on the state of the discipline. Journal of the Association for Information Systems4, 10.
- KleinHKMyersMDA set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systemsMIS Quarterly1999231679310.2307/249410
- KuhnTSThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions1962Chicago, ILUniversity of Chicago
- LeeRPHartRIWatsonRMRapleyTQualitative synthesis in practice: some pragmatics of meta-ethnographyQualitative Research201515333435010.1177/1468794114524221
- Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine151(4), W-65.
- LincolnYSGubaEANaturalistic Inquiry1985Beverly Hills, CASage
- LongAFGodfreyMAn evaluation tool to assess the quality of qualitative research studiesInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology20047218119610.1080/1364557032000045302
- MarchSTSmithGFDesign and natural science research on information technologyDecision Support Systems199515425126610.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2
- MingersJMutchAWillcocksLCritical realism in information systems researchMIS Quarterly2013373795802
- MoherDShamseerLClarkeMGhersiDLiberatiAPetticrewMet alPreferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statementSystematic Reviews201541110.1186/2046-4053-4-1
- NewbertSLDavidRJHanSKRarely pure and never simple: assessing cumulative evidence in strategic managementStrategic Organization201412214215410.1177/1476127014529895
- Noblit GW and Hare RD (1988) Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing Qualitative Studies (vol. 11). Sage, London.
- Oates B (2011) Evidence-based information systems: a decade later. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems, Paper no. 222. Helsinki, Finland.
- OatesBOn systematic reviews for evidence-based practiceJournal of Information Technology201530217717910.1057/jit.2015.9
- Okoli C (2015a) A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems37, 43.
- Okoli C (2015b) The view from giants’ shoulders: developing theory with theory-mining systematic literature reviews. Working Paper. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2699362.
- OxmanADGuyattGHValidation of an index of the quality of review articlesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology199144111271127810.1016/0895-4356(91)90160-B
- ParéGCameronAFPoba-NzaouPTemplierMA systematic assessment of rigor in information systems ranking-type Delphi studiesInformation & Management201350520721710.1016/j.im.2013.03.003
- ParéGTrudelMCJaanaMKitsiouSSynthesizing information systems knowledge: a typology of literature reviewsInformation & Management201552218319910.1016/j.im.2014.08.008
- PawsonRGreenhalghTHarveyGWalsheKRealist review–a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventionsJournal of Health Services Research & Policy200510suppl 1213410.1258/1355819054308530
- PentlandBTInformation systems and organizational learning: the social epistemology of organizational knowledge systemsAccounting, Management and Information Technologies19955112110.1016/0959-8022(95)90011-X
- PetterSStraubDRaiASpecifying formative constructs in information systems researchMIS Quarterly2007314623656
- PetticrewMMcCartneyGUsing systematic reviews to separate scientific from policy debate relevant to climate changeAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine201140557657810.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.022
- Petticrew M and Roberts H (2006) Why do we need systematic reviews? In: Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide, chapter 1, pp 1–26. Blackwell Publishing Co, Malden, MA
- PinsonneaultAKraemerKLSurvey research methodology in management information systems: an assessmentJournal of Management Information Systems19931027510510.1080/07421222.1993.11518001
- RaginCThe comparative method. Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies1987BerkeleyUniversity of California Press
- RavichandranTLertwongsatienCLertwongsatienCEffect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: a resource-based perspectiveJournal of Management Information Systems2005214237276
- ReevesCBednarDDefining quality: alternatives and implicationsThe Academy of Management Review1994193419445
- RivardSLapointeLInformation technology implementers’ responses to user resistance: nature and effectsMIS Quarterly2012363897920
- RousseauDMManningJDenyerDEvidence in management and organizational science: assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through synthesesThe Academy of Management Annals20082147551510.1080/19416520802211651
- RoweFWhat literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendationsEuropean Journal of Information Systems201423324125510.1057/ejis.2014.7
- SandelowskiMBarrosoJCreating metasummaries of qualitative findingsNursing Research200352422623310.1097/00006199-200307000-00004
- SandelowskiMVoilsCILeemanJCrandellJLMapping the mixed methods–mixed research synthesis terrainJournal of Mixed Methods Research20126431733110.1177/1558689811427913
- Schryen G (2015) Writing qualitative IS literature reviews – guidelines for synthesis, interpretation, and guidance of research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems37, 12.
- SchultzeUSkirting SLR’s language trap: reframing the ‘systematic’ vs ‘traditional’ Literature review opposition as a continuumJournal of Information Technology201530218018410.1057/jit.2015.10
- SheaBJHamelCWellsGABouterLMKristjanssonEGrimshawJBoersMAMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology200962101013102010.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009
- ShortJThe art of writing a review articleJournal of Management20093561312131710.1177/0149206309337489
- SivoSASaundersCChangQJiangJJHow low should you go? Low response rates and the validity of inference in IS questionnaire researchJournal of the Association for Information Systems20067617
- StraubDWValidating instruments in MIS researchMIS Quarterly198913214716910.2307/248922
- Straub DW, Boudreau MC and Gefen D (2004) Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems13, 63.
- SylvesterATateMJohnstoneDBeyond synthesis: re-presenting heterogeneous research literatureBehaviour & Information Technology201332121199121510.1080/0144929X.2011.624633
- Tate M, Furtmueller E, Evermann J and Bandara W (2015) Introduction to the special issue: the literature review in information systems. Communications of the Association for Information Systems37, 5.
- Templier M and Paré G (2015) A framework for guiding and evaluating literature reviews. Communications of the Association for Information Systems37, 6.
- TorracoRJWriting integrative literature reviews: guidelines and examplesHuman Resource Development Review20054335636710.1177/1534484305278283
- TurnerMKitchenhamBBreretonPChartersSBudgenDDoes the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature reviewInformation and Software Technology201052546347910.1016/j.infsof.2009.11.005
- Valanides N and Charoula A (2008) An exploratory study about the role of epistemological beliefs and dispositions on learners’ thinking about an iII-defined issue in solo and duo problem-solving contexts. In Knowing, Knowledge and Beliefs, pp 197–218. Springer, Netherlands.
- VickersMInformation technology development methodologies towards a non-positivist, developmental paradigmThe Journal of Management Development199918325527210.1108/02621719910261148
- vom BrockeJSimonsANiehavesBRiemerKPlattfautRClevenAReconstructing the giant: on the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search processProceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems2009922062217
- vom Brocke J, Simons A, Riemer K, Niehaves B, Plattfaut R and Cleven A (2015) Standing on the shoulders of giants: challenges and recommendations of literature search in information systems research, Communications of the Association for Information Systems37, 9.
- WalkerLOAvantKCStrategies for Theory Construction in Nursing2010San Francisco, CAPrentice Hall
- Wall JD, Stahl BC and Salam AF (2015) Critical discourse analysis as a review methodology: an empirical example, Communications of the Association for Information Systems37, 11.
- Ward S and Read L (1983) “Introduction” In Knowledge Structure and Use: Implications for Synthesis and Interpretation (Ward S and Read L, Eds), pp1–18. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
- WatsonRBeyond being systematic in literature reviews in ISJournal of Information Technology201530218518710.1057/jit.2015.12
- Webster J and Watson RT (2002) Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly26(2), xiii–xxiii.
- WolfswinkelJFFurtmuellerEWilderomCPUsing grounded theory as a method for rigorously reviewing literatureEuropean Journal of Information Systems2013221455510.1057/ejis.2011.51
- Wong G, Greenhalgh T, Westhorp G, Buckingham J and Pawson R (2013) RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses. BMC Medicine11(1), 1.