Airborne electromagnetic modelling options and their consequences in target definition

References

• Auken E. Christiansen A. V. 2004 Layered and laterally constrained 2D inversion of resistivity data: Geophysics 69 752 761 10.1190/1.1759461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auken E. Christiansen A. V. Westergaard J. H. Kirkegaard C. Foged N. Viezzoli A. 2009 An integrated processing scheme for high-resolution airborne electromagnetic surveys, the SkyTEM system: Exploration Geophysics 40 184 192 10.1071/EG08128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auken E Christiansen A Kirkegaard C Fiandaca G Schamper C Behroozmand A Binley A Nielsen E Effersø F Christensen N Sørensen K Foged N Vignoli G 2014 An overview of a highly versatile forward and stable inverse algorithm for airborne, ground-based and borehole electromagnetic and electric data: Exploration Geophysics in press. 10.1071/EG13097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodie, R. C., 2012, Appendix 3: GA-LEI inversion of TEMPEST data, in I. C. Roach, ed., The Frome airborne electromagnetic survey, South Australia: implications for energy, minerals and regional geology: Geoscience Australia Record 2012/40-DMITRE Report Book 2012/00003, 278–287.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen N. 2002 A generic 1-D imaging method for transient electromagnetic data: Geophysics 67 438 447 10.1190/1.1468603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen N. B. Lawrie K. C. 2012 Resolution analyses for selecting an appropriate airborne electromagnetic (AEM) system: Exploration Geophysics 43 213 227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen A. V. Auken E. 2012 A global measure for depth of investigation: Geophysics 77 WB171 WB177 10.1190/geo2011-0393.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, L. H., and Zhdanov, M. S., 2007, Large scale 3D inversion of HEM data using a moving footprint: presented at SEG International Exposition and 77th Annual Meeting, San Antonio.
   Google Scholar
• Cox L. H. Wilson G. A. Zhdanov M. S. 2010 3D inversion of airborne electromagnetic data using a moving footprint: Exploration Geophysics 41 250 259 10.1071/EG10003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox L. Wilson G. Zhdanov M. 2012 3D inversion of airborne electromagnetic data: Geophysics 77 WB59 WB69 10.1190/geo2011-0370.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drexel, J. F., and Preiss, W. V., 1993, The geology of South Australia: volume 1, The Precambrian: Australian Geological Survey Organisation Bulletin 54.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis R. G. 1998 Inversion of airborne electromagnetic data: Exploration Geophysics 29 121 127 10.1071/EG998121
   Google Scholar
• EMIT, 2014, Maxwell modeling, presentation and visualization of EM and electrical geophysical data. Available at http://www.electromag.com.au/maxwell.php (accessed 12 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Glikson, A. Y., Stewart, A. J., Ballhaus, C. G., Clarke, G. L., Feeken, E. H. J., Leven, J. H., Sheraton, J. W., and Sun, S. S., 1996, Geology of the western Musgrave Block, central Australia, with particular reference to the mafic-ultramafic Giles Complex: Australian Geological Survey Organisation Bulletin 239, 205 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Green, A., and Lane, R., 2003, Estimating noise levels in AEM data: ASEG 16th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Extended Abstracts, 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Guillemoteau J. Sailhac P. Béhaegel M. 2011 Regularization strategy for the layered inversion of airborne transient electromagnetic data: application to in-loop data acquired over the basin of Franceville (Gabon): Geophysical Prospecting 59 1132 1143 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00990.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillemoteau J. Sailhac P. Behaegel M. 2012 Fast approximate 2D inversion of airborne TEM data: Born approximation and empirical approach: Geophysics 77 WB89 WB97 10.1190/geo2011-0372.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson D. K. Roach I. C. Costelloe M. T. 2010 Depth of investigation grid for regional airborne electromagnetic surveys: Preview 2010 145 38 39
   Google Scholar
• Kratzer T. Macnae J. Mutton P. 2013 Detection and correction of SPM effects in airborne EM surveys: Exploration Geophysics 44 6 15 10.1071/EG12048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamontagne, Y., 2014, EM modelling with Multiloop. Available at: http://www.lamontagnegeophysics.com/products-multiloop-home.html (accessed 12 September 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Lane, R., Brodie, R. C., and Fitzpatrick, A., 2004, Constrained inversion of AEM data from the Lower Balonne area, Southern Queensland, Australia: Cooperative Research Centre for Landscapes, Environment and Mineral Exploration Open-file Report 163.
   Google Scholar
• Last B. Kubik K. 1983 Compact gravity inversion: Geophysics 48 713 721 10.1190/1.1441501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ley-Cooper, A. Y., and Brodie, C., 2013, Inversion of Spectrem AEM data for conductivity and system geometry: ASEG Extended Abstracts, 2013(1), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Ley-Cooper Y. Macnae J. Viezzoli A. 2010 Breaks in lithology: interpretation problems when handling 2D structures with a 1D approximation: Geophysics 75 WA179 WA188 10.1190/1.3483101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnae J. King A. Soltz N. Osmakoff A. Blaha A. 1998 Fast AEM data processing and inversion: Exploration Geophysics 29 163 169 10.1071/EG998163
   Google Scholar
• Oldenburg D. W. Li Y. 1999 Estimating depth of investigation in DC resistivity and IP surveys: Geophysics 64 403 416 10.1190/1.1444545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portniaguine O. Zhdanov M. 1999 Focusing geophysical inversion images: Geophysics 64 874 887 10.1190/1.1444596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sattel, D., 2009, An overview of helicopter time-domain EM systems: ASEG Extended Abstracts, 2009(1), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Smith R. S. Annan A. P. McGowan P. D. 2001 A comparison of data from airborne, semi-airborne, and ground electromagnetic systems: Geophysics 66 1379 1385 10.1190/1.1487084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viezzoli A. Christiansen A. V. Auken E. Sorensen K. 2008 Quasi-3D modeling of airborne TEM data by spatially constrained inversion: Geophysics 73 F105 F113 10.1190/1.2895521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignoli G. Strobbia C. Cassiani G. Vermeer P. 2011 Statistical multioffset phase analysis for surface-wave processing in laterally varying media: Geophysics 76 U1 U11 10.1190/1.3542076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignoli G. Fiandaca G. Christiansen A. V. Kirkegaard C. Auken E. 2014 Sharp Spatially Constrained Inversion (sSCI) with applications to transient electromagnetic data: Geophysical Prospecting in press.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhdanov, M. S., 2002, Geophysical inverse theory and regularization problems: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Zhdanov, M. S., 2009, Geophysical electromagnetic theory and methods: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Zhdanov M. S. Vignoli G. Ueda T. 2006 Sharp boundary inversion in crosswell travel-time tomography: Journal of Geophysics and Engineering 3 122 134 10.1088/1742-2132/3/2/003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar