An efficient hybrid scheme for fast and accurate inversion of airborne transient electromagnetic data

References

• Allard, M., 2007, On the origin of the HTEM species, in B. Milkereit, ed., Proceedings of Exploration 07: Fifth Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration: Decennial Mineral Exploration Conferences, 355–374.
   Google Scholar
• Auken E. Christiansen A. V. 2004 Layered and laterally constrained 2D inversion of resistivity data: Geophysics 69 752 761 10.1190/1.1759461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auken E. Christiansen A. V. Jacobsen L. Sørensen K. I. 2008 A resolution study of buried valleys using laterally constrained inversion of TEM data: Journal of Applied Geophysics 65 10 20 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auken E. Christiansen A. V. Kirkegaard C. Fiandaca G. Schamper C. Behroozmand A. A. Binley A. Nielsen E. Effersø F. Christensen N. B. Sørensen K. I. Foged N. Vignoli G. 2014 An overview of a highly versatile forward and stable inverse algorithm for airborne, ground-based and borehole electromagnetic and electric data: Exploration Geophysics 10.1071/EG13097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broyden C. G. 1965 A class of methods for solving nonlinear simultaneous equations: Mathematics of Computation 19 577 593 10.1090/S0025-5718-1965-0198670-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen N. B. 1997 Electromagnetic subsurface imaging. A case for adaptive Born approximation: Surveys in Geophysics 18 477 510 10.1023/A:1006593408478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen N. B. Reid J. E. Halkjaer M. 2009 Fast, laterally smooth inversion of airborne time-domain electromagnetic data: Near Surface Geophysics 7 599 612 10.3997/1873-0604.2009047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen A. V. Auken E. 2004 Optimizing a layered and laterally constrained 2D inversion of resistivity data using Broyden’s update and 1D derivatives: Journal of Applied Geophysics 56 247 261 10.1016/S0926-9851(04)00055-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen A. V. Auken E. 2012 A global measure for depth of investigation: Geophysics 77 WB171 WB177 10.1190/geo2011-0393.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen A. V. Auken E. Viezzoli A. 2011 Quantification of modeling errors in airborne TEM caused by inaccurate system description: Geophysics 76 F43 F52 10.1190/1.3511354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox L. H. Wilson G. A. Zhdanov M. S. 2010 3D inversion of airborne electromagnetic data using a moving footprint: Exploration Geophysics 41 250 259 10.1071/EG10003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haber E. Ascher U. M. Oldenburg D. 2000 On optimization techniques for solving nonlinear inverse problems: Inverse Problems 16 1263 1280 10.1088/0266-5611/16/5/309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbo, M. S., Pedersen, J., Johnsen, R., and Petersen, K., eds., 2011, Groundwater in a future climate: Danish Ministry of the Environment Nature Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Hestenes M. R. Stiefel E. 1952 Methods of conjugate gradients for solving linear systems: Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards 49 409 436 10.6028/jres.049.044
   Google Scholar
• Huang H. Fraser D. C. 1996 The differential parameter method for multifrequency airborne resistivity mapping: Geophysics 61 100 109 10.1190/1.1574674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang H. Palacky G. J. 1991 Damped least-squares inversion of time-domain airborne EM data based on singular value decomposition: Geophysical Prospecting 39 827 844 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1991.tb00346.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen F. Scheer W. Thomsen S. Sonnenborg T. O. Hinsby K. Wiederhold H. Schamper C. Roth B. Kirsch R. Auken E. 2012 Transboundary geophysical mapping of geological elements and salinity distribution critical for the assessment of future sea water intrusion in response to sea level rise: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 16 1845 1862 10.5194/hess-16-1845-2012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkegaard C. Auken E. 2015 A parallel, scalable and memory efficient inversion code for very large scale airborne EM surveys: Geophysical Prospecting 63 495 507 10.1111/1365-2478.12200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkegaard C. Sonnenborg T. O. Auken E. Flemming J. 2011 Salinity distribution in heterogeneous coastal aquifers mapped by airborne electromagnetics: Vadose Zone Journal 10 125 135 10.2136/vzj2010.0038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkegaard C. Foged N. Auken E. Christiansen A. V. Sørensen K. I. 2012 On the value of including x-component data in 1D modeling of electromagnetic data from helicopterborne time domain systems in horizontally layered environments: Journal of Applied Geophysics 84 61 69 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2012.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legault, J. M., Witter, J. B., Berardelli, P., Lombardo, S., and Orta, M., 2011, Recent ZTEM airborne AFMAG EM survey results over Reese River and other geothermal test areas: Geothermal Resources Council 2011 Annual Meeting, 23–26 October 2011, San Diego, California, 35, 879–884.
   Google Scholar
• Ley-Cooper A. Y. Viezzoli A. Guillemoteau J. Vignoli G. Macnae J. Cox L. Munday T. 2015 Airborne electromagnetic modelling options and their consequences in target definition: Exploration Geophysics 46 74 84 10.1071/EG14045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loke M. H. Barker R. D. 1996 Rapid least squares inversion of apparent resistivity pseudosections by a quasi-Newton method: Geophysical Prospecting 44 131 152 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1996.tb00142.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnae J. King A. Stolz N. Osmakoff A. Blaha A. 1998 Fast AEM data processing and inversion: Exploration Geophysics 29 163 169 10.1071/EG998163
   Google Scholar
• Marquardt D. 1963 An algorithm for least squares estimation of nonlinear parameters: SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 11 431 441 10.1137/0111030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minsley, B., Cox, L. H., Brodie, R., Wilson, G. A., Abraham, J. D., and Zhdanov, M. S., 2012, A comparison of AEM inversion methods for discontinuous permafrost at Fort Yukon, Alaska: Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems, SAGEEP, Tuscon, Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Oldenburg D. W. Ellis R. G. 1991 Inversion of geophysical data using an approximate inverse mapping: Geophysical Journal International 105 325 353 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb06717.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfaffhuber A. A. Monstad S. Rudd J. 2009 Airborne electromagnetic hydrocarbon mapping in Mozambique: Exploration Geophysics 40 237 245 10.1071/EG09011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plessix R. E. 2006 A review of the adjoint-state method for computing the gradient of a functional with geophysical applications: Geophysical Journal International 167 495 503 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2006.02978.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romdhane A. Grandjean G. Brossier R. M. Rejiba F. Operto S. Vineux J. 2011 Shallow structure characterization by 2D elastic full-waveform inversion: Geophysics 76 R81 R93 10.1190/1.3569798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengpiel K. P. Siemon B. 2000 Advanced inversion methods for airborne electromagnetic exploration: Geophysics 65 1983 1992 10.1190/1.1444882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemon B Christiansen A. V. Auken E 2009 A review of helicopter-borne electromagnetic methods for groundwater exploration: Near Surface Geophysics 7 629 646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen K. I. Auken E. 2004 SkyTEM – a new high-resolution helicopter transient electromagnetic system: Exploration Geophysics 35 191 199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torres-Verdín C. Druskin V. L. Fang S. Knizhnerman L. A. Malinverno A. 2000 A dual-grid nonlinear inversion technique with applications to the interpretation of dc resistivity data: Geophysics 65 1733 1745 10.1190/1.1444858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viezzoli A. Christiansen A. V. Auken E. Sørensen K. I. 2008 Quasi-3D modeling of airborne TEM data by spatially constrained inversion: Geophysics 73 F105 F113 10.1190/1.2895521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viezzoli A. Munday T. Auken E. Christiansen A. V. 2010 Accurate quasi 3D versus practical full 3D inversion of AEM data – the Bookpurnong case study: Preview 149 23 31
   Google Scholar
• Ward, S. H., and Hohmann, G. W., 1988, Electromagnetic theory for geophysical applications, in M. N. Nabighian, ed., Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics: Society of Exploration Geophysicists (SEG), 131–311.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson G. A. Raiche A. Sugeng F. 2006 2.5D inversion of airborne electromagnetic data: Exploration Geophysics 37 363 371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhdanov, M. S., 2002, Geophysical inverse theory and regularization problems: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar