Song variation and habitat structure in the Golden Bowerbird

References

• Anderson, M., and Connor, R. (1985). Northern cardinal song in three forest habitats in eastern Texas. Wilson Bulletin 97, 436–449.
   Google Scholar
• Badayev, A. V, and Leaf, E. S. (1997). Habitat associations of characteristics in Phylloscopus and Hippolais warblers. Auk 114, 40–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baptista, L. F. (1996). Nature and its nurturing in avian vocal development. In ‘Ecology and Evolution of Acoustical Communication in Birds’. (Eds D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller.) pp. 39–60. (Comstock Publishing Associates: Ithaca, NY.)
   Google Scholar
• Beecher, M. D., Campbell, S. E., and Stoddard, P. K. (1994). Correlation of song learning and territory establishment strategies in the song sparrow. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 91, 1450–1454. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.4.1450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beecher, M. D., Stoddard, P. K., Campbell, S. E., and Horning, C. L. (1996). Repertoire matching between neighbouring song sparrows. Animal Behaviour 51, 917–923. doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, J., and Vehrencamp, S. (1998). ‘Principles of Animal Communication.’ (Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA.)
   Google Scholar
• Catchpole, C. K., and Slater, P. J. B. (1995). ‘Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations.’ (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.)
   Google Scholar
• Chapuis, C. (1971). Un exemple de l'influence du milieu sur les émissions vocales des Oiseaux: l'évolution des chants en forêt équatoriale. La Terre et la Vie 2, 183–217.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, C. W., Marler, P., and Beeman, K. (1987). Quantitative analysis of animal vocal phonology: an application to swamp sparrow song. Ethology 76, 101–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabelsteen, T., Larsen, O., and Pedersen, S. (1993). Habitat induced degradation of sound signals: quantifying the effects of communication sounds and bird location on blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal-to-noise ratio in blackbird song. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 93, 2206–2220. doi:10.1121/1.406682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniel, J. C., and Blumstein, D. T. (1998). A test of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis in four species of marmots. Animal Behaviour 56, 1517–1528. doi:10.1006/anbe.1998.0929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deecke, V B., Slater, P. J. B., and Ford, J. K. B. (2002). Selective habit- uation shapes acoustic predator recognition in harbour seals. Nature 420, 171–173. doi:10.1038/nature01030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doutrelant, C., and Lambrechts, M. M. (2001). Macrogeographic variation in song—a test of competition and habitat effects in blue tits. Ethology 107, 533–544. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00688.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotheringham, J. R., Martin, P. R., and Ratcliffe, L. (1997). Song transmission and auditory perception of distance in wood warblers (Parulinae). Animal Behaviour 53, 1271–1285. doi:10.1006/anbe.1996.0361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, C. B., and Frith, D. W. (2000a). Bower system and structures of the golden bowerbird, Prionodura newtoniana (Ptilonorhynchidae). Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 45, 293–316.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, C. B., and Frith, D. W. (2000b). Attendance levels and behaviour at bowers by male golden bowerbird, Prionodura newtoniana (Ptilonorhynchidae). Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 45, 317–341.
   Google Scholar
• Frith, C. B., and Frith, D. W. (2000c). Home range and associated socio-biology and ecology of male golden bowerbird, Prionodura newtoniana (Ptilonorhynchidae). Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 45, 343–357.
   Google Scholar
• Handford, P., and Lougheed, S. C. (1991). Variation in duration and frequency character in the song of the rufous-collared sparrow Zonotrichia capensis, with respect to habitat, trill dialects and body size. Condor 93, 644–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, P. (1979). Vocal learning: its role in adapting sound structures to long-distance propagation, and a hypothesis on its evolution. Animal Behaviour 27, 1270–1271. doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(79)90073–3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, M., and Krebs, J. (1979). Geographical variation in the song of the great tit (Parus major) in relation to ecological factors. Journal ofAnimal Ecology 48, 759–785. doi:10.2307/4194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, D. E. (2000). Song variation in an avian ring species. Evolution 54, 998–1010. doi:10.1554/0014-3820(2000)054[0998:SVIAAR]2.3.CO;2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kime, N., Turner, W., and Ryan, M. (2000). The transmission of advertisement calls in Central American frogs. Behavioral Ecology 11, 71–83. doi:10.1093/beheco/11.1.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lack, D., and Southern, H. N. (1949). Birds on Tenerife. Ibis 91, 607–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langmore, N. E. (1999). Song tutor choice in polyandrous dunnocks. Ethology 105, 125–136. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.1999.00367.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Roux, A., Jackson, T. P., and Cherry, M. I. (2002). Differences in alarm vocalizations of sympatric populations of the whistling rats, Paratomys brantsii and P. littledalei (Rodentia: Muridae). Journal of Zoology 257, 189–194. doi:10.1017/S09528369082000791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemon, R. E., Struger, J., Lechowicz, M. J., and Norman, R. F. (1981). Song features and singing heights of American warblers: maximization or optimization of distance. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 69, 1169–1176. doi:10.1121/1.385697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marler, P. (1997). Three models of song learning: evidence from behavior. Journal of Neurobiology 33, 501–516. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(19971105)33:5<501::AID-NEU2>3.0.CO;2-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, A. J. (1954). ‘Bower-birds: Their Displays and Breeding Cycles.’ (Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.)
   Google Scholar
• Martens, J. (1996). Vocalizations and speciation in Palearctic birds. In ‘Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds’. (Eds D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller.) pp. 221–240. (Comstock Publishing Associates: Ithaca, NY.)
   Google Scholar
• Mathevon, N., and Aubin, T. (1997). Reaction to conspecific degraded song by the wren Troglodytes troglodytes: territorial response and choice of song post. Behavioural Processes 39, 77–84. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00046-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathevon, N., and Aubin, T. (2001). Sound-based species-specific recognition in the blackcap, Sylvia atricapilla, show high tolerance to signal modifications. Behaviour 138, 511–524. doi: 10.1163/156853901750382133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathevon, N., Aubin, T., and Dabelsteen, T. (1996). Song degradation during propagation: importance of song post for the wren Troglodytes troglodytes. Ethology 102, 397–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathevon, N., Dabelsteen, T., and Blumenrath, S. (2005). Are high perches in the Blackcap Sylvia atricapilla song or listening posts? A sound transmission study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117, 442–449. doi:10.1121/1.1828805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, P. K. (1993). Signalling in territorial systems—a context for individual identification, ranging and eavesdropping. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 340, 237–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, P. K., and Falls, J. B. (1984). The response of western mead- owlarks (Sturnella neglecta) to the playback of undegraded and degraded song. Canadian Journal of Zoology 62, 2125–2168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, P. K., Krebs, J. R., and Ratcliffe, L. M. (1983). The reaction of great tits (Parus major) to playback of degraded and undegraded songs: the effect of familiarity with the stimulus song type. Auk 100, 898–906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, E. S. (1975). Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. American Naturalist 109, 17–34. doi:10.1086/282971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagle, L., and Kreutzer, M. L. (1997). Song tutoring influences female song preferences in domesticated canaries. Behaviour 134, 89–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naguib, M. (1996). Auditory distance estimation in song birds: implications, methodologies and perspectives. Behavioural Processes 38, 163–168. doi:10.1016/0376-6357(95)00077-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naguib, M., Hammerschmidt, K., and Wirth, J. (2001). Micro-geographic variation, habitat effects and individual signature cues in calls of chiffchaffs, Phylloscopus collybita canarensis. Ethology 107, 341–355. doi:10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00669.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeth, E., Winkler, H., and Dabelsteen, T. (2001). Differential degradation of antbird songs in a Neotropical rainforest: adaptation to perch height? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 110, 3263–3274. doi:10.1121/1.1420385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nemeth, E., Dabelsteen, T., Pederson, S. B., and Winkler, H. (2006). Rainforests as concert halls for birds: are reverberations improving sound transmission of long song elements? Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119, 620–626. doi: 10.1121/1.2139072
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, R. F., McGregor, P. K., and Latruffe, C. (1998). Know thine enemy: fighting fish gather information from observing conspecific interactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 265, 1045–1049. doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otter, K., McGregor, P. K., Terry, A. M. R., Burford, F. R. L., Peake, T. M., and Dabelsteen, T. (1999). Do female great tits (Parus major) assess males by eavesdropping? A field study using interactive song playback. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 266, 1305–1309. doi:10.1098/rspb.1999.0779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, R. B. (1987). Song dialects and neighbourhood habitats in the indigobirds, Vidua chalybeata and V. purpurascens a Lochinvar National Park, Zambia. Journal of Field Ornithology 58, 152–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, R. B., and Payne, L. L. (1993). Song copying and cultural transmission in indigo buntings. Animal Behaviour 46, 1045–1065. doi:10.1006/anbe.1993.1296
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penna, M., and Sólis, R. (1998). Frog call intensities and sound propagation in the South American temperate forest region. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 42, 371–381. doi:10.1007/s002650050452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, T. (1998). Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B 353, 251–260. doi:10.1098/rstb.1998.0207 Richards, D. G. (1981). Estimation of distance of singing conspecifics by Carolina wrens. Auk 98, 127–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, D. G., and Wiley, R. H. (1980). Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: implications for animal communication. American Naturalist 115, 381–399. doi:10.1086/283568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shy, E. (1983). The relation of geographical variation in song to habitat characteristics and body size in North American tanagers (Thraupinae: Piranga). Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 12, 71–76. doi:10.1007/BF00296935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slabbekoorn, H., and Smith, T. B. (2002). Habitat-dependent song divergence in the little greenbul: an analysis of environmental selection pressures on acoustic signals. Evolution 56, 1849–1858. doi:10.1554/0014-3820(2002)056[1849:HDSDIT]2.0.CO;2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Specht, R. (1999). ‘Avisoft-SASLab Pro for Windows.’ (Berlin.) available at www.avisoft-saslab.com
   Google Scholar
• Statsoft (1999). ‘Statistica for Windows Version 6.0.’ (Statsoft Inc.: Tulsa, OK.)
   Google Scholar
• Thielcke, G. (1973). On the origin of divergence of learned signals (songs) in isolated populations. Ibis 115, 511–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracey, J. (1982). ‘The Vegetation of the Humid Tropical Region of Queensland.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne.)
   Google Scholar
• Tubaro, P. L., and Segura, E. T. (1994). Dialect differences in the song of Zonotrichia capensis in the southern pampas—a test of the acoustic adaptation hypothesis. Condor 96, 1084–1088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Buskirk, J. (1997). Independent evolution of song structure and note structure in American wood warblers. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 264, 755–761. doi:10.1098/rspb.1997.0107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, L. J., and Tracey, J. G. (1981). Australian rainforests: patterns and change. In ‘Ecological Biogeography of Australia’. (Ed. A. Keast.) pp. 606–669. (W. Junk: The Hague, The Netherlands.)
   Google Scholar
• Westcott, D. A., and Kroon, F. J. (2002). Geographic song variation and its consequences in the Golden Bowerbird. Condor 104, 750–760. doi:10.1650/0010-5422(2002)104[0750:GSVAIC]2.0.C0;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, R. H. (1991). Associations of song properties with habitats for territorial oscine birds of eastern North America. American Naturalist 138, 973–993. doi:10.1086/285263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, R. H., and Richards, D. G. (1982). Adaptations for acoustic communication in birds: sound transmission and signal detection. In ‘Acoustic Communication in Birds: Production, Perception, and Design Features’. (Eds D. R. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller.) pp. 132–181. (Academic Press: New York.)
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. M., and Slater, P. J. B. (1993). Does chaffinch, Fringilla coelebs, song vary with the habitat in which it is sung. Ibis 135, 202–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zar, J. H. (1984). ‘Biostatistical Analysis.’ (Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.)
   Google Scholar