Low and variable reproductive success of a neotropical tyrant-flycatcher, Chapada Flycatcher (Suiriri islerorum)

References

• Banbura, J., Perret, P., Blondel, J., Thomas, D. W., Cartan-Son, M., and Lambrechts, M. M. (2004). Effects of Protocalliphora parasites on nestling food composition in Corsican Blue Tits Parus caeruleus: consequences for nestling performance. Acta Ornithologica 39, 93–103.
   Google Scholar
• Burgman, M. A. (2000). Population viability analysis for bird conservation: prediction, heuristics, monitoring and psychology. Emu 100, 347–353. doi: 10.1071/MU0002S
   Google Scholar
• Burhans, D. E., Dearborn, D., Thompson, F. R. III, and Faaborg, J. (2002). Factors affecting predation at songbird nests in old fields. Journal of Wildlife Management 66, 240–249. doi: 10.2307/3802890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnham, K. P., and Anderson, D. R. (1998). ‘Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach.’ (SpringerVerlag: New York.)
   Google Scholar
• Cucco, M., and Malacarne, G. (1995). Increase of parental effort in experimentally enlarged broods of Pallid Swifts. Canadian Journal of Zoology 73, 1387–1395. doi: 10.1139/z95-163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Silva, J. M. C., and Bates, J. M. (2002). Biogeographic patterns and conservation in the South American Cerrado: a tropical savanna hotspot. Bioscience 52, 225–234. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0225:BPACIT]2.0.C0;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duca, C. (2007). Biologia e conservação de Neothraupis fasciata (Aves: Thraupidae) no Cerrado do Brasil central. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Brasilia, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, K. L. (2004). The potential for interactions between predation and habitat change to cause population declines of farmland birds. Ibis 146, 1–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00231.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franca, L. F. (2008). Demografia e conservaçâo de Suiriri islerorum, um passeriforme endemico do Cerrado. Ph.D. Thesis, University de Brasilia, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, T. A., Shaffer, T. L., Madden, E. M., and Pietz, P. J. (2005). Time-specific variation in passerine nest survival: new insights into old questions. Auk 122, 661–672. doi: 10.1642/0004-8038(2005)122[0661:TVIPNS]2.0.C0;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazler, K. R., Amacher, A. J., Lancia, R. A., and Gerwin, J. A. (2006). Factors influencing Acadian Flycatcher nesting success in an intensively managed forest landscape. Journal of Wildlife Management 70, 532–538. doi: 10.2193/0022-541X(2006)70[532:FIAFNS]2.0.C0;2
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, B. F., Lopes, L. E., Santana, F. H. A., Couri, M. S., and Pujol- Luz, J. R. (2005). Sobre a ocorrencia de Philornis angustifrons e P. deceptiva (Diptera, Muscidae) em ninhos de Suiriri affinis e S. islerorum (Aves, Tyrannidae), no Cerrado do Distrito Federal, Brasil. Entomología y Vectores 12, 127–131.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, R. D. (1977). Predation, apparent competition and structure of prey communities. Theoretical Population Biology 12,197–229. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(77)90042-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUCN (2008). ‘IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.’ (IUCN Species Survival Commission: Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK.)
   Google Scholar
• Jehle, G., Adams, A. A. Y., Savidge, J. A., and Skagen, S. K. (2004). Nest survival estimation: a review of alternatives to the Mayfield estimator. Condor 106, 472–484. doi: 10.1650/7411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, J., Doran, P. J., Nagy, L. R., and Holmes, R. T. (2005). Relationship between Mayfield nest-survival estimates and seasonal fecundity: a cautionary note. Auk 122, 306–312. doi: 10.1642/0004-8038(2005)122[0306:RBMNEA]2.0.C0;2
   Google Scholar
• Klink, C. A., and Machado, R. B. (2005). Conservation of the Brazilian Cerrado. Conservation Biology 19, 707–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd, J. D., and Martin, T. E. (2005). Reproductive success of Chestnut-collared Longspurs in native and exotic grassland. Condor 107, 363–374. doi: 10.1650/7701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes, L. E., and Marini, M. Â. (2005). Biologiareprodutiva de Suiriri affinis e S. islerorum (Aves: Tyrannidae) no Cerrado do Brasil central. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 45(12), 127–141.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes, L. E., and Marini, M. Â. (2006). Home range and habitat use by Suiriri affinis and Suiriri islerorum (Aves: Tyrannidae) in the Central Brazilian Cerrado. Studies on Neotropical Fauna and Environment 41, 87–92. doi: 10.1080/01650520500309826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marini, M. Â., Sousa, N. O. M., Borges, F. J. A., and Silveira, M. B. (2009a). Biologia reprodutiva de Elaenia cristata (Aves: Tyrannidae) em cerrado do Brasil Central. Neotropical Biology and Conservation 4(1), 3–12. doi: 10.4013/nbc.2009.41.01
   Google Scholar
• Marini, M. Â., Lobo, Y., Lopes, L. E., Franç a, L. F., and Paiva, L. V. (2009b). Biologia reprodutiva de Tyrannus savana (Aves, Tyrannidae) em Cerrado do Brasil. Biota Neotropica 9(1), 55–63. Available at http://www.biotaneotropica.org.br/v9n1/en/abstract?article+bn01009012009 [Verified 5 January 2009].
   Google Scholar
• Martin, T. E., Scott, J., and Menge, C. (2000). Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 267, 2287–2293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayfield, H. F. (1961). Nesting success calculated from exposure. Wilson Bulletin 73, 255–261.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, W. F., and Doak, D. F. (2002). ‘Quantitative Conservation Biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability Analysis.’ (Sinauer Associates Inc.: Sunderland, MA.)
   Google Scholar
• Paiva, L. V. (2008). Fatores que determinam o período reprodutivo de Elaenia chiriquensis (Aves: Tyrannidae) no Cerrado do Brasil Central. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Brasilia, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, J. F., and Walter, B. M. T. (1998). Fitofisionomias do bioma Cerrado. In ‘Cerrado: Ambiente e Flora’. (Eds S. M. Sano and S. P. Almeida.) pp. 89–166. (EMBRAPA: Planaltina, Distrito Federal.)
   Google Scholar
• Ricklefs, R. E. (1969). Preliminary models for growth rates in altricial birds. Ecology 50, 1031–1039. doi: 10.2307/1936894
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, W. D., Robinson, T. R., Robinson, S. K., and Brawn, J. D. (2000). Nesting success of understory forest birds in central Panama. Journal of Avian Biology 31, 151–164. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-048X.2000.310207.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos, S. (2002). Functional response, seasonal decline and landscape differences in nest predation risk. Oecologia 133, 608–615. doi: 10.1007/s00442-002-1056-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roper, J. J. (2005). Try and try again: nest predation favors persistence in a neotropical bird. Ornitologia Neotropical 16, 253–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, L. R. (2008). Biologia reprodutiva e comportamento cooperativo em ninhos de Cypsnagra hirundinacea. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Brasília, Brazil.
   Google Scholar
• SAS Institute (1997). ‘SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements Through Release 6.12.’ (SAS Institute: Cary, NC.)
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, K. A., and Whelan, C. J. (1999). The relative impacts of nest predation and brood parasitism on seasonal fecundity in songbirds. Conservation Biology 13, 46–57. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97065.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaffer, T. L. (2004). A unified approach to analyzing nest success. Auk 121, 526–540. doi: 10.1642/0004-8038(2004)121[0526:AUATAN]2.0.C0;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skutch, A. F. (1949). Do tropical birds rear as many young as they can nourish? Ibis 91, 430–455. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-919X.1949.tb02293.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stutchbury, B. J. M., and Morton, E. S. (2001). ‘Behavioral Ecology of Tropical Birds.’ (Academic Press: San Diego, CA.)
   Google Scholar
• Wiebe, K. L., and Martin, K. (2000). The use ofincubation behaviorto adjust avian reproductive costs after egg laying. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 48, 463–470. doi: 10.1007/s002650000259
   Google Scholar