Call-based identification as a potential tool for monitoring Great Spotted Kiwi

References

• Bioacoustics Research Program (2012). ‘Raven Pro 1.5.’ (Cornell Lab of Ornithology: New York.)
   Google Scholar
• Blumstein, D. T., Mennill, D. J., Clemins, P., Girod, L., Yao, K., Patricelli, G., Deppe, J. L., Krakhauer, A. H., Clark, C., Cortopassi, K. A., Hanser, S. F., McCowan, B., Ali, A. M., and Kirschel, A. N. G. (2011). Acoustic monitoring in terrestrial environments using microphone arrays: applications, technological considerations and prospectus. Journal of Applied Ecology 48, 758–767. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01993.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boardman, W. (2007). Veterinary care of kiwi. In ‘Zoo and Wild Animal Medicine Current Therapy’. (Eds M. E. Fowler and R. E. Miller.) pp. 214–221. (Saunders: St Lewis, MO.)
   Google Scholar
• Charrier, I., Jouventin, P., Mathevon, N., and Aubin, T. (2001). Individual identity coding depends on call type in the South Polar Skua Catharacta maccormicki. Polar Biology 24, 378–382. doi:10.1007/s003000100231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colbourne, R. M. (2006). Kiwi call scheme. Technical report S5020/129, Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Corfield, J. (2004). Description, dueting, seasonal variations, and individual identification of the vocalisations of the Brown Kiwi (Apteryx mantelli). M.App.Sc. Thesis, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Corfield, J., Gillman, L., and Parsons, S. (2008). Vocalizations of the North Island brown Kiwi (Apteryx mantelli). The Auk 125, 326–335. doi:10.1525/auk.2008.06234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, E., Gardiner, C., Renwick, N., and Sporle, W. (2011). Taxon plan for Northland Brown Kiwi (Apteryx mantelli): strategic plan for Northland Brown Kiwi 2010–2019 and beyond. Department of Conservation, Whangarei, NZ.
   Google Scholar
• Dent, J. (2013). Vocalisations of the Great Spotted Kiwi: an assessment of vocal individuality. B.Sc. (Hons) thesis, Lincoln University, Lincoln, NZ. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10182/6339 [Verified3 May 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Dent, J., and Molles, L. E. (2015). Sexually dimorphic vocalisations of the Great Spotted Kiwi (Apteryx haastii). Notornis 62, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Conservation (2004). Operation Ark—operation plan for predator control in the Hawdon and Poulter Valleys. Department of Conservation, Christchurch, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Conservation (2007). Arthur's Pass National Park Management Plan 2007. Department of Conservation, Christchurch, New Zealand. Available at http://www.doc.govt.nz/Documents/about-doc/role/policies-and-plans/national-park-management-plans/Arthurs-Pass/arthurs-pass-npmp-full.pdf [Verified 1 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Digby, A. (2013). Whistling in the dark: an acoustic study of Little Spotted Kiwi. Ph.D. Thesis, Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/10063/2781 [Verified 3 May 2016].
   Google Scholar
• Digby, A., Bell, B. D., and Teal, P. D. (2013). Vocal cooperation between the sexes in Little Spotted Kiwi Apteryx owenii. Ibis 155, 229–245. doi: 10.1111/ibi.12031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digby, A., Bell, B. D., and Teal, P. D. (2014). Vocal individuality of Little Spotted Kiwi (Apteryx owenii). Emu 114, 326–336. doi:10.1071/MU13114
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-Juricic, E., del Nevo, A. J., and Poston, R. (2009). Identification of individual and population level variation in vocalisations of the endangered Southwestern Willow Flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus). Auk 126, 89–99. doi:10.1525/auk.2009.07090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foote, J. R., Palazzi, E., and Mennill, D. J. (2013). Songs of the Eastern Phoebe, a suboscine songbird, are individually distinctive but do not vary geographically. Bioacoustics 22, 137–151. doi:10.1080/09524622.2012.740174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, E. (1990). ‘Kiwi.’ (Seto Publishing: Auckland.)
   Google Scholar
• Galeotti, P., and Sacchi, R. (2001). Turnover of territorial Scops Owls Otus scops as estimated by spectrographic analyses of male hoots. Journal of Avian Biology 32, 256–262. doi:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2001.320308.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeotti, P., Paladin, M., and Pavan, G. (1993). Individually distinct hooting in male Pygmy Owls Glaucidium passerinum—a multivariate approach. Ornis Scandinavica 24, 15–20. doi:10.2307/3676404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibb, J. A. (1996). First seen or first heard? A useful distinction when counting forest birds. Notornis 43, 7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, G., McGregor, P. K., and Tyler, G. (1994). Vocal individuality as a census tool—practical considerations illustrated by a study of two rare species. Journal of Field Ornithology 65, 335–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, G., Tyler, G. A., and Smith, K. W. (2002). Local annual survival ofbooming male Great Bittern Botaurus stellaris in Britain, in the period 1990–1999. Ibis 144, 51–61. doi:10.1046/j.0019-1019.2001.00012.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goutte, C. (1997). Note on free lunches and cross-validation. Neural Computation 9, 1245–1249. doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.6.1245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grava, T., Mathevon, N., Place, E., and Balluet, P. (2008). Individual acoustic monitoring of the European Eagle Owl Bubo bubo. Ibis 150, 279–287. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00776.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hojem, C. (2006). The real New Zealand national anthem: calling structure and calling rate of North Island Brown Kiwi (Apteryx mantelli) on Ponui Island and comparisons with Rarewarewa Reserve. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Auckland, Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Holzapfel, S., Robertson, H. A., McLennan, J. A., Sporle, W., Hackwell, K., and Impey, M. (2008). Kiwi (Apteryx spp.) recovery plan: 2008–2018. Department of Conservation, Wellington. Available at http://www.doc.govt.nz/Documents/science-and-technical/tsrp60entire.pdf [Verified 1 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Hoodless, A. N., Inglis, J. G., Doucet, J. P., and Aebischer, N. J. (2008). Vocal individuality in the roding calls of Woodcock Scolopax rusticola and their use to validate a survey method. Ibis 150, 80–89. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2007.00743.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. (2013). ‘IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0.’ (IBM Corp.: Armonk, NY.)
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, P., Harper, G. A., and Gilchrist, J. (2013). Home range sharing in family units of Great Spotted Kiwi (Apteryx haastii) at Nelson Lakes National Park. Notornis 60, 201–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, D. N., and Smith, G. C. (1997). Vocalisations of the Marbled Frogmouth: an assessment of vocal individuality as a potential census technique. Emu 97, 296–304. doi:10.1071/MU97043
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, R. A. W., Evans, C. S., and MacDonald, P. G. (2009). Individual distinctiveness in the mobbing call of a cooperative bird, the Noisy Miner Manorina melanocephala. Journal of Avian Biology 40, 481–490. doi:10.1111/j.1600-048X.2008.04682.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, K. T. A., and McDonald, P. G. (2014). A low-cost, yet simple and highly repeatable system for acoustically surveying cryptic species. Austral Ecology 39, 779–785. doi:10.1111/aec.12143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lengagne, T. (2001). Temporal stability in the individual features in the calls of Eagle Owls (Bubo bubo). Behaviour 138, 1407–1419. doi:10.1163/156853901317367663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchant, S., and Higgins, P. J. (Eds) (1990). ‘Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. Vol. 1: Ratites to Ducks.’ (Oxford University Press: Melbourne.)
   Google Scholar
• Mathevon, N. (1997). Individuality of contact calls in the Greater Flamingo Phoenicopterus ruber and the problem of background noise in a colony. Ibis 139, 513–517. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1997.tb04667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLennan, J., and McCann, T. (2002). Genetic variability, distribution and abundance of Great Spotted Kiwi (Apteryx haastii). Science and Research Internal Report No. 191. Department of Conservation, Wellington. Available at http://www.nationalparks.co.nz/Documents/science-and-technical/ir191b.pdf [Verified 1 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Miller, P. J., and Pierce, R. J. (1995). Distribution and decline of the North Island Brown Kiwi (Apteryx australis mantelli) in Northland. Notornis 42, 203–211.
   Google Scholar
• Nagy, C. M., and Rockwell, R. F. (2012). Identification of individual Eastern Screech-Owls Megascops asio via vocalization analysis. Bioacoustics 21, 127–140. doi:10.1080/09524622.2011.651829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peake, T. M., and McGregor, P. M. (2001). Corncrake Crex crex census estimates: a conservation application of vocal individuality. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 24, 81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Peake, T. M., McGregor, P. K., Smith, K. W., Tyler, G., Gilbert, G., and Green, R. E. (1998). Individuality in Corncrake Crex crex vocalizations. Ibis 140, 120–127. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.1998.tb04548.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce, R., and Westbrooke, I. (2003). Call count responses of North Island Brown Kiwi to different levels of predator control in Northland, New Zealand. Biological Conservation 109, 175–180. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00134-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Policht, R., Petru, M., Lastimoza, L., and Suarez, L. (2009). Potential for the use of vocal individuality as a conservation research tool in two threatened Philippine Hornbill species, the Visayan Hornbill and the Rufous-headed Hornbill. Bird Conservation International 19, 83–97. doi:10.1017/S0959270908008228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puglisi, L., and Adamo, C. (2004). Discrimination of individual voices in male Great Bitterns (Botaurus stellaris) in Italy. Auk 121, 541–547. doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2004)121[0541:DOIVIM]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebbeck, M., Corrick, R., Eaglestone, B., and Stainton, C. (2001). Recognition of individual European Nightjars Caprimulgus europaeus from their song. Ibis 143, 468–475. doi:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2001.tb04948.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, H., and Colbourne, R. (2003). Kiwi (Apteryx spp.) best practice manual. (Department of Conservation: Wellington.) Available at https://www.kiwisforkiwi.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Kiwi_Best_Practice_Manual_Sep03.pdf [Verified 1 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, H. A., Dowding, J. E., Elliott, G. P., Hitchmough, R. A., Miskelly, C. M., O'Donnell, C. F. J., Powlesland, R. G., Sagar, P. M., Scofield, R. P., and Taylor, G. A. (2013). Conservation status of New Zealand birds, 2012. New Zealand Threat Classification Series 4. Department of Conservation, Wellington. Available at http://www.doc.govt.nz/Documents/science-and-technical/nztcs4entire.pdf [Verified 1 May 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, D. J., and Paton, D. C. (2005). Acoustic identification of individual Rufous Bristlebirds, a threatened species with complex song repertoires. Emu 105, 203–210. doi:10.1071/MU05040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sales, J. (2005). The endangered Kiwi: a review. Folia Zoologica 54, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, S. P., and Hatchwell, B. J. (2005). Individuality in the contact calls of cooperatively breeding Long-tailed Tits (Aegithalos caudatus). Behaviour 142, 1559–1575. doi:10.1163/156853905774831918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (2012). ‘Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research.’ 4th Edn. (W. H. Freeman and Company: New York.)
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell, L. S. (2007). ‘Using Multivariate Statistics.’ (Pearson Education Ltd: New York.)
   Google Scholar
• Terry, A. M., Peake, T. M., and McGregor, P. K. (2005). The role of vocal individuality in conservation. Frontiers in Zoology 2, 10. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-2-10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tibbetts, E. A., and Dale, J. (2007). Individual recognition: it is good to be different. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22, 529–537. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2007.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trimble, M., and Charrier, I. (2011). Individuality in South American Sea Lion (Otaria flavescens) mother-pup vocalizations: implications of ecological constraints and geographical variations? Mammalian Biology 76, 208–216. doi:10.1016/j.mambio.2010.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripp, T. M., and Otter, K. A. (2006). Vocal individuality as a potential long-term monitoring tool for Western Screech-Owls, Megascops kenni- cottii. Canadian Journal of Zoology 84, 744–753. doi:10.1139/z06-055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrington, M. H., McDonald, P. G., Rollins, L. A., and Griffith, S. C. (2014). All signals are not equal: acoustic signalling of individuality, sex and breeding status in a cooperative breeder. Animal Behaviour 93, 249–260. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia, C. W., Xiao, H., and Zhang, Y. Y. (2010). Individual variation in Brownish-flanked Bush Warbler songs. Condor 112, 591–595. doi:10.1525/cond.2010.090021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zollinger, S. A., Podos, J., Nemeth, E., Goller, F., and Brumm, H. (2012). On the relationship between, and measurement of, amplitude and frequency in birdsong. Animal Behaviour 84, e1–e9. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.04.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar