Reference
- Beauchamp M, Matthews WB, Small D, Stein JF. The topography of the visual evoked response to half field stim-ulation. J Physiol. 1976;260:46–47.
- Bradnam MS, Montgomery DM, Evans AL, Keating D, McClure EA, Damato BE, McFadzean R. Objective detec- tion of hemifield and quadrantic field defects by visual evoked cortical potentials. Br J Ophthalmol. 1996;80:297–303.
- Oguchi Y, Toyoda M. Vector analysis of pattern VEP Doc Ophthal Proc Series. 1981;27:239–245.
- Kardon R, Kirkali P, Thompson HS. Automated pupil Perimetry. Pupil field mapping in patients and normal sub-jects. Ophthalmology. 1991;98:485–495.
- Lehman D, Skrandies W. Multichannel evoked potential fields show different properties of human upper and lower hemiretina systems. Exp Brain Res. 1979;35:154–159.
- Kiyosawa M, Mizuno K, Hatazawa J, Fukuda H, Yamada K, Ito M. Metabolic imaging in hemianopia using positron emission tomography with 18F-deoxy fluoroglucose. Am J Ophthalmol. 1986;101:310–319.
- Mild A, Nakajima T, Fujita M, Takagi M, Abe H. Functional Magnetic Rrsonance imaging in homonymous hemianopia. Am J Ophthalmol. 1996;121:258–266.
- Sutter EE. A deterministic approach to nonlinear systems analysis. In: Printer RB, ed. Nonlinear Vision. Cleveland, OH: CRC Press; 1992:171–220.
- Sutter EE. The fast m-transform: A fast computation of cross-correlations with binary m-sequences. SIAM J Comput. 1991;20:686–694.
- Sutter EE, Tran D. The field topography of ERG compo-nents in man: I. The photopic luminance response. Vision Res. 1992;32:433–446.
- Palmowski AM, Sutter EE, Bearse MA, Fung W. Mapping of retinal function in diabetic retinopathy using the multi-focal electroretinogram. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997; 38:2586–2596.
- Bearse MA Jr, Sutter EE. Imaging localized retinal dys-function with the multifocal electroretinogram. J Optic Soc Am A. 1996;13:634–640.
- Kondo M, Miyake Y, Horiguchi S, Tanikawa A. Clinical Evaluation of multifocal electroretinogram. Invest Oph-thalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36:2146–2150.
- Kretschmann U, Ruther K, Usui T, Zrenner E. ERG campimetry using a multi-input stimulation technique for mapping of retinal function in the central visual field. Oph-thalmic Res. 1996;28:303–311.
- Baseler HA, Sutter EE, Klein SA, Carney T. The topogra-phy of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994;90:65–81.
- Ohde H, Kimura I, Betsuin Y. The retinotopic response of visual evoked potentials (VEP). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:S991.
- Baseler HA, Sutter EE. M and P components of the VEP and their visual field distribution. Vision Res Alexander I, Klistner, Stuart L1997;37:675–690.
- Klistorner AT, Graham SL, Grigg JR, Billson FA. Multifo-cal topographic visual evoked Potencial: Improving objec-tive detection of local visual field defects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:937–950.
- Blumhardt LD, Barrett G, Halliday AM. The asymmetrical visual evoked potential to pattern reversal in one half field and its significance for the analysis of visual field defects. Br J Ophtalmol. 1977;61:454–461.
- Michael WF, Halliday AM. Differences between the occip-ital distribution of upper and lower field pattern-evoked responses in man. Brain Res. 1971;32:311–324.