171
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Characterization of the pupil light reflex, electroretinogram and tonometric parameters in healthy mouse eyes

, , , , , & show all
Pages 371-378 | Published online: 02 Jul 2009

References

  • Goldblum D, Mittag T. Prospects for relevant glaucoma models with retinal ganglion cell damage in the rodent eye. Vision Res. 2002;42(4):471–478.
  • Levkovitch-Verbin H, Harris-Cerruti C, Groner Y, Wheeler LA, Schwartz M, Yoles E. RGC death in mice after optic nerve crush injury: Oxidative stress and neuroprotection Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:4169–4174.
  • Mittag TW, Danias J, Pohorenec G, Yuan HIM, Burakgazi E, Chalmers-Redman R, Podos SM, Tatton WG. Retinal damage after 3 to 4 months of elevated intraocular pressure in a rat glaucoma model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41: 3451–3459.
  • Johnson EC, Deppmeier LM, Wentzien SK, Hsu I, Morrison JC. Chronology of optic nerve head and retinal responses to elevated intraocular pressure. Invest Ophthal-mol Vis Sci. 2000;41:431–442.
  • Garcia-Valenzuela E, Shareef S, Walsh J, Sharma SC. Programmed cell death of retinal ganglion cells during experimental glaucoma. Exp Eye Res. 1995;61:33–44.
  • Moore CG, Johnson EC, Morrison JC. Circadian rhythm of intraocular pressure in the rat. Curr Eye Res. 1996;15:185–191.
  • Cohan BE, Bohr DF. Goldmann applanation tonometry in the conscious rat. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:340–342.
  • Moore CG, Milne ST, Morrison JC. Noninvasive measure-ment of rat intraocular pressure with the Tono-Pen. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:363–369.
  • Kurata K, Nishida E, Tsukuda R, Suzuki T, Sato S. Evalu-ation of Perkin's applanation tonometer and the normal range of intraocular pressure in anesthetized rats. J Toxicol Sci. 1996;21:249–252.
  • Krishna R, Mermoud A, Baerveldt G, Minckler DS. Circa-dian rhythm of intraocular pressure: A rat model. Oph-thalmic Res. 1995:27:163–167.
  • Kontiola AT, Goldblum D, Mittag T, Danias J. The induc-tion/impact tonometer: A new instrument to measure intraocular pressure in the rat. Exp Eye Res. 2001; 73:781–785.
  • John SW, Hagaman JR, MacTaggart TE, Peng L, Smithes O. Intraocular pressure in inbred mouse strains. Invest Oph-thalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:249–253.
  • Zhang D, Vetrivel L, Verkman AS. Aquaporin deletion in mice reduces intraocular pressure and aqueous fluid pro-duction. J Gen Physiol. 2002;119:561–569.
  • Avila MY, Cane DA, Stone RA, Civan MM. Reliable mea-surement of mouse intraocular pressure by a servo-null micropipette system. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1841–1846.
  • John SW, Smith RS, Savinora OV, Hawes NL, Cheng B, Turnbull D, Davisson M, Roderick TH, Heckenlively JR. Essential iris atrophy, pigment dispersion, and glaucoma in DBA/J mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998;39:951–962.
  • Savinova OV, Sugiyama F, Martin JE, Tomarev SI, Paigen BJ, Smith RS, John SW. Intraocular pressure in genetically distinct mice: an update and strain survey. BMC Genet. 2001;2: 12.
  • Avila MY, Stone RA, Civan MM. Knockout of A3 adeno-sine receptors reduces mouse intraocular pressure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43: 3021–3026.
  • Cohan BE, Bohr DF. Measurement of intraocular pressure in awake mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:2560–2562.
  • Danias J, Filippopoulos T, Kontiola AT, Podos SM, Mittag T. Measurement of Intraocular Pressure (TOP) in the Mouse Eye Using an Impact Probe. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) Annual Meeting-ARVO, 2002 May 5–10; Ft Lauderdale, FL, USA.
  • Bayer U, Neuhardt T, May AC, Martus P, Maag KP, Brodie S, Liitjen-Drecoll E, Podos SM, Mittag T. Retinal morphology and erg response in the DBA/2NNia mouse modal of angle-closure glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42: 1258–1265.
  • Bayer AU, Brodie SE, Mittag T. Pilot study of pattern-electroretinographic changes in the DBA/2NNia mouse. Animal model of congenital angle-closure glaucoma. Oph-thalmologe. 2001;98: 248–252.
  • Lucas RJ, Douglas RH, Foster RG. Characterization of an ocular photopigment capable of driving pupillary constric-tion in mice. Nat Neurosci. 2001;4:621–626.
  • Grozdanic S, Sakaguchi DS, Kwon YH, Kardon RH, Sonea IM. Characterization of the pupil light reflex, electroretinogram and tonometric parameters in healthy rat eyes. Current Eye Research. 2002;25:69–78.
  • Lowenfeld IE. The Pupil: Anatomy, Physiology and Clini-cal Applications. Detroit: Wayne State University Press; 1993.
  • Green DG, Herreros de Tejada P, Glover MJ. Electrophys-iological estimates of visual sensitivity in albino and pig-mented mice. Vis Neurosci. 1994;11:919–925.
  • Iwakabe H, Katsuura G, Ishibashi C, Nakanishi S. Impair-ment of pupillary responses and optokinetic nystagmus in the mGluR6-deficient mouse. Neuropharmacology. 1997;36:135–143.
  • Pennesi ME, Lyubarsky AL, Pugh EN. Extreme respon-siveness of the pupil of the dark adapted mouse to steady retinal illumination. Invest Ophth Vis Sci. 1998;39: 2148–2156.
  • Lowenstein O, Kawabata H, Lowenfeld IE. The pupil as indicator of retinal activity. Am J Ophthalmol. 1964;57: 569–596.
  • Whiteley SJ, Sauve Y, Aviles-Trigueros M, Vidal-Sanz M, Lund RD. Extent and duration of recovered pupillary light reflex following retinal ganglion cell axon regeneration through peripheral nerve grafts directed to the pretectum in adult rats. Exp Neurol. 1998;154:560–572.
  • Nusinowitz S, Ridder WH, Heckenlively JR. Electrodiag-nostic techniques for visual function testing in mice. In: Smith R, John SWM, Nishina PM, Sundberg JP, eds. Sys-tematic Evaluation of the Mouse Eye: Anatomy, Pathology, and Biomethods. New York: CRC Press; 2002.
  • Moore CG, Johnson EC, Morrison JC, Circadian rhythm of intraocular pressure in the rat. Curr Eye Res. 1996;15:185–191.
  • Krishna R, Mermoud A, Baerveldt G, Minckler DS. Circa-dian rhythm of intraocular pressure: A rat model. Oph-thalmic Res. 1995;27:163–167.
  • Grozdanic S, Torres MI, Kardon RH, Kwon YH, Sakaguchi DS, Sonea IM. Functional deficits induced by laser surgery in the mouse. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO) Annual Meeting-ARVO, 2002 May 5–10; Ft Lauderdale, FL, USA.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.