37
Views
22
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry with the Tonopen for measuring intraocular pressure in a population-based glaucoma survey in rural West Bengal

, , , , &
Pages 215-224 | Published online: 08 Jul 2009

References

  • Leibowitz HM, Kreuger DE, Maunder IR, et al. The Framingham Eye Study Monograph. Surv Ophthalmol. 1980;24.(suppl):335–610.
  • Tielsch JIM, Sommer A, Katz J, et al. Racial variation in the prevalence of open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. J Am Med Assoc. 1991; 266:369–374.
  • Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J, et al. Baltimore Eye Survey Research Group. Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open-angle glaucoma among White and Black Americans. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991; 109:1090–1095.
  • Armstrong TA. Evaluation of the Tonopen and the Pulsair Tonometers. Am J Ophthalmol. I990; 109:716–720.
  • Minckler DS, Baerveldt G, Heuer DK, et al. Clinical evaluation of the Oculab Tonopen. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987;104:168–173.
  • Geyer 0, Mayron Y, Loewenstein A, et al. Tonopen tonometry in normal and in post-keratoplasty eyes. Br J Ophthalmol. 1992;76:538–540.
  • Denis P, Nordmann JP, Bertin V, et al. Evaluation of Tonopen 2 and the X pert noncontact tonometers in cataract surgery. Ophthalmologica. 1993;207(3):155–161.
  • Rootman DS, Insler MS, Thompson HW, et al. Accuracy and the precision of the Tonopen in measuring intraocular pressure after keratoplasty and epikeratophakia and in scarred corneas. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:1697–1700.
  • Quigley HA, West S, Munoz B, et al. Examination methods for glaucoma surveys. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:1409–1415.
  • Wensor MD, McCarty CA, Stanislavsky YL, et al. The prevalence of glaucoma in the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project. Ophthalmology. 1998;105:733-739.u Frenkel REP, Hong YJ, Shin DH. Comparison of the Tonopen with the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988; 106:750–753.
  • Kao SF, Lichter PR, Bergstrom TJ, et al. Clinical comparison of the Oculab Tonopen to the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer.Ophthalmology. 1987;94: 1541—'544.
  • Hines MW, Jost BF, Fogelman KL.Oculab Tonopen, Goldmann Applanation Tonometry, and Pneumatic Tonometry for intraocular pressure assessment in gas-filled eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988;106:174–179.
  • Kooner KS, Cooksey JC, Barron JB, et al. Tonometry comparison: Goldmann versus Tonopen. Ann Ophthalmol. 1992;24:29–36.
  • Whitacre MM, Emig M, Hassanein K. The effect of Perkins, Tonopen and Schiotz Tonometry on intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;1'1:59–64.
  • Christoffersen T, Fors T, Ringberg U, et al. Tonometry in general practice setting. (I). Tonopen compared to Goldmann applanation tonometry. Acta Ophthalmol. 1993;71: 103—,08.
  • Farrar SM, Miller KN, Schields MB, et al. An evaluation of the Tonopen for the measurement of diurnal intraocular pressure. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:411-4,6.
  • Draeger J, Rumberger E, Dauper J, et al. Microprocessor controlled tonometry. Eye. 1989;3:738–742.
  • Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. Feb. 8,1986: 307–310.
  • Stepanik J. Why is the Schiotz tonometer not suitable for measuring intraocular pressure. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1980; 176:61.
  • Krieglstein GK. Screening tonometry by technicians. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1975; 194:221.
  • Boothe WA, Lee DA, Panec WC, et al. The Tonopen. A manometric and clinical study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988;106:1214–1217.
  • Jackson C, Bullock J, Pitt M, et al. Screening for glaucoma in a Brisbane general practice- the role of tonometry. Aust NZ J Ophthalmol. 1995;23(3):173—178.
  • Stamper RL, Gardner ID, Bron AJ. Evaluation of a new, portable Tonometer with digital display.Ophthalmology. 1987;94(suppl): 133.
  • Bengtsson B. Comparison of Schiotz and Goldmann tonometry in a population. Acta Ophthalmol. 1972;50:445.
  • Mason RP, Kosoko 0, Wilson MR, et al. National survey of the prevalence and risk factors of glaucoma in St. Lucia, West Indies; I: prevalence findings. Ophthalmology. 1989;96: 1363–1368.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.