The Avian Caeca: A Review

REFERENCES

• ABRAHAM, K. (1901). Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte des Wellen-sittich (Melopsittacus undulntus). Anat. Heft. 17: 559.
   Google Scholar
• AKESTER, A. R., ANDERSON, R. S., HILL, K. J. and OSBALDISTON, G. W. (1967). A radio- graphic study of urine flow in the domestic fowl. Br. Poult. Sci. 8: 209.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ANNLSON, E. F., HILL, K. J. and KENWORTHY, R. (1968). Volatile fatty acids in the digestive tract of the fowl. J. Nutr. 22: 207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BARNES, E. M. and GOLDBERG, H. S. (1962). The isolation of anaerobic, Gram positive bacteria from poultry reared with and without antibiotic supplements. J. appl. Boct. 25: 94.
   Google Scholar
• BARNES, E. M. and IMPEY, C. S. (1972). Some properties of the non-sporing anaerobes from poultry caeca. J. appl. Bnct. 35: 241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BARNES, E. M. and SHRIMPTON, D. H. (1957). Causes of greening of uneviscerated poultry carcasses during storage. J. oppl. Bact. 20: 273.
   Google Scholar
• BEACH, J. R. (1925). The effect of feeding Bacillus acidophilus, lactose, dry skim milk or whole milk on the hydrogen ion concentration of the contents of the caeca of chickens. Hilgardin. 1: 145.
   Google Scholar
• BEATTIE, J. and SHRIMPTON, D. H. (1958). Surgical and chemical techniques for in vivo studies of the intestinal microflora of domestic fowls. Q.Jl.exp. Physiol. 43: 399.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BEER, A. E. (1969). A review of thc effects of nutritional deficlencies on hatchability. In “The fertility and hatchability of the hen's egg” (eds. T. C. Carter and B. M. Freeman). Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• BROWNE, T. G. (1922). Some observations on the digestive system of the fowl. J. camp. Path. Ther. 35: 12.
   Google Scholar
• BUCKNER, G. D., INSKO, W. M. and HENRY, A. H. (1944). Does breed, age, sex or laying condition affect the pH of the digestive system of chickens? Poult. Sci. 23: 457.
   Google Scholar
• CALHOUN, M. L. (1933). The microscopic anatomy of the digestive tract of Gallus domesticus. Iowa State Call. J. Sci. 7: 261.
   Google Scholar
• COATES, M. E. (1962). Relationship between alimentary microflora and nutrition in poultry. In “Nutrition of pigs and poultry”. (eds. Morgan, J. T. and Lewis, D.). Butterworths, London.
   Google Scholar
• COATES, M. E., FORD, J. E. and HARRISON, G. F. (1968). Intestinal synthesis of vitamins of the B complex in chicks. Br. J. Nutr. 22: 493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COATES, M. E., GREGORY, M. E., PORTER, J. W. G. and WILLIAMS, A. P. (1963). Vitamin B12 and its analogues in the gut contents of germ-free and conventional chicks. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 22: 27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COATES, M. E. and JAYNE-WILLIAMS, D. J. (1965). Current views on the role of the gut flora in nutrition of the chicken. In “Physiology of the domestic fowl”. (eds. Horton-Smith, C., and Amoroso, E. C.). Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• COUCH, J. R., GERMAN, H. L., KNIGHT, D. R., PARKS, P. S. and PEARSON, P. B. (1950). Importance of the caecum in intestinal synthesis in the mature fowl. Poult. Sci. 29: 52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DZIUK, H. E., SCHEIBER, A. R. and DUKE, G. E. (1970). Caecectomised turkeys—physiological characteristics and susceptibility to bluecomb. Poult. Sci. 49: 244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FARNER, D. S. (1942). The hydrogen ion concentration in avian digestive tracts. Poult. Sci. 21: 445.
   Google Scholar
• FARNER, D. S. (1960). Digestion and the digestive system. In “Biology and comparative physiology of birds. Volume 1”.—(ed. Marshall, A. J.). Academic Press, New York, and London.
   Google Scholar
• FRETER, R. (1969). Studies of the mechanism of action of intestinal antibody in experimental cholera. Tex. Rep. Biol. Med. 27: 299.
   Google Scholar
• FULLER, R. and JAYNE-WILLIAMS, D. J. (1968). The origin of bacteria recovered from the peritdneum and yolk sac of healthy chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 9: 159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FULLER, R. and JAYNE-WILLIAMS, D. J. (1970). Resistance of the fowl (Gallus domesticus) to invasion by its intestinal flora. II. Clearance of translocated intestinal bacteria. Res. vet. Sci. 11: 368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FULLER, R. and TURVEY, A. (1971). Bacteria associated with the intestinal wall of the fowl (Gallus domesticus). J. appl. Bact. 34: 617.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GOLDBEPG, H. S., BARNES, E. M. and CHARLES, A. B. (1964). Unusual bacteriodes-like organisms. J. Bact… 87: 737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HALNAN, E. T. (1949). Architecture of the avian gut and tolerance of crude fibre. Br.J. Nutr. 3: 245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HARWOOD, P. D. (1937). The frequency of change of caecal contents in fowls. Proc. helminth. Sac. Wash. 4: 38.
   Google Scholar
• HENNING, H. (1929). Die verdaulichkeit der Rohfaser beis Huhn. Landwn. VersStnen. 108: 253.
   Google Scholar
• HERPOL, C. and Van GREMENBERGEN, G. (1967a). La signification du pH dans le tube digestif de Gallus domesticus. Anuls. Biol. anim. Biochem. Biophys. 6: 495.
   Google Scholar
• HERPOL, C. and Van GREMENBERGEN, G. (1967b). L'activité protéolytique du system digestif de Gallus domesticus. Z. vergl. Physiol. 57: 1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HUNTER, J. E., DURANT, A. J. and HOGAN, A. G. (1930). Studies on the pathology and physiology of the caecal pouches of turkeys. II. The utilization of food by turkeys with abligated caeca. Res. Bull. Mo. agric. Exp. Sm. No. 136.
   Google Scholar
• JAYNE-WILLIAMS, D. J. and COATES, M. E. (1969). The micro-flora of the alimentary tract of the bird and itssignificance in nutrition. In “Nutrition of animals of agricultural importance. Part 1. The science of nutrition of farm livestock. International encyclopaedia food and nutrition 17”. (ed. Cuthbertson, D.). Perganlmon Press, Oxford, London and New York.
   Google Scholar
• JOHANSSON, K. R., SARLES, W. B. and SHAPIRO, S. K. (1948). The intestinal microflora of hens as influenced by various carbohydrates in a biotin deficient ration. J. Bact. 56: 619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LEV, M. and BRIGGS, C. A. E. (1956). The gut flora of the chick. II. The establishment of the flora. J. appl. Bact. 19: 224.
   Google Scholar
• LEWIN, V. (1963). Reproduction and development of young in a population of California quail. Condor, 65: 249.
   Google Scholar
• MANGOLD, E. (1928). Die physiologischen Funktionen des Blinddarms, allgemein und besonders bei den Voeeln. Sber. Ges. NafurL Freunde Berlin. 217.
   Google Scholar
• MASSON, M. J. (1954). Microscopic studies of the gut flora of the hen with special reference to the breakdown of starches. Proc. 10th World' Poultry Congress Edinburgh. P. 105.
   Google Scholar
• MATTOCKS, J. G. M. (1971). Some aspects of the problems of cellulose digestion and caecal function in the domestic goose. N.Sc. thesis, Univ. of Bath.
   Google Scholar
• MAUMUS, J. (1902). Les caecums des oiseaux. Annls. Sci. nat. Zool. 15: 2.
   Google Scholar
• MAUMUS, J. and LAUNOY, L. (1901). La digestion caecale chez les oiseaux. Bull. Mus. natn. Hist. Nat., Paris. 7: 361.
   Google Scholar
• McBEE, R. H. and WEST, G. C. (1969). Caecal fermentation in the willow ptarmigan. Condor. 71: 54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNAB, J. M. and SHANNON, D. W. F. (1972). Studies on the process of digestion in the fowl: dry matter and total nitrogen. Br. Poult. Sci. 13: 497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MEYER, W. (1927). Vergleichende mikroskopische unter-suchungen über die Verdauung der Kleberzellen verschiedener Zerealien im magen-darmkanal pflan-zenfressender Tiere (Huhn, Taub, Schaf, Kaninchen). Z. vergl. Physiol. 6: 402.
   Google Scholar
• MITCHELL, P. C. (1901). On the intestinal tract of birds: with remarks on the valuation and nomenclature of zoological characters. Trans. Linn. Sac. Land. 8: 173.
   Google Scholar
• MOSS, R. (1972). Effects of captivity on gut lengths in red grouse. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 36: 99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MOSS, R. and PARKINSON, J. A. (1972). The digestion of heather (Calluna vulgaris) by red grouse (lagopus lagopus scoticus). Br. J. Nutr. 27: 285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NESHEIM, M. C. and CARPENTER, K. J. (1967). The digestion of heat damaged protein. Br. J. Nutr. 21: 399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NITSAN, Z. and ALUMOT, E. (1963). Role of the caecum in the utilization of raw soybean in chicks. J. Nutr. 80: 299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OLSON, C. and MANN, F. C. (1935). The physiology of the caecum of the domestic fowl. J. Am. vef. med. Assn. 87: 151.
   Google Scholar
• PAYNE, W. L., KIFER, R. R., SNYDER, D. G. and COMBS, G. F. (1971). Studies of protein digestion in the chicken. 1. Investigation of apparent amino acid digestibity of fish meal protein using caecectomized, adulg male chickens. Poult. Sci. 50: 143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PINCHON, R. (1942). Théses: contribution á l'étude moruhologique des caecums dans la serie des oiseaux. Université de Paris.
   Google Scholar
• RADEFF, T. (1928). Uber die Rohfaserverdauung beim Huhn und die Hierbei die Blinddärm Zukommende Redeutung. Biochem. Z. 193: 192.
   Google Scholar
• RÖSELER, M. (1929). Die bedeutung der Blinddärme des Haushuhnes fur die Resorption der Nahrung und die Verduung der Rohfaser. Z. Tierrucht. Zuchtbiol. 13: 281.
   Google Scholar
• SALTER, D. M. and COATES, M. E. (1971). The influence of the microflora of the alimentary tract on protein digestion in the chick. Br. J. Nutr. 26: 55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHRIMPTON, D. H. (1954). The utilization of intestinally synthesised riboflavin and vitamin B12by poultry. Proc. 10th World's Poultry Congress Edinburgh. p. 161.
   Google Scholar
• SHRIMPTON, D. H. (1963). Some volatile oroducts of microbial metabolism in the caeca of the fowl. J. appl. Baci. 26: 1.
   Google Scholar
• SKADHAUGE, E. (1968). The cloaca1 storage of urine in the rooster. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 24: 7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SUNDE, M. L., CRAVENS, W. W., ELVEHJEM, C. A. and HALPIN, J. G. (1950). The effect of diet and caecectomy on the iuteitinal synthesis of biotin in the mature fowl. Poult. Sci. 29: 10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SOUMALAINEN, H. and ARHIMO, E. (1945). On the microbial decomposition of cellulose by wild gallinaceous birds (family Tetraonidnel). Ornis fenn. 22: 21.
   Google Scholar
• THORNBURN, C. C. and WILLCOX, J. S. (1965a). The caeca of the domestic fowl and digestion of the crude fibre complex. I. Digestibility trials with normal and caecectomised birds. Br. Poult. Sci. 6: 23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• THORNBURN, C. C. and WILLCOX, J. S. (1965b). The caeca of the domestic fowl and digestion of the crude fibre complex. II. Experiments in vivo with fistulated birds, and the artificd and isolated caecum in vitro. Br. Poult. Sci. 6: 33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar