References

• BERG, L. R. and G. E. BEARSE (1951). Effect of iodinated casein and thiouracil on the performance of laying birds. Poultry Science. 30: 21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BORNSTEIN, S. (1971). Studies with decreasing lighting regimes for early-season replacement pullets under subtropical conditions. 3. Comparisons of photoperiodic and chemical control of the start of the laying period. Israel Journal Agricultural Research. 21: 35.
   Google Scholar
• BORNSTEIN, S. and Y. LEV (1969a). Studies with decreasing lighting regimes for early-season replacement pullets under subtropical conditions. I. A. comparison of various programmes. Poultry Science. 48: 1919.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BORNSTEIN, S. and Y. LEV (1969b). Studies with decreasing light regimes for early-season replacement pullets under subtropical conditions. 2. A possible explanation for their effect on egg size. Poultry Science. 48: 1934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BOWMAN, J. C. (1960). Lighting techniques for the domestic fowl. 1. Experiments 1958–59. British Poultry Science. 1: 122.
   Google Scholar
• BOWMAN, J. C. and R. H. JONES (1961). Lighting techniques for the domestic fowl. 2. Experiment 1959–60. British Poultry Science. 2: 91.
   Google Scholar
• BOWMAN, J. C. and R. H. JONES (1963). Lighting techniques for the domestic fowl. 3. Experiments 1960–61. British Poultry Science. 4: 27.
   Google Scholar
• BOWMAN, J. C., R. H. JONES and D. W. KNIGHT (1964). Lighting techniques for domestic fowl. 4. Experiments 1961–62. British Poultry Science. 5: 217.
   Google Scholar
• BOWMAN, J. C., R. H. JONES and D. W. KNIGHT (1966). Lighting techniques for domestic fowl. 5. Experiments 1962–63. British Poultry Science. 7: 117.
   Google Scholar
• CARSON, J. R., W. A. JUNNILA and B. F. BACON (1958). Sexual maturity and productivity in the chicken as affected by the quality of illumination during the growing period. Poultry Science. 37: 102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DORMINEY, R. W., J. E. PARKER and W. H. McCLUSKEY (1970). Effects of light intensity on Leghorn pullets during the development and laying periods. Poultry Science. 49: 1657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FULLER, H. L., W. M. KIRKLAND and L. W. CHANEY (1973). Methods of delaying sexual maturity of pullets. 2. Restricting energy consumption. Poultry Science. 52: 228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HARRISON, R., J McGINNIS, G. SCHUMAIER and J. LAUBER (1969a). Sexual maturity and subsequent reproductive performance of White Leghorn chickens subjected to different parts of the light spectrum. Poultry Science. 48: 878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HARRISON, P. C., G. SCHUMAIER and J. McGINNIS (1969b). Reproductive development and response of White Leghorn pullets subjected to increasing day-lengths at different ages. Poultry Science. 48: 1021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HUTCHINSON, J. C. D. and W. W. TAYLOR (1957). Seasonal variation in the egg production of fowls: Effect of temperature and change of day length. Journal of Agricultural Science. 49: 419.
   Google Scholar
• KING, D. F. (1961). Effects of increasing, decreasing and constant lighting treatments on growing pullets. Poultry Science. 40: 479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KING, D. F. (1962). Egg production of chickens raised and kept in darkness. Poultry Science. 41: 1449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LILLIE, R. J. and C. A. DENTON (1965). Effect of lighting systems in the grower and adult periods upon the overall performance of White Leghorns. Poultry Science. 44: 809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LOWE, R. W. and B. W. HEYWANG (1964). Effect of various light treatments during growing peroid on egg production of October hatched White Leghorns Poultry Science. 43: 11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCLUSKEY, W. H. and J. E. PARKER (1963). The effects of length of daily light periods on reproduction in female chickens. Poultry Science. 42: 1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MILLER, P. C. and M. L. SUNDE (1975). Combinations of restricted feeding, lighting and energy levels on performance of growing pullets and subsequent layer performance. Poultry Science. 54: 1631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MORRIS, R. H. and A. H. LEAN (1967). Step-down lighting. Proceedings Australian Poultry Science Convention. 141.
   Google Scholar
• MORRIS, T. R. (1963). Personal Communication.
   Google Scholar
• MORRIS, T. R. (1979). The influence of light on ovulation in domestic birds. In: Animal Reproduction. Ed. H. Hawk (BARC, Symposium no. 3), pp. 307–322. (Allanheld, Osmun, Montclair).
   Google Scholar
• MORRIS, T. R. and S. FOX (1958a). Light and sexual maturity in the domestic fowl. Nature. 181: 1453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MORRIS, T. R. and S. FOX (1958b). Artificial light and sexual maturity in the fowl. Nature. 182: 1522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MORRIS, T. R. and S. FOX (1960). The use of lights to delay sexual maturity in pullets. British Poultry Science. 1: 25.
   Google Scholar
• NOLES, R. K. and R. E. SMITH (1964). Rearing and maintaining pullets on controlled lighting. Poultry Science. 43: 848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PAYNE, C. G. (1975). Day-length during rearing and the subsequent egg production of meat-strain pullets. British Poultry Science. 16: 559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PIGAREV, N. V., Y. LANTING and M. PIGAREV (1966). Light pattern for replacement pullets and hens kept in batteries. Proceedings 13th World's Poultry Congress 463.
   Google Scholar
• PROUDFOOT, F. G. and R. S. GOWE (1967). The effect of photoperiodism and rearing period feed restriction on the performance of five Leghorn strains. Poultry Science. 46: 1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PROUDFOOT, F. G. and R. S. GOWE (1974). The influence of an increasing photoperiod, a modified natural daylength and feed restriction during the rearing period on the performance of five S.C.W.L. genotypes. Poultry Sciences. 53: 518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHANAWANY, M. M. and T. R. MORRIS (1980). Light, sexual maturity and subsequent performance. Paper presented at the summer meeting of World's Poultry Association (UK Branch). Reading 9th July and reproduced in ADAS Poultry Quarterly Review.
   Google Scholar
• SHUTZE, J. V., W. E. MATSON and J. McGINNIS (1961). Influence of different photoperiods during brooding and rearing on subsequent productive characteristics in chickens. Poultry Science. 40: 1604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHUTZE, J. V., W. E. MATSON and J. McGINNIS (1963). Effect of light on economic and physiological characters of laying hens. Poultry Science. 42: 150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SIEGEL, H. S., G. E. BEANE and C. E. HOWES (1963). Lighting regimes as an influence on maturity and productivity of Leghorn-type layers. Poultry Science. 42: 1064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SMITH, R. E. and R. K. NOLES (1963). Effects of varying daylength on laying hen production rates and annual eggs. Poultry Science. 42: 973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SYKES, A. H. (1956). Short day-length and egg production in the fowl. Journal of Agricultural Science. 47: 429.
   Google Scholar
• TOMHAVE, A. E. (1954). Influence of artificial lights during rearing on the egg production of October hatched New Hampshires. Poultry Scinece. 33: 725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar