Ahemeral lighting and reproductive efficiency in breeding flocks

References

• BACON, W.L. and NESTOR, K.E. (1979) Reproductive traits of first eggs of clutches vs. other clutch positions in turkeys. Poultry Science 58: 257–258
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BLAKE, A.G. and RINGER, R.K. (1987) Changes in ring-necked pheasants' (Phasianus colchius) egg formation time, oviposition lag time and egg sequence length due to ahemeral light:dark cycles. Poultry Science 66: 231–236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BLAKE, A.G., BALANDER, R., FLEGAL, C.J. and RINGER, R.K. (1987) Ahemeral light–dark cycles and egg production parameters of ring-necked pheasants (Phasianus colchius). Poultry Science 66: 258–263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BYERLY, T.C. and MOORE, O.K. (1941) Clutch length in relation to period of illumination in the domestic fowl. Poultry Science 20: 387–390
   Google Scholar
• CAHANER, A. and ABPLANALP, H. (1979) Changes in egg production and egg intervals under selection for high egg number under 22 hour day cycles of artificial lighting. Poultry Science 58: 757–761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FASENKO, G.M., HARDIN, R.T. and ROBINSON, F.E. (1992) Relationship of hen age and egg sequence position with fertility, hatchability, viability and preincubation embryonic development in broiler breeders. Poultry Science 71: 1374–1383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FÖRSTER, A., KALM, E. and FLOCK, D.K. (1992) Influence of egg sequence position on fertility and hatchability in two brown egg lines. Proceedings of XIX World's Poultry Science Congress, The Netherlands, Vol. 1, p. 702
   Google Scholar
• FOSTER, W.H. (1972) Selection for egg production under ahemeral light–dark cycles of abnormal lengths. In: Egg Formation and Production (Eds Freeman, B.M. and Lake, P.E.), Carfax, Oxford, pp. 161–183
   Google Scholar
• FOSTER, W.H. (1985) The genetics of ovulation efficiency. In: Poultry Genetics and Breeding (Eds Hill, W.G., Manson, J.M. and Hewitt, D.), Longman, Harlow, pp. 157–168
   Google Scholar
• FOSTER, W.H. (1986) Selection for increased egg mass under ahemeral light-dark cycles. British Poultry Science 27: 339–344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBARAKI, K, YOSHIDA, S., KUMIMATSU, Y. and KOJIMA, Y. (1985) Effect of 28-h ahemeral light–dark cycles on egg production and shell qualities of laying hens. I. Effect on oviposition time, rate of lay and egg yolk weight. Japanese Poultry Science 22: 181–189
   Google Scholar
• KOBAYASHI, S., OKAMOTO, S. and MATSUO, T. (1981) Effects of ahemeral light and dark cycles on egg production and oviposition rhythm in the quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science 52: 39–46
   Google Scholar
• KOJIMA, Y., ASHIDA, H., KUMIMATSU, Y. and IBARAKI, K. (1986) Entrainment of oviposition under 28 hour ahemeral light–dark cycle in laying hens. Japanese Poultry Science 23: 10–17
   Google Scholar
• KOJIMA, Y., ITOH, M., KUMIMATSU, Y. and IBARKAI, K. (1988) Entrainment of ovipositions under 28 hour ahemeral light–dark cycles in laying hens. Japanese Poultry Science 25: 312–318
   Google Scholar
• KOSIN, I.L. and MUN, A.B. (1960) Clutch size, oviposition time and ‘floor’ eggs as factors in turkey hatchability. Poultry Science 39: 82–92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LACASSAGNE, L., SAUVEUR, B. and DE REVIERS, M. (1973) Effects of an ahemeral light cycle of 28 h on fertility and embryonic mortality in the domestic hen (Gallus gallus). Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Seances de l'Academie des Sciences, D. Sciences Naturelles 277: 1201–1204
   Google Scholar
• MARKS, H.L., LUCAS, L.M. and GODFREY, E.F. (1968) Selection for egg production in the domestic fowl under normal and ‘short day’ environments. Poultry Science 47: 1170–1176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MORRIS, T.R. (1973) The effects of ahemeral light and dark cycles on egg production. Poultry Science 52: 423–445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MORRIS, T.R. (1978) The photoperiodic effect of ahemeral light–dark cycles which entrain circadian rhythms. British Poultry Science 19: 207–212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MORRIS, T.R. (1979) The influence of light on ovulation in domestic birds. In: Animal Reproduction (BARC Symposium in Agricultural Research), Wiley, New York, pp. 307–322
   Google Scholar
• MORRIS, T.R. and BHATTI, B.M. (1978) Entrainment of oviposition in the fowl using bright and dim cycles. British Poultry Science 19: 341–348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAITO, M. (1992) Ahemeral light–dark cycles as a selection environment for laying hens. Japanese Poultry Science 29: 335–349
   Google Scholar
• NAITO, M., KOMIYAMA, T. and NIRASAWA, K. (1985) The effects of ahemeral light–dark on egg production and oviposition cycle in the domestic fowl. Bulletin of National Institute of Animal Industry (Japan) 43: 1–9
   Google Scholar
• NAITO, M., NIRASAWA, K. and KOMIYAMA, T. (1986) The effect of 23 h light–dark cycle on egg production and egg characteristics in the domestic fowl. Japanese Poultry Science 23: 83–90
   Google Scholar
• NAITO, M., NIRASAWA, K. and OISHI, T. (1990) Duration of egg formation in hens selected for increased rate of lay under 23 h and 24 h light–dark cycles. British Poultry Science 31: 371–375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PROUDFOOT, F.G. (1980) The effects of dietary protein levels, ahemeral light and dark cycles and intermittent photoperiods on the performance of chicken broiler parent genotypes. Poultry Science 59: 1258–1267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ROBINSON, F.E., HARDIN, R.T., ROBINSON, N.A. and WILLIAMS, B.J. (1991) The influence of egg sequence position on fertility, embryo viability and embryo weight in broiler breeders. Poultry Science 70: 760–765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHANAWANY, M.M. (1982) The effect of ahemeral light and dark cycles on the performance of laying pullets. World's Poultry Science Journal 38: 120–126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHANAWANY, M.M. (1987) Hatching weight in relation to egg weight in domestic birds. World's Poultry Science Journal 43: 107–115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHANAWANY, M.M. (1990a) Ahemeral light cycles and egg quality. World's Poultry Science Journal 46: 101–108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHANAWANY, M.M. (1990b) Reproductive performance of broiler breeders under ahemeral light cycles. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 54: 111–114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHANAWANY, M.M. (1992) Response of layers to ahemeral light cycles incorporating age at application and changes in effective photoperiod. World's Poultry Science Journal 48: 156–164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHANAWANY, M.M. and PIRCHNER, F. (1992) Performance of breeding flocks under ahemeral lighting. Archiv für Geflügelkunde 56: 227–229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHANAWANY, M.M., MORRIS, T.R. and PIRCHNER, F. (1993) Influence of clutch length on the response to ahemeral lighting late in lay. British Poultry Science (in press)
   Google Scholar
• WATERS, C.J., ROSE, S.P. and BAMPTON, P.R. (1987) Production responsens of laying hens to 28 h bright:dim cycles using different light intensity ratios and a 24 h temperature regimen. British Poultry Science 28: 207–212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar