Prioritising disclosures in the annual report

References

• ACCA, 2012. Re-assessing the Value of Corporate Reporting. London: ACCA.
   Google Scholar
• AICPA, 1981. Tentative Conclusions and Recommendations of the Special Committee on Accounting Standards Overload. New York: American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, H.K. and Haslem, J.A., 1973. Information needs of individual investors. Journal of Accountancy, 136 (5), 64–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, H., 1996. Strengths and limitations of ipsative measurement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 69 (1), 49–56. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1996.tb00599.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, S.A. and Chandler, R.A., 1997. The corporate report and the private shareholder: Lee and Tweedie twenty years on. British Accounting Review, 29 (3), 245–264. doi: 10.1006/bare.1996.0044
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, V. and Pratt, K., 2002. Voluntary Annual Report Disclosures: What Users Want. Edinburgh: Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, V. and Smith, S.J., 2012. Evaluating disclosure theory using the views of UK finance directors in the intellectual capital context. Accounting and Business Research, 42 (5), 471–494. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2012.668468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beattie, V., Fearnley, S., and Hines, T., 2011. Reaching Key Financial Reporting Decisions: How Directors and Auditors Interact. Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, J., Larrinaga, C., and Moneva, J.M., 2008. Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21 (3), 337–361. doi: 10.1108/09513570810863932
   Google Scholar
• Beyer, A., Cohen, D.A., Lys, T.Z., and Walther, B.R., 2010. The financial reporting environment: review of the recent literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50 (2), 296–343. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brent, R.J., 2006. Applied Cost-Benefit Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, P., 2011. International Financial Reporting Standards: what are the benefits?. Accounting and Business Research, 41 (3), 269–285. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2011.569054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushman, R. and Landsman, W.R., 2010. The pros and cons of regulating corporate reporting: a critical review of the arguments. Accounting and Business Research, 40 (3), 259–273. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2010.9663400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzby, S.L., 1974. Selected items of information and their disclosure in annual reports. Accounting Review, 49 (3), 423–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra, G., 1975. Information needs of security analysts. Journal of Accountancy, 140 (6), 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, L.S. and Most, K.S., 1977. Investor uses of financial statements: an empirical study. Singapore Accountant, 12 (1), 83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Crow, R., Gage, H., Hampson, S., Hart, J., Kimber, A., Storey, L., and Thomas, H., 2002. The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technology Assessment, 6 (32), 1–245. Available from: http://www.hta.ac.uk/fullmono/mon632.pdf [Accessed 28 June 2013].
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deegan, C., Rankin, M., and Tobin, J., 2002. An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983–1997. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 15 (3), 312–343. doi: 10.1108/09513570210435861
   Google Scholar
• De Zoysa, A. and Rudkin, K., 2010. An investigation of perceptions of company annual report users in Sri Lanka. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 5 (2), 183–202. doi: 10.1108/17468801011031810
   Google Scholar
• Dillman, D.A., 2007. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Edejer, T.T.-T., Baltussen, R.M.P.M., Adam, T., Hutubessy, R., Acharya, A., Evans, D. B, and Murray, C.J.L., 2003. WHO Guide to Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• EFRAG and ASB, 2011. Considering the effects of accounting standards: discussion paper. European Financial Reporting Advisory Group and Accounting Standards Board, Financial Reporting Council, Brussels and London.
   Google Scholar
• EFRAG, ANC, and FRC, 2012. Towards a disclosure framework for the notes: discussion paper. European Financial Reporting Advisory Group, Autorité des Normes Comptables and the UK Financial Reporting Council, Brussels, Paris and London.
   Google Scholar
• ESMA, 2011. Considerations of materiality in financial reporting. Consultation paper, European Securities and Markets Authority, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2010. Public Consultation of Disclosure of Non-financial Information by Companies. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2011. Expert Group on Disclosure of Non-financial Information by EU Companies: First Meeting. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2013a. Impact Assessment Accompanying the Document Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC as Regards Disclosure of Non-financial and Diversity Information by Certain Large Companies and Groups. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission, 2013b. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC as Regards Disclosure of Non-financial and Diversity Information by Certain Large Companies and Groups. Strasbourg: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Ewert, R. and Wagenhofer, A., 2012. Using academic research for the post-implementation review of accounting standards: a note. ABACUS, 48 (2), 278–291. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2012.00362.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabbris, L., 2013. Measurement scales for scoring or ranking sets of interrelated items. In C. Davino and L. Fabbris, eds. Survey Data Collection and Integration. Berlin: Springer, 21–44.
   Google Scholar
• FASB, 1991. Benefits, costs, and consequences of financial accounting standards. Special report, Financial Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, R., 2004. Standardization to account for cross-cultural response bias: a classification of score adjustment procedures and review of research in JCCP. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35 (3), 263–282. doi: 10.1177/0022022104264122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FRC, 2009a. Louder than Words: Principles and Actions for Making Corporate Reports Less Complex and More Relevant. London: Financial Reporting Council.
   Google Scholar
• FRC, 2009b. Rising to the Challenge: A Review of Narrative Reporting by UK Listed Companies. London: The Accounting Standards Board, Financial Reporting Council.
   Google Scholar
• FRC, 2011. Cutting Clutter: Combating Clutter in Annual Reports. London: Financial Reporting Council.
   Google Scholar
• FRC, 2012. Thinking about Disclosures in a Broader Context. London: Financial Reporting Council.
   Google Scholar
• Gafni, A., 1991. Willingness-to-pay as a measure of benefits: relevant questions in the context of public decisionmaking about health care programs. Medical Care, 29 (12), 1246–1252. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199112000-00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gassen, J. and Schwedler, K., 2010. The decision usefulness of financial accounting measurement concepts: evidence from an online survey of professional investors and their advisors. European Accounting Review, 19 (3), 495–509. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2010.496548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J.R. and Harvey, C.R., 2001. The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field. Journal of Financial Economics, 60 (2–3), 187–243. doi: 10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00044-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J.R., Harvey, C.R., and Rajgopal, S., 2005. The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40 (1–3), 3–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, S.J., Radebaugh, L.H., and Roberts, C.B., 1990. International perceptions of cost constraints on voluntary information disclosures: a comparative study of UK and US multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 21 (4), 597–622. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, C. and Königsgruber, R., 2012. What you measure is what you get: the effects of accounting standards effects studies. Accounting in Europe, 9 (2), 171–190. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2012.720873
   Google Scholar
• Gwilliam, D., Macve, R., and Meeks, G., 2005. The costs and benefits of increased accounting regulation: a case study of Lloyd's of London. Accounting and Business Research, 35 (2), 129–146. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2005.9729669
   Google Scholar
• Harrington, L. and Liu, J.H., 2002. Self-enhancement and attitudes toward high achievers: a bicultural view of the independent and interdependent self. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33 (1), 37–55. doi: 10.1177/0022022102033001003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, M.S., 1998. The association between competition and managers’ business segment reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting Research, 36 (1), 111–128. doi: 10.2307/2491323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, S.S.M. and Wong, K.S., 2001. A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation, 10 (2), 139–156. doi: 10.1016/S1061-9518(01)00041-6
   Google Scholar
• Hooks, J., Coy, D., and Davey, H., 2002. The information gap in annual reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15 (4), 501–522. doi: 10.1108/09513570210440577
   Google Scholar
• Huber, G.P. and Power, D.J., 1985. Retrospective reports of strategic-level managers: guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strategic Management Journal, 6 (2), 171–180. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250060206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutubessy, R., Baltussen, R.M.P.M., Torres-Edejer, T.T., and Evans, D.B., 2003. WHO-CHOICE: CHOosing Interventions that are Cost Effective. In C.J.L. Murray and D.B. Evans, eds. Health Systems Performance Assessment: Debates, Methods and Empirism. Geneva: World Health Organization, 823–834.
   Google Scholar
• IASB, 2010. The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. London: International Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• IASB, 2011a. Effect Analysis: IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements and IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities. London: International Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• IASB, 2011b. Effect Analysis: IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements and Disclosures for Joint Arrangements Included in IFRS 12 Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities. London: International Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• IASB, 2012. Agenda consultation 2011: comment letter summary. IASB meeting, Agenda ref 5A, International Accounting Standards Board, London.
   Google Scholar
• IASB, 2013. Discussion Forum – Financial Reporting Disclosure: Feedback Statement. London: International Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• IAASB, 2011. The Evolving Nature of Financial Reporting: Disclosure and Its Audit Implications. New York: International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• IAASB, 2012. The Evolving Nature of Financial Reporting: Disclosure and Its Audit Implications – Feedback Statement. New York: International Auditing and Assurance Standards Boards, International Federation of Accountants.
   Google Scholar
• ICAEW, 2007. EU Implementation of IFRS and the Fair Value Directive. London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
   Google Scholar
• IIRC, 2013. Consultation Draft of the International Integrated Reporting Framework. London: International Integrated Reporting Council.
   Google Scholar
• Jaén, C.R., Stange, K.C., and Nutting, P.A., 1994. Competing demands of primary care: a model for the delivery of clinical preventive services. Journal of Family Practice, 38 (2), 166–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jermakowicz, E.K. and Gornik-Tomaszewski, S., 2006. Implementing IFRS from the perspective of EU publicly traded companies. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 15 (2), 170–196. doi: 10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2006.08.003
   Google Scholar
• Klein, R., Day, P., and Redmayne, S., 1996. Managing Scarcity: Priority Setting and Rationing in the National Health Service. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, R., Leuz, C., and Verrecchia, R.E., 2007. Accounting information, disclosure, and the cost of capital. Journal of Accounting Research, 45 (2), 385–420. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2007.00238.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, R.A., Leuz, C., and Verrecchia, R.E., 2012. Information asymmetry, information precision, and the cost of capital. Review of Finance, 16 (1), 1–29. doi: 10.1093/rof/rfr014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Layard, R. and Glaister, S., 1994. Cost-Benefit Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, T.A. and Tweedie, D.P., 1975. Accounting information: an investigation of private shareholder usage. Accounting and Business Research, 5 (20), 280–291. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1975.9728653
   Google Scholar
• Leuz, C., 2003. Proprietary versus non-proprietary disclosures: evidence from Germany. Working paper. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=99861 [Accessed 28 June 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Leuz, C. and Wysocki, P., 2008. Economic consequences of financial reporting and disclosure regulation: a review and suggestions for future research. Working paper. Available from: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1105398 [Accessed 28 June 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Lev, B., 1992. Information disclosure strategy. California Management Review, 34 (4), 9–32. doi: 10.2307/41166701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, H.M. and McEwan, P.J., 2001. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Litjens, R., Bissessur, S., Langendijk, H., and Vergoossen, R., 2012. How do preparers perceive costs and benefits of IFRS for SMEs? Empirical evidence from the Netherlands. Accounting in Europe, 9 (2), 227–250. doi: 10.1080/17449480.2012.720875
   Google Scholar
• Maciosek, M.V., Coffield, A.B., Edwards, N.M., Flottemesch, T.J., Goodman, M.J., and Solberg, L.I., 2006. Priorities among effective clinical preventive services. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 31 (1), 52–61. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maijoor, S., 2010. Discussion of “how can we measure the costs and benefits of changes in financial reporting standards?”. Accounting and Business Research, 40 (3), 329–330. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2010.9663407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinnon, S.M., 1984. A cost-benefit study of disclosure requirements for multinational corporations. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 11 (4), 451–468. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1984.tb00763.x
   Google Scholar
• McNally, G.M., Eng, L.H., and Hasseldine, C.R., 1982. Corporate financial reporting in New Zealand: an analysis of user preferences, corporate characteristics and disclosure practices for discretionary information. Accounting and Business Research, 13 (49), 11–20. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1982.9729725
   Google Scholar
• Mitton, C. and Donaldson, C., 2003. Tools of the trade: a comparative analysis of approaches to priority setting in healthcare. Health Services Management Research, 16 (2), 96–105. doi: 10.1258/095148403321591410
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morris, S., Devlin, N., and Parkin, D., 2007. Economic Analysis in Health Care. Chichester: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, C.J.L. and Evans, D.B., 2003. Health Systems Performance Assessment. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• NZCA and ICAS, 2011. Losing the Excess Baggage – Reducing Disclosures in Financial Statements to What's Important. Napier Edinburgh: New Zealand Institute of Chartered Accountants and The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, P.F. and McLeay, S.J., 2011. The European IFRS experiment: objectives, research challenges and some early evidence. Accounting and Business Research, 41 (3), 233–266. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2011.575002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, W.A., 1984. Consensus between preparers and users of municipal annual reports: an empirical analysis. Accounting and Business Research, 14 (54), 157–162. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1984.9729202
   Google Scholar
• Schipper, K., 2010. How can we measure the costs and benefits of changes in financial reporting standards?. Accounting and Business Research, 40 (3), 309–327. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2010.9663406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffensen, H., Skødt, L., Nilsen, J.-C., and Fedders, J., 2011. Årsrapporten: Kommentarer til Årsregnskabsloven. Copenhagen: Karnov Group.
   Google Scholar
• Vergoossen, R.G.A., 1993. The use and perceived importance of annual reports by investment analysts in the Netherlands. European Accounting Review, 2 (2), 219–244. doi: 10.1080/09638189300000020
   Google Scholar
• Verrecchia, R., 2001. Essays on disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 32 (1–3), 97–180. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00025-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, M., 1988. The information economics approach to financial reporting. Accounting and Business Research, 18 (70), 170–182. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1988.9729362
   Google Scholar
• WHO, 2009. Evidence for the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Interventions to Reduce Alcohol-Related Harm. Copenhagen: The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Wilton, R.L. and Tabb, J.B., 1978. An investigation into private shareholder usage of financial statements in New Zealand. Accounting Education, 18 (1), 93–101.
   Google Scholar