References
- Abidin, S., Beattie, V., and Goodacre, A., 2010. Audit market structure, fees and choice following the Andersen break-up: evidence from the UK. British Accounting Review, 42 (3), 187–206. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2010.04.002
- AIU, 2006. Audit Quality Inspections. Audit Inspection Unit. London: Financial Reporting Council.
- Ball, R. and Shivakumar, L., 2005. Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39 (1), 83–128. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.04.001
- Baumol, W., 1982. Contestable markets: an uprising in the theory of industry structure. American Economic Review, 72 (1), 1–15.
- Beattie, V. and Fearnley, S., 1995. The importance of audit firm characteristics and the drivers of auditor change in UK listed companies. Accounting and Business Research, 25 (100), 227–239. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1995.9729912
- Beatty, R., 1993. The economic determinants of auditor compensation in the initial public offerings market. Journal of Accounting Research, 31 (2), 294–302. doi: 10.2307/2491275
- Butterworth, S. and Houghton, K., 1995. Auditor switching: the pricing of audit services. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 22 (3), 323–344. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1995.tb00877.x
- Cassell, C., Giroux, G., Myers, L., and Omer, T., 2013. The emergence of second-tier auditors in the US: evidence from investor perceptions of financial reporting credibility. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 40 (3&4), 350–372.
- CC, 2012a. Statutory Audit Market Inquiry: Consultation on the CC's Selection of Subjects for Studies. London: Competition Commission. Available from: http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/assets/competitioncommission/docs/2011/statutory-audit-services/case_study_cover_note.pdf [Accessed 19 January 2012].
- CC, 2012b. Evidence Relating to the Selection Process: Tendering, Annual Renegotiations and Switching. London: Competition Commission. Available from: http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/assets/competitioncommission/docs/2011/statutory-audit-services/evidence_relating_to_the_selection_process_tendering_annual_renegotiations_and_switching.pdf [Accessed 20 December 2012].
- CC, 2012c. Working Paper on Competition Commission Survey Results. London: Competition Commission. Available from: http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/assets/competitioncommission/docs/2011/statutory-audit-services/survey_results_revised.pdf [Accessed 20 December 2012].
- CC, 2012d. The Framework for the CC's Assessment and Revised Theories of Harm. London: Competition Commission. Available from: http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/assets/competitioncommission/docs/2011/statutory-audit-services/framework_for_the_ccs_assessment.pdf [Accessed 6 January 2012].
- CC, 2013. Statutory Audit Services for Large Companies Market Inquiry: Provisional Findings Report. London: Competition Commission. Available from: http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/assets/competitioncommission/docs/2011/statutory-audit-services/provisional_findings_report.pdf [Accessed 23 May 2013].
- Chan, P., Ezzamel, M., and Gwilliam, D., 1993. Determinants of audit fees for quoted UK companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 20 (6), 765–786. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1993.tb00292.x
- Chaney, P., Jeter, D., and Shivakumar, L., 2004. Self-selection of auditors and audit pricing in private firms. Accounting Review, 79 (1), 51–72. doi: 10.2308/accr.2004.79.1.51
- Chatterjee, S., Hadi, A., and Price, B., 2000. Regression Analysis by Example. New York: Wiley.
- Chelley-Steeley, P., 2008. Concentration of the UK stock market. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 35 (3&4), 541–562. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2007.02073.x
- Clatworthy, M. and Peel, M., 2007. The effect of corporate status on external audit fees: evidence from the UK. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 34 (1&2), 169–201. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2006.00658.x
- Cohen Commission, 1978. Report, Conclusions and Recommendations. New York: The Commission on Auditors’ Responsibility.
- Craswell, A. and Francis, J., 1999. Pricing initial audit engagements: a test of competing theories. Accounting Review, 74 (2), 201–216. doi: 10.2308/accr.1999.74.2.201
- DeAngelo, L., 1981. Auditor independence, low-balling, and disclosure regulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3 (2), 113–127. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(81)90009-4
- Ettredge, M. and Greenberg, R., 1990. Determinants of fee cutting on initial audit engagements. Journal of Accounting Research, 28 (1), 198–210. doi: 10.2307/2491224
- Firth, M., 1997. The provision of non-audit services and the pricing of audit fees. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 24 (3), 511–525. doi: 10.1111/1468-5957.00118
- Francis, J., 1984. The effect of audit firm size and audit prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 6 (2), 133–152. doi: 10.1016/0165-4101(84)90010-7
- FRC, 2006. Key Facts and Trends in the Accountancy Profession. London: Financial Reporting Council.
- Ghosh, A. and Lustgarten, S., 2006. Pricing of initial audit engagements by large and small audit firms. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23 (2), 333–368. doi: 10.1506/927U-JGJY-35TA-7NT1
- Gregory, A. and Collier, P., 1996. Audit fees and auditor change: an investigation of the persistence of fee reduction by type of change. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 23 (1), 13–28. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1996.tb00399.x
- Hay, D., 2013. Evaluating the evidence on the big firm premium. Working Paper. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1675605 [Accessed 21 May 2013].
- Hay, D. and Jeter, D., 2011. The pricing of industry specialisation by auditors in New Zealand. Accounting and Business Research, 41 (2), 171–195. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2011.550744
- HL, 2011. Auditors: Market Concentration and their Role. Volume II: Evidence. London: House of Lords Select Committee on Economic Affairs.
- ICAEW, 2002. Mandatory Rotation of Audit Firms. London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
- ICAEW, 2010. The Audit Firm Governance Code. London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. Available from: http://www.icaew.com/en/technical/corporate-governance/audit-firm-governance-code [Accessed 2 November 2011].
- LE, 2006. Study on the Economic Impact of Auditors’ Liability Regimes: Final Report to EC-DG Internal Market and Services. London: London Economics.
- Lennox, C., 2000. Do companies successfully engage in opinion-shopping? Evidence from the UK. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29 (3), 321–337. doi: 10.1016/S0165-4101(00)00025-2
- Magee, R. and Tseng, M., 1990. Audit pricing and independence. Accounting Review, 65 (2), 315–336.
- McMeeking, K., Peasnell, K., and Pope, P., 2006. The determinants of the UK big firms’ premium. Accounting and Business Research, 36 (3), 207–231. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2006.9730022
- McMeeking, K., Peasnell, K., and Pope, P., 2007. The effect of audit firm mergers on audit pricing in the UK. Accounting and Business Research, 37 (4), 301–319. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2007.9663314
- OFT, 2011. OFT Refers Audit Market to Competition Commission. London: Office of Fair Trading. Available from: http://www.oft.gov.uk/news-and-updates/press/2011/115-11 [Accessed 20 November 2011].
- Oxera, 2006. Competition and Choice in the UK Audit Market. London: Oxera Consulting.
- Palmrose, Z., 1986. Audit fees and auditor size: further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 24 (1), 97–110. doi: 10.2307/2490806
- Pong, C., 1999. Auditor concentration: a replication and extension for the UK audit market 1991–1995. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 26 (3&4), 451–475. doi: 10.1111/1468-5957.00263
- Pong, C. and Whittington, G., 1994. The determinants of audit fees: some empirical models. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 21 (8), 1071–1095. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5957.1994.tb00365.x
- PwC, 2012. Submission and Response to Issues Statement: Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP. London: Competition Commission. Available from: http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/assets/competitioncommission/docs/2011/statutory-audit-services/pwc_response_to_is_non_confidential_version.pdf [Accessed 2 February 2012].
- Schatzberg, J. and Sevcik, G., 1994. A multiperiod model and experimental evidence of independence and lowballing. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11 (1), 137–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1994.tb00440.x
- Simon, D. and Francis, J., 1988. The effects of auditor change on audit fees: tests of price cutting and price recovery. Accounting review, 63 (2), 255–269.
- Simunic, D., 1980. The pricing of audit services: theory and evidence. Journal of accounting research, 18 (1), 161–190. doi: 10.2307/2490397
- Stiglitz, J., 1987. Competition and the number of firms in a market: are duopolies more competitive than atomistic markets?. Journal of Political Economy, 95 (5), 1041–1061. doi: 10.1086/261501
- White, H., 1980. A heteroscedastic-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroscedasticity. Econometrica, 48 (4), 817–828. doi: 10.2307/1912934
- Zanfei, A., 2005. Globalization at bay? Multinational growth and technology spillover. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 1 (1), 5–17. doi: 10.1108/17422040510577870