Derivatives disclosure in corporate annual reports: bank analysts' perceptions of usefulness

References

• Allen, L. and Saunders, A., 1992. Bank window dressing: theory and evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 16 (3), 585–623. doi: 10.1016/0378-4266(92)90046-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey, H. and Knight, P., 1999. Interviewing for Social Scientists: An Introductory Resource with Examples. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, C.S., Guay, W.R., and Weber, J.P., 2010. The role of information and financial reporting in corporate governance and debt contracting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50 (2), 179–234. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASX, 2015. ASX 200 List. Australian Stock Exchange. Available from: http://www.asx200list.com/ [Accessed 1 June 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Bartholomeusz, S. (2004, 4 September). Sons of Gwalia's gold hedging had big holes. Sydney Morning Herald. Available from: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/09/03/1093939143587.html# [Accessed 29 July 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Beattie, V. and Pratt, K., 2002. Voluntary Annual Report Disclosures: What Users Want. Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
   Google Scholar
• Birt, J., Rankin, M., and Song, C.L., 2013. Derivatives use and financial instrument disclosure in the extractives industry. Accounting & Finance, 53 (1), 55–83. doi: 10.1111/acfi.12001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodnar, G.M. and Gebhardt, G., 1999. Derivatives usage in risk management by US and German non-financial firms: a comparative survey. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 10 (3), 153–187. doi: 10.1111/1467-646X.00049
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. and Slack, R., 2011. Environmental disclosure and environmental risk: sceptical attitudes of UK sell-side bank analysts. British Accounting Review, 43 (1), 54–64. doi: 10.1016/j.bar.2010.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, K.G. and Godfrey, J.M., 2000. Practice versus prescription in the disclosure and recognition of derivatives. Australian Accounting Review, 10 (21), 40–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2000.tb00061.x
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, M., 2005, 22 August. How Sons of Lalor built, then sank, Sons of Gwalia. Sydney Morning Herald. Available from: http://www.smh.com.au/news/business/how-sons-of-lalor-built-then-sank-sons-of-gwalia/2005/08/21/1124562748347.html [Accessed 29 July 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Durocher, S. and Gendron, Y., 2010. IFRS: on the docility of sophisticated users in preserving the ideal of comparability. European Accounting Review, 20 (2), 233–262. doi: 10.1080/09638181003687869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbannan, M. and McKinley, W., 2006. A theory of the corporate decision to resist FASB standards: an organization theory perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31 (7), 601–622. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2005.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst & Young, 2008. Observations on the Implementation of IFRS 7 in Corporate Entities. London: EYGM Limited.
   Google Scholar
• FRC, 2009. Louder Than Words: Principles and Actions for Making Corporate Reports Less Complex and More Relevant. London: Financial Reporting Council.
   Google Scholar
• FRC, 2011. Cutting Clutter: Combating Clutter in Annual Reports. London: Financial Reporting Council.
   Google Scholar
• Géczy, C.C., Minton, B.A., and Schrand, C.M., 2007. Taking a view: corporate speculation, governance, and compensation. The Journal of Finance, 62 (5), 2405–2443. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01279.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giner, B. and Arce, M., 2012. Lobbying on accounting standards: evidence from IFRS 2 on share-based payments. European Accounting Review, 21 (4), 655–691. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2012.701796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaum, M. and Klöcker, A., 2011. Hedge accounting and its influence on financial hedging: when the tail wags the dog. Accounting and Business Research, 41 (5), 459–489. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2011.573746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gniewosz, G., Fargher, N., and Simnett, R., 2001. Auditors’ assessment of hedge effectiveness. International Journal of Auditing, 5 (1), 3–19. doi: 10.1111/1099-1123.00322
   Google Scholar
• Heaney, R. and Winata, H., 2005. Use of derivatives by Australian companies. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13 (4), 411–430. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2004.11.004
   Google Scholar
• Hoogervorst, H., 2013. Breaking the boilerplate. Paper presented at the IFRS Conference, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• IASB, 2005. IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures. London: International Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• IASB, 2008a. Board Discussion and Papers: IASB/FASB Meeting. 24 March. London: International Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• IASB, 2008b. Discussion Paper: Reducing Complexity in Reporting Financial Instruments. London: IASB.
   Google Scholar
• IASB, 2010. The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. London: International Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• IASB, 2011. IFRS 13 Fair Value Measurement. London: International Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• IASB, 2013a. Discussion Forum – Financial Reporting Disclosure Feedback Statement. London: International Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• IASB, 2013b. Discussion Paper: A Review of the Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. London: International Accounting Standards Board.
   Google Scholar
• Johansen, T.R. and Plenborg, T., 2013. Prioritising disclosures in the annual report. Accounting and Business Research, 43 (6), 605–635. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2013.827105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M., 2011. Creative Accounting, Fraud and International Accounting Scandals. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Jorion, P., 2002. How informative are value-at-risk disclosures? Accounting Review, 77 (4), 911–931. doi: 10.2308/accr.2002.77.4.911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorissen, A., Lybaert, N., Orens, R., and van der Tas, L., 2012. Formal participation in the IASB's due process of standard setting: a multi-issue/multi-period analysis. European Accounting Review, 21 (4), 693–729. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2010.522775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jorissen, A., Lybaert, N., Orens, R., and van der Tas, L., 2013. A geographic analysis of constituents’ formal participation in the process of international accounting standard setting: do we have a level playing field? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32 (4), 237–270. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari, S.P., Ramanna, K., and Skinner, D.J., 2010. Implications for GAAP from an analysis of positive research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50 (2–3), 246–286. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KPMG, 2011. Disclosure Overload and Complexity: Hidden in Plain Sight. DE: KPMG LLP.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R.K., 2007. Constituent participation and the IASB's International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee. Accounting in Europe, 4 (2), 207–254. doi: 10.1080/17449480701727981
   Google Scholar
• Lee, P., 2012. Discussion of ‘Risk reporting quality: implications of academic research for financial reporting policy’ by Stephen G. Ryan (2012). Accounting and Business Research, 42 (3), 325–327. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2012.683332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Guyader, L.P., 2013. Can accountants understand derivatives? Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 24 (6), 49–54. doi: 10.1002/jcaf.21891
   Google Scholar
• Liao, L., Kang, H.H.J., Morris, R., and Tang, Q., 2010. Information Asymmetry of Fair Value Accounting and Loan Loss Provisions During the Global Financial Crisis. Available at SSRN 1569076.
   Google Scholar
• Lim, C.Y. and Tan, P.M.-S., 2007. Value relevance of value-at-risk disclosure. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 29 (4), 353–370. doi: 10.1007/s11156-007-0038-7
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G., 1994. Naturalistic Inquiry. 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lins, K.V., Servaes, H., and Tamayo, A., 2011. Does fair value reporting affect risk management? International survey evidence. Financial Management, 40 (3), 525–551. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-053X.2011.01152.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, C.C., Ryan, S.G., and Tan, H., 2004. How banks’ value-at-risk disclosures predict their total and priced risk: effects of bank technical sophistication and learning over time. Review of Accounting Studies, 9 (2), 265–294. doi: 10.1023/B:RAST.0000028190.48665.d0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J., 2002. Qualitative Researching. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Matolcsy, Z.P. and Petty, J.D., 2001. Internal reporting of derivatives: some Australian evidence. Australian Accounting Review, 11 (23), 26–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.2001.tb00177.x
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M., 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, H. and Faff, R., 2002. On the determinants of derivative usage by Australian companies. Australian Journal of Management, 27 (1), 1–24. doi: 10.1177/031289620202700101
   Google Scholar
• Onwuegbuzie, A.J. and Collins, K.M.T., 2007. A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report, 12 (2), 281–316.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, E.L. and Wu, J.S., 2014. Quarter-end repo borrowing dynamics and bank risk opacity. Simon School Working Paper No. FR 11–15. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1811110.
   Google Scholar
• Papa, V. and Peters, S., 2011. User Perspective on Financial Instruments Risk Disclosures under International Financial Reporting Standards. London: CFA Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Papa, V. and Peters, S., 2013. User Perspective on Financial Instruments Risk Disclosures under IFRS – Derivatives and Hedging Activities Disclosures. London: CFA Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q., 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pérignon, C. and Smith, D.R., 2010. The level and quality of value-at-risk disclosure by commercial banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34 (2), 362–377. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedl, E.J. and Serafeim, G., 2011. Information risk and fair values: an examination of equity betas. Journal of Accounting Research, 49 (4), 1083–1122. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2011.00408.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roulstone, D.T., 1999. Effect of SEC Financial Reporting Release no. 48 on derivative and market risk disclosures. Accounting Horizons, 13 (4), 343–363. doi: 10.2308/acch.1999.13.4.343
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, S.G., 2008. Accounting in and for the subprime crisis. Accounting Review, 83 (6), 1605–1638. doi: 10.2308/accr.2008.83.6.1605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, S.G., 2012. Risk reporting quality: implications of academic research for financial reporting policy. Accounting and Business Research, 42 (3), 295–324. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2012.681855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schipper, K., 2007. Required disclosures in financial reports. Accounting Review, 82 (2), 301–326. doi: 10.2308/accr.2007.82.2.301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenton, A.K., 2004. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22 (2), 63–76.
   Google Scholar
• Sikka, P., 2009. Financial crisis and the silence of the auditors. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34 (6), 868–873. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, C.J., Thomas, W.B., and Yi, H., 2010. Value relevance of FAS no. 157 fair value hierarchy information and the impact of corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Review, 85 (4), 1375–1410. doi: 10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thinggaard, F., 1996. Mark-to-market accounting, hedge accounting or historical cost accounting for derivative financial instruments? A survey of financial analysts in Denmark. European Accounting Review, 5 (1), 57–75. doi: 10.1080/09638189600000003
   Google Scholar
• Weetman, P., Davie, E.S., and Collins, W., 1996. Lobbying on accounting issues: preparer/user imbalance in the case of the operating and financial review. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 9 (1), 59–76. doi: 10.1108/09513579610109978
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K., 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar