Capital reduction case law decisions and the development of the capital maintenance doctrine in late-nineteenth-century England

References

• Abe, E., 1996. The technological strategy of a leading iron and steel firm. Bolckow Vaughan and Co. Ltd: late Victorian industrialists did fail. Business History, 38 (1), 45–76. doi: 10.1080/00076799600000003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammonia Soda Company v Chamberlain. 1918. 1 Ch. 266.
   Google Scholar
• Andews, P.W.S. and Brunner, E., 1951. Capital Development in Steel: A Study of United Steel Cos Ltd. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ardern, D. and Aiken, M., 2005. An accounting history of capital maintenance: legal precedents for managerial autonomy in the UK. Accounting Historians Journal, 32 (1), 23–60.
   Google Scholar
• Armour, J., 2000. Share capital and creditor protection: efficient rules for a modern Company Law. Modern Law Review, 63 (3), 355–378. doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.00268
   Google Scholar
• Bannatyne v Direct Spanish Telegraph Company, 1886. 34 Ch. D. 287.
   Google Scholar
• re Barrow Haematite Steel Company, 1888. L.R. 39 Ch. D. 582.
   Google Scholar
• re Barrow Haematite Steel Company, 1900. 2 Ch. 846.
   Google Scholar
• re Barrow Haematite Steel Company, 1901. 2 Ch. 746.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, A., 1967. The Economic History of the British Iron and Steel Industry, 1784–1879. London: Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, M.M. 2003a. Locking in capital: what corporate law achieved for business organizers in the nineteenth century. UCLA Law Review, 51 (2), 387–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, M.M. 2003b. Why markets chose the corporate form: entity status and the separation of asset ownership from control. Georgetown Law and Economics Research Paper 429300.
   Google Scholar
• Bond v Barrow Haematite Steel Company, 1902. 1 Ch. 353.
   Google Scholar
• Bryer, R.A., 1998. The laws of accounting in late nineteenth century Britain. Accounting History, 3 (1), 55–94. doi: 10.1177/103237329800300104
   Google Scholar
• Bryer, R.A., 2000. The history of accounting and the transition to capitalism in England. Part one: theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25 (2), 131–162. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00032-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannadine, D., 1977. The landowner as millionaire: the finances of the dukes of Devonshire, c. 1880–1926. Agriculture History Review, 25 (2), 77–97.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, J.C. and Taplin, W., 1962. History of the British Steel Industry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chiapello, E., 2007. Accounting and the birth of the notion of capitalism. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 18 (3), 263–296. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2005.11.012
   Google Scholar
• Companies Act, 1867. 30 & 31 Vict c 131.
   Google Scholar
• Companies Act, 1877. 40 & 41 Vict c 26.
   Google Scholar
• Companies Act, 1947. 10 & 11 Geo 6 c 47.
   Google Scholar
• Companies Act, 1948. 11 & 12 Geo 6 c 38.
   Google Scholar
• Companies Act, 1981. c 31.
   Google Scholar
• Companies Act, 2006. c 46.
   Google Scholar
• Companies Clauses Consolidation Act, 1845. 8 & 9 Vict c 16.
   Google Scholar
• Cottrell, P.L., 1980. Industrial Finance 1830–1914. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• re Ebbw Vale Steel, Iron, and Coal Company, 1877. 4 Ch. D. 827.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J.R., 1980. British capital accounting practices and business finance 1852–1919: an exemplification. Accounting and Business Research, 10, 241–258. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1980.9728750
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J.R., 1989. A History of Financial Accounting. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferran, E., 1999. Company Law and Corporate Finance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Floud, R., 1994. Britain, 1860–1914: a survey. In: R. Floud and D. McCloskey, eds. The Economic History of Britain since 1700, Vol 2: 1860–1939. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• French, E.A., 1977. The evolution of the dividend law of England. In: W.T. Baxter and S. Davidson, eds. Studies in Accounting. London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales, 306–331.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, J.R., 1948. Value and Capital. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hope v International Financial Society Ltd., 1877. 46 L. J. Ch. 200.
   Google Scholar
• Inflation Accounting, 1975. Report of the Inflation Accounting Committee (Sandilands Committee), Cmnd. 6225. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferys, J.B., 1946. The denomination and character of shares, 1855–1885. Economic History Review, 16 (1), 45–55. doi: 10.2307/2590580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• re Kingston Cotton Mills Co. No. 2, 1896. 1 Ch 331.
   Google Scholar
• Lee v Neuchatel Asphalte Company, 1889. 41 Ch. D. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, A., 1890. Principles of Economics, Vol. 1. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, J.D., 1958. Furness and the Industrial Revolution. Barrow: Barrow-in-Furness Library and Museum Committee.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, K., 1978. Capital (Volumes 1 and 2). Harmondsworth, Middlesex: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, P., 1932. Profits and surplus available for dividends. Accounting Review, 7 (1), 61–66.
   Google Scholar
• Mayson, S.W., French, D., and Ryan, C., 1996. Company Law. 13th ed. London: Blackstone Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCartney, S. and Arnold, A.J., 2012. Financial capitalism, incorporation and the emergence of financial reporting information. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 25 (8), 1290–1316. doi: 10.1108/09513571211275489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D.N., 1970. Did Victorian Britain fail? Economic History Review, 23 (3), 446–459. doi: 10.2307/2594615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, R.D., 1986. Lee v Neuchatel Asphalte Company (1889) and depreciation accounting: two empirical studies. Accounting and Business Research, 16, 71–81. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1986.9729783
   Google Scholar
• Napier, C.J., 2015. The British aristocracy, capital and income. Paper presented at the Eighth Accounting History International Conference, Ballarat, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, M.A., 1963. The problem of the preference share. Modern Law Review, 26 (5), 499–519. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.1963.tb00727.x
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, S., 1954. Town planning in the nineteenth century: the beginnings of modern Barrow-in-Furness. Transactions of the Lancashire and Cheshire Antiquarian Society, 64, 87–116.
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, S., 1955. Barrow-in-Furness and the Seventh Duke of Devonshire. Economic History Review, VIII (2), 213–221. doi: 10.2307/2590989
   Google Scholar
• Pollard, S. and Marshall, J.D., 1953. Furness railway and the growth of barrow. Journal of Transport History, 1 (2), 109–126.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, J.M., 1986. Law and Accounting: Pre-1889 British Legal Cases. New York: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, J.M., 1987a. Judicial intervention in accounting behavior: a reevaluation of the nineteenth century experience. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 6, 9–34. doi: 10.1016/0278-4254(87)90003-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, J.M., 1987b. Judicial views on accounting in Britain. Accounting and Business Research, 17, 247–258. doi: 10.1080/00014788.1987.9729805
   Google Scholar
• Reid, J.M., 1988. Legal acceptance of accounting principles in Great Britain and the United States. Accounting Historians Journal, 15 (1), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Ribstein, L.E., 2005. Should history lock in lock-in? Tulsa Law Review, 41, 523–540.
   Google Scholar
• Roepke, H.G., 1956. Movements of the British Iron and Steel Industry, 1720 to 1951. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toms, J.S., 2010. Calculating profit: a historical perspective on the development of capitalism. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35 (2), 205–221. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevor v Whitworth, 1887. 12 App Cas 409, HL.
   Google Scholar
• Verner v General and Commercial Investment Trust, 1894. 2 Ch 239.
   Google Scholar
• Yamey, B.S., 1941. Aspects of the law relating to company dividends. Modern Law Review, 4 (4), 273–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.1940.tb00779.x
   Google Scholar
• Archival sources
   Google Scholar
• Barrow Records Office, BD HJ 163/3/1, Draft deed of agreement Haematite Steel Co. Ltd and Schneider and Hannay, 1864.
   Google Scholar
• Guildhall Library, London, annual reports filed with Stock Exchange; Barrow Haematite Steel Co. Ltd 1883–1964.
   Google Scholar
• National Archives (NA), BT31/1126c/44942–44944, Company files Barrow Haematite Iron and Steel Co. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• National Archives of Scotland, Buccleuch papers; GD 224/144/5 Printed papers, mainly annual reports of the Barrow Haematite Steel Co. Ltd, 1865–1882.
   Google Scholar
• Parliamentary Archives, House of Lords, London, Barrow Haematite Steel Co. Ltd Act 1902; An Act to provide for the settlement of questions which have arisen between the preference shareholders and ordinary shareholders in Barrow Haematite Steel Co. Ltd and for other purposes, Local Act 2 Edward VII c.ccxxxvii HL/PO/PB/1/1902/2E7n266 1902.
   Google Scholar