Sharing corporate tax knowledge with external advisers

References

• Argote, L. and Fahrenkopf, E. 2016. Knowledge transfer in organizations: the roles of members, tasks, tools, and networks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 146–159. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. and Cross, R. 2003. A relational view of information seeking and learning in social networks. Management Science, 49 (4), 432–445. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.49.4.432.14428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J. 2009. Choosing the right type of rotation in PCA and EFA. JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 13 (3), 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• CFE. 2014. European tax advisers’ priorities in EU policy: goals for the next 5 years ahead. Available from: www.nob.net/system/files/content/article/uploads/european_tax_advisers_priorities_in_eu_policy_2014-2019_cfe_opinion_statement.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, S., Lee, H. and Yoo, Y. 2010. The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: a field study. MIS Quarterly, 34 (4), 855–870. doi: 10.2307/25750708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, T. and Prusak, L. 2000. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dyer, J. and Singh, H. 1998. The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23 (4), 660–679. doi: 10.5465/amr.1998.1255632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyreng, S. and Maydew, E. 2018. Virtual issue on tax research. Journal of Accounting Research, 56 (2), 311. doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.12213
   Google Scholar
• Empson, L. 2004. Organizational identity change: managerial regulation and member identification in an accounting firm acquisition. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 759–781. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2004.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feller, A. and Schanz, D. 2017. The three hurdles of tax planning: how business context, aims of tax planning, and tax manager power affect tax expense. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34 (1), 494–524. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincham, R. 1999. The consultant-client relationship: critical perspectives on the management of organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 36 (3), 335–351. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincham, R. 2002. The agent’s agent: power, knowledge, and uncertainty in management consultancy. International Studies of Management & Organization, 32 (4), 67–86. doi: 10.1080/00208825.2002.11043668
   Google Scholar
• Fosstenløkken, S.M., Løwendahl, B. and Revang, Ø. 2003. Knowledge development through client interaction: A comparative study. Organization Studies, 24 (6), 859–879. doi: 10.1177/0170840603024006003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frecknall-Hughes, J. and Kirchler, E. 2015. Towards a general theory of tax practice. Social & Legal Studies, 24 (2), 289–312. doi: 10.1177/0964663915571787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbins, M. and Jamal, K. 1993. Problem-centred research and knowledge-based theory in the professional accounting setting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18, 451–466. doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(93)90041-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbins, M. and Jamal, K. 1999. Expertise and knowledge management in public accounting professional services firms: A north American perspective. Australian Accounting Review, 9, 27–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1835-2561.1999.tb00114.x
   Google Scholar
• Glaister, K. and Frecknall Hughes, J. 2008. Corporate strategy formulation and taxation: evidence from UK firms. British Journal of Management, 19, 33–48. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2007.00532.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gluckler, J. and Armbruster, T. 2003. Bridging uncertainty in management consulting: The mechanisms of trust and networked reputation. Organization Studies, 24 (2), 269–297. doi: 10.1177/0170840603242004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gracia, L. and Oats, L. 2012. Boundary work and tax regulation: A Bourdieusian view. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37, 304–321. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2012.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Hanlon, M., Shevlin, T. and Shroff, N. 2014. Incentives for tax planning and avoidance: evidence from the field. The Accounting Review, 89, 991–1023. doi: 10.2308/accr-50678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J., Hanlon, M., Shevlin, T. and Shroff, N. 2017. Tax rates and corporate decision-making. The Review of Financial Studies, 30 (9), 3128–3175. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhx037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, T. and Neale, M. 2001. Information processing in traditional, hybrid, and virtual teams: from nascent knowledge to transactive memory. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 379–421. doi: 10.1016/S0191-3085(01)23009-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasseldine, J., Holland, K. and Van der Rijt, P. 2010. The Management of Tax Knowledge. London: ACCA Research Report 112.
   Google Scholar
• Hasseldine, J., Holland, K. and Van der Rijt, P. 2011. The market for corporate tax knowledge. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22 (1), 39–52. doi: 10.1016/j.cpa.2010.06.019
   Google Scholar
• Hau, Y.S., Kim, B., Lee, H. and Kim, Y.-G. 2013. The effects of individual motivations and social capital on employees’ tacit and explicit knowledge sharing intentions. International Journal of Information Management, 33, 356–366. doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HMRC. 2016. Large Businesses: Publish Your Tax Strategy. London: HMRC. Available from: www.gov.uk/guidance/large-businesses-publish-your-tax-strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Holland, K., Lindop, S. and Zainudin, F. 2016. Tax avoidance: a threat to corporate legitimacy? An examination of companies’ financial and CSR reports. British Tax Review, 3, 310–338.
   Google Scholar
• Hollingshead, A. 1998. Communication, learning, and retrieval in transactive memory systems. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 423–442. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1998.1358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollingshead, A. 2001. Cognitive interdependence and convergent expectations in transactive memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81 (6), 1080–1089. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.1080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, J.S.-C., Shih, S.-P., Chiang, J. and Liu, J. 2012. The impact of transactive memory systems on IS development teams’ coordination, communication, and performance. International Journal of Project Management, 30, 329–340. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICAEW. 2016. ICAEW Representation 130/16 Legal Services Market Study. Interim Report. London: ICAEW available at www.icaew.com/-/media/corporate/files/technical/icaew-representations/2016/icaew-rep-130-16-legal-services-market-study-interim-report.ashx.
   Google Scholar
• Ihrig, M. and MacMillan, I. 2015. Managing your mission-critical knowledge. Harvard Business Review, 93 (1–2), 80–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. and Majchrzak, A. 2008. Knowledge collaboration among professionals protecting national security: role of transactive memories in Ego-centered knowledge networks. Organization Science, 19 (2), 260–276. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitay, J. and Wright, C. 2003. Expertise and organizational boundaries: the varying roles of Australian management consultants. Asia Pacific Business Review, 9 (3), 21–40. doi: 10.1080/13602380312331288610
   Google Scholar
• Klassen, K.J., Lisowsky, P. and Mescall, D. 2016. The role of auditors, non-auditors, and internal tax departments in corporate tax aggressiveness. The Accounting Review, 91 (1), 179–205. doi: 10.2308/accr-51137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen, K., Lisowsky, P. and Mescall, D. 2017. Transfer pricing: strategies, practices, and tax minimization. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34 (1), 455–493. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko, D.-G. 2010. Consultant competence trust doesn’t pay off, but benevolent trust does! managing knowledge with care. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14 (2), 202–213. doi: 10.1108/13673271011032355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. 2003. Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (4), 587–604. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K. 2004. Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: a longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science, 50 (11), 1519–1533. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1040.0257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K., Lange, D. and Gillis, L. 2005. Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning transfer. Organization Science, 16 (6), 581–598. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Løwendahl, B., Revang, Ø. and Fosstenløkken, S. 2001. Knowledge and value creation in professional service firms: a framework for analysis. Human Relations, 54 (7), 911–931. doi: 10.1177/0018726701547006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, T. and Empson, L. 1998. Organisation and expertise: an exploration of knowledge bases and the management of accounting and consulting firms. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23, 609–624. doi: 10.1016/S0361-3682(98)00032-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan, E. and Oats, L. 2016. Tax professionals at work in Silicon Valley. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 52, 63–76. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2015.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal, S. 1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23 (2), 242–266. doi: 10.5465/amr.1998.533225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nevo, D. and Wand, Y. 2005. Organizational memory information systems: a transactive memory approach. Decision Support Systems, 39, 549–562. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2004.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2008. Study Into the Role of Tax Intermediaries. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Prudential plc & Anor, R. (on the Application of) v. Special Commissioner of Income Tax & Anor, 2013, UKSC 1.
   Google Scholar
• Sarvary, M. 1999. Knowledge management and competition in the consulting industry. California Management Review, 41 (2), 95–107. doi: 10.2307/41165988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturdy, A. 1997. The consultancy process – an insecure business? Journal of Management Studies, 34 (3), 389–413. doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturdy, A., Clark, T., Fincham, R. and Handley, K. 2009. Between innovation and legitimation – boundaries and knowledge flow in management consultancy. Organization, 16 (5), 627–653. doi: 10.1177/1350508409338435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. 2007. Using Multivariate Statistics. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Hooff, B. and Huysman, M. 2009. Managing knowledge sharing: emergent and engineering approaches. Information & Management, 46, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C.K.W. and Homan, A.C. 2004. Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89 (6), 1008–1022. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wijk, R., Jansen, J. and Lyles, M. 2008. Inter- and intra-organizational knowledge transfer: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Management Studies, 45 (4), 830–853. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00771.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegner, D., Raymond, P. and Erber, R. 1991. Transactive memory in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61 (6), 923–929. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.6.923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werr, A. and Styhre, A. 2003. Management consultants: friend or foe? Understanding the ambiguous client-consultant relationship. International Studies of Management & Organization, 32 (4), 43–66.
   Google Scholar