Bank loan loss accounting and its contracting effects: the new expected loss models

References

• Acharya, V.V. and Ryan, S.G., 2016. Banks’ financial reporting and financial system stability. Journal of Accounting Research, 54 (2), 277–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerlof, G.A., 1970. The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84 (3), 488–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altamuro, J. and Beatty, A., 2010. How does internal control regulation affect financial reporting?. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 49, 58–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayadi, R., Arback, E., and Groen, W.P., 2011. Business models in European banking, A pre and post crisis screening, Centre of European Policy Studies, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, R., Li, X., and Shivakumar, L., 2015. Contractibility and transparency of financial statement information prepared under IFRS: evidence from debt contracts around IFRS adoption. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53 (5), 915–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, R. and Shivakumar, L., 2005. Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39, 83–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, R. and McGeachin, A., 2015. An analysis of concepts and evidence on the question of whether IFRS should be conservative. Abacus, 51 (2), 169–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, M.E. and Landsman, W.E., 2010. How did financial reporting contribute to the financial crisis? European Accounting Review, 19 (3), 399–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, S., 2005. Discussion of ‘conditional and unconditional conservatism: concepts and modelling’. Review of Accounting Studies, 10 (2/3), 311–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, A.L., Ke, B., and Petroni, R.K., 2002. Earnings management to avoid earnings declines across publicly and privately held banks. The Accounting Review, 77 (3), 547–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, A. and Liao, S., 2011. Do delays in expected loss recognition affect banks’ willingness to lend? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52 (1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty A. and Liao, S., 2014. Financial accounting in the banking industry: a review of the empirical literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58, 339–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaver, W.H. and Ryan, S.G., 2005. Conditional and unconditional conservatism: concepts and modeling. Review of Accounting Studies, 10, 269–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, P. and Narayanamoorthy, G., 2013. Did the SEC impact banks’ loan loss reserve policies and their informativeness? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56, 42–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belkhir, M., 2013. Do subordinated debt holders discipline bank risk-taking? Evidence from risk management decisions. Journal of Financial Stability, 9, 705–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benston G. and Wall, G., 2005. How should banks account for loan losses? Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review 90 (4), 19–38.
   Google Scholar
• Berndt A. and Gupta, A., 2009. Moral hazard and adverse selection in the originate-to-distribute model of bank credit. Journal of Monetary Economics, 56 (5), 725–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, A., Cohen, D.A., Lys, T.Z., and Walther, B.R., 2010. The financial reporting environment: review of the recent literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50, 296–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bikker, J.A. and Metzemakers, P.A.J., 2005. Bank provisioning behavior and procyclicality. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 15, 141–157.
   Google Scholar
• Blum, J.M., 2002. Subordinated debt, market discipline, and banks’ risk taking. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26 (7), 1427–1441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bord, V. and Santos, J., 2012. The rise of the originate-to-distribute model and the role of banks in financial intermediation, FRBNY Economic Policy Review, July.
   Google Scholar
• Bouvatier, V. and Lepetit, L., 2008. Banks’ procyclical behavior: does provisioning matter? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 18 (5), 513–526.
   Google Scholar
• Bushman, R.M. and Williams, C.D., 2012. Accounting discretion, loan loss provisioning, and discipline of banks’ risk-taking. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 54, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callen, J.L., Dou, Y., Xin, B., and Chen, F., 2016. Accounting conservatism and performance covenants: a signaling approach. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33 (3), 961–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camfferman, K., 2015. The emergence of the ‘incurred-loss’ model for credit losses in IAS 39. Accounting in Europe, 12 (1), 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, H., Nikolaev, V., and Wittenberg-Moerman, R., 2016. Accounting information in financial contracting: the Incomplete contract theory perspective. Journal of Accounting Research, 54 (2), 397–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L.J., Cornett, M.M., Marcus, A.J., and Tehranian, H., 2014. Bank earnings management and tail risk during the financial crisis. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 46 (1), 171–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, B.H. and Edwards, G.A., 2017. The new era of expected credit loss provisioning. BIS Quarterly Review, March, 39–56.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, J.H., Shackelford, D.A., and Wahlen, J.M., 1995. Bank differences in the coordination of regulatory capital, earnings, and taxes. Journal of Accounting Research, 33 (2), 263–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordella, T. and Yeyati, E.L., 2003. Bank bailouts: moral hazard vs. value effect. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 12, 300–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dam, L. and Koetter, M., 2012. Bank bailouts and moral hazard: evidence from Germany. Review of Financial Studies, 25 (8), 2343–2380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte, 2014. Securitization accounting 9th edition, January. Available from: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/lu/Documents/financial-services/us-aers-securitization-accounting-011914-final.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, D.W., 1984. Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring, Review of Economic Studies, 51 (3), 393–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugan, J.C., 2009. Loan loss provisioning and pro-cyclicality, remarks before the Institute of International Bankers. March 2nd. Available from: https://www.occ.gov/news-issuances/speeches/2009/pub-speech-2009-16.pdf [Accessed 4 March 2017].
   Google Scholar
• European Central Bank, 2008. The incentive structure of the ‘originate and distribute’ model. December. Available from: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/incentivestructureoriginatedistributemodel200812en.pdf?ed4e24fdaf559694a836c7f5f1128a5c [Accessed 4 March 2017].
   Google Scholar
• European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG). 2009. Impairment of Financial Assets: The expected loss model. December. Available from: https://www.accountancyeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/EFRAG_FEE_Paper_Impairment_of_Financial_Assets_-_The_Expected_Loss_Model_09129122009231030.pdf [Accessed 30 December 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Evanoff, D., Jagtiani, J., and Nakata, T., 2011. Enhancing market discipline in banking: the role of subordinated debt in financial regulatory reform, Journal of Economics and Business, 63 (1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Federation of European Accountants-European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (FEE-EFRAG). 2009. Impairment of financial assets. The expected loss model, December. Available from: http://www.efrag.org/Assets/Download?assetUrl=%2Fsites%2Fwebpublishing%2FSiteAssets%2FEFRAG_FEE_Paper-The_Expected_Loss_Model_Final%2520-%2520web.pdf [Accessed 4 March 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), 1980. Statement of Financial Accounting Concept (SFAC) 2. Qualitative characteristics of accounting information. FASB. Norwalk, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), 2010. Accounting for Financial Instruments and Revisions to the Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. FASB. Norwalk, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), 2011. Supplementary Document. Financial Instruments – Impairment. FASB. Norwalk, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), 2012. Proposed Accounting Standards Update. Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Subtopic 825–15). FASB. Norwalk, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), 2016. Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326). Accounting Standards Update. No. 2016–13. June. FASB. Norwalk, CT.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Advisory Crisis Advisory Group (FCAG), 2009. Report of the Financial Crisis Advisory Group. July. Available from: http://www.ifrs.org/Features/Documents/FCAGReportJuly2009.pdf [Accessed 4 March 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Financial Stability Forum (FSF), 2009. Report of the Financial Stability Forum on Addressing Procyclicality in the Financial System. Available from: http://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/r_0904a.pdf [Accessed 4 March 2017].
   Google Scholar
• G20 Leaders, 2009. London Summit – Leaders’ Statement. April 2nd. Available from: https://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/2009/pdf/g20_040209.pdf [Accessed 4 March 2017].
   Google Scholar
• García Lara, J.M. and Mora, A., 2004. Balance sheet versus earnings conservatism in Europe. European Accounting Review, 13 (2), 261–292.
   Google Scholar
• García Osma, B., Mora, A. and Porcuna-Enguix, L. 2019. Prudential supervisors´ independence and income smoothing in European banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 102, 156–176.
   Google Scholar
• Gebhardt, G. and Novotny-Farkas, Z., 2011. Mandatory IFRS adoption and accounting quality of European Banks. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 38 (3-4), 289–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorton, G. and Huang, L., 2004. Liquidity, efficiency, and bank bailouts. American Economic Review, 94, 455–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, L.P. and Clarke, F.L., 2004. A methodology for calculating the allowance for loan losses in commercial banks. Abacus, 40 (3), 321–341.
   Google Scholar
• Gunther, J.W. and Moore, R.R., 2003. Loss underreporting and the auditing role of bank exams. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 12, 153–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashim, N., Li, W., and O’Hanlon, J., 2016. Expected-loss-based accounting for impairment of financial instruments: the FASB and IASB Proposals 2009–2016. Accounting in Europe, 13 (2), 229–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, I. and Wall, L.D., 2003. Determinants of the Loan Loss Allowance: Some Cross-Country Comparisons. Bank of Finland Discussion Papers, 33.
   Google Scholar
• Hellmann, T.F., Murdock, K.C. and Stiglitz, J.E., 2000. Liberalization, moral hazard in banking and prudential regulation: are capital requirements enough? American Economic Review, 90 (1), 147–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmström, B. and Tirole, J., 1993. Market liquidity and performance monitoring. Journal of Political Economy, 101 (4), 678–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogervorst, H., 2012. What and What Not to Expect of the Expected Loss Model, 3rd ECB Conference on Accounting, Frankfurt, 4 June. Available from: http://www.ifrs.org/Alerts/Conference/Documents/ECB462012.pdf [Accessed 4 March 2017].
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), 2009. Exposure Draft ED/2009/12: Financial Instruments – Amortised Cost and Impairment. IASB. London.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), 2011. Supplement to Exposure Draft ED/2009/12 Financial Instruments – Amortised Cost and Impairment. IASB, London.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), 2013. Exposure Draft ED/2013/3 Financial Instruments – Expected Credit Losses, IASB. London.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), 2014. IFRS 9: Financial Instruments. IASB. London.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), 2015. Exposure Draft ED/2015/3 Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. Basis for Conclusions. IASB. London.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), 2018a. Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. IASB. London.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), 2018b. Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. Basis for Conclusions. IASB. London.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC), 1989. Framework for the Preparation of Financial Statements. IASC. London.
   Google Scholar
• International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) Foundation, 2013. Staff Paper on Financial Instruments: Impairment. Available from: http://www.ifrs.org/Meetings/MeetingDocs/IASB/2013/July/05C-Impairment.pdf [Accessed 4 March 2017].
   Google Scholar
• International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation, 2015. Working in the Public Interest: The IFRS Foundation and the IASB. Available from: https://www.ifrs.org/about-us/the-public-interest/ [Accessed 30 December 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. and Liu, X., 2010. The allowance for uncollectible accounts, conservatism, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting Research, 48 (3), 565–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, M.C. and Meckling, W.H., 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4), 305–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, J., Kanagaretnam, K., and Lobo, G.J., 2018. Discretion in bank loan loss allowance, risk taking and earnings management. Accounting & Finance, 58, 171–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanagaretnam, K, Justin, J., and Lobo, G.J., 2014. Bank Accounting Conservatism, Risk Taking and Earnings Management. Working Paper. EAA congress. Tallin.
   Google Scholar
• Kanagaretnam, K., Lobo, G.J., and Mathieu, R., 2003. Managerial incentives for income smoothing through bank loan loss provisions. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 20 (1), 63–80.
   Google Scholar
• Kanagaretnam, K., Lobo, G.J., and Yang, D.H., 2004. Joint tests of signaling and income smoothing through bank loan loss provisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21 (4), 843–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, R.G. and Levine, R., 1993. Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108 (3), 717–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laeven, L. and Majnoni, G., 2003. Loan loss provisioning and economic slowdowns: too much too late? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 12 (2), 178–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, R., 2010. Discussion on implications for GAAP from an analysis of positive research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50, 287–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laux, C., 2012. Financial instruments, financial reporting, and financial stability. Accounting and Business Research, 42 (3), 239–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, A., Sloan, R., and Sun, Y., 2013. Non-discretionary conservatism: evidence and implications. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56, 112–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, A. 1998. The ‘Numbers Game,’ September 28. Speech delivered at New York University Center for Law and Business. Available from: https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/speecharchive/1998/spch220.txt [Accessed 4 March 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Lim, C.Y., Lee, E., Kausar, A., and Walker, M., 2014. Bank accounting conservatism and bank loan pricing. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33, 260–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobo, G.J. and Yang, D.H., 2001. Bank managers’ heterogeneous decisions on discretionary loan loss provisions. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 16: 223–250.
   Google Scholar
• Maystadt, P. 2013. Should IFRS Standards be more European. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Mishkin, F.S., 2006. How big a problem is too big to fail? A review of Gary Stern and Ron Feldman’s too big to fail: The Hazards of bank Bailouts. Journal of Economic Literature, 44 (4), 988–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora A. and Walker, M., 2015. The implications of research on accounting conservatism for accounting standard setting. Accounting and Business Research, 45 (5), 620–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, D., Kang, H., and Jie, J., 2016. The determinants and value relevance of banks’ discretionary loan loss provisions during the financial crisis. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 12 (2), 176–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, D., Wahlen, J., and Wieland, M., 2009. Publicly traded versus privately held: implications for conditional conservatism in bank accounting. Review of Accounting Studies, 14, 88–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nier, E. and Baumann, U., 2006. Market discipline, disclosure and moral hazard in banking. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 15, 332–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novotny-Farkas, Z., 2016. The interaction of the IFRS 9 expected loss approach with supervisory rules and implications for financial stability. Accounting in Europe, 13 (2), 197–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hanlon, J., 2013. Did loan-loss provisioning by UK banks become less timely after implementation of IAS 39? Accounting and Business Research, 43 (3), 225–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hanlon, J., Hashim, N., and Li, W., 2017. Research Briefing: Issues Arising in the Development of the FASB’s and IASB’s Expected-Loss Methods of Accounting for Credit Losses. Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Papa, V. and Peters, S., 2014. Financial Crisis Insights on Bank Performance Reporting (Part 1). Assessing the key Factors Influencing Price-to-Book Ratios, CFA Institute, July. Available from: http://www.cfainstitute.org/learning/products/publications/ccb/Pages/ccb.v2014.n3.1.aspx [Accessed 4 March 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Penman, S. and Zhang, X., 2002. Accounting conservatism, the quality of earnings and stock returns. The Accounting Review, 77 (2), 237–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez, D., Salas-Fumás, V., and Saurina, J., 2008. Earnings and capital management in alternative loan loss provision regulatory regimes. European Accounting Review, 17 (3), 423–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, P. and Walker, M., 2003. Ex-ante and Ex-Post Accounting Conservatism, Asset Recognition and Asymmetric Earnings Timeliness. Working Paper, Lancaster University and University of Manchester.
   Google Scholar
• Poveda, R., 2000. La reforma del sistema de provisiones de insolvencia. Boletín económico del Banco de España, January, 79–92.
   Google Scholar
• Purnanandam, A., 2011. Originate-to-distribute model and the subprime mortgage crisis. Review of Financial Studies, 24 (6), 1881–1915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rixtel A., Romo González, L., and Yang, J., 2015. The Determinants of Long-Term Debt Issuance by European Banks: Evidence of Two Crisis. BIS Working Papers No 513, September.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, S.A., 1973. The economic theory of agency: the principal’s problem. American Economic Review, 63 (2), 134–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, S.G. and Keeley, J.H., 2013. Discussion of ‘Did the SEC impact banks’ loan loss reserve policies and their informativeness?’ Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56, 66–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saavedra, D., 2018. Syndicate size and the choice of covenants in debt contracts. The Accounting Review, 93 (6), 301–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), 2001. Staff Accounting Bulletin 102: No.102 Selected Loan Loss Allowance Methodology and Documentation Issues. July.
   Google Scholar
• Shrieves, R.E. and Dahl, D., 2003. Discretionary accounting and the behavior of Japanese banks under financial duress. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27, 1219–1243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivakumar, K. and Waymire, G., 2003. Enforceable accounting rules and income measurement by early 20th century railroads. Journal of Accounting Research, 41, 397–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundaresan, S.M. and Wang, Z., 2016. Bank Liability Structure. Kelley School of Business Research Paper no. 14–41, March 24.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, M., 1997. Current Developments in Financial Reporting: Perspectives from the SEC. Remarks to the AICPÁs 1997 National Conference on Banks and Saving Institutions, Washington DC. Available from: https://www.sec.gov/news/speech/speecharchive/1997/spch195.txt [Accessed 4 March 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Tang, P. (Rapporteur), 2016. Working Document on Common Rules on Securitisation and Creating a European Framework for Simple, Transparent and Standardised Securitisation. Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs, European Parliament, 15th May. Available from: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?type=COMPARL&reference=PE-580.483&format=PDF&language=EN&secondRef=01 [Accessed 18 January 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Trombetta, M., Wagenhofer, A., and Wysocki, P., 2012. The usefulness of academic research in understanding the effects of accounting standards. Accounting in Europe, 9 (2), 127–146.
   Google Scholar
• Vyas, D., 2011. The timeliness of accounting write downs by US financial institutions during the financial crisis of 2007–2008. Journal of Accounting Research, 49, 823–860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlen, J.M., 1994. The nature of information in commercial bank loan Lloss disclosures. The Accounting Review, 69 (3), 455–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, L. and Koch, T., 2000. Bank loan-loss accounting: a review of theoretical and empirical evidence. Economic Review, 2, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, R.L., 2003. Conservatism in accounting part I: explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons, 17 (3), 207–221.
   Google Scholar
• Zeff, S.A., 2012. The evolution of the IASC into the IASB, and the challenges it faces. The Accounting Review, 87 (3), 807–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar