The art of conversation: the expanded audit report

References

• Asare, S.K., and Wright, A.M, 2012. Investors’, auditors’, and lenders’ understanding of the message conveyed by the standard audit report on the financial statements. Accounting Horizons, 26 (2), 193–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession (ACAP), 2018. Final Report of the Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Washington, USA: U.S. Department of the Treasury. Available at: https://www.treasury.gov/about/organizational-structure/offices/Documents/final-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Asbahr, K., and Ruhnke, K, 2019. Real effects of reporting key audit matters on auditors’ judgment and choice of action. International Journal of Auditing, 23 (2), 165–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backof, A.G., Bowlin, K., and Goodson, B.M, 2018. The importance of clarification of auditors’ responsibilities under the new audit reporting standards. Working paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2446057 or https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2446057.
   Google Scholar
• Banham, R, 2018. Critical audit matters coming into focus: As public company auditors prepare to deliver new information in auditors’ reports, firms need to develop consistent processes for determining what should be disclosed. Journal of Accountancy, 226 (4), 27. https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/issues/2018/oct/critical-audit-matters-reporting.html
   Google Scholar
• Bartov, E., Gul, F. A., and Tsui, J. S, 2000. Discretionary-accruals models and audit qualifications. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30 (3), 421–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bédard, J., Coram, P., Espahbodi, R., and Mock, T. J, 2016. Does recent academic research support changes to audit reporting standards? Accounting Horizons, 30 (2), 255–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bédard, J., Gonthier-Besacier, N., and Schatt, A, 2019. Consequences of expanded audit reports: evidence from the justifications of assessments in France. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38 (3), 23–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, A., Cohen, D.A., Lys, T.Z., and Walther, B.R, 2010. The financial reporting environment: review of the recent literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50 (2-3), 296–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BEIS Select Committee, 2019. The Future of Audit. London, England: House of Commons of the United Kingdom. Available at: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmbeis/1718/1718.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bochkay, K., Chychyla, R., De George, E.T., Minutti-Meza, M., and Schroeder, J., 2020. SEC comment letter. Available from:https://pcaobus.org/EconomicAndRiskAnalysis/pir/PostImplementationReviewAS3101UnqualifiedOpinion/18_Miguel-Minutti-Meza.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brasel, K., Doxey, M. M., Grenier, J. H., and Reffett, A, 2016. Risk disclosure preceding negative outcomes: The effects of reporting critical audit matters on judgments of auditor liability. The Accounting Review, 91 (5), 1345–1362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T., Majors, T.M. and Peecher, M.E., 2020. Evidence on how different interventions affect juror assessment of auditor legal culpability and responsibility for damages after auditor failure to detect fraud. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 87, 101–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brydon, D., 2019. Report of the independent review into the quality and effectiveness of audit. Available from:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/ attachment_data /file/852960/brydon-review-final-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, J., Hoitash, R., Hoitash, U., and Xiao, X, 2020. An investigation of US critical audit matter disclosures. Working paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3635477 or https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3635477.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, M., Leone, A., and Willenborg, M, 2004. An empirical analysis of auditor reporting and its association with abnormal accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37, 139–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camfferman, K., and Wielhouwer, J.L, 2019. twenty-first century scandals: towards a risk approach to financial reporting scandals. Accounting and Business Research, 49 (5), 503–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J.L., Chen, H., Dhaliwal, D.S., Lu, H.M., and Steele, L.B, 2014. The information content of mandatory risk factor disclosures in corporate filings. Review of Accounting Studies, 19 (1), 396–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, E., Fargher, N. L., Geiger, M. A., Lennox, C. S., Raghunandan, K., and Willekens, M., 2013. Audit reporting for going concern uncertainty: A research synthesis. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32 (Supplement 1), 353–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Causholli, M., and Knechel, W.R, 2012. An examination of the credence attributes of an audit. Accounting Horizons, 26 (4), 631–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P.F., He, S., Ma, Z., and Stice, D, 2016. The information role of audit opinions in debt contracting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61 (1), 121–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, B. E., Glover, S. M., and Wolfe, C. J, 2014. Do critical audit matter paragraphs in the audit report change nonprofessional investors’ decision to invest? Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 33 (4), 71–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Church, B. K., Davis, S. M., and McCracken, S. A., 2008. The auditor’s reporting model: A literature overview and research synthesis. Accounting Horizons, 22 (1), 69–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coffee, J.C, 2019. Why do auditors fail? what might work? what won’t? Accounting and Business Research, 49 (5), 540–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Competitions & Markets Authority (CMA), 2019. Statutory audit services market study. London, England. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5d03667d40f0b609ad3158c3/audit_final_report_02.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Czerney, K., Schmidt, J. J., and Thompson, A. M, 2014. Does auditor explanatory language in unqualified audit reports indicate increased financial misstatement risk? The Accounting Review, 89, 2115–2149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czerney, K., Schmidt, J.J., and Thompson, A.M, 2019. Do investors respond to explanatory language included in unqualified audit reports? Contemporary Accounting Research, 36 (1), 198–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M., and Zhang, J, 2014. A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58 (2-3), 275–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, S., Griffin, J., and Zehms, K, 2019. The value relevance of managers’ and auditors’ disclosures about material measurement uncertainty. The Accounting Review, 94 (4), 215–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Haj, M., Alves, P., Rayson, P., Walker, M., and Young, S, 2020. Retrieving, classifying and analysing narrative commentary in unstructured (glossy) annual reports published as PDF files. Accounting and Business Research, 50 (1), 6–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, W.B., Fanning, K., and Peecher, M.E, 2020. Do investors value higher financial reporting quality, and can expanded audit reports unlock this value? The Accounting Review, 95 (2), 141–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Financial Reporting Council (FRC), 2013a. Revision to ISA (UK and Ireland) 700, February 2013. London, England: The Financial Reporting Council Limited. Available at: https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/b567ab62-dfa5-4b61-a052-852c4bf51f0e/;.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Reporting Council (FRC), 2013b. Feedback statement. Feedback statement on consultation on proposed revision to ISA (UK and Ireland) 700, June 2013. London, England: The Financial Reporting Council Limited. Available at: https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/95da69ad-6996-496b-adb7-b0f1522badc9/Feedback-Statement-for-publication.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Reporting Council (FRC), 2013c. Standard. The independent auditor’s report on financial statements. International Standard on Auditing (UK and Ireland) 700 (Revised June 2013). London, England: The Financial Reporting Council Limited. Available at: https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/501de004-b616-43c3-8d65-aeaebde19f8d/ISA-700-(UK-and-Ireland)-700-(Revised)-Independent-auditors-report-June-2013.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Reporting Council (FRC), 2014a. Standard. International Standard on Auditing (UK and Ireland) 700 (Revised September 2014). London, England: The Financial Reporting Council Limited. Available at: https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/458999f8-5e60-45e4-8b54-90bf252b76c7/ISA-700-Sept-2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Reporting Council (FRC), 2014b. The U.K. Corporate Governance Code. London, England: The Financial Reporting Council Limited. Available at: https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/59a5171d-4163-4fb2-9e9d-daefcd7153b5/UK-Corporate-Governance-Code-2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Reporting Council (FRC), 2016a. Standard. International Standard on Auditing (UK) 700 (Revised June 2016). London, England: The Financial Reporting Council Limited. Available at: https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/a08b0906-f40c-4735-bbc7-45908bee2b32/ISA-(UK)-700_Revised-June-2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Reporting Council (FRC), 2016b. Standard. International Standard on Auditing (UK) 701 (Revised June 2016). London, England: The Financial Reporting Council Limited. Available at: https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/b250cf61-407f-4b1e-9f1c-e959174e1426/ISA-(UK)-701.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Reporting Council (FRC), 2020a. Standard. International Standard on Auditing (UK) 700 (Revised November 2019, Updated January 2020). London, England: The Financial Reporting Council Limited. Available at: https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/0b1f9783-42a8-44f5-ae4b-d4fcd4b538db/ISA-(UK)-700_Revised-November-2019_Updated-January-2020_final-With-Covers.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Reporting Council (FRC), 2020b. Standard. International Standard on Auditing (UK) 701 (Revised November 2019, Updated January 2020). London, England: The Financial Reporting Council Limited. Available at: https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/4af1deff-9145-4758-b033-ff637da24117/ISA-(UK)-701_Revised-November-2019_Updated-January-2020_final-With-Covers.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gandy, B, 2019. ‘twenty-first century scandals: towards a risk approach to financial reporting scandals’: a practitioner view. Accounting and Business Research, 49 (5), 536–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimbar, C., Hansen, B., and Ozlanski, M. E, 2016. The effects of critical audit matter paragraphs and accounting standard precision on auditor liability. The Accounting Review, 91 (6), 1629–1646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, B.W., Li, D., and Wang, M, 2019. Informativeness of the expanded audit report: Evidence from China. Working paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3432107 or https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3432107.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, G. L., Turner, J. L., Coram, P. J., and Mock, T. J., 2011. Perceptions and misperceptions regarding the unqualified auditor’s report by financial statement preparers, users, and auditors. Accounting Horizons, 25 (4), 659–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, E., Krupa, J., Minutti-Meza, M. and Vulcheva, M., 2020. Do going concern opinions provide incremental information to predict corporate defaults?. Review of Accounting Studies, 25(4), 1344–1381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, E., Minutti-Meza, M., Tatum, K., and Vulcheva, M, 2018. Consequences of adopting an expanded auditor’s report in the United Kingdom. Review of Accounting Studies, 23 (4), 1543–1587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, E., Minutti-Meza, M., Tatum, K., and Vulcheva, M., 2020b. Consequences of the expanded auditor’s report: Evidence from the United Kingdom’s Alternative Investment Market. Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Hopwood, W., McKeown, J.C., and Mutchler, J.F, 1994. A reexamination of auditor versus model accuracy within the context of the going-concern opinion decision. Contemporary Accounting Research, 10 (2), 409–431.
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), 2012. Improving the auditor’s report. New York, USA: International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). Available at: https://www.iaasb.org/publications/improving-auditor-s-report.
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), 2015a. International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 700. New York, USA: International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). Available at: https://www.iaasb.org/publications/reporting-audited-financial-statements-new-and-revised-auditor-reporting-standards-and-related-11.
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), 2015b. International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 701. New York, USA: International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). Available at: https://www.iaasb.org/publications/reporting-audited-financial-statements-new-and-revised-auditor-reporting-standards-and-related-11.
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), 2015c. International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 260. New York, USA: International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). Available at: https://www.iaasb.org/publications/reporting-audited-financial-statements-new-and-revised-auditor-reporting-standards-and-related-11.
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), 2015d. The new auditor’s report: Enhancing auditor communications. Greater transparency into the financial statement audit. New York, USA: International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). Available at: https://www.iaasb.org/publications/reporting-audited-financial-statements-new-and-revised-auditor-reporting-standards-and-related-11.
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), 2019. International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 315 (Revised 2019). New York, USA: International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). Available at: https://www.iaasb.org/publications/isa-315-revised-2019-identifying-and-assessing-risks-material-misstatement.
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), 2020. Auditor reporting post implementation review project update. New York, USA: International Federation of Accountants (IFAC). Available at: https://www.iaasb.org/publications/iaasb-auditor-reporting-project-update-january-2020.
   Google Scholar
• Izza, M, 2019. ‘Why do auditors fail? what might work? what won't?’: a practitioner view. Accounting and Business Research, 49 (5), 562–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachelmeier, S.J., Rimkus, D., Schmidt, J.J. and Valentine, K., 2020. The forewarning effect of critical audit matter disclosures involving measurement uncertainty. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37(4), 2186–2212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kend, M. and Nguyen, L.A., 2020. Investigating recent audit reform in the Australian context: An analysis of the KAM disclosures in audit reports 2017–2018. International Journal of Auditing, 24 (3), 412–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingman, J., 2018. Independent Review of the Financial Reporting Council. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/767387/frc-independent-review-final-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Klevak, J., Livnat, J., Pei, D., and Suslava, 2020. Are critical audit matters informative? Working paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3685369 or https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3685369.
   Google Scholar
• Knechel, W. R, 2016. Audit quality and regulation. International Journal of Auditing, 20 (3), 215–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, H.C, 1991. Model predictions and auditor assessments of going concern status. Accounting and Business Research, 21 (84), 331–338.
   Google Scholar
• Kowsmann, P., Davies, P., and Chung, J., 2020. Wirecard scandal puts spotlight on auditor Ernst & Young. The Wall Street Journal. Available from:https://www.wsj.com/articles/wirecard-scandal-putsspotlight-on-auditor-ernst-young-11593286933.
   Google Scholar
• Kravet, T., and Muslu, V, 2013. Textual risk disclosures and investors’ risk perceptions. Review of Accounting Studies, 18 (4), 1088–1122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennox, C.S., Schmidt, J.J., and Thompson, A, 2019. Are expanded audit reports informative to investors? Evidence from the UK. Working paper. Available from: https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2619785.
   Google Scholar
• Leuz, C, 2018. Evidence-based policymaking: promise, challenges and opportunities for accounting and financial markets research. Accounting and Business Research, 48 (5), 582–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuz, C., and Wysocki, P.D, 2016. The Economics of disclosure and financial reporting regulation: evidence and suggestions for future research. Journal of Accounting Research, 54 (2), 525–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, E.X., and Ramesh, K, 2009. Market reaction surrounding the filing of periodic SEC reports. The Accounting Review, 84 (4), 1171–1208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Hay, D., and Lau, D, 2019. Assessing the impact of the new auditor’s report. Pacific Accounting Review, 31 (1), 110–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, L., Minutti-Meza, M., Zhang, Y., and Zou, Y, 2019. Consequences of the adoption of the expanded auditor’s report: Evidence from Hong Kong. Working paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3392449 or https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3392449.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, M., 2020. Companies shell out more in audit fees to tackle accounting rule changes. The Wall Street Journal. Available from:https://www.wsj.com/articles/companies-shell-out-more-in-audit-fees-to-tackle-accounting-rule-changes-11579084204.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, M., 2020. SEC to allow businesses more flexibility in disclosing risk, legal information. The Wall Street Journal. Available from: https://www.wsj.com/articles/sec-to-allow-businesses-more-flexibility-in-disclosing-risk-legal-information-11598468579.
   Google Scholar
• Menon, K., and Williams, D. D, 2010. Investor reaction to going concern audit reports. The Accounting Review, 85, 2075–2105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mock, T. J., Bédard, J., Coram, P. J., Davis, S. M., Espahbodi, R., and Warne, R. C, 2013. The audit reporting model: current research synthesis and implications. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 32 (sp1), 323–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, L. A., Shipman, J. E., Swanquist, Q. T., and Whited, R. L, 2018. Measuring the market response to going concern modifications: The importance of disclosure timing. Review of Accounting Studies, 23 (4), 1512–1542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogneva, M., and Subramanyam, K.R, 2007. Does the stock market underreact to going concern opinions? evidence from the US and Australia. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43 (2-3), 439–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasztor, A., 2020. Congressional Report Faults Boeing on MAX Design, FAA for Lax Oversight. The Wall Street Journal. Available from: https://www.wsj.com/articles/congressional-report-says-max-crashes-stemmed-from-boeings-design-failures-and-lax-faa-oversight-11583519145.
   Google Scholar
• Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), 2012. AS 1301: Communications with Audit Committees. Washington, D.C. Available at: https://pcaobus.org/Standards/Auditing/Pages/AS1301.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), 2016. Concept release on possible revisions to PCAOB standards related to reports on audited financial statements and related amendments to PCAOB standards PCAOB Release No. 2011-003. Washington, D.C. Available at: https://pcaobus.org/Rulemaking/Docket034/Concept_Release.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), 2016. Proposed Auditing Standard–The auditor’s report on an audit of financial statements when the auditor expresses an unqualified opinion and related amendments to PCAOB Standards. PCAOB Release No. 2016-003. Washington, D.C. Available at: https://pcaobus.org/Rulemaking/Docket034/Release-2016-003-ARM.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), 2017. The auditor’s report on an audit of financial statements when the auditor expresses an unqualified opinion and related amendments to PCAOB Standards. PCAOB Release No. 2017-001. Washington, D.C. available at: https://pcaobus.org/Rulemaking/Docket034/2017-001-auditors-report-final-rule.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), 2019a. Implementation of critical audit matters: staff observations from review of audit methodologies. Washington, D.C. available at: https://pcaobus.org/Standards/Documents/Implementation-of-Critical-Audit-Matters-Review-Audit-Methodologies.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), 2019b. Implementation of critical audit matters: The basics. Washington, D.C. available at: https://pcaobus.org/Standards/Documents/Implementation-of-Critical-Audit-Matters-The-Basics.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Porumb, V., Karaibrahimoglu, Y. Z., Lobo, G. J., Hooghiemstra, R., and De Waard, D., 2019. Is more always better? Disclosures in the expanded audit report and their impact on loan contracting. Working paper. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3216492 or https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3216492.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, L., Carcello, J. V., Li, C., and Neil, T., 2015. Are auditor and audit committee report changes useful to investors? Evidence from the United Kingdom. Working paper, University of Pittsburgh and University of Tennessee.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, L.C., Carcello, J.V., Li, C., Neal, T.L., and Francis, J.R, 2019. Impact of auditor report changes on financial reporting quality and audit costs: evidence from the United Kingdom. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36 (3), 1501–1539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, L.M., and Zehms, K.M, 2020. Audit Partner Style in Key Audit Matter Reporting Decisions. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3625651 or https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3625651.
   Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), 2011. Cautionary advice regarding disclosure about critical accounting policies. Available at: https://www.sec.gov/rules/pcaob/2017/34-81916.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), 2017. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; Order Granting Approval of Proposed Rules on the Auditor’s Report on an Audit of Financial Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion, and Departures from Unqualified Opinions and Other Reporting Circumstances, and Related Amendments to Auditing Standards. SEC Release No. 34-81916; File No. PCAOB-2017-01. Available at: https://www.sec.gov/rules/pcaob/2017/34-81916.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Shumsky, T., 2019. Revenue recognition compliance costs are higher than expected, companies say. The Wall Street Journal. Available from: https://www.wsj.com/articles/revenue-recognition-compliance-costs-are-higher-than-expected-companies-say-11549406561.
   Google Scholar
• Sierra-García, L., Gambetta, N., García-Benau, M., and Orta-Pérez, M, 2019. Understanding the determinants of the magnitude of entity-level risk and account-level risk key audit matters: The case of the United Kingdom. The British Accounting Review, 51 (3), 227–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simnett, R., and Huggins, A, 2014. Enhancing the auditor's report: to what extent is there support for the IAASB's proposed changes? Accounting Horizons, 28 (4), 719–747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simnett, R., Carson, E., and Vanstraelen, A, 2016. International archival auditing and assurance research: trends, methodological issues, and opportunities. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35 (3), 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirois, L.P., Bédard, J., and Bera, P, 2018. The informational value of key audit matters in the auditor's report: evidence from an eye-tracking study. Accounting Horizons, 32 (2), 141–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stettler, H, 1994. Accounting and auditing history: major developments in England and the United States from ancient roots through the mid-twentieth century. Auditing Symposium XII, 7. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/dl_proceedings/55/
   Google Scholar
• Storbeck, O., 2020. Wirecard: the frantic final months of a fraudulent operation. Financial Times. Available from: https://www.ft.com/content/6a660a5f-4e8c-41d5-b129-ad5bf9782256.
   Google Scholar
• Tett, G, 2019. ‘Financial scandals: a historical overview’: a practitioner view. Accounting and Business Research, 49 (5), 500–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toms, S, 2019. Financial scandals: a historical overview. Accounting and Business Research, 49 (5), 477–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanstraelen, A., Schelleman, C., Meuwissen, R., and Hofmann, I, 2012. The audit reporting debate: seemingly intractable problems and feasible solutions. European Accounting Review, 21 (2), 193–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinson, J.M., Robertson, J.C., and Cockrell, R.C, 2019. The effects of critical audit matter removal and duration on jurors' assessments of auditor negligence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38 (3), 183–202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waxman, R.N., 2017. SEC comment letter. Available from: https://www.sec.gov/comments/pcaob-2017-01/pcaob201701-2231226-160793.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Willenborg, M, and McKeown, 2001. Going-concern initial public offerings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30 (3), 279–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Work and Pensions and BEIS UK Parliament Committees, 2018. Carillion inquiry. London, England: House of Commons of the United Kingdom. Available at: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmworpen/769/76902.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Zeng, Y., Zhang, J., Zhang, J., and Zhang, M., 2020. Key Audit Matters Reports in China: Their Descriptions and Implications of Audit quality. Accounting Horizons. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2308/HORIZONS-19-189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar