Standard precision and aggressive financial reporting: the influence of incentive horizon

References

• Agoglia, C. P., Doupnik, T.S., and Tsakumis, G.T., 2011. Principles-based versus rules-based accounting standards: The influence of standard precision and audit committee strength on financial reporting decisions. The Accounting Review, 86 (3), 747–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, A, 1999. A benchmark for the adequacy of published financial statements. Accounting and Business Research, 29 (Summer), 239–253.
   Google Scholar
• American Accounting Association Financial Accounting Standards Committee, 2003. Evaluating concepts-based vs. rules-based approaches to standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 17 (1), 73–89.
   Google Scholar
• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), 2002. Consideration of Fraud in a Financial Statement Audit. Statement on Auditing Standards No. 99. New York, NY: AICPA.
   Google Scholar
• Antia, M., Pantzalis, C., and Park, J.C., 2010. CEO incentive horizon and firm performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 16 (3), 288–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balkin, D. B., and Gomez-Mejia, L. R., 1990. Matching compensation and organizational strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 11 (2), 153–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, R, 2016. IFRS – 10 years later. Accounting and Business Research, 46 (5), 545–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, M. E., Elliott, J. A., and Finn, M. W., 1999. Market rewards associated with patterns of increasing earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, 37 (Autumn), 387–413.
   Google Scholar
• Bebchuk, L., and Fried, J., 2003. Executive compensation as an agency problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 71–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebchuk, L., and Fried, J., 2010. Paying for long-term performance. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 158 (7), 1915–1959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstresser, D., and Philippon, T., 2006. CEO incentives and earnings management. Journal of Financial Economics, 80 (3), 511–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brink, A., Gouldman, A., Rose, J., and Rotaru, K., 2020. Effects of executive compensation structure and R&D reporting method on psychophysiological responses and real earnings management decisions of subordinate managers. Management Accounting Research, 48.
   Google Scholar
• Chava, S., and Purnanandam, A, 2010. CEOs versus CFOs: incentives and corporate policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 97 (2), 263–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Q., and Warfield, T.D., 2005. Equity incentives and earnings management. The Accounting Review, 80 (2), 441–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechow, P., and Sloan, R., 1991. Executive incentives and the horizon problem: an empirical investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 14 (1), 51–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defond, M. L., and Jiambalvo, J., 1993. Factors related to methods. Contemporary Accounting Research, 9, 415–431.
   Google Scholar
• Dichev, I. D., Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., and Rajgopal, S., 2013. Earnings quality: evidence from the field. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56, 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folsom, D., Hribar, P., Mergenthaler, R., and Peterson, K., 2016. Principles-based standards and earnings attributes. Management Science, 63, 2592–2615.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., and Krishnan, J., 1999. Accounting accruals and auditor reporting conservatism. Contemporary Accounting Research, 16, 135–165.
   Google Scholar
• Gigler, F., Kanodia, C., Sapra, H., and Venugopalan, R, 2014. How frequent financial reporting can cause managerial short-termism: An analysis of the costs and benefits of increasing reporting frequency. Journal of Accounting Research, 52 (2), 357–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopalan, R., Milbourn, T., Song, F., and Thakor, A. V., 2014. Duration of executive compensation. The Journal of Finance, 69 (6), 2777–2817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., and Rajgopal, S., 2005. The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 4, 3–73.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., and Preacher, K. J., 2014. Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67 (3), 451–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F, 2018. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hershfield, H. E., Cohen, T.R., and Thompson, L., 2012. Short horizons and tempting situations: lack of continuity to our future selves leads to unethical decision making and behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117 (2), 298–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imhoff, E., and Thomas, J., 1988. Economic consequences of accounting standards: the lease disclosure rule change. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 10 (4), 277–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), 2009. International Standard on Auditing (ISA) 240: The Auditor’s Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements. New York: IFAC. http://web.ifac.org/download/ISA_240_standalone_2009 _Handbook.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jastrow, J, 1899. The mind’s eye. Popular Science Monthly, 54, 299–312.
   Google Scholar
• Jastrow, J, 1900. Fact and Fable in Psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, M.C., and Meckling, W.H., 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (4), 305–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, S. A., Ryan, H. E., and Tian, Y. S., 2009. Managerial incentives and corporate fraud: The sources of incentives matter. Review of Finance, 13 (1), 115–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulas, J. T., Stachowski, A. A., and Haynes, B. A., 2008. Middle response functioning in Likert-responses to personality items. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22 (3), 251–259. doi: 10.1007/s10869-008-9064-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuz, C, 2010. Different approaches to corporate reporting regulation: how jurisdictions differ and why. Accounting and Business Research, 40 (3), 229–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, S., Rasheet, A. A., and Hou, W., 2021. Stock options, restricted stock, salary or bonus? Managing CEO compensation to maximize organizational performance. Business Horizons. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2021.02.041.
   Google Scholar
• Maines, L, 2007. Spotlight on principles-based financial reporting. Business Horizons, 50 (5), 359–364.
   Google Scholar
• Marginson, D., and McAulay, L., 2008. Exploring the debate on short-termism: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 29 (3), 273–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, M., and McCarthy, R., 2014. Financial statement preparers’ Revenue decisions: accuracy in applying rules-based standards and the IASB-FASB Revenue recognition model. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 14 (6), 21–43.
   Google Scholar
• Morck, R., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R. W., 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanan, M.P, 1996. Form of compensation and managerial incentive horizon. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31 (4), 467–491.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. W., Elliott, J. A., and Tarpley, R. L., 2002. Evidence from auditors about managers’ and auditors’ earnings management decisions. The Accounting Review, 77, 175–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. W, 2003. Behavioral evidence on the effects of principles- and rules-based standards. Accounting Horizons, 17 (1), 91–104.
   Google Scholar
• Nobes, C. W, 2005. Rules-based standards and the lack of principles in accounting. Accounting Horizons, 19 (1), 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Nobes, C, 2006. The survival of international differences under IFRS: towards a research agenda. Accounting and Business Research, 36 (3), 233–245.
   Google Scholar
• Peytcheva, M., 2021. Duck or Rabbit? Joint Effects of Accounting Standard and Transaction Ambiguity on Aggressive Reporting by Managers in the Presence of Incentives to Report Aggressively. Working Paper, LeHigh University.
   Google Scholar
• Psaros, J., and Trotman, K. T., 2004. The impact of the type of accounting standards on preparers’ judgments. Abacus, 40 (1), 76–93.
   Google Scholar
• Raaijmakers, Q. A., Hoof, A. V., Hart, H. T., Verbogt, T. F., and Wollebergh, A. M., 2000. Adolescents’ midpoint response on Likert-type scale items: neutral or missing values? International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 12 (2), 208–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schipper, K, 2003. Principles-based accounting standards. Accounting Horizons, 17 (1), 61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Schipper, K, 2005. The introduction of international accounting standards in Europe: implications for international convergence. European Accounting Review, 14 (1), 101–126.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, R. S., and MacMillan, I. C., 1984. Gaining competitive advantage through human resource management practices. Human Resource Management, 23, 241–255.
   Google Scholar
• Schreiber, S. P, 2014. Notice defines terms for economic substance doctrine. Journal of Accountancy. Available from: https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/news/2014/oct/201411106.html#:~:text=7701(o)%2C%20which%20defines,for%20entering%20into%20the%20transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Shortridge, R. T., and Myring, M., 2004. Defining principles-based accounting standards. The CPA Journal, 74 (8), 34–37.
   Google Scholar
• Worcester, R. M., and Burns, T. R., 1975. A statistical examination of the relative precision of verbal scales. Journal of the Market Research Society, 17 (3), 181–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wüstemann, J., and Wüstemann, S., 2010. Why consistency of accounting standards matters: a contribution to the rules-versus-principles debate in financial reporting. Abacus, 46 (1), 1–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar