Moving toward the expected credit loss model under IFRS 9: capital transitional arrangement and bank systematic risk

References

• Acharya, V.V., Engle, R., and Richardson, M., 2012. Capital shortfall: a new approach to ranking and regulating systemic risks. American Economic Review, 102 (3), 59–64. doi:10.1257/aer.102.3.59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya, V.V., Pedersen, L.H., Philippon, T., and Richardson, M., 2017. Measuring systemic risk. Review of Financial Studies, 30 (1), 2–47. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhw088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, A.S., Takeda, C., and Thomas, S., 1999. Bank loan loss provisions: a reexamination of capital management, earnings management and signaling effects. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 28 (1), 1–25. doi:10.1016/S0165-4101(99)00017-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, K., 2016. The European Central Bank and banking supervision: the regulatory limits of the single supervisory mechanism. European Company and Financial Law Review, 24 (13), 467–494. doi:10.1515/ecfr-2016-5001.
   Google Scholar
• Barth, M.E., and Landsman, W.R., 2010. How did financial reporting contribute to the financial crisis? European Accounting Review, 19 (3), 399–423. doi:10.1080/09638180.2010.498619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, J.R., Caprio, G., and Levine, R., 2004. Bank regulation and supervision: what works best? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 13 (2), 205–248. doi:10.1016/j.jfi.2003.06.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth, J.R., Caprio, G., and Levine, R., 2013. Bank regulation and supervision in 180 countries from 1999 to 2011. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 5 (2), 111–219. doi:10.1108/17576381311329661.
   Google Scholar
• Basu, S., Vitanza, J., and Wang, W., 2020. Asymmetric loan loss provision models. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Forthcoming, 1–21. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BCBS, 1996. Amendment to the capital accord to incorporate market risks. In Bank for International Settlements (Issue January). https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs24.pdf [Accessed 15 September 2019].
   Google Scholar
• BCBS, 2004. Implementation of Basel II : practical considerations. In Bank for International Settlements (Issue July). https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs109.pdf [Accessed 15 September 2019].
   Google Scholar
• BCBS, 2009. Guiding principles for the replacement of IAS 39. In Bank for International Settlements (Issue August). https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs161.pdf [Accessed 10 April 2020].
   Google Scholar
• BCBS, 2017. Regulatory treatment of accounting provisions – interim approach and transitional arrangements (Issue March 2017). Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d401.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Beatty, A., and Liao, S., 2014. Financial accounting in the banking industry: a review of the empirical literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58 (2–3), 339–383. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, A., and Liao, S., 2020. Alternative evidence and views on asymmetric loan loss provisioning. Journal of Accounting and Economics, Forthcoming, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, A., Chamberlain, S.L., and Magliolo, J., 1995. Managing financial reports of commercial banks: the influence of taxes, regulatory capital, and earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, 33 (2), 231–261. doi:10.2307/2491487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, A., Ke, B., and Petroni, K.R., 2002. Earnings management to avoid earnings declines across publicly and privately held banks. The Accounting Review, 77 (3), 547–570. doi:10.2308/accr.2002.77.3.547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn, M., Haselmann, R.F.H., and Vig, V., 2016. The limits of model-based regulation. ECB Working Paper, 1928 (July 4, 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Beltratti, A., and Stulz, R.M., 2012. The credit crisis around the globe: why did some banks perform better? Journal of Financial Economics, 105 (1), 1–17. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bischof, J., Brüggemann, U., and Daske, H., 2011. Asset reclassifications and bank recapitalization during the financial crisis. SSRN Electronic Journal, May 31, 2019. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1628843.
   Google Scholar
• Bischof, J., Laux, C., and Leuz, C., 2020. Accounting for financial stability: bank disclosure and loss recognition in the financial crisis. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3644284.
   Google Scholar
• Bonfim, D., 2009. Credit risk drivers: evaluating the contribution of firm level information and of macroeconomic dynamics. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33 (2), 281–299. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2008.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownlees, C., and Engle, R., 2017. SRISK: a conditional capital shortfall measure of systemic risk. Review of Financial Studies, 30 (1), 48–79. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhw060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buch, C.M., Krause, T., and Tonzer, L., 2019. Drivers of systemic risk: do national and European perspectives differ? Journal of International Money and Finance, 91 (March 2019), 160–176. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2018.11.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushman, R.M., and Williams, C.D., 2012. Accounting discretion, loan loss provisioning, and discipline of banks’ risk-taking. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 54 (1), 1–18. doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2012.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bushman, R.M., Hendricks, B.E., and Williams, C.D., 2016. Bank competition: measurement, decision-making, and risk-taking. Journal of Accounting Research, 54 (3), 777–826. doi:10.1111/1475-679X.12117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, M., and Garriott, C., 2020. High-frequency trading and institutional trading costs. Journal of Empirical Finance, 56 (March 2020), 74–93. doi:10.1016/j.jempfin.2019.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., Hribar, P., and Melessa, S., 2018. Incorrect inferences when using residuals as dependent variables. Journal of Accounting Research, 56 (3), 751–796. doi:10.1111/1475-679X.12195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, A.M., Granja, J., and Weber, J., 2019. Do strict regulators increase the transparency of banks? Journal of Accounting Research, 57 (3), 603–637. doi:10.1111/1475-679X.12255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cucinelli, D., Di Battista, M.L., Marchese, M., and Nieri, L., 2018. Credit risk in European banks: the bright side of the internal ratings based approach. Journal of Banking & Finance, 93 (August 2018), 213–229. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curcio, D., De Simone, A., and Gallo, A., 2017. Financial crisis and international supervision: new evidence on the discretionary use of loan loss provisions at Euro area commercial banks. The British Accounting Review, 49 (2), 181–193. doi:10.1016/j.bar.2016.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jonghe, O., 2010. Back to the basics in banking? A micro-analysis of banking system stability. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 19 (3), 387–417. doi:10.1016/j.jfi.2009.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EBA, 2018. First observations on the impact and implementation of IFRS 9 by EU Institutions. In European Banking Authority (Issue December). https://eba.europa.eu/sites/default/documents/files/documents/10180/2087449/bb4d7ed3-58de-4f66-861e-45024201b8e6/Report on IFRS 9 impact and implementation.pdf?retry=1 [Accessed 10 April 2020].
   Google Scholar
• ECB, 2017. SSM thematic review on IFRS 9 (Issue November 2017). European Central Bank. https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/press/letterstobanks/shared/pdf/2017/ssm.reportlsi_2017.en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• ECB, 2018. Status update on TRIM: overview of outcome of general topics review and interim update on preliminary results of credit risk on-site investigations. In European Central Bank (Issue June). https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/press/letterstobanks/shared/pdf/2018/ssm.letter_on_targeted_review_of_internal_models_TRIM.en.pdf [Accessed 11 September 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R., Jondeau, E., and Rockinger, M., 2015. Systemic risk in Europe. Review of Finance, 19 (1), 145–190. doi:10.1093/rof/rfu012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst & Young, 2018. IFRS 9 expected credit loss: making sense of the transition impact. EY. https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ey-ifrs-9-expected-credit-loss/$File/ey-ifrs-9-expected-credit-loss.pdf [Accessed 10 April 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, E., and Orbe, S., 2018. Why are there time-varying comovements in the European stock market? The European Journal of Finance, 24 (10), 828–848. doi:10.1080/1351847X.2017.1339622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiechter, P., Landsman, W.R., Peasnell, K., and Renders, A., 2017. The IFRS option to reclassify financial assets out of fair value in 2008: the roles played by regulatory capital and too-important-to-fail status. Review of Accounting Studies, 22 (4), 1698–1731. doi:10.1007/s11142-017-9419-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiechter, P., Halberkann, J., and Meyer, C., 2018. Determinants and consequences of a voluntary turn away from IFRS to local GAAP: evidence from Switzerland. European Accounting Review, 27 (5), 955–989. doi:10.1080/09638180.2017.1375418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannery, M.J., and James, C.M., 1984. The effect of interest rate changes on the common stock returns of financial institutions. The Journal of Finance, 39 (4), 1141–1153. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03898.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannery, M.J., and Rangan, K.P., 2008. What caused the bank capital build-up of the 1990s?*. Review of Finance, 12 (2), 391–429. doi:10.1093/rof/rfm007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FSB, 2009. Addressing procyclicality in the financial system (Issue April 2009). Financial Stability Forum. www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/r_0904a.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gaffney, E., and Mccann, F., 2019. The cyclicality in SICR: Mortgage modelling under IFRS 9. European Systemic Risk Board. Working Paper Series, May(92), 1–26. doi:10.20955/r.85.67.
   Google Scholar
• García Osma, B., Mora, A., and Porcuna-Enguix, L., 2019. Prudential supervisors’ independence and income smoothing in European banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 102 (May 2019), 156–176. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2019.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhardt, G., and Novotny-Farkas, Z., 2011. Mandatory IFRS adoption and accounting quality of European banks. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 38 (3–4), 289–333. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.2011.02242.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giner, B., and Mora, A., 2019. Bank loan loss accounting and its contracting effects: the new expected loss models. Accounting and Business Research, 0 (0), 1–27. doi:10.1080/00014788.2019.1609898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruenberger, D., 2012. A rating migration model for loan loss provisions and credit cycles. Working Paper, Issue January 2013. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2187515.
   Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., 2012. Entropy balancing for causal effects: a multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis, 20 (1), 25–46. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., and Xu, Y., 2013. Ebalance: a Stata package for entropy balancing. Journal of Statistical Software, 54 (7), 1–18. doi:10.18637/jss.v054.i07.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haq, M., and Heaney, R., 2012. Factors determining European bank risk. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 22 (4), 696–718. doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2012.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashim, N., Li, W., and O’Hanlon, J., 2016. Expected-loss-based accounting for impairment of financial instruments: the FASB and IASB proposals 2009–2016. Accounting in Europe, 13 (2), 229–267. doi:10.1080/17449480.2016.1210179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashim, N., Li, W., and O’Hanlon, J., 2019. Reflections on the development of the FASB’s and IASB’s expected-loss methods of accounting for credit losses. Accounting and Business Research, 49 (6), 682–725. doi:10.1080/00014788.2018.1526665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heß, S., 2017. Randomization inference with Stata: a guide and software. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 17 (3), 630–651. doi:10.1177/1536867X1701700306.
   Google Scholar
• Hirtle, B., Kovner, A., and Plosser, M., 2020. The impact of supervision on bank performance. The Journal of Finance, 75 (5), 2765–2808. doi:10.1111/jofi.12964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holod, D., Kitsul, Y., and Torna, G., 2020. Market risk-based capital requirements, trading activity, and bank risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 112 (March 2020), 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.08.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, G., and Sarkar, S., 2007. Equity systematic risk (beta) and its determinants. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24 (2), 423–466. doi:10.1506/8187-56KM-6511-Q532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogervorst, H., 2012. What and what not to expect of the expected loss model. June, 1–15. https://www.ifrs.org/-/media/feature/news/speeches/2012/hans-hoogervorst-ecb-june-2012.pdf [Accessed 15 June 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Hoque, H., Andriosopoulos, D., Andriosopoulos, K., and Douady, R., 2015. Bank regulation, risk and return: evidence from the credit and sovereign debt crises. Journal of Banking & Finance, 50 (January 2015), 455–474. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannotta, G., Pennacchi, G., and Santos, J.A.C., 2019. Ratings-based regulation and systematic risk incentives. The Review of Financial Studies, 32 (4), 1374–1415. doi:10.1093/rfs/hhy091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IASB, 2018. The Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. London: International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Kanagaretnam, K., Krishnan, G.V., and Lobo, G.J., 2010. An empirical analysis of auditor independence in the banking industry. The Accounting Review, 85 (6), 2011–2046. doi:10.2308/accr.2010.85.6.2011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, E.J., and Unal, H., 1988. Change in market assessments of deposit-institution riskiness. Journal of Financial Services Research, 1 (3), 207–229. doi:10.1007/BF00114851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., and Mastruzzi, M., 2011. The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 3 (2), 220–246. doi:10.1017/S1876404511200046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, C.Y., Lim, C.Y., and Lobo, G.J., 2013. IAS 39 reclassification choice and analyst earnings forecast properties. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 32 (5), 342–356. doi:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loipersberger, F., 2018. The effect of supranational banking supervision on the financial sector: event study evidence from Europe. Journal of Banking & Finance, 91 (June 2018), 34–48. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lönnbark, C., 2017. Setting scenarios and assessing scenario probabilities under IFRS 9 accounting. SSRN Electronic Journal, August 22, 1–11. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3024186.
   Google Scholar
• Mariathasan, M., and Merrouche, O., 2014. The manipulation of basel risk-weights. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 23 (3), 300–321. doi:10.1016/j.jfi.2014.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merton, R.C., 1974. On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates. The Journal of Finance, 29 (2), 449–470. doi:10.2307/2978814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora, A., and Walker, M., 2015. The implications of research on accounting conservatism for accounting standard setting. Accounting and Business Research, 45 (5), 620–650. doi:10.1080/00014788.2015.1048770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer, S.E., 1990. Capital adequacy ratio regulations and accounting choices in commercial banks. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 13 (2), 123–154. doi:10.1016/0165-4101(90)90027-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagler, M., Piopiunik, M., and West, M.R., 2020. Weak markets, strong teachers: recession at career start and teacher effectiveness. Journal of Labor Economics, 38 (2), 453–500. doi:10.1086/705883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niu, F.F., and Richardson, G.D., 2006. Are securitizations in substance sales or secured borrowings? Capital-market evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23 (4), 1105–1133. doi:10.1506/X652-8M45-1702-7424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novotny-Farkas, Z., 2016. The interaction of the IFRS 9 expected loss approach with supervisory rules and implications for financial stability. Accounting in Europe, 13 (2), 197–227. doi:10.1080/17449480.2016.1210180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Hanlon, J., 2013. Did loan-loss provisioning by UK banks become less timely after implementation of IAS 39? Accounting and Business Research, 43 (3), 225–258. doi:10.1080/00014788.2013.747260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orozco, L., and Rubio, S., 2021. Regulatory capital management to exceed thresholds. SSRN Electronic Journal, doi:10.2139/ssrn.3234652.
   Google Scholar
• Pagano, M.S., and Sedunov, J., 2016. A comprehensive approach to measuring the relation between systemic risk exposure and sovereign debt. Journal of Financial Stability, 23 (April 2016), 62–78. doi:10.1016/j.jfs.2016.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, S.G., 2011. Financial reporting for financial instruments. Foundations and Trends® in Accounting, 6 (3–4), 187–354. doi:10.1561/1400000021.
   Google Scholar
• Vallascas, F., and Hagendorff, J., 2013. The risk sensitivity of capital requirements: evidence from an international sample of large banks. Review of Finance, 17 (6), 1947–1988. doi:10.1093/rof/rfs042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeff, S., 2012. The evolution of the IASC into the IASB, and the challenges it faces. The Accounting Review, 87 (3), 807–837. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar