Auditors’ self-assessment of engagement quality and the role of stakeholder priority

References

• Abbott, L.J., Daugherty, B., Parker, S., and Peters, G.F., 2016. Internal audit quality and financial reporting quality: the joint importance of independence and competence. Journal of Accounting Research, 54 (1), 3–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alderman, C.W., and Deitrick, J.W., 1982. Auditors’ perceptions of time budget pressures and premature sign-offs: a replication and extension. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 1 (2), 54–68.
   Google Scholar
• Aobdia, D., 2019. Do practitioner assessments agree with academic proxies for audit quality? Evidence from PCAOB and internal inspections. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 67, 144–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, D.F., and Ponemon, L.A., 1991. Internal auditors perceptions of whistle blowing and the influence of moral reasoning: an experiment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 10, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamber, E.M., and Iyer, V.M., 2002. Big 5 auditors’ professional and organizational identification: consistency or conflict? Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21 (2), 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamber, E.M., and Iyer, V.M., 2007. Auditors’ identification with their clients and its effect on auditors’ objectivity. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 26 (2), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, T.D., 2015. The effects of client identity strength and professional identity salience on auditor judgments. Accounting Review, 90 (1), 95–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, T.B., Causholli, M., and Knechel, W.R., 2015. Audit firm tenure, non-audit services, and internal assessments of audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 53 (3), 461–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, C., Persson, M., and Willenhag, P., 2005. Gender and overconfidence. Economic Letters, 86 (2), 199–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobek, D.D., Hageman, A.M., and Radtke, R.R., 2015. The influence of roles and organizational fit on accounting professionals’ perceptions of their firms’ ethical environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 126 (1), 125–141. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1996-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brivot, M., Roussy, M., and Mayer, M., 2018. Conventions of audit quality: the perspective of public and private company audit partners. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37 (2), 51–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broberg, P., Tagesson, T., Argento, D., Gyllengahm, N., and Mårtensson, O., 2017. Explaining the influence of time budget pressure on audit quality in Sweden. Journal of Management & Governance, 21, 331–350.
   Google Scholar
• Broberg, P., Umans, T., Skog, P., and Theodorsson, E., 2018. Auditors’ professional and organizational identities and commercialization in audit firms. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31 (2), 374–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brydon, 2019. Assess, Assure, and Inform. Improving Audit Quality and Effectiveness. Report of the independent review into the quality and effectiveness of audit.
   Google Scholar
• Cahan, S., and Sun, J., 2015. The effect of audit experience on audit fees and audit quality. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 30 (1), 78–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameran, M., Ditillo, A., and Pettinicchio, A., 2018. Audit team attributes matter: how diversity affects audit quality. European Accounting Review, 27 (4), 595–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcello, J.V., Hermanson, R.H., and McGrath, N.T., 1992. Audit quality attributes: the perceptions of audit partners, preparers, and financial statement users. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 11 (1), 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Che, L., Langli, J.C., and Svanström, T., 2018. Education, experience and audit effort. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 37 (3), 91–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, F., Peng, S., Xue, S., Yang, Z., and Ye, F., 2016. Do audit clients successfully engage in opinion shopping? Partner-level evidence. Journal of Accounting Research, 54 (1), 79–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, C.L., and Chi, H.Y., 2009. Reducing restatements with increased industry expertise. Contemporary Accounting Research, 26 (3), 729–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, B.E., Glover, S.M., Omer, T.C., and Shelley, M.K., 2016. Understanding audit quality: insights from audit professionals and investors. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33 (4), 1648–1684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, H., Heyjung Sonu, C., Zang, Y., and Choi, J.-H., 2019. Opinion shopping to avoid a going concern audit opinion and subsequent audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38 (2), 101–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contessotto, C., Knechel, W.R., and Moroney, R.A., 2019. The association between audit manager and auditor-in-charge experience, effort, and risk responsiveness. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 38 (3), 121–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, D.J., and Robson, K., 2006. Accounting, professions and regulation: locating the sites of professionalization. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, 415–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coram, P., Glavovic, A., Ng, J., and Woodliff, D.R., 2008. The moral intensity of reduced audit quality acts. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 27 (1), 127–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, A., and Killen, M., 2018. Moral Reasoning: Theory and Research in Developmental Science. Volume 4. Developmental and Social Psychology. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Daoust, L., and Malsch, B., 2020. When the client is a former auditor: auditees’ expert knowledge and social capital as threats to staff auditors’ operational independence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37 (3), 1333–1369. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M.L., and Lennox, C.S., 2011. The effect of SOX on small auditor exits and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52, 21–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M., and Zhang, J., 2014. A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58, 275–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamant, A., 2004. Revisors oberoende, om den svenska oberoenderegleringens utveckling, dess funktion och konstruktion. Doktorsavhandling, Juridiska fakulteten, Uppsala universitet. Uppsala: Iustus förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly, D.P., Quirin, J.J., and O’Bryan, D., 2003. Auditor acceptance of dysfunctional audit behavior: an explanatory model using auditors’ personal characteristics. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 15 (1), 87–110.
   Google Scholar
• Feldmann, D.A., and Read, W.J., 2010. Auditor conservatism after Enron. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 29 (1), 267–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, J.R., 2004. What do we know about audit quality? The British Accounting Review, 36, 345–368.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J.R., 2011. A framework for understanding and researching audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30 (2), 125–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaynor, L.M., Kelton, A.S., Mercer, M., and Yohn, T.L., 2016. Understanding the relation between financial reporting quality and audit quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35 (4), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbins, M., 2001. Incorporating context into the study of judgment and expertise in public accounting. International Journal of Auditing, 5 (3), 225–236.
   Google Scholar
• Gonthier-Besacier, N., Hottegindre, G., and Fine-Falcy, S., 2016. Audit quality perception: beyond the ‘role-perception gap’. International Journal of Auditing, 20, 186–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramling, A.A., Schatzberg, J.W., and Wallace, W.A., 1996. The role of undergraduate auditing coursework in reducing the expectations gap. Issues in Accounting Education, 11 (1), 131–161.
   Google Scholar
• Guénin-Paracini, H., Malsch, B., and Paillé, A.M., 2014. Fear and risk in the audit process. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 39 (4), 264–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2014.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guénin-Paracini, H., Malsch, B., and Tremblay, M.S., 2015. On the operational reality of auditors’ independence: lessons from the field. Auditing, 34 (2), 201–236. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul, F.A., Wu, D., and Yang, Z., 2013. Do individual auditors affect audit quality? Evidence from archival data. The Accounting Review, 88 (6), 1993–2023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekman, D.R., Steensma, H.K., Bigley, G.A., and Hereford, J.F., 2009. Effects of organizational and professional identification on the relationship between administrators’ social influence and professional employees’ adoption of new work behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94 (5), 1325–1335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herda, D.N., Cannon, N.H., and Young, R.F., 2019. Workplace mindfulness and its effect on staff auditors’ audit quality-threatening behavior. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 31 (1), 55–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrbach, O., 2001. Audit quality, auditor behaviour and the psychological contract. European Accounting Review, 10 (4), 787–802.
   Google Scholar
• Hirst, E., and Koonce, L., 1996. Audit analytical procedures: a field investigation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13 (2), 457–486.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey, C., 1997. Debating audit expectations. In: M. Sherer and S. Turley, eds. Current Issues in Auditing. 3rd ed. London: Paul Chapman, 3–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hurtt, K.R., Brown-Liburd, H., Earley, C.E., and Krishnamoorthy, G., 2013. Research on auditor professional skepticism: literature synthesis and opportunities for future research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 32 (Supplement 1), 45–97.
   Google Scholar
• International Auditing and Assurance Standards Boards (IAASB), 2013. A Framework for Audit Quality.
   Google Scholar
• Ittonen, K., Vähämaa, E., and Vähämaa, S., 2013. Female auditors and accruals quality. Accounting Horizons, 27 (2), 205–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeppesen, K.K., 1998. Reinventing auditing, redefining consulting and independence. European Accounting Review, 7, 517–539.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, L.M., Keune, M.B., and Winchel, J., 2019. US auditors’ perceptions of the PCAOB inspection process: a behavioral examination. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36 (3), 1540–1574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, T.M., 1991. Ethical decision-making by individuals in organizations: an issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16 (2), 366–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones III, A., Strand Norman, C., and Wier, B., 2010. Healthy lifestyle as a coping mechanism for role stress in public accounting. Behavioural Research in Accounting, 22 (1), 21–41.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, T., and Margheim, L., 1987. The effect of audit billing arrangement on underreporting of time and audit quality reduction acts. Advances in Accounting, 5, 221–233.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, T., and Margheim, L., 1990. The impact of time budget pressure, personality and leadership variables on dysfunctional behaviour. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 9 (2), 21–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlberg, L., and Kramer, R., 1969. Continuities and discontinuities in childhood and adult moral development. Human Development, 12 (2), 93–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knechel, W.R., Krishnan, G.V., Pevzner, M., Shefchik, L.B., and Velury, U.K., 2013a. Audit quality: insights from the academic literature. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32 (1), 385–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knechel, W.R., Niemi, L., and Zerni, M., 2013b. Empirical evidence on the implicit determinants of compensation in Big 4 audit partnerships. Journal of Accounting Research, 51 (2), 349–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan, J., Krishnan, J., and Soong, H., 2017. PCAOB International inspections and audit quality. Accounting Review, 92 (5), 143–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langli, J.C., and Svanström, T., 2014. Audits of private companies. In: W.R. Knechel, D. Hay and M. Willekens, eds. The Routledge Companion to Auditing. London: Routledge, 148–158.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R.F., and Catton, W.R., 1959. Can the mail-back bias contribute to a study’s validity? American Sociological Review, 24 (2), 243–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, B., 2002. Professional socialization, commercial pressures and junior staffs time-pressured irregular auditing – a contextual interpretation. British Accounting Review, 34, 315–333.
   Google Scholar
• Lennox, C., 2000. Do companies successfully engage in audit opinion shopping? Evidence from the UK. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 29 (3), 321–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L., Qi, B., Tian, G., and Zhang, G., 2017. The contagion effect of low-quality audits at the level of individual auditors. The Accounting Review, 92 (1), 137–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litjens, R., van Buuren, J., and Vergoossen, R., 2015. Addressing information needs to reduce the audit expectation gap: evidence from Dutch bankers, audited companies and auditors. International Journal of Auditing, 19, 267–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone, C.F., and Roberts, R.W., 1996. Factors associated with the incidence of reduced audit quality behaviors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15 (2), 49–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malsch, B., and Gendron, Y., 2011. Reining in auditors: on the dynamics of power surrounding an “innovation” in the regulatory space. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36 (7), 456–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malsch, B., and Gendron, Y., 2013. Re-Theorizing change: institutional experimentation and the struggle for domination in the field of public accounting. Journal of Management Studies, 50 (5), 870–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R.D., 2013. Audit quality indicators: audit practice meets audit research. Current Issues in Auditing, 7 (2), A17–A23.
   Google Scholar
• Martinov, N., and Roebuck, P., 1998. The assessment and integration of materiality and inherent risk: an analysis of major firms’ audit practices. International Journal of Auditing, 2 (2), 103–123.
   Google Scholar
• McNair, C.J., 1991. Proper compromises: the management control dilemma in public accounting and its impact on auditor behavior. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 16 (7), 635–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, S.M., and Liyanarachchi, G.A., 2008. Time budget pressure and auditor dysfunctional behaviour within an occupational stress model. Accountancy Business and the Public Interest, 7 (1), 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, G.S., and Woodliff, G.R., 1993. The effect of education on the audit expectation gap. Accounting & Finance, 33 (1), 61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M., Elliot, J.A., and Tarpley, R.L., 2002. Evidence from auditors about managers’ and auditors’ earnings management decisions. Accounting Review, 77 (1), 175–202.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, R., 1981. Using rank category variables to represent continuous variables. Social Forces, 59, 1149–1162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otley, D.T., and Pierce, B.J., 1996a. The operation of control systems in large audit firms. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 15 (2), 65–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otley, D.T., and Pierce, B.J., 1996b. Auditor time budget pressure: consequences and antecedents. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 9 (1), 31–58.
   Google Scholar
• Peecher, M.E., Solomon, I., and Trotman, K.T., 2013. An accountability framework for financial statement auditors and related research questions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38 (8), 596–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peytcheva, M., and Gillett, P.R., 2012. Auditor perceptions of prior involvement and reputation threats as antecedents of quality threatening audit behaviour. Managerial Auditing Journal, 27 (9), 796–820.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, B., and Sweeney, B., 2004. Cost-quality conflict in audit firms: an empirical investigation. European Accounting Review, 13 (1), 415–441.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, B.A., 1993. An empirical study of the audit expectation-performance gap. Accounting and Business Research, 24 (3), 49–68.
   Google Scholar
• Power, M., 1997. The Audit Society. Rituals of Verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salterio, S., 2012. Fifteen years in the trenches: auditor–client negotiations exposed and explored. Accounting and Finance, 52 (1), 233–286.
   Google Scholar
• Salterio, S., and Denham, R., 1997. Accounting consultation units: an organizational memory analysis. Contemporary Accounting Research, 14 (4), 669–691.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzberg, J.W., Sevcik, G.R., Shapiro, B.P., Thorne, L., and Olusegun Wallace, R.S., 2005. Reexamination of behavior in experimental audit markets: the effects of moral reasoning and economic incentives on auditor reporting and fees. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22 (1), 229–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, M.S., Solomon, I., and Vickrey, D., 1986. Audit quality: the perceptions of audit-committee chairpersons and audit partners. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 5 (2), 86–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaub, M., and Lawrence, J., 1996. Ethics, experience, and professional scepticism: a situational analysis. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8 (Supplement), 124–157.
   Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., Cooper, D.J., and Greenwood, R., 2007. Transnational regulation of professional services: governance dynamics of field level organizational change. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 333–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., Gendron, Y., and Lam, H., 2009. The organizational context of professionalism in accounting. Accounting, Organization and Society, 34 (3-4), 409–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundgren, S., and Svanström, T., 2017. Is the public oversight of auditors effective? The impact of sanctions on loss of clients, salary and audit reporting? European Accounting Review, 26 (4), 787–818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svanberg, J., and Öhman, P., 2013. Auditors’ time pressure: does ethical culture support audit quality? Managerial Auditing Journal, 28 (7), 572–591.
   Google Scholar
• Svanberg, J., and Öhman, P., 2015. Auditors’ identification with their clients: effects on audit quality. The British Accounting Review, 47, 395–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svanberg, J., and Öhman, P., 2019. Auditors’ issue contingency of reduced audit quality acts: perceptions of managers and partners. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 15 (1), 57–88.
   Google Scholar
• Svanström, T., 2016. Time pressure, training activities and dysfunctional auditor behavior: evidence from small audit firms. International Journal of Auditing, 20 (1), 42–51.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, B., and McGarry, C., 2011. Commercial and professional audit goals: inculcation of audit seniors. International Journal of Auditing, 15, 316–332.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, B., and Pierce, B., 2015. Audit quality threatening behaviours: perceptions of auditees. Accounting, Finance and Governance Review, 22 (2), 47–76.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, B., Pierce, B., and Arnold, D.F., 2013. The impact of perceived ethical intensity on audit-quality-threatening behaviours. Accounting and Business Research, 43 (2), 112–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepalagul, N., and Lin, L., 2015. Auditor independence and audit quality: a literature review. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 30 (1), 101–121.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., and Turner, J.C., 1985. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: S. Worchel, and W.G. Austin, eds. Psychology on Intergroup Relations. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall, 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., and Wetherell, M.S., 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self Categorization on Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Trompeter, G.M., and Wright, A.M., 2010. The world has changed — have analytical procedure practices ? Contemporary Accounting Research, 27 (2), 669–700. doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01021.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uddin, N., and Gillett, P.R., 2002. The effects of moral reasoning and self-monitoring on CFO intention to report fraudulently on financial statements. Accounting Organizations and Society, 40 (1), 41–51.
   Google Scholar
• Warming-Rasmussen, B., and Jensen, L., 1998. Quality dimensions in external audit services – an external user perspective. European Accounting Review, 7 (1), 65–82.
   Google Scholar
• Westermann, K.D., Cohen, J., and Trompeter, G., 2019. PCAOB inspections: public accounting firms on “trial”. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36 (2), 694–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willett, C., and Page, M., 1996. A survey of time budget pressure and irregular auditing practices among newly qualified UK chartered accountants. British Accounting Review, 28, 101–120.
   Google Scholar
• Winship, C., and Mare, R.D., 1984. Regression models with ordinal variables. American Sociological Review, 49 (4), 512–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wyatt, A.R., 2004. Accounting professionalism—they just don’t get it. Accounting Horizons, 18 (1), 45–53.
   Google Scholar
• Zeff, S.A., 2003. How the U.S. accounting profession got where it is today: part II. Accounting Horizons, 17 (4), 267–286.
   Google Scholar
• Zerni, M., 2012. Audit partner specialization and audit fees: some evidence from Sweden. Contemporary Accounting Research, 29 (1), 312–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, P., 2007. The impact of the public’s expectations of auditors on audit quality and auditing standards compliance. Contemporary Accounting Research, 24 (2), 631–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar