Examining an expanded repertoire of finance functions: effects on performance and the moderating role of environmental uncertainty

References

• Anderson, D.R., 1944. The function of industrial controllership. The Accounting Review, 19 (1), 55–65.
   Google Scholar
• Bechtold, C., Reimer, M., and Schäffer, U., 2014. The multi-role job profile of controllers: a double-edged sword. Working Paper Presented at the “New Directions in Management Accounting Research” Conference 2014, Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Bentler, P.M., 1990. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle, J.T., 1979. Role Theory: Expectations, Identities, and Behaviors. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, J.T., 1986. Recent development in role theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 67–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozdogan, H., 1987. Model selection and Akaike's information criteria (AIC): the general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika, 52, 345–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branicki, L., Brammer, S., Linnenluecke, M., and Houghton, D., 2023. Accounting for resilience: the role of the accounting professions in promoting resilience. Accounting and Business Research, 53 (5), 508–536. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2023.2219148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, M.W., and Cudeck, R., 1993. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: K.A. Bollen and J.S. Long, eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 136–162.
   Google Scholar
• Buenger, V., Daft, R.L., Conlon, E.J., and Austin, J., 1996. Competing values in organizations: contextual influences and structural consequences. Organization Science, 7 (5), 557–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, M.J., and Dunlap, W.P., 2002. Estimating interrater agreement with the average deviation index: A user's guide. Organizational Research Methods, 5 (2), 159–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, M.K., Finkelstein, L.M., and Dusig, M.S., 1999. On average deviation indices for estimating interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 49–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, J., and Baldvindsdottir, G., 2005. An institutional perspective of accountants’ new roles – the interplay of contradictions and praxis. European Accounting Review, 14 (4), 725–757.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, B.M., 2010. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS – Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, S., and Pierce, B., 2007. Towards a more comprehensive understanding of the roles of controllers. European Accounting Review, 16 (3), 469–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caglio, A., 2003. Enterprise resource planning systems and accountants: towards hybridization? European Accounting Review, 12 (1), 123–153.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, K.S., Quinn, R., Degraff, J., and Anjan, T., 2014. Competing values leadership. 2nd ed. Cheltenham: New Horizons in Management.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., and Zhang, H., 2009. Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: Dimensions, contingencies and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20 (4), 781–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmeli, A., and Halevi, M., 2009. How top management team behavioral integration and behavioral complexity enable organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of contextual ambidexterity. The Leadership Quarterly, 20 (3), 207–218.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, H., Itnner, C.D., and Paz, M.T., 2014. The multiple roles of the finance organization: determinants, effectiveness, and the moderating influence of information system integration. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26 (2), 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, C.S., 2005. Not because they are new: developing the contribution of enterprise resource planning systems to management control research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30 (7–8), 685–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenhall, R., 2003. Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 127–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chenhall, R.H., and Moers, F., 2007. The issue of endogeneity within theory-based, quantitative management accounting research. European Accounting Review, 16 (1), 173–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chreim, S., 2005. The continuity-change duality in narrative texts of organizational identity. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (3), 567–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuen, P.W., Osman, M., Yusoff, W., and Fadzillah, W., 2018. The impact of behavioural complexity on exploitative and explorative behaviour among owner-managers of SMEs in Malaysia. Academy of Strategic Journal, 17 (1), 273–281.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, P., and Dart, E., 2013. Business Partnering as a Complement to the Accountant’s Other Roles: International Survey Evidence, University of Bath School of Management, Working Paper Series.
   Google Scholar
• Curtis, E., and Sweeney, B., 2017. Managing different types of innovation: mutually reinforcing management control systems and the generation of dynamic tension. Accounting and Business Research, 47 (3), 313–343. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2016.1255585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedreu, C.K.W., 1991. Productive conflict: the importance of conflict management and conflict issue. In: C.K.W. Dedreu and E. Van de Vliert, eds. Using Conflict in Organizations. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte, 2020. The future of operational finance: how the exponential growth of robotics, cognitive computing and other disruptive technologies impact the evolution of the finance function.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, X., Doll, W.J., Hendrickson, A.R., and Scazzero, J.A., 2005. A multi-group analysis of structural invariance: An illustration using the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42 (5), 745–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denison, D.R., Hoijberg, R., and Quinn, R.E., 1995. Toward a theory of behavioral complexity in managerial leadership. Organization Science, 6 (5), 524–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dess, G.G., and Robinson jr, R.B., 1984. Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (3), 265–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, L., 2001. The contingency theory of organizations. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eskenazi, P.I., Hartmann, F.G.H., and Rietdijk, W.J.R., 2016. Why controllers compromise on their fiduciary duties: EEG evidence on the role of the human mirror neuron system. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 50, 41–50. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2016.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eustler, J., and Lang, B., 2015. Rating scales in accounting research: The impact of scale points and labels. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 27 (2), 35–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EY, 2020. How can the CFO evolve today to reframe finance for tomorrow? Three priorities for the chief financial officer to meet their role’s changing demands.
   Google Scholar
• Floh, A., and Treiblmaier, H., 2006. What keeps the E-banking customer loyal? A multigroup analysis of the moderation role of consumer characteristics of E-loyalty in the financial service industry. Journal of Electronic Commer Research, 7 (2), 97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Floyd, S.W., and Wooldridge, B., 1992. Middle management involvement in strategy and its association with strategic type: a research note. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 153–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and Larcker, D.F., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 39–50.
   Google Scholar
• Fourné, S.P.L., Guessow, D., Margolin, M., and Schäffer, U., 2023. Controllers and strategic decision-making: the role of cognitive flexibility in controller-manager collaboration. Management Accounting Research, 60, 100840. doi: 10.1016/j.mar.2023.100840.
   Google Scholar
• Fullerton, R.R., Kennedy, F.A., and Widener, S.K., 2013. Management accounting and control practices in a lean manufacturing context. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38 (1), 50–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullerton, R.R., and Wempe, W.F., 2009. Lean manufacturing, non-financial performance measures, and financial performance. International Journal of Production Management, 29 (3), 214–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goretzki, L., Lukka, K., and Messner, M., 2018. Controllers’ use of informational tactics. Accounting and Business Research, 48 (6), 700–726. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2017.1407627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goretzki, L., and Messner, M., 2019. Backstage and frontstage interactions in management accountants’ identity work. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 74, 1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2018.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goretzki, L., Strauss, E., and Weber, J., 2013. An institutional perspective on the changes in management accountants’ professional role. Management Accounting Research, 24 (1), 41–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabner, I., and Speckbacher, G., 2016. The cost of creativity: A control perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 48, 31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, A., Davey-Evans, S., and Toon, I., 2012. The developing role of the financial controller: evidence from the UK. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 13 (1), 71–88.
   Google Scholar
• Granlund, M., and Lukka, L., 1998. Towards increasing business orientation: Finnish controllers in a changing cultural context. Management Accounting Research, 9, 185–211.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., and Anderson, R., 2014. Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed. Edinburgh, England: Pearson Education Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, S.C., and Van der Stede, W.A., 2004. Multiple facets of budgeting: an exploratory analysis. Management Accounting Research, 15, 415–439.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, F.G.H., and Maas, V.S., 2011. The effects of uncertainty on the roles of controllers and budgets: an exploratory study. Accounting and Business Research, 41 (5), 439–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawawini, G., and Viallet, C., 2011. Finance For Executives – Managing for Value Creation. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Hedström, P., and Swedberg, R., 1996. Rational choice, empirical research and the sociological tradition. European Sociological Review, 12, 127–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henri, J-F., 2006. Management control systems and strategy: a resource-based perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31, 529–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooijberg, R., 1996. A multidirectional approach toward leadership: an extension of the concept of behavioral complexity. Human Relations, 49 (4), 917–946.
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K.G., and Sörbom, D., 1988. LISREL 7: A Guide to the Program and Applications. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
   Google Scholar
• Jun, M., and Cai, M., 2010. Examining the relationships between internal service quality and its dimensions, and internal customer satisfaction. Total Quality Management, 21 (2), 205–223.
   Google Scholar
• Kalliath, T.J., Bluedorn, A.C., and Gillespie, D.F., 1999. A confirmatory factor analysis of the competing values instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59 (1), 143–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyes, C.L., Hysom, S.J., and Lupo, K.L., 2000. The positive organization: leadership legitimacy, employee well-being, and the bottom-line. The Psychologist-Manger Journal, 4 (2), 143–153.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R.B., 2005. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd ed. New York: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R.B., 2011. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 3rd ed. New York: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• KPMG, 2020. The CFO agenda: digital delivered. The future of finance.
   Google Scholar
• Kunert, S., 2018. Mastering uncertainty with the competing values framework – insights from multilevel research on employee motivation, team climate, leadership style, and organizational culture. International Conference on Creating Uncertainty, Ascona, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, C., and Sponem, S., 2012. Roles, authority, and involvement of the management accounting function: a multiple case-study perspective. European Accounting Review, 21 (3), 565–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, K.A., Lenk, P., and Quinn, R.E., 2009. Behavioral complexity in leadership: the psychometric properties of a new instrument to measure behavioral repertoire. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 87–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M.W., 2000. Exploring paradox: toward a more comprehensive guide. The Academy of Management Review, 25 (4), 760–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, R.L., Brown, D.A., and Sutton, N.C., 2018. Control and empowerment as an organising paradox: implications for management control systems. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 32 (2), 483–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luft, J., and Shields, M., 2003. Mapping management accounting: graphics and guidelines for theory-consistent empirical research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28 (2–3), 169–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, V.S., and Matejka, M., 2009. Balancing the dual responsibilities of business unit controllers: field and survey evidence. The Accounting Review, 84 (4), 1233–1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahlendorf, M.D., 2014. Discussion of the roles of the finance organization: determinants, effectiveness, and the moderating influence of information system integration. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26 (2), 33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Malmi, T., and Brown, D.a., 2008. Management control systems as a package-opportunities, challenges and research directions. Management Accounting Research, 19 (4), 287–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H.W., and Hocevar, D., 1985. Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: first- and higher order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97 (3), 562–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, A.A., and Shah, R., 2009. In union lies strength: collaborative competence in new product development and its performance effects. Journal of Operations Management, 27 (4), 324–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouritsen, J., 1996. Five aspects of accounting department's work. Management Accounting Research, 7, 283–303.
   Google Scholar
• Nicotera, A.M., 1995. Conflict and Organizations. Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P.M., Mackensie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., and Podsakoff, N.P., 2003. Common method bias in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5), 879–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P.M., and Organ, D.W., 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12 (4), 531–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayees, F., and Sandeep, V., 2017. Moderating variablesin business research. IUP Journal of Business Strategy, 14 (4), 34–54.
   Google Scholar
• Rindskopf, D., and Rose, T., 1988. Some theory and applications of confirmatory second-order factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23 (1), 51–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathe, V., 1983. The controller's role in management. Organizational Dynamics, Winter, 31–48.
   Google Scholar
• Schad, J., Lewis, M.W., Raisch, S., and Smith, W., 2016. Paradox research in management science: looking back to move forward. The Academy of Management Annals, April, 1–60.
   Google Scholar
• Schäffer, U., 2007. Management Accounting & Control Scales Handbook. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., and Muller, H., 2003. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8 (2), 23–74.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H.A., Guetzkow, H., Kozmetsky, G., and Tyndall, G., 1954. Centralization Versus Decentralization in Organizing the Controller's Department. New York: The Controllership Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, S.F., and Olson, E.M., 2000. Strategy type and performance: the influence of sales force management. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 813–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, W.K., and Lewis, M.W., 2011. Toward a theory of paradox: a dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. The Academy of Management Review, 36 (2), 381–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, J. (2009). Management accountants in the United States: practitioner and academic views of recent developments. In: C.S. Chapman, A.G. Hopwood and M.D. Shields, eds. Handbook of Management Accounting Research, vol. 3, pp. 1271–1296. UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Speklé, R.F., van Elten, H.J., and Widener, S.K., 2017. Creativity and control: a paradox—evidence from the levers of control framework. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 29 (2), 73–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi, H., and Venkatraman, N., 2005. Knowledge relatedness and the performance of multibusiness firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26 (2), 97–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillema, S., Trapp, R., and Veen-Dirks, P.v., 2022. Business partnering in risk management: a resilience perspective on management accountants’ response to a role change. Contemporary Accounting Research. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toldbod, T., and Dumay, J., 2023. How managerial capabilities of cognitive and behavioural complexity enable dynamic tension between management controls. Qualitative Research in Accounting and Management, 20 (4), 515–542. doi: 10.1108/QRAM-05-2022-0091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toldbod, T., and Van der Kolk, B., 2022. Cascading control changes, incoherence, and dialogue: insights from a longitudinal case study. European Accounting Review, 31(2), 377–407. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2020.1813185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, L.R., and Lewis, C., 1973. A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Kolk, B., van Veen-Dirks, P., and ter Bogt, H., 2020. How combinations of control elements create tensions and how these can be managed: an embedded case study. Management Accounting Research, 48, 100677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, J., 2011. The development of controller tasks: explaining the nature of controllership and its changes. Journal of Management Control, 22 (25), 25–45.
   Google Scholar
• Weissenberger, B.E., and Angelkort, H., 2011. Integration of financial management accounting systems: the mediating influence of a consistent financial language on controllership effectiveness. Management Accounting Research, 22 (3), 160–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whetten, D.A., 1989. What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14, 490–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widener, S.K., 2007. An empirical analysis of the levers of control framework. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 757–788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L.J., Gavin, M.B., and Hartmann, N.S., 2004. Structural equation modeling methods in strategy research: applications and issue. In: D.J. Ketchen and D.D. Berg, eds. Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, 1. Connecticut: Elsevier/JAI press, 33–65.
   Google Scholar