Non-Big 6 audit firms’ access to external resources through inter-organisational relationships

References

• Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession to the U.S. Department of the Treasury (ACAP), 2008. Final Report of the Advisory Committee on the Auditing Profession to the U.S. Department of the Treasury. Available from: http://www.treasury.gov/about/organizational-structure/offices/Documents/final-report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ahn, J., Akamah, H., Bills, K., and Saunders, K., 2022. Accounting firm association membership and small audit firm growth. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 41 (3), 45–65. doi: 10.2308/AJPT-19-049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ai, X., Cunningham, L. M., Li, X., and Myers, L. A., 2021. How can small international accounting firms improve audit quality? The role of accounting associations and networks. Available from SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id = 3406206.
   Google Scholar
• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), 2017. Forming alliances with other firms: Expand your service offerings and ensure quality. Available from: https://us.aicpa.org/content/dam/aicpa/interestareas/privatecompaniespracticesection/qualityservicesdelivery/keepingup/downloadabledocuments/forming-alliances.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Andre, P., Broye, G., Pong, C., and Schatt, A., 2016. Are joint audits associated with higher audit fees? European Accounting Review, 25 (2), 245–274. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2014.998016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianchi, P., 2018. Auditors’ joint engagements and audit quality: evidence from Italian private companies. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35 (3), 1533–1577. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bills, K. L., Cunningham, L. M., and Myers, L. A., 2016a. Small audit firm membership in associations, networks, and alliances: implications for audit quality and audit fees. The Accounting Review, 91 (3), 767–792. doi: 10.2308/accr-51228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bills, K. L., Swanquist, Q. T., and Whited, R. L., 2016b. Growing pains: audit quality and office growth. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33 (1), 288–313. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bills, K. L., Hayne, C., and Stein, S. E., 2018. A field study on small accounting firm membership in associations and networks: implications for audit quality. The Accounting Review, 93 (5), 73–96. doi: 10.2308/accr-52003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bills, K. L., Hayne, C., and Stein, S. E., 2021. Collaborating with competitors: How do small firm accounting associations and networks successfully manage cooperative tensions? Contemporary Accounting Research, 38 (1), 545–585. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, J., Hoitash, R., and Hoitash, U., 2020. The use and characteristics of foreign component auditors in US multinational audits: insights from form AP disclosures. Contemporary Accounting Research, 37 (4), 2398–2437. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, E., Simnett, R., Thürheimer, U., and Vanstraelen, A., 2022. Involvement of component auditors in multinational group audits: determinants, audit quality and audit fees. Journal of Accounting Research, January, 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Dacin, M. T., Oliver, C., and Roy, J. P., 2007. The legitimacy of strategic alliances: An institutional perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 28 (2), 169–187. doi: 10.1002/smj.577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., and Sloan, R. G., 2011. Predicting material accounting misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28 (1), 17–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01041.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dee, C. C., Lulseged, A., and Zhang, T., 2015. Who did the audit? Audit quality and disclosures of other audit participants in PCAOB filings. The Accounting Review, 90 (5), 1939–1967. doi: 10.2308/accr-50968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFond, M., and Zhang, J., 2014. A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58 (2-3), 275–326. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, M., Lu, T., Simunic, D., and Ye, M., 2014. Do joint audits improve or impair audit quality? Journal of Accounting Research, 52 (5), 1029–1060. doi: 10.1111/1475-679X.12060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docimo, W. M., Gunn, J. L., Li, C., and Michas, P. N., 2021. Do foreign component auditors harm financial reporting quality? A subsidiary-level analysis of foreign component auditor use. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38 (4), 3113–3145. doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, C., and Leech, S., 2007. Audit support systems and decision aids: current practice and opportunities for future research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 8 (2007), 92–116. doi: 10.1016/j.accinf.2007.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Downey, D., 2018. An exploration of offshoring in audit practice and the potential consequences of associated work “redesign” on auditor performance. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 37 (2), 197–223. doi: 10.2308/ajpt-51771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downey, D., and Bedard, J. C., 2019. Do use of foreign auditor personnel and lead engagement partner incentives affect audit quality for US multinational companies? Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id = 3401466.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C., Pinnuck, M., and Skinner, D., 2022. The evolution of audit market structure and the emergence of the Big 4: Evidence from Australia. Available from SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id = 2431727.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, J. R., and Yu, M. D., 2009. Big 4 office size and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 84 (5), 1521–1552. doi: 10.2308/accr.2009.84.5.1521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Accountability Office (GAO), 2008. Audits of public companies: Continued concentration in audit market for large public companies does not call for immediate action. GAO-08-163. Available from: https://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08163.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, T., Simunic, D., and Stein, M., 2019. Reconceptualizing audit production: The importance of capital investments and joint fixed costs. Available from SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id = 2900389.
   Google Scholar
• International Accounting Bulletin, May 4, 2021. https://www.internationalaccountingbulletin.com/news/accounting-giants/ (last accessed on December 7, 2023).
   Google Scholar
• Jones, K. L., Krishnan, G. V., and Melendrez, K. D., 2008. Do models of discretionary accruals detect actual cases of fraudulent and restated earnings? An empirical analysis. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25 (2), 499–531. doi: 10.1506/car.25.2.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari, S., Leone, A., and Wasley, C., 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39 (1), 163–197. doi: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, K., Liu, J., and Yip, R., 2021. Does access to developed audit markets improve home audit quality? evidence from China. Accounting and Business Research, 51 (6-7), 707–743. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2021.1951645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesage, C., Ratzinger-Sakel, N., and Kettunen, J., 2017. Consequences of the abandonment of mandatory joint audit: An empirical study of audit costs and audit quality effects. European Accounting Review, 26 (2), 311–339. doi: 10.1080/09638180.2016.1152558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., Liu, H., and Wang, X., 2021. Does joining global accounting firm networks and associations affect audit quality and audit pricing? evidence from China. Accounting and Business Research, 51 (6-7), 677–706. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2020.1824115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macve, R., 2020. Perspectives from mainland China, Hong Kong and the UK on the development of China’s auditing firms: implications and a research agenda. Accounting and Business Research, 50 (7), 641–692. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2020.1736494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, J., Ettredge, M., and Stone, M., 2020. Group audits: Are audit quality and price associated with the lead auditor’s decision to accept responsibility for work performed by other auditors? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 39 (2), 1–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2020.106718
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao, J., Qi, B., and Xu, Q., 2017. Does international accounting network membership affect audit fees and audit quality? Evidence from China. The International Journal of Accounting, 52 (3), 262–278. doi: 10.1016/j.intacc.2017.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrow, C., 1961. Organizational prestige: some functions and dysfunctions. American Journal of Sociology, 66 (4), 335–341. doi: 10.1086/222899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, J., and Salancik, G. R., 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Ruan, L., and Zhang, H., 2021. Do auditors consider alleged bribery when accepting clients? evidence from Chinese nonstate-owned enterprises. Accounting and Business Research, 51 (6-7), 744–776. doi: 10.1080/00014788.2020.1868283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirois, L. (2009). Auditor size and audit quality revisited: The role of market size and legal environment. Doctoral dissertation written at The University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Sirois, L., Marmousez, S., and Simunic, D., 2016. Auditor size and audit quality revisited: The importance of audit technology. Accounting Auditing Control, 22 (3), 111–144.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C., 1995. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), 571–610. doi: 10.2307/258788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, J., 1991. Sunk Costs and Market Structure: Price Competition, Advertising, and the Evolution of Concentration. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar