References
- Hendel RC, Berman DS, Di Carli MF, et al. ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:2201–2229.
- Donataccio MP, Reverberi C, Gaibazzi N. The dilemma of ischemia testing with different methods. Echo Res Pract. 2014;1:K1–K4.
- Shah BN, Chahal NS, Bhattacharyya S, et al. The feasibility and clinical utility of myocardial contrast echocardiography in clinical practice: results from the incorporation of myocardial perfusion assessment into clinical testing with stress echocardiography study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27:520–530.
- Marwick TH, Buonocore J. Environmental impact of cardiac imaging tests for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Heart. 2011;97:1128–1131.
- Braga L, Vinci B, Leo CG, et al. The true cost of cardiovascular imaging: focusing on downstream, indirect, and environmental costs. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2013;11:10.