Impact of cardiac rehabilitation on left ventricular diastolic function and exercise capacity in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention after acute coronary event

References

• Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2011;32(23):2999–3054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perk J, De Backer G, Gohlke H, et al. European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur Heart J. 2012;33(13):1635–1701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohara T, Little WC. Evolving focus on diastolic dysfunction in patients with coronary artery disease. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2010; 25(6):613–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(3):233–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(12):1321–1360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Thoracic Society; American College of Chest Physicians. ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167(2):211–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guazzi M, Adams V, Conraads V, et al. EACPR/AHA scientific statement. Clinical recommendations for cardiopulmonary exercise testing data assessment in specific patient populations. Circulation. 2012;126(18):2261–2274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, et al. Normal values. In: Weinberg R, editor. Principles of exercise testing and interpretation. 4th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005. p. 160–182.
   Google Scholar
• Lawler PR, Filion KB, Eisenberg MJ. Efficacy of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation post-myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J. 2011;162(4):571–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mezzani A, , Hamm LF, Jones AM, et al. Aerobic exercise intensity assessment and prescription in cardiac rehabilitation: a joint position statement of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2013;20(3):442–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazzeroni D, Castiglioni P, Bini M, et al. Improvement in aerobic capacity during cardiac rehabilitation in coronary artery disease patients: is there a role for autonomic adaptations? Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2017;24(4):357–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang X, Li Y, Ren X, et al. Effects of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: a Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Sci Rep. 2017;7(7):44789.
   Google Scholar
• Lin X, Zhang X, Guo J, et al. Effects of exercise training on cardiorespiratory fitness and biomarkers of cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015;4(7):e0020144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liou K, Ho S, Fildes J, et al. High intensity interval versus moderate intensity continuous training in patients with coronary artery disease: a Meta-analysis of physiological and clinical parameters. Heart Lung Circ. 2016; 25(2):166–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattyn N, Coeckelberghs E, Buys R, et al. Aerobic interval training vs moderate continuous training in coronary artery disease patients: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2014;44(5):687–700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart N, Haluska B, Jeffriess L, et al. Exercise training in systolic and diastolic dysfunction: effects on cardiac function, functional capacity, and quality of life. Am Heart J. 2007;153(4):530–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korzeniowska-Kubacka I, Bilinska M, Michalak E, et al. Influence of exercise training on left ventricular diastolic function and its relationship to exercise capacity in patients after myocardial infarction. Cardiol J. 2010;17(2):136–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zile MR, Brutsaert DL. New concepts in diastolic dysfunction and diastolic heart failure: part II: causal mechanisms and treatment. Circulation. 2002;105(12):1503–1508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa de Sa DD, Hodge DO, Slusser JP, et al. Progression of preclinical diastolic dysfunction to the development of symptoms. Heart. 2010;96(7):528–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane GC, Karon BL, Mahoney DW, et al. Progression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and the risk of heart failure. JAMA. 2011;306(8):856–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RS, Brown A, Ebrahim S, et al. Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med. 2004;116(10):682–692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson MJ, Mungovan SF, Smart NA. Effect of exercise on diastolic function in heart failure patients: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Heart Fail Rev. 2017;22(2):229–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conraads VM, Beckers PJ. Exercise training in heart failure: practical guidance. Heart. 2010;96(24):2025–2023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey A, Parashar A, Kumbhani D, et al. Exercise training in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Circ Heart Fail. 2015;8(1):33–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelmann F, Gelbrich G, Düngen H-D, et al. Exercise training improves exercise capacity and diastolic function in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: results of the Ex-DHF (Exercise training in Diastolic Heart Failure) pilot study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(17):1780–1791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu T-C, Yang N-I, Wang C-H, et al. Aerobic interval training elicits different hemodynamic adaptations between heart failure patients with preserved and reduced ejection fraction. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;95(1):15–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart NA, Haluska B, Jeffriess L, et al. Exercise training in heart failure with preserved systolic function: a randomized controlled trial of the effects on cardiac function and functional capacity. Congest Heart Fail. 2012;18(6):295–301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dieberg G, Ismail H, Giallauria F, et al. Clinical outcomes and cardiovascular responses to exercise training in preserved ejection fraction heart failure patients: systematic review & Meta-analysis. J Appl Physiol. 2015;119(6):726–733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angadi SS, Mookadam F, Lee CD, et al. High-intensity interval training vs. moderate-intensity continuous exercise training in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pilot study. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2015;119(6):753–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar