Protected Carotid Artery Stenting (PCAS): a short medical technology assessment

References

• Eastcott H. H., Pickering G. W., Rob C. G. Reconstruction of internal carotid artery in a patient with intermittent attacks of hemiplegia. Lancet, 1954, 267 (6846): 994–6.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett H. J., Taylor D. W., Eliasziw M. et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med, 1998, 339 (20): 1415–25.
   Google Scholar
• European Carotid Surgery Trialists Group. Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST). Lancet, 1998, 351 (9113): 1379–87.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor S. M., Robison J. G., Langan E. M., 3rd, Crane M. M. The pitfalls of establishing a statewide vascular registry: the South Carolina experience. Am Surg, 1999, 65 (6): 513–8.
   Google Scholar
• Bond R., Rerkasem K., Shearman C. P., Rothwell P. M. Time trends in the published risks of stroke and death due to endarterec-tomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2004, 18 (1): 37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell P. M., Eliasziw M., Gutnikov S. A. et al. Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterecto-my for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet, 2003, 361 (9352): 107–16.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell P. M., Mehta Z., Howard S. C., Gutnikov S. A., Warlow C. P. Treating Individuals 3: From subgroups to individuals: general principles and the example of carotid endarterectomy. Lancet, 2005, 365 (9455): 256–65.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell P. M., Giles M. F., Flossmann E. et al. A simple score (ABCD) to identify individuals at high early risk of stroke after transient ischaemic attack. Lancet, 2005, 366 (9479): 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Bonneux L., Cleemput I., Ramaekers D. Endovascular treatment of carotid stenosis. Brussels: Belgian Health Care Knowledge Center, 2005. Report No.: 13A.
   Google Scholar
• Blankensteijn J. D. Vaatchirurgie terecht. [Oratio]. Nijmegen: K.U. Nijmegen, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell P. M. Personal communication.
   Google Scholar
• Tu J. V., Hannan E. L., Anderson G. M. et al. The fall and rise of carotid endarterectomy in the united states and Canada. N Engl J Med, 1998, 339 (20): 1441–7.
   Google Scholar
• Brown M. M., Hacke W. Carotid artery stenting: the need for randomised trials. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2004, 18 (1): 57–61.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester J. S., Topol E. J., Abele J. E., Holmes D. R., Jr., Skorton D. J. 28th Bethesda Conference. Task Force 5: Assessment, approval, and regulation of new technology. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1997, 29 (6): 1171–9.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell P. M. Treating individuals 2. Subgroup analysis in randomised controlled trials: importance, indications, and interpretation. Lancet, 2005, 365 (9454): 176–86.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell P. M. External validity of randomised controlled trials: “to whom do the results of this trial apply ?” Lancet, 2005, 365 (9453): 82–93.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. Interventional procedures overview of carotid artery stent placement for carotid stenosis. http://www.nice.org.uk/pdf/ip/ip008overview.pdf, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Coward L. J., Featherstone R. L., Brown M. M. Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of carotid stenosis compared with carotid endarterectomy: a Cochrane systematic review of the randomized evidence. Stroke, 2005, 36 (4): 905–11.
   Google Scholar
• Mas J. L., Chatellier G., Beyssen B. Carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection: clinical alert from the Endarterectomy Versus Angioplasty in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial. Stroke, 2004, 35 (1): 18–20.
   Google Scholar
• Yadav J. S., Wholey M. H., Kuntz R. E. et al. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med, 2004, 351 (15): 1493–501.
   Google Scholar
• Becquemin J., El Kadi H. B., Desgranges P., Kobeiter H. Carotid stenting versus carotid surgery: a prospective cohort study. JEndovasc Ther, 2003, 10 (4): 687–94.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson R. W., 2nd, Howard V. J., Roubin G. S. et al. Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30-day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead-in phase. J Vasc Surg, 2004, 40 (6): 1106–11.
   Google Scholar
• McKinlay S., White R. A., Diethrich E. B. et al. Carotid Revascularization Using Endarterectomy or Stenting Systems (CARESS): Phase I Clinical Trial. J Endovasc Ther, 2003, 10 (6): 1021–30.
   Google Scholar
• Kastrup A., Schulz J. B., Raygrotzki S., Groschel K., Ernemann U. Comparison of angioplasty and stenting with cerebral protection versus endarterectomy for treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis in elderly patients. J Vasc Surg, 2004, 40 (5): 945–51.
   Google Scholar
• Reimers B., Schlüter M., Castriota F. et al. Routine use of cerebral protection during carotid artery stenting: results of a multicenter registry of 753 patients. Am J Med, 2004, 116 (4): 217–22.
   Google Scholar
• Wholey M. H., Wholey M., Bergeron P. et al. Current global status of carotid artery stent placement. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 1998, 44 (1): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kastrup A., Groschel K., Krapf H., Brehm B. R., Dichgans J., Schulz J. B. Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting with and without cerebral protection devices: a systematic review of the literature. see comment. Review 71 refs. Stroke, 2003, 34 (3): 813–9.
   Google Scholar
• Wholey M. H., Al-Mubarek N. Updated review of the global carotid artery stent registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2003, 60 (2): 259–66.
   Google Scholar
• McKevitt F. M., Macdonald S., Venables G. S., Cleveland T. J., Gaines P. A. Complications following carotid angioplasty and carotid stenting in patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2004, 17 (1): 28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Zahn R., Mark B., Niedermaier N. et al. Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting: better results than stenting without protection ? Eur Heart J, 2004, 25 (17): 1550–8.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman H. S., Eliasziw M., Barnett H. J. M. et al. Carotid-Artery Stenting versus Endarterectomy. N Engl J Med, 2005, 352 (6): 624–7.
   Google Scholar
• CARESS steering committee. Carotid revascularization using endarterectomy or stenting systems (CARESS): phase I clinical trial. J Endovasc Ther, 2003, 10 (6): 1021–30.
   Google Scholar
• Mas J. L. Endarterectomy vs. Angioplasty in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis (EVA-3S) trial. Cerebro-vasc-Dis, 2004, 18 (1): 62–5.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone R. L., Brown M. M., Coward L. J. International carotid stenting study: protocol for a randomised clinical trial comparing carotid stenting with endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2004, 18 (1): 69–74.
   Google Scholar
• Ringleb P. A., Kunze A., Allenberg J. R. et al. The Stent-Supported Percutaneous Angioplasty of the Carotid Artery vs. Endarterectomy Trial. Cerebrovasc-Dis, 2004, 18 (1): 66–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson R. W., 2nd, Brott T., Ferguson R. et al. CREST: carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stent trial. Cardiovasc Surg, 1997, 5 (5): 457–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson R. W., 2nd. CREST (Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial): background, design, and current status. Semin Vasc Surg, 2000, 13 (2): 139–43.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson II R. W., Howard V. J., Brott T. G. et al. Organizing the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST): National Institutes of Health, Health Care Financing Administration, and industry funding. Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine, 2001, 2 (4): 160–4.
   Google Scholar
• Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA, 1995, 273 (18): 1421–8.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday A., Mansfield A., Marro J. et al. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2004, 363 (9420): 1491–502.
   Google Scholar
• The CASANOVA Study Group. Carotid surgery versus medical therapy in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke, 1991, 22 (10): 1229–35.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo Asymptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Study Group. Results of a randomized controlled trial of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Mayo Clin Proc, 1992, 67 (6): 513–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson R. W., 2nd, Weiss D. G., Fields W. S. et al. Efficacy of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. N Engl J Med, 1993, 328 (4): 221–7.
   Google Scholar
• Wennberg D. E., Lucas F. L., Birkmeyer J. D., Bredenberg C. E., Fisher E. S. Variation in carotid endarterectomy mortality in the Medicare population: trial hospitals, volume, and patient characteristics. JAMA, 1998, 279 (16): 1278–81.
   Google Scholar