Evaluation and Functional Assessment of Flexor Tendon Repair in the Hand

References

• Kleinert H. E, Verdan C. Report of the committee on tendon injuries (International Federation of Societies for Surgery of the Hand). J Hand Surg (Am), 1983 Sep, 8 (5 Pt 2): 794–8.
   Google Scholar
• Strickland J. W. Results of flexor tendon surgery in zone II. Hand-Clin, 1985 Feb, 1 (1): 167–79.
   Google Scholar
• Strickland J. W., Glogovac S. V. Digital function following flexor tendon repair in zone II: A comparison of immobilization and controlled passive motion techniques. J Hand Surg (Am), 1980 Nov, 5 (6): 537–43.
   Google Scholar
• Gault D. T. Reduction of grip strength, finger flexion pressure, finger pinch pressure and key pinch following flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg (Br), 1987 Jun, 12B (2): 182–184.
   Google Scholar
• Baktir A., Turk C. Y., Kabak S., Sahin v., Kardas Y. Flexor tendon repair in zone 2 followed by early active mobilization. J Hand Surg (Br), 1996 Oct, 21 (5): 624–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ejeskar A. Finger flexion force and hand grip strength after tendon repair. J Hand Surg (Am), 1982 Jan, 7 (1): 61–65.
   Google Scholar
• Marin Braun F., Foucher G., Buch Jaeger N., Sammut D. Repair of the flexor digitorum profundus and the flexor pollicis longus by the “rope down” technique. Results in a series of 77 cases. Ann Chir Main Memb Super, 1991, 10 (l): 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Riaz M., Hill C., Khan K., Small J. O. Long term outcome of early active mobilization following flexor tendon repair in zone 2. J Hand Surg (Br), 1999 Apr, 24 (2) :157–60.
   Google Scholar
• Stefanich R. J., Putnam M. D., Peimer C. A., Sherwin F. S. Flexor tendon lacerations in zone V. J Hand Surg (Am), 1992 Mar, 17 (2): 284–91.
   Google Scholar
• Hudak P. L., Amadio P. C., Bombardier C., UECC. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). Am J Ind Med, 1996, 29: 602608.
   Google Scholar
• Davis A. M., Beaton D. E., Hudak P., Amadio P., Bombardier C. Measuring disability of the upper extremity: a rationale supporting the use of a regional outcome measure. J Hand Ther, 1999 oct-Dec, 12: 269–274.
   Google Scholar
• Macdermid J. C., Richards R. S., Donner A., Bellamy N., Roth J. H. Responsiveness of the short form-36, disability of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire, patient-rated wrist evaluation, and physical impairment measurements in evaluating recovery after a distal radius fracture. J Hand Surg (Am) 2000 Mar, 25 (2): 330–40.
   Google Scholar
• Navsarikar A., Gladman D. D., Husted J. A., Cook R. J. Validity assessment of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH) for patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Rheuma-tol, 1999 Oct, 26 (10): 2191–4.
   Google Scholar
• Kalb K., Ludwig A., Tauscher A., Landsleitner B., Wiemer P., Krimmer H. Treatment outcome after surgical arthrodesis. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir, 1999 Jul, 31 (4): 253–9.
   Google Scholar
• Karunakar M. A., Cha P., Stern P. J. Distal biceps ruptures. A follow-up of Boyd and Anderson repair. Clin Orthop, 1999 Jun, (363): 100–7.
   Google Scholar
• Ring D., Perey B. H., Jupiter J. B. The functional outcome of operative treatment of ununited fractures of the humeral diaphysis in older patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1999 Feb, 81 (2): 177–90.
   Google Scholar
• Sauerbier M., Gunther C., Bickert B., Pelzer M., Germann G. Long-term outcome of reconstruction of proximal scaphoid pseudo-arthroses with Matti-Russe-plastyl. Handchir mikrochir Plast Chir, 1999 May, 31 (3): 182–6.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe S. W., Pike L., Slade J. F. 3rd, Katz L. D. Augmentation of distal radius fracture fixation with coralline hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute. J Hand Surg (Am), 1999 Jul, 24 (4): 816–27.
   Google Scholar
• Tsuge K., Yoshikazu I., Matsuishi Y. Repair of flexor tendons by intratendinous tendon suture. J Hand Surg (Am), 1977 Nov, 2 (6): 436–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinert H. E., Kutz J. E., Atasoy E., Stormo A. Primary repair of flexor tendons. Orthopedic Clinics of North America, 1973 oct, 4 (4): 865–76.
   Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz v., Weber K., Volland G., Kashman N. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluation. J Hand Surg (Am), 1984 March, 9A (2): 222–226.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen P., Petrick M., Connor H., Conklin D. Grip strength and hand dominance: challenging the 10% rule. Am J Occup Ther, 1989 Jul, 43 (7) :444–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hook W. E., Stanley J. K. Assessment of thumb to index pulp to pulp pinch grip strengths. J Hand Surg (Br), 1986 Feb, 11 (l): 912.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong C. A., Oldham J. A. A comparison of dominant and non-dominant hand strengths. J Hand Surg (Br), 1999 Aug, 24 (4): 421–5.
   Google Scholar
• Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. 5th Ed. 2000, Duxbury.
   Google Scholar
• May E. J., Silfverskiold K. L. Rate of recovery after flexor tendon repair in zone ii. A prospective longitudinal study of 145 digits. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg, 1993, 27 (2): 89–94.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen C. W., Watson M. G. Measurement of range of motion of the finger after flexor tendon repair in zone ii of the hand. J Hand Surg (Am), 1993 May, 18 (3): 411–7.
   Google Scholar
• Hume M. C., Gellman H., Mckellop H., Brumfield R. H. Functional range of motion of the joints of the hand. J Hand Surg (Am), 1990 Mar, 15A (2): 240–243.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis B., Bruton A., Goddard J. R. Joint angle measurement: a comparative study of the reliability of goniometry and wire tracing for the hand. Clin Rehab, 1997, 11: 314–320.
   Google Scholar
• Hanten W. P., Chen W. Y., Austin A. A. et al. Maximum grip strength in normal subjects from 20 to 64 years of age. J Hand Ther, 1999 Jul-Sep, 12 (3) :, 193–200.
   Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V., Kashman N., Volland G., Weber K., Dowe M., Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1985 Feb, 66: 69–72.
   Google Scholar
• Reikeras O. Bilateral differences of normal hand strength. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 1983, 101 (3): 223–4.
   Google Scholar
• Silfverskiold K. L., May E. J., Oden A. Factors affecting results after flexor tendon repair in zone ii: a multivariate prospective analysis. J Hand Surg (Am), 1993 Jul, 18 (4): 654–62.
   Google Scholar