Appraisal Era for Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

References

• Parodi J. e., Palmaz J. C., Barone H. D. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg, 1991, 5 (6): 491–9.
   Google Scholar
• Volodos N. L., Shekhanin V. E., Karpovich I. P., Troian V. I., Gur’ev Iu A. [A self-fixing synthetic blood vessel endoprosthesis]. Vestn Khir Im 11 Grek, 1986, 137 (11): 123–5.
   Google Scholar
• Powell J. T. How Much Evidence is Needed for the Introduction of New Technologies Into Clinical Practice in Vascular Surgery ? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2006, 31 (1): 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Guyatt G. H., Haynes R. B., Jaeschke R. Z., Cook D. J., Green L., Naylor C. D. et al. Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature: XXV. Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the Users’ Guides to patient care. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA, 2000, 284: 1290–6.
   Google Scholar
• Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 365 (9478): 2179–86.
   Google Scholar
• Blankensteijn J. D., de Jong S. E. C. A., Prinssen M., van der Ham A. C., Buth J., van Sterkenburg S. M. M. et al. Two-Year outcomes after Conventional or Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. N Engl J Med, 2005, 352 (23): 2398–405.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh R. M. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 364 (9437): 843–8.
   Google Scholar
• Endovascular aneurysm repair and outcome in patients unfit for open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 2): randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 365 (9478): 2187–92.
   Google Scholar
• Prinssen M., Buskens E., Blankensteijn J. D., On behalf of the Dtp. Quality of Life after Endovascular and Open AAA Repair. Results of a Randomised Trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2004, 27 (2): 121–7.
   Google Scholar
• Prinssen M., Buskens E., de Jong S. E., Buth J., Mackaay A. J., Sambeek M. R. et al. Cost-effectiveness of conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: Results of a randomized trial. J Vasc Surg, 2007, 46 (5): 883–90.e1.
   Google Scholar
• Rutherford R. B. Randomized EVAR Trials and Advent of Level I Evidence: A Paradigm Shift in Management of Large Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ? Seminars Vasc Surg, 2006, 19 (2): 69–74.
   Google Scholar
• Prinssen M., Verhoeven E. L. G., Buth J., Cuypers P. W. M., van Sambeek M. R. H. M., Balm R. et al. A Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional and Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. N Engl J Med, 2004, 351 (16): 1607–18.
   Google Scholar
• Mortality results for randomised controlled trial of early elective surgery or ultrasonographic surveillance for small abdominal aortic aneurysms. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial Participants. Lancet, 1998, 352 (9141): 1649–55.
   Google Scholar
• The UK Small Aneurysm Trial: design, methods and progress. The UK Small Aneurysm Trial participants. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 1995, 9 (1): 42–8.
   Google Scholar
• Lederle F. A., Wilson S. E., Johnson G. R., Reinke D. B., Littooy F. N., Acher C. W. et al. Immediate Repair Compared with Surveillance of Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. N Engl J Med, 2002, 346 (19): 1437–44.
   Google Scholar
• Ballard D. J., Fowkes F. G., Powell J. T. Surgery for small asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysms. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2000 (2): CD001835.
   Google Scholar
• The United Kingdom Small Aneurysm Trial P. Long-Term Outcomes of Immediate Repair Compared with Surveillance of Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. N Engl J Med, 2002, 346 (19): 1445–52.
   Google Scholar
• Powell J. T. Final 12-year follow-up of Surgery versus Surveillance in the UK Small Aneurysm Trial. Br J Surg, 2007, 94 (6): 702–8.
   Google Scholar
• Powell J. T, Greenhalgh R. M. Small Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms. N Engl J Med, 2003, 348 (19): 1895–901.
   Google Scholar
• Cao P. Comparison of surveillance vs Aortic Endografting for Small Aneurysm Repair (CAESAR) trial: study design and progress. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2005 Sep, 30 (3): 245–51.
   Google Scholar
• Sarac T. P., Altinel O., Ouriel K. Current trends in the management of small abdominal aortic aneurysms. Future Cardiology, 2007, 3 (1): 65–9.
   Google Scholar
• Crow P., Shaw E., Earnshaw J. J., Poskitt K. R., Whyman M. R., Heather B. P. A single normal ultrasonographic scan at age 65 years rules out significant aneurysm disease for life in men. Br J Surg, 2001, 88 (7): 941–4.
   Google Scholar
• Earnshaw J. J., Shaw E., Whyman M. R., Poskitt K. R., Heather B. P. Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms in men. Brit Med J, 2004 May 8, 328 (7448): 1122–4.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh R. M. National screening programme for aortic aneurysm. Brit Med J, 2004 May 8, 2004, 328 (7448): 1087–8.
   Google Scholar
• Scott R. A. P. The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 2002, 360 (9345): 1531–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kim L. G., RA P. S., Ashton H. A., Thompson S. G. A sustained mortality benefit from screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Intern Med, 2007, 146 (10): 699–706.
   Google Scholar
• Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study G. Multicentre aneurysm screening study (MASS): cost effectiveness analysis of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysms based on four year results from randomised controlled trial. Brit Med J, 2002, 325 (7373): 1135-.
   Google Scholar
• Scott R. A., Bridgewater S. G., Ashton H. A. Randomized clinical trial of screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in women. Br J Surg, 2002 Mar, 89 (3): 283–5.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh R. M., Powell J. T. Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm. N Engl J Med, 2008, 358 (5): 494–501.
   Google Scholar
• van Marrewijk C., Buth J., Harris P. L., Norgren L., Nevelsteen A., Wyatt M. G. Significance of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: The EUROSTAR experience. J Vasc Surg, 2002, 35 (3): 461–73.
   Google Scholar
• Jones W. B., Taylor S. M., Kalbaugh C. A., Joels C. S., Blackhurst D. W., Langan E. M., 3rd. et al. Lost to follow-up: a potential under-appreciated limitation of endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg, 2007, 46 (3): 434–40, discussion 40–1.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein D. M., Sculpher M. J., Manca A., Michaels J., Thompson S. G., Brown L. C. et al. Modelling the long-term cost-effectiveness of endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg, 2008, 95 (2): 183–90.
   Google Scholar