The Accuracy of Non-Nephrotoxic Surveillance after EVAR and the Role of Surveillance in Directing Post-Operative Re-Intervention

References

• Parodi J. C., Palmaz J. C., Barone H. D. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Annals of vascular surgery, 1991, 5 (6): 491–499.
   Google Scholar
• Orandi B. J., Dimick J. B., Deeb G. M., Patel H. J., Upchurch G. R. Jr. A population-based analysis of endovascular versus open thoracic aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg, 2009, 49 (5): 1112–1116.
   Google Scholar
• EVAR Trial Participants. Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial. The Lancet, 2005, 365: 21792186.
   Google Scholar
• Blankensteijn J. D., de Jong S. E., Prinssen M., van der Ham A. C., Buth J., van Sterkenburg S. M. et al. Two-year outcomes after conventional or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. New England Journal of Medicine, 2005, 352 (23): 2398–2405.
   Google Scholar
• Blankensteijn J. D. Shocking and unexpected 5-year results from the DREAM trial. Veith Symposium November, 2008, XIV.08 (Abstract).
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser F. J., Gusberg R. J., Dardik A., Lin P. H., Verhagen H. J., Moll F. L. et al. Aneurysm rupture after EVAR: can the ultimate failure be predicted ? European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2009, 37 (1): 15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Biasi L., Ali T., Ratnam L. A., Morgan R., Loftus I., Thompson M. M. Intra-operative DynaCT Identifies Technical Problems Undiagnosed by Uniplanar Angiography during Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Journal of Vascular ¡Surgery, 2009, 49 (2): 288–295.
   Google Scholar
• Indes J. E., Lipsitz E. C., Veith F. J., Gargiulo N. J. 3rd., Privrat A. I., Eisdorfer J. et al. Incidence and significance of nonaneurysmal-related computed tomography scan findings in patients undergoing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg, 2008, 48 (2): 286–290.
   Google Scholar
• Weerakkody R. A., Walsh S. R., Cousins C., Goldstone K. E., Gaunt M. E. Radiation exposure during endovascular aneurysm repair. British Journal of Surgery, 2008, 95 (6): 699–702.
   Google Scholar
• Katzberg R. W., Haller C. Contrast-induced nephrotoxicity: clinical landscape. Kidney international, 2006 (100): S3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Prinssen M., Wixon C. L., Buskens E., Blankensteijn J. D. Surveillance after endovascular aneurysm repair: diagnostics, complications, and associated costs. Annals of vascular surgery, 2004, 18 (4): 421–427.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle J. R. Long-term outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. British Journal of Surgery, 2009, 96: 447–448.
   Google Scholar
• Chaer R. A., Gushchin A., Rhee R., Marone L., Cho J. S., Leers S. et al. Duplex ultrasound as the sole long-term surveillance method post-endovascular aneurysm repair: a safe alternative for stable aneurysms. J Vasc Surg, 2009, 49 (4): 845–849, discussion 49–50.
   Google Scholar
• Ashoke R., Brown L. C., Rodway A., Choke E., Thompson M. M., Greenhalgh R. M. et al. Color duplex ultrasonography is insensitive for the detection of endoleak after aortic endografting: a systematic review. J Endovasc Ther, 2005, 12 (3): 297–305.
   Google Scholar
• Melany M. L., Grant E. G., Farooki S., McElroy D., KimmeSmith C. Effect of US contrast agents on spectral velocities: in vitro evaluation. Radiology 1999, 211 (2): 427–431.
   Google Scholar
• Mirza T. A., Karthikesalingam A., Walsh S. R., Hayes P. D., Boyle J. R. Duplex Ultrasound versus Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography for detection of endoleak after EVAR: Systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis. In Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Harbord R. M., Whiting P., Sterne J. A., Egger M., Deeks J. J., Shang A. et al. An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary. J Clin Epidemiol, 2008, 61 (11): 1095–1103.
   Google Scholar
• van der Laan M. J., Bartels L. W., Viergever M. A., Blankensteijn J. D. Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging of endoleaks after EVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2006, 32 (4): 361–365.
   Google Scholar
• Back M. R. Surveillance after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Perspectives in vascular surgery and endovascular therapy, 2007, 19 (4): 395–400, discussion 01–2.
   Google Scholar
• Stavropoulos S. W., Charagundla S. R. Imaging techniques for detection and management of endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Radiology, 2007, 243 (3): 641–655.
   Google Scholar
• Springer F., Gunther R. W., Schmitz-Rode T. Aneurysm Sac pressure measurement with minimally invasive implantable pressure sensors: an alternative to current surveillance regimes after EVAR ? Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2008, 31 (3): 460–467.
   Google Scholar
• Ohki T., Ouriel K., Silveira P. G., Katzen B., White R., Criado F. et al. initial results of wireless pressure sensing for endovascular aneurysm repair: the APEX Trial-Acute Pressure Measurement to Confirm Aneurysm Sac EXclusion. J Vasc Surg, 2007, 45 (2): 236–242.
   Google Scholar
• Dias N. V., Ivancev K., Resch T. A., Malina M., Sonesson B. Endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair lead to nonuniform intra-aneurysm sac pressure. J Vasc Surg, 2007, 46 (2): 197–203.
   Google Scholar
• Vallabhaneni S. R., Gilling-Smith G. L., How T. V., Brennan J. A., Gould D. A., McWilliams R. G. et al. Aortic side branch perfusion alone does not account for high intra-sac pressure after endovascular repair (EVAR) in the absence of graft-related endoleak. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2003, 25 (4): 354–359.
   Google Scholar
• Kim J. K., Tonnessen B. H., Noll R. E. Jr.., Money S. R., Sternbergh W. C. 3rd. Reimbursement of long-term postplacement costs after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg, 2008, 48 (6): 1390–1395.
   Google Scholar
• Nordon I., Karthikesalingam A., Hinchliffe R. J., Holt P. J. E., Loftus I. M., Thompson M. M. Secondary interventions following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) and the enduring value of graft surveillance. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, In Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad M. F., Crawford R. S., Pedraza J. D., Brewster D. C., Lamuraglia G. M., Corey M. et al. Long-term durability of open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg, 2007, 46 (4): 669–675.
   Google Scholar
• Mills J. L. S., Duong S. T., Leon L. R. J., Goshima K. R., Ihnat D. M., Wendel C. S. et al. Comparison of the effects of open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair on long-term renal function using chronic kidney disease staging based on glomerular filtration rate. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2008, 47 (6): 11411149.
   Google Scholar
• Black S. A., Carrell T. W., Bell R. E., Waltham M., Reidy J., Taylor P. Endovascular aneurysm repair: A low rate of secondary interventions does not justify long-term yearly CT surveillance. British Journal of Surgery. In Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Dias N. V., Riva L., Ivancev K., Resch T., Sonesson B., Malina M. Is there a benefit of frequent CT follow-up after EVAR ? European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2009, 37 (4): 425430.
   Google Scholar
• Karthikesalingam A., Holt P. J., Hinchliffe R. J., Nordon I., Loftus I., Thompson M. M. Stratification of the risk of re-intervention after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. British Journal of Surgery. In Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar