Significance of TNM staging, Demographic and Histologic Features in Predicting the Prognosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma

References

• Lam J. S., Klatte T., Kim H. L. et al. Prognostic factors and selection for clinical studies of patients with kidney cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol, 2008, 65: 235–262.
   Google Scholar
• Gudbjartsson T., Hardarson S., Petursdottir V., Thoroddsen a., Magnusson J., Einarsson G. V. Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients. Eur Urol, 2005, 48: 593–600.
   Google Scholar
• Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., Murray T., Xu J., Smigal c., Thun. M. J. Cancer statistics, 2006. CA Cancer J Clin, 2006, 56: 106–130.
   Google Scholar
• Suer E., Baltaci S., Burgu B., Aydogdu O., Gogu§ Q. Significance of tumor size in renal cell cancer with perinephric fat infiltration: is TNM staging system adequate for predicting prognosis ? Urol J, 2013, 10: 774–796.
   Google Scholar
• Volpe A., Patard J. J. Prognostic factors in renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol, 2010, 28: 319–327.
   Google Scholar
• Ljungberg B., cowan N. c., Hanbury D. c. et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the, 2010 update. Eur Urol, 2010, 58: 398–406.
   Google Scholar
• ordonez N. G., Rosai J. Urinary tract. In: Rosai J. (ed.). Rosai Ackerman’s Surgical Pathology. Philadelphia, 2004. 1163–1317.
   Google Scholar
• Amin M. B., Tamboli P., Javidan J. et al. Prognostic impact of histologic subtyping of adult renal epithelial neoplasms: an experience of 405 cases. Am J Surg Pathol, 2002, 26: 281–291.
   Google Scholar
• Patard J. J., Leray E., Rioux-Leclercq N. et al. Prognostic value of histologic subtypes in renal cell carcinoma: a multicenter experience. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23: 2763–2771.
   Google Scholar
• Minervini A., Lilas L., Minervini R., Selli C. Prognostic value of nuclear grading in patients with intracapsular (pT1-pT2) renal cell carcinoma: long term analysis in 213 patients. Cancer, 2002, 94: 2590–2595.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui K. H., Shvarts o., Smith R. B., Figlin R. A., deKemion J. B., Belldegrun A. Prognostic indicators for renal cell carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of 643 patients using the revised 1997 TNM staging criteria. J Urol, 2000, 163: 1090–1095.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy A. M., Gilbert S. M., Katz A. E. et al. Re-evaluation of the Tumour-Node-Metastasis staging of locally advanced renal cortical tumours: absolute size (T2) is more significant than renal capsuler invasion (T3a). BJU Int, 2005, 95: 27–30.
   Google Scholar
• Siemer S., Lehmann J., Loch A. et al. Current TNM classification of renal cell carcinoma evaluated: revising stage T3a. J Urol, 2005, 173: 33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo c., Song c., Hong J. H., Kim c. S., Ahn H. Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma. J Urol, 2008, 180: 486–491.
   Google Scholar
• -Steiner T., Knels R., Schubert J. Prognostic significance of tumour size in patients after tumour nephrectomy for localised renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol, 2004, 46: 327–330.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson R. H., Leibovich B. c., cheville J. C. et al. Is renal sinus fat invasion the same as perinephric fat invasion for pT3a renal cell carcinoma ? J Urol, 2005, 174: 1218–1221.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqui S. A., Frank I., Leibovich B. c. et al. Impact of tumor size on the predictive ability af the pT3a primary tumor classification for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol, 2007, 177: 59–62.
   Google Scholar
• Ozakin T. A., Yildiz K., Dillioglugil O. Staging of renal cell carcinoma: 2010 TNM classification system and validation in Turkey. Uroonkoloji Bulteni, 2012, 11: 206–211.
   Google Scholar
• MartInez-Salamanca J. I., Huang W. c., Millan I. et al. Prognostic impact of the, 2009 UICC/AJCC TNM staging system for renal cell carcinoma with venous extension. Eur Urol, 2011, 59: 120–127.
   Google Scholar
• Kates M., Lavery H. J., Brajtbord J., Samadi D., Palese M. A. Decreasing rates of lymph node dissection during radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol, 2012, 19: 2693–9.
   Google Scholar
• capitanio u., Becker F., Blute M. L. et al. Lymph node dissection in renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol, 2011, 60: 1212–1220.
   Google Scholar
• Van Poppel H., Vandendriessche H., Boel K. et al. Microscopic vascular invasion is the most relevant prognosticator after radical nephrectomy for clinically nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 1997, 158: 45–49.
   Google Scholar
• Goncalves P. D., Srougi M., Dall’lio M. F., Leite K. R., ortiz V., Hering F. Low clinical stage renal cell carcinoma: relevance of microvascular tumor invasion as a prognostic parameter. J Urol, 2004, 172: 470–474.
   Google Scholar
• de Peralta-Venturina M., Moch H., Amin M. et al. Sarcomatoid differentiation in renal cell carcinoma: a study of 101 cases. Am J Surg Pathol, 2001, 25: 275–284.
   Google Scholar
• Lam J. S., Shvarts o., Said J. W. et al. Clinicopathologic and molecular correlations of necrosis in the primary tumor of patients with renal cell carcinoma. Cancer, 2005, 103: 2517–2525.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S. E., Byun S. S., oh J. K. et al. Significance of macroscopic tumor necrosis as a prognostic indicator for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol, 2006, 176: 1332–1337.
   Google Scholar