Patient satisfaction after nipple-sparing mastectomy with intraoperative radiotherapy and breast reconstruction for breast cancer

References

• American Cancer Society. Breast cancer facts&figures 2013–2014. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, Inc; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Laronga C, Lewis JD, Smith PD. The changing face of mastectomy: an oncologic and cosmetic perspective. Cancer Control. 2012;19(4):286–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boneti C, Yuen J, Santiago C, et al. Oncologic safety of nipple skin-sparing or total skin-sparing mastectomies with immediate reconstruction. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;212(4):686–693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Didier F, Radice D, Gandini S, et al. Does nipple preservation in mastectomy improve satisfaction with cosmetic results, psychological adjustment, body image and sexuality? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;118(3):623–633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon RS, van Geel AM. Cancer of the breast with nipple involvement. Br J Cancer. 1989;59(1):81–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirozzi PR, Rossetti C, Carelli I, et al. Clinical and morphological factors predictive of occult involvement of the nipple-areola complex in mastectomy specimens. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;148(2):177–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons RM, Brennan M, Christos P, et al. Analysis of nipple/areolar involvement with mastectomy: can the areola be preserved? Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9(2):165–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brachtel EF, Rusby JE, Michaelson JS, et al. Occult nipple involvement in breast cancer: clinicopathologic findings in 316 consecutive mastectomy specimens. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(30):4948–4954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyas JJ, Chinoy RF, Vaidya JS. Prediction of nipple and areola involvement in breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1998;24(1):15–16.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. Risk factors associated with recurrence after nipple-sparing mastectomy for invasive and intraepithelial neoplasia. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(8):2053–2058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Alcantara Filho P, Capko D, Barry JM, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer and risk-reducing surgery: the Memorial Sloan–Kettering cancer center experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18(11):3117–3122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garwood ER, Moore D, Ewing C, et al. Total skin-sparing mastectomy: complications and local recurrence rates in 2 cohorts of patients. Ann Surg. 2009;249(1):26–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber B, Krause A, Dieterich M, et al. The oncological safety of skin sparing mastectomy with conservation of the nipple-areola complex and autologous reconstruction: an extended follow-up study. Ann Surg. 2009;249(3):461–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benediktsson KP, Perbeck L. Survival in breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with implants: a prospective trial with 13 years median follow-up in 216 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34(2):143–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit JY, Veronesi U, Rey P, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy: risk of nipple-areolar recurrences in a series of 579 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114(1):97–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krajewski AC, Boughey JC, Degnim AC, et al. Expanded indications and improved outcomes for nipple-sparing mastectomy over time. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(10):3317–3323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orzalesi L, Casella D, Santi C, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy: surgical and oncological outcomes from a national multicentric registry with 913 patients (1006 cases) over a six year period. Breast. 2016;25:75–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moo TA, Pinchinat T, Mays S, et al. Oncologic outcomes after nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(10):3221–3225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith BL, Tang R, Rai U, et al. Oncologic safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy in women with breast cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225(3):361–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit JY, Veronesi U, Orecchia R, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy with nipple areola intraoperative radiotherapy: one thousand and one cases of a five years experience at the European Institute of Oncology of Milan (EIO). Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;117(2):333–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan L, Zheng W, Ye X, et al. A novel approach of INTRABEAM intraoperative radiotherapy for nipple-sparing mastectomy with breast reconstruction. Clin Breast Cancer. 2014;14(6):435–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan L, Ye C, Chen L, et al. Oncologic outcomes and radiation safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy with intraoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer. 2019;26(5):618–627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan L, Wan M, Zheng W, et al. Intrabeam radiation inhibits proliferation, migration, and invasiveness and promotes apoptosis of MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2019; 18:153303381984070–153303381984077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology Breast Cancer. Available from: https://www.nccn.org
   Google Scholar
• Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(2):345–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. A closer look at the BREAST-Q(©). Clin Plast Surg. 2013;40(2):287–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munhoz AM, Aldrighi C, Montag E, et al. Optimizing the nipple-areola sparing mastectomy with double concentric periareolar incision and biodimensional expander-implant reconstruction: aesthetic and technical refinements. Breast. 2009;18(6):356–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Algaithy ZK, Petit JY, Lohsiriwat V, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy: can we predict the factors predisposing to necrosis? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012;38(2):125–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colwell AS, Tessler O, Lin AM, et al. Breast reconstruction following nipple-sparing mastectomy: predictors of complications, reconstruction outcomes, and 5-year trends. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(3):496–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies K, Allan L, Roblin P, et al. Factors affecting post-operative complications following skin sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction. Breast. 2011;20(1):21–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazar S, Karadag EC, Altinkaya A, et al. Risk factor analysis for survival of Becker-type expander in immediate breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2018;42(4):971–979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesdag V, Régis C, Tresch E, et al. Nipple sparing mastectomy for breast cancer is associated with high patient satisfaction and safe oncological outcomes. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2017;46(8):637–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy J, Bosc R, Warren N, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with a deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: a study of patient satisfaction. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;80(6):639–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellisch DK, Schain WS, Noone RB, et al. The psychological contribution of nipple addition in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;80(5):699–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadoch V, Bodin F, Himy S, et al. Latissimus dorsi free flap for reconstruction of extensive full-thickness abdominal wall defect. A case of desmoid tumor. J Visc Surg. 2010;147:45–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlenz I, Kuzbari R, Gruber H, et al. The sensitivity of the nipple-areola complex: an anatomic study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(3):905–909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahm J, Hansson P, Brandberg Y, et al. Breast sensibility after bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2003;66:1521–1527.
   Google Scholar