References
- Campbell S. The prediction of fetal maturity by ultrasonic measurement of the biparietal diameter. J Obstet Gynecol Br Commonw 1969; 76: 603–9
- Gardosi J, Geirsson RT. Routine ultrasound is the method of choice for dating pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 105: 933–6
- Backe B. Routine ultrasonography in obstetric care in Norway, 1994. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1997; 117: 2314–5
- Eik-Nes SH, Grøttum P. Graviditetskalenderen Snurra. DrammenNorway: Scan-Med a/s.
- Backe B, Nakling J. Term prediction in routine ultrasound practice. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1994; 73: 113–8
- Tunon K, Eik-Nes SH, Grottum P. A comparison between ultrasound and a reliable last menstrual period as predictors of the day of delivery in 15,000 examinations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1996; 8: 178–85
- Tunon K, Eik-Nes SH, Grottum P, von During V, Kahn JA. Gestational age in pregnancies conceived after in vitro fertilization: a comparison between age assessed from oocyte retrieval, crown–rump length and biparietal diameter. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000; 15: 41–6
- Kiserud T, Rasmussen S. Gestational age assessment using ultrasound biometry – and evaluation of the second trimester scan. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen 1999; 119: 4331–4
- Johnsen SL, Rasmussen S, Sollien R, Kiserud T. Fetal age assessment based on ultrasound head biometry and the effect of maternal and fetal factors. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83: 716–23
- Saltvedt S, Almström H, Kublicas M, Reilly M, Valentin L, Grunewald C. Ultrasound dating at 12–14 or 15–20 weeks of gestation? A prospective cross-validation of established dating formulae in a population of in-vitro fertilized pregnancies randomized to early or late dating scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 24: 42–50
- Kieler H, Axelsson O, Nilsson S, Waldenstrom U. The length of human pregnancy as calculated by ultrasonographic measurement of the fetal biparietal diameter. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1995; 6: 353–7
- Wilcox AJ, Dunson D, Bird DD. The timing of the “fertile window” in the menstrual cycle: day specific estimates from a prospective study. BMJ 2000; 321: 1259–62
- Bergsjø P, Denman DW, Hoffman HJ, Meirik O. Duration of human singleton pregnancy – a population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1990; 69: 197–207
- Nguyen TH, Larsen T, Engholm G, Møller H. Evaluation of ultrasound-estimated date of delivery in 17 450 spontaneous singleton births: do we need to modify Naegele's rule?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999; 14: 23–8
- Smith GCS. Use of time to event analysis to estimate the normal duration of pregnancy. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1497–500
- Skjærven R, Gjessing HK, Bakketeig LS. Birthweight by gestational age in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2000; 79: 440–9
- Altman DG, Chitty LS. Charts of fetal size: 1. Methodology. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1994; 101: 29–34
- Chervenak FA, Skupski DW, Romero R, Myers MK, Smith-Levitin M, Rosenwaks Z, et al. How accurate is fetal biometry in the assessment of fetal age?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178: 678–87