Variation of force applied during external cephalic version with different patients’ characteristic and outcome of version

References

• Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000; 356: 1375–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutton EK, Hannah ME, Barrett J. Use of external cephalic version for breech pregnancy and mode of delivery for breech and twin pregnancy: a survey of Canadian practitioners. Obstet Gynaecol Can 2002; 24: 804–10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Molkenboer JF, Bouckaert PX, Roumen FJ. Recent trends in breech delivery in the Netherlands. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 110(10)948–51
   Google Scholar
• Hogle KL, Kilburn L, Hewson S, Gafni A, Wall R, Hannah ME. Impact of the international term breech trial on clinical practice and concerns: a survey of centre collaborators. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003; 25: 14–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaushik V, Gudgeon C. Caesarean for breech: a paradigm shift?. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2003; 43: 298–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah ME. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; 3: CD000166
   Google Scholar
• Petrou S, Glazener C. The economic costs of alternative modes of delivery during the first two months postpartum: results from a Scottish observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 109: 214–7
   Google Scholar
• Collaris RJ, Oei SG. External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004; 83: 511–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yogev Y, Horowitz E, Ben-Haroush A, Chen R, Kaplan B. Changing attitudes toward mode of delivery and external cephalic version in breech presentations. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002; 79: 221–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltart T, Edmonds DK, al-Mufti R. External cephalic version at term: a survey of consultant obstetric practice in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 544–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk NM. Survey of obstetricians’ personal preference and discretionary practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1997; 73: 1–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raynes-Greenow CH, Roberts CL, Barratt A, Brodrick B, Peat B. Pregnant women's preferences and knowledge of term breech management, in an Australian setting. Midwifery 2004; 20: 181–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Bowes WA, Jr, Fortney JA. Efficacy of external cephalic version: a review. Obstet Gynecol 1993; 82: 306–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau TK, Lo KWK, Chan LYS, Leung TY, Lo YMD. Cell-free fetal DNA in maternal circulation as a marker of feto-maternal hemorrhage in patients undergoing external cephalic version near term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: 712–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau TK, Leung TY, Lo KWK, Fok WY, Rogers MS. Effects of external cephalic version at term on fetal circulation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 1239–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung TY, Sahota DJ, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK. Quantification of contact surface pressure exerted during external cephalic version. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003; 82: 1017–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung TY, Sahota DJ, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK. External cephalic version induced fetal cerebral and umbilical blood flow changes are related to the amount of pressure exerted. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 111: 430–5
   Google Scholar
• Lau TK, Lo KWK, Rogers M. Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 176: 218–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau TK, Lo KW, Wan D, Rogers MS. Predictors of successful external cephalic version at term: a prospective study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 104: 798–802
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shepard M, Filly RA. A standardized plane for biparietal diameter measurement. J Ultrasound Med 1982; 1: 145–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore TR. Clinical assessment of amniotic fluid. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1997; 40: 303–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ. Interventions to help external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004; 1: CD000184
   Google Scholar
• Stock A, Chung T, Rogers M, Ming WW. Randomized, double blind, placebo controlled comparison of ritodrine and hexoprenaline for tocolysis prior to external cephalic version at term. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 1993; 33: 265–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanny H, Johanson R, Balwin KJ, Lucking L, Fitzpatrick R, Jones P. Double-blind randomised controlled trial of glyceryl trinitrate spray for external cephalic version. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 107: 562–4
   Google Scholar
• Bujold E, Marquette GP, Ferreira E, Gauthier RJ, Boucher M. Sublingual nitroglycerin versus intravenous ritodrine as tocolytic for external cephalic version: a double-blinded randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 188: 1454–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schorr SJ, Speights SE, Ross EL, Bofill JA, Rust OA, Norman PF, et al. A randomized trial of epidural anesthesia to improve external cephalic version success. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997; 177: 1133–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugoff L, Stamm CA, Jones OW, Mohling SI, Hawkins JL. The effect of spinal anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 345–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancuso KM, Yancey MK, Murphy JA, Markenson GR. Epidural analgesia for cephalic version: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95: 648–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RL, Elliot JP. Fetal acoustic stimulation, an adjunct to external cephalic version: a blinded, randomized crossover study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995; 173: 1369–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar