References
- World Health Organisation. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985;2:436–7.
- Källén K, Rydhström H, Otterblad Olausson P. Kejsarsnitt i Sverige 1991–2001. www.socialstyrelsen.se/Publicerat/2005/8750/2005–112–3.htm (in Swedish); www.socialstyrelsen.se/Publicerat/2007/9724/Summary.htm.
- Anderson GM. Making sense of rising caesarean section rates. Br Med J. 2004; 329: 696–7
- Hildingsson I, Radestad I, Rubertsson C, Waldenstrom U. Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002; 109(6)618–23
- Habiba M, Kaminski M, Da Fré M, Marsal K, Bleker O, Libero J, et al. Caesarean section on request: a comparison of obstetricians attitudes in eight European countries. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006; 113: 647–56
- Al-Mufti R, McCarthy A, Fisk NM. Survey of obstetricians’ personal preference and discretionary practice. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997; 73: 1–4
- Wright JB, Wright AL, Simpson NA, Bryce FC. A survey of trainee obstetricians preferences for childbirth. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001; 97: 23–5
- Bergholt T, Østberg B, Legarth J, Weber T. Danish obstetricians’ personal preference and general attitude to elective caesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004; 83: 262–6
- Backe B, Salversen KA, Sviggum O. Norwegian obstetricians prefer vaginal route of delivery. Lancet. 2002; 59: 629
- Wu JM, Hundley AF, Visco AG. Elective primary caesarean delivery: attitudes of urogynecology and maternal-fetal medicine specialists. Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105: 301–6
- Cotzias CS, Paterson-Brown S, Fisk NM. Obstetricians say yes to maternal request for elective caesarean section: a survey of current opinion. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001; 97: 15–6
- Kenton K, Brincat C, Mutone M, Brubaker L. Repeat caesarean section and primary elective caesarean section: recently trained obstetrician-gynecologist practice patterns and opinion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 192: 1872–6
- Groom KM., Paterson-Brown S, Fisk NM. Temporal and geographical variation in UK obstetricians preference regarding mode of delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002; 100: 185–8
- Gabbe GS, Holzman GB. Obstetricians’ choice of delivery. Lancet. 2001; 357: 722
- Gonen R, Tamir A, Degani S. Obstetricians opinions regarding patient choice in caesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99: 577–80
- Land R, Parry E, Rane A, Wilson D. Personal preferences of obstetricians towards childbirth. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 41: 249–52
- McGurgan P, Coulter-Smith S, O'Donovan PJ. A national confidential survey of obstetrician's personal preferences regarding mode of delivery. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001; 97(1)17–9
- Ghetti C, Chan BKS, Guise J-M. Physicians’ responses to patient requested cesarean delivery. Birth. 2004; 31: 280–4