Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound assessment of the anal sphincters: Reproducibility

References

• Kamm MA. Obstetric damage and faecal incontinence. Lancet. 1994; 344: 730–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandridge DA, Thorp JM, Jr, Roddenberry P, Kuller J, Wild J. Vaginal delivery is associated with occult disruption of the anal sphincter mechanism. Am J Perinatol. 1997; 14: 527–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Bartram CI, Hudson CN. Anal sphincter trauma during instrumental delivery. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1993; 43: 263–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford LA, Quinet EH, Pearl ML, DeLancey JO. Incontinence following rupture of the anal sphincter during delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 1993; 82: 527–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjessing H, Backe B, Sahlin Y. Third-degree obstetrics tear; outcome after primary repair. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998; 77: 736–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinta TM, Kylanpaa ML, Salmi TK, Teramo KA, Luukkonen PS. Primary sphincter repair: are the results good enough?. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004; 47: 18–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norderval S, Oian P, Revhaug A, Vonen B. Anal incontinence after obstetric sphincter tears: outcome of anatomic primary repairs. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005; 48: 1055–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roig JV, Villoslada C, Lledo S, Solana A, Buch E, Alos R, et al. Prevalence of pudendal neuropathy in fecal incontinence. Results of prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995; 38: 952–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sultan AH. The role of anal endosonography in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 2286: 559–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollard RC, Gardiner A, Lindow S, Phillips K, Duthie GS. Normal female anal sphincter. Difficulties in interpretation explained. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002; 45: 171–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enck, P, Heyer, Th, Gantke, B, Schmidt, WU, Schäfer, R, Frieling, T, , et al. How reproducible are measures of the anal sphincter muscle diameter by endoanal ultrasound?. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92:293–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold DM, Halligan S, Kmiot WA, Bartram CI. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in anal endosonography. Br J Surg. 1999; 86: 371–5.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, RL, Dwarkasing, Briel, JW, Hansen, BE, Hussain, SM, Schouten, WR, , et al. Can three-dimensional endoanal ultrasonography detect external anal sphincter atrophy? A comparison with endoanal magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005;20:328–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maier A, Fuchsjager M, Funovics M. Endoanal magnetic resonance tomography in fecal incontinence. Radiologe. 2000; 40: 465–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazemier M, Maaike PT, Stoker J, de Lange-de Klerk ESM, Boeckxstaens GEE, Mulder CJJ, et al. Atrophy and defects detection of the external anal sphincter: comparison between three-dimensional anal endosonography and endoanal magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006; 49: 20–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams AB, Bartram CI, Halligan S, Marshall MM, Nicholls RJ, Kmiot WA. Endosonographic anatomy of the normal anal canal compared with endocoil magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002; 45: 176–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Measurement error and correlation coefficients. BMJ. 1996; 313: 41–2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Med. 1999; 2: 135–60
   Google Scholar
• Gregory WT, Boyles SH, Simmons K, Corcoran BS, Clark AL. External anal sphincter volume measurements using 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 194: 1243–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West R, Felt-Bersma RJF, Hansen BE, Schouten WR, Kuipers EJ. Volume measurement of the anal sphincter complex in healthy controls and fecal-incontinent patients with a three-dimensional reconstruction of endoanal ultrasonography images. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005; 48: 540–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, IP, Augensen, K, Wilsgaard, T, Kiserud, T. Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound assessment of the anal sphincters during rest and squeeze. Acta Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 87: 669–674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiserud T, Rasmussen S. How repeat measurements affect the mean diameter of the umbilical vein and ductus venosus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1998; 11: 419–25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiserud T, Saito T, Ozaki T, Rasmussen S, Hanson M. Validation of diameter measurements by ultrasound. Intra-observer and inter-observer variation assessed in vitro and in fetal sheep. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 13: 52–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valsky DV, Messing B, Petkova R, Savchev S, Rosenak D, Hochner-Celnikier D, et al. Postpartum evaluation of the anal sphincter by transperineal three-dimensional ultrasound in primiparous women after vaginal delivery and following surgical repair of third-degree tears by the overlapping technique. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 29: 195–204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Smilen SW, Porges RF, Avizova E. Simple ultrasound evaluation of the anal sphincter in female patients using a transvaginal transducer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 2: 177–83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar